GNU bug report logs - #57090
'guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers as base10

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN>; dated Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:52:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Changed bug title to ''guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers as base10' from '[BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?' Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.

Message received at 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:12:32 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 17:12:32 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLWWe-0007x9-7s
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:12:32 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54310)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1oLWWc-0007wo-1i
 for 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:12:30 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47408)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oLWWW-0007YA-RU; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:12:24 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:
 From; bh=Gd7z3aZcFnoi5uVs2dUw7fKkVit2ItFmHRy5NLR3+cc=; b=iDRPUBFpBCb4oIz2F6H4
 nc6KF4EA8IN34+1ToFt1rDAZtNprQX9v8zs1KiTChT6BushJA/ybfscDQ+RVQQPrd1jLXo8YU0CTl
 QLpBR0W4r2WSgX+4eWIXWjHBxy8U+ZIbbjhOJHN1f/iiJZq92stjmnRSAF0vIBprPlS7C9/56wO43
 5prNsRG0cJy6u8vC+8ljRMvHaPDqcNMf/ijg3I+cQCxBW5sFhbBdoXfP7VVWDXJhdeed+lvIwGPv5
 RSWCvnb7NREzuJC47rTRGvOOhr//NrNPGLAFyqQNPZBM9E4V6njHmgUOL54PtdxS/O8Z3RqTAkAPt
 6U1kvmNlTWU74g==;
Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:50892
 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oLWWT-0007rd-Mm; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:12:24 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
To: "(" <paren@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@HIDDEN>
 <CM1SWY80OFEA.YWFI9JJ7KLOC@guix-aspire>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 23:12:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CM1SWY80OFEA.YWFI9JJ7KLOC@guix-aspire> (paren@HIDDEN's
 message of "Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:04:24 +0100")
Message-ID: <87czd92kaz.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57090
Cc: 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN>,
 Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

"(" <paren@HIDDEN> skribis:

> On Tue Aug 9, 2022 at 9:59 PM BST, Maxime Devos wrote:
>> 'chmod' is not mentioned anywhere in (guix scripts style), so I'd think=
=20
>> it's just an oversight. The authority on the matter would be Ludovic=20
>> Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN>
>
> Is it possible that (guix read-print) stores octal numbers directly as
> Scheme numbers, with no way to distinguish them from decimal numbers,
> which means when they are printed they are just treated as base10? I
> poked around a bit in the module but couldn't find the code for number
> reading.

Indeed, the reader is basically a wrapper around =E2=80=98read=E2=80=99.  I=
t preserves
comments and vertical space, but it doesn=E2=80=99t attempt to preserve the
style of numbers (base, etc.), strings (whether \n & co. are escaped or
literal), and so on.  I think that=E2=80=99d be a bit too much honestly.

Now, we could tweak the pretty printer so that it recognizes patterns
where numbers or strings should be printed in a certain way.

Help welcome! :-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#57090; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:08:58 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 17:08:57 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLWTB-0007nN-Na
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:08:57 -0400
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:45414)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <paren@HIDDEN>) id 1oLWTA-0007nD-C4
 for 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:08:56 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A2C40D3B;
 Tue,  9 Aug 2022 23:08:55 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id fQZYd_2g2yZA; Tue,  9 Aug 2022 23:08:54 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
 t=1660079334; bh=bUqYa5FaJQMlrZp5ZghDa2zgEguazQLplP7RSNLuRg8=;
 h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To;
 b=KR0x7SQQyXOGHmSesvl6bWj34b7uPzoCjTOo0XJaNNsQdzPEtY2jdyp708fReFuwl
 rggO8rvvf/EM+u8Oz+lYUEjGgMPBSZtDXHSFw2/C9N/YoN985rN8QJHHmSCJVi7v2H
 68JZDQwFWpGGJ0xR9fHtO7XSCpFu4QBBlCvF5HvAztGPtkv65offHqjHs1mcKLcsAX
 7C9mJquzO36xnz3KpCCjJzNP3WzHGZwPvuihCxhR9XeV+9fcMNUQe2cX8jg2aMWZl4
 QAbYD9516EcdFnz/LvOg9CCoJ4Cljq5guWtMdb+Usbd3LNZhuge4/H+dCl3xukTkrr
 U4ofk9f9TmQuw==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:08:53 +0100
Message-Id: <CM1T0DEFGBLX.1AX6V2L09HFML@guix-aspire>
Subject: Re: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
From: "(" <paren@HIDDEN>
To: "Csepp" <raingloom@HIDDEN>, "Christopher Rodriguez"
 <yewscion@HIDDEN>
References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN> <87wnbhf7sd.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87wnbhf7sd.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57090
Cc: 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

On Tue Aug 9, 2022 at 10:01 PM BST, Csepp wrote:
> Seems to be a Scheme limitation:
>
> ```
> scheme@(guile-user)> '(#o10)
> $1 =3D (8)
> ```

`guix style` uses a completely seperate reader, defined
in (guix read-print), so even though it's possible it has
the same limitation, we could easily modify it to support
octal/hexadecimal/binary numbers.

    -- (




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#57090; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:04:37 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 17:04:37 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLWOz-0007bN-KO
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:37 -0400
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:42404)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <paren@HIDDEN>) id 1oLWOw-0007b7-WF
 for 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:35 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F87840E32;
 Tue,  9 Aug 2022 23:04:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with UTF8SMTP id BFSXn_VA7pWd; Tue,  9 Aug 2022 23:04:32 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
 t=1660079069; bh=iPc1tw2jRPsRUrOOgYtWclSlwEXhOq+ojlroqCFFdCw=;
 h=Date:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To;
 b=OJrtGaxA6/dveh/oWN3KRPqG/a4YC0mjInNBLfnWrGPBhYFogbAH4sRs9D197XhfH
 goje/asmrRsykrGMoefrDOaMVhlE7IVjA9rER08ibxShgLmdGDFwL61i/pLmvDGYGk
 E1DOOmcwxzNFjSdawDyir9kYYu/JaQ07Wle+8Sr9glGjcVhQ7atF47n2CFzAosvr7A
 ISQGaVjZ2Mw5i5m1F+mHm/fdaWYowqdNqwWQEtzrKwHtVhIqv7Mh0Isn/rcATVUhhN
 PZBK30/gY7hOEOWPsJk1anxzyvCHg+J63aDDDF3PLksUDdAl522gWQZ8HvpkMvKKdo
 2zQ/MQmDBEnCQ==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:04:24 +0100
Message-Id: <CM1SWY80OFEA.YWFI9JJ7KLOC@guix-aspire>
Subject: Re: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
From: "(" <paren@HIDDEN>
To: "Maxime Devos" <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, "Christopher Rodriguez"
 <yewscion@HIDDEN>, <57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, <ludo@HIDDEN>
References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57090
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

On Tue Aug 9, 2022 at 9:59 PM BST, Maxime Devos wrote:
> 'chmod' is not mentioned anywhere in (guix scripts style), so I'd think=
=20
> it's just an oversight. The authority on the matter would be Ludovic=20
> Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN>

Is it possible that (guix read-print) stores octal numbers directly as
Scheme numbers, with no way to distinguish them from decimal numbers,
which means when they are printed they are just treated as base10? I
poked around a bit in the module but couldn't find the code for number
reading.

    -- (




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#57090; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:04:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 17:04:31 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLWOt-0007ar-Ai
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:31 -0400
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:43274)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1oLWOq-0007aM-U1
 for 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:30 -0400
Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M2QYM3R1czDqVX;
 Tue,  9 Aug 2022 21:04:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1660079063; bh=Nkvqayy8MTSBXw2LnTWfLCNBWH+XNhGB0fRt5+E3n8E=;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From;
 b=h5aq0PQCjzJX4xOlsXGRO36CiTWF4pYfJn5+pMt0oANobeO7bxDbGZPlTVL2ui0ib
 WH3TB5qVxlDQEdJtls0OEybAC1s+YERUPNwNFWQRn0i2ZJhNl5UR/Eeyy0A825KwZ6
 kq9Wta2xbQ7GDilEezaQsps5IhfnKLefSDOip9OI=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 2D85D353C1025928FBE34D253CF982BB6A80BDD9713ED8183ECF1030BA3E8DD6
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4M2QYL54yhz1yWw;
 Tue,  9 Aug 2022 21:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:01:15 +0000
In-reply-to: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <87wnbhf7sd.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57090
Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN, 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)


Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that, when I explicitly declare absolute permissions in
> octal during a (chmod =E2=80=A6) in my package definitions and then run g=
uix
> style, it converts them to decimal instead.
>
> Is this intended? I've gotten feedback and agree that octal (#o755) is
> much clearer to read than decimal (493), simply because I'm used to the
> actual unix chmod tool and its conventions.

Seems to be a Scheme limitation:

```
scheme@(guile-user)> '(#o10)
$1 =3D (8)
```




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#57090; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:04:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 17:04:31 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45260 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLWOt-0007an-27
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:31 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50604)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1oLWOq-0007aY-JG
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:29 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37212)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oLWOq-0004X9-Ep
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:28 -0400
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:42650)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oLWOn-0006Ai-69
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:27 -0400
Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M2QYM3R1czDqVX;
 Tue,  9 Aug 2022 21:04:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1660079063; bh=Nkvqayy8MTSBXw2LnTWfLCNBWH+XNhGB0fRt5+E3n8E=;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From;
 b=h5aq0PQCjzJX4xOlsXGRO36CiTWF4pYfJn5+pMt0oANobeO7bxDbGZPlTVL2ui0ib
 WH3TB5qVxlDQEdJtls0OEybAC1s+YERUPNwNFWQRn0i2ZJhNl5UR/Eeyy0A825KwZ6
 kq9Wta2xbQ7GDilEezaQsps5IhfnKLefSDOip9OI=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 2D85D353C1025928FBE34D253CF982BB6A80BDD9713ED8183ECF1030BA3E8DD6
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4M2QYL54yhz1yWw;
 Tue,  9 Aug 2022 21:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:01:15 +0000
In-reply-to: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <87wnbhf7sd.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129;
 envelope-from=raingloom@HIDDEN; helo=mx1.riseup.net
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN, 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)


Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that, when I explicitly declare absolute permissions in
> octal during a (chmod =E2=80=A6) in my package definitions and then run g=
uix
> style, it converts them to decimal instead.
>
> Is this intended? I've gotten feedback and agree that octal (#o755) is
> much clearer to read than decimal (493), simply because I'm used to the
> actual unix chmod tool and its conventions.

Seems to be a Scheme limitation:

```
scheme@(guile-user)> '(#o10)
$1 =3D (8)
```




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#57090; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 20:59:21 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 16:59:21 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLWJt-0005Bu-0O
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:59:21 -0400
Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.90]:36218)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1oLWJq-0005Bg-4L
 for 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:59:18 -0400
Received: from [IPV6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:5dba:d409:33f7:a16]
 ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:5dba:d409:33f7:a16])
 by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
 id 5YzG2800X20ykKC06YzG1P; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:59:16 +0200
Message-ID: <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 22:59:11 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Subject: Re: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
Content-Language: en-US
To: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN>, 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 ludo@HIDDEN
References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------ZtPyiqNfC1XjbttIXZUz6O5p"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22;
 t=1660078756; bh=xzjTwtDin2nPd2kwqLlI+5s9lYaXsEJAv64k3Ah9gHk=;
 h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To;
 b=h6BeAX+d1mDU+khjeGVgD5P59IfhKCXlfORkHn3hBppiLCh5gvcaZwx8oChQs3hNx
 0+V0RCWw2Iz53fnrDhmt8XAI/CNxkVeCkbPsVtSArlTHaaswVuU95IXV29ZUA862sB
 +TSgfyW67sMamHHT72hNXJhWD3PcYAvJKHSbEuq4/69CsyJX41nEAIk9tGYWZyGy1q
 M8k9AP8Zi0HhHOt1Xc+vBJSS4nhWoLM2/KOcXD0Vp0nVv5GSxlJKgZh0IVYv2beWDA
 KOjYe/i/IWR54oT6g4/yOBy3DQHtQ0C0leuByfAwwmfF1McUR4ZObUIN9SIxMMFGVp
 DTlvOFuBNafaA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57090
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--------------ZtPyiqNfC1XjbttIXZUz6O5p
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------0xsa9PvNSfalKj9Yg9eN2HdG";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
To: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN>, 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 ludo@HIDDEN
Message-ID: <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>

--------------0xsa9PvNSfalKj9Yg9eN2HdG
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------ep80yEyJEmhMeaRjYJzk0GwN"

--------------ep80yEyJEmhMeaRjYJzk0GwN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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--------------ep80yEyJEmhMeaRjYJzk0GwN
Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP public key
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
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3D=3D
=3DOVqp
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

--------------ep80yEyJEmhMeaRjYJzk0GwN--

--------------0xsa9PvNSfalKj9Yg9eN2HdG--

--------------ZtPyiqNfC1XjbttIXZUz6O5p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wnsEABYIACMWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYvLKnwUDAAAAAAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7hEf
AQDB8V3ppIEiT3eecvd5DGYGcT5wCwYNbOmHnJx1QdM9lwEAsiC/lHdjZ0Lsu9YFMgDYqwexjxS5
L5aevvWB9fyp7Qs=
=jadR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------ZtPyiqNfC1XjbttIXZUz6O5p--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#57090; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 20:51:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 09 16:51:30 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLWCH-0004rf-SO
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:30 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44436)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <yewscion@HIDDEN>) id 1oLWCG-0004rV-2f
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:29 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34242)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <yewscion@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oLWCF-00079r-T0
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:27 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]:41544)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <yewscion@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oLWCE-00047x-EX
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:27 -0400
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id i13so1851879qkm.8
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:user-agent:from:to:cc;
 bh=CCsYNH34iIlMataqAhOSab3a4RfEq2tH5syJxtONmSM=;
 b=VEQTwfDvLMOsP+6PjC7nEuvmehJqRdkdgt0wgEvocHjXfRORtQ+2OWFR9RBkl25oET
 DjwXa0zDuNSgpOeHvBhAfU1BptO8TTIR0OB55Xvk9G5TnI9hnkrMr3Bupn4HKnQ8ZrkE
 wFIGhlMpcQsIp8DiljzzflI3uL9JvXVRmUQodle3Evx984Lm+f7PsUwVZ+ShxyMmHMg5
 FJonqzMw82Bf4z4QVPC81rkZFrDyLXD6d7Ukym1vsifjd9qsjxTLuFKBxsBd95LgFliS
 SeuuwTpJ86cYVF+vyg/WT/EyV2+UEaraobQdOFAXs3/9rped53PVDQTkg0m7ZTkKmQHQ
 PJJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:user-agent
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc;
 bh=CCsYNH34iIlMataqAhOSab3a4RfEq2tH5syJxtONmSM=;
 b=a43Yh2KOXM+ne12g9w+ueSi28XXOf/d4A8KYXBpqu1Hf6x460GNETf5hfjkBu9uVsP
 gjXqttyYBix/PGOY0zKjy6/OZv/WXoNwhH2Vp+0hrkRzEBPhSB8EjALvLIWbatsynZss
 +IY70k8FeV0mToTT10Nc59lSWzf8oxwQmmEgHzH8tnFqDDAAijQDryodgEeCF6yx+m8Q
 9rqxrGiBYbHaAn4MYNIpUjegd/Q1j0Iugsjkzt6M4QGycukK/IQ0xpxPYeX2qxVpDXvS
 wdxlFOz9yeYj3KiAoiZHMSGfPJyTBXsBLx2ez8phKIj1E7vjH3G9zW0lK+yCeGkXLQIC
 Wcgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1tkHQE7fgMM8qfTl9Kax3jeMVdqCRbz/KZV11VoEIqCRtOGvo7
 RbsP3NJQJpaupcuaSveQVwWkwl1R3jw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4KOX3+0bqOuLOPRvydtQvTzFtnkwuA0gDFXM4HyUXHWVf0R8tthLIlPXY4nS37zBP4KKep6Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:96c7:0:b0:6b9:3ca9:422 with SMTP id
 y190-20020a3796c7000000b006b93ca90422mr11214261qkd.101.1660078283848; 
 Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gmail.com (ec2-44-193-71-234.compute-1.amazonaws.com.
 [44.193.71.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 bq23-20020a05622a1c1700b0031eebfcb369sm10085353qtb.97.2022.08.09.13.51.23
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: mu4e 1.8.7; emacs 28.1
From: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:47:58 -0400
Message-ID: <878rnxi1it.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::735;
 envelope-from=yewscion@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qk1-x735.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hello,

I've noticed that, when I explicitly declare absolute permissions in
octal during a (chmod =E2=80=A6) in my package definitions and then run guix
style, it converts them to decimal instead.

Is this intended? I've gotten feedback and agree that octal (#o755) is
much clearer to read than decimal (493), simply because I'm used to the
actual unix chmod tool and its conventions.

=2D-

Christopher Rodriguez

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=LYUE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--




Acknowledgement sent to Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#57090; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.