GNU logs - #57095, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#57095: another "inappropriate ioctl" bug :)
Resent-From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 23:13:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57095.B.166008674322578 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 57095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 23:06:11 +0000
Message-ID: <874jylf1v8.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129;
 envelope-from=raingloom@HIDDEN; helo=mx1.riseup.net
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)


```
./pre-inst-env guix import pypi -r linode-cli | tee -a gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm

...
In guix/build/syscalls.scm:
  2284:35  1 (_)
   2273:8  0 (terminal-window-size _)

guix/build/syscalls.scm:2273:8: In procedure terminal-window-size:
In procedure terminal-window-size: Inappropriate ioctl for device
```

I assume the progress bar code does not gracefully handle the very
common case when stdout is not a terminal.

Good thing I'm in a local checkout so I can just make it return some
constant.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#57095: Acknowledgement (another "inappropriate ioctl" bug :))
Message-ID: <handler.57095.B.166008674322578.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <874jylf1v8.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 57095
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 57095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 23:13:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 57095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
57095: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D57095
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2022 13:38:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 10 09:38:30 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLluo-0005jk-9g
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:38:30 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45656)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1oLlum-0005jK-N9
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:38:29 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33980)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1oLluh-0007kU-Bc
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:38:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:Subject:From:To:Date:in-reply-to:
 references; bh=zY19HiV5ixM0fYqcMvB1ukrdDOqr3xrfCq0HY1u8xzs=; b=gwQrORr+G4BeGB
 DRIQWzu19xkzmQWXu0i+uHyCjKVS8uyTHUnXZL+gPLrqFPEzrzHtCcbWOgdtnKHfByD4PuqMpCbkw
 Vyp0vVIM9EgksNV/xPlRW4vexKnpARch7q6M9qtNoFA1mpuq9kqjhWrhePCF3GqGMJhCAJCSHl1fP
 6R5uiqc8vJtvSBXFWOfr19ThMRqnY05lTEJ+Q5WmSoV1iIJl5RiBmdDl6DUnt8N5W5nFvfGearqi9
 gAQ6dxqNVf4o2UORIFWdTQkLVLylCwHgc6Kmvlc3QPy6Evg6jKNlKdh3L83iAfhvym24SmEqsg9y0
 u4yoRzE9Hq0TaVgveXAg==;
Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:63796
 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1oLluf-0000tR-V2
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:38:23 -0400
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:38:20 +0200
Message-Id: <874jyk1ann.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #57095
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

retitle 57095 'terminal-window-size' throws ENOTTY ("Inappropriate ioctl for device")
quit

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#57095: another "inappropriate ioctl" bug :)
Resent-From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 13:44:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57095.B57095.166013901222579 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>, 57095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <874jylf1v8.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <874jylf1v8.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:43:18 +0200
Message-ID: <87bkssjjt5.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

 Content preview:  Hi! Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes: > ``` > ./pre-inst-env
    guix import pypi -r linode-cli | tee -a gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm > > ...
    > In guix/build/syscalls.scm: > 2284:35 1 (_) > 2273:8 0 (terminal-window-size
    _) > > guix/build/sysc [...] 

 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Hi!

Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes:

> ```
> ./pre-inst-env guix import pypi -r linode-cli | tee -a gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
>
> ...
> In guix/build/syscalls.scm:
>   2284:35  1 (_)
>    2273:8  0 (terminal-window-size _)
>
> guix/build/syscalls.scm:2273:8: In procedure terminal-window-size:
> In procedure terminal-window-size: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> ```
>
> I assume the progress bar code does not gracefully handle the very
> common case when stdout is not a terminal.

There is some code in place to handle this issue, and it works most of
the time, but not here.  The issue is that we handle any error coming
from ioctl by first throwing a `'system-error`, and handling it with a
`catch` that checks whether the errno is ENOTTY (and deprecated
equivalents) and in that case falls back to a good default.  In the case
where the error is not of that type, it is rethrown.  This works well in
most cases, but here comes the Guile shenanigans:

We also use a big wrapping `with-error-handling` to display errors
properly in the case when they are not caught.  The difference is that
`with-error-handling` adds a non-unwinding handler, while catch is
unwinding.  My first thought was that non-unwinding handlers, even outer
ones would get priority over unwinding ones, since once the stack's
unwound you can't really go back (I have no idea if that last part is
actually true).  In practice this is actually false, I tested with a
very simple example, but that lead me to test by setting `#:unwind? #t`
for the `guard*` definition in guix/ui.scm and the issue went away, so I'm
clueless as to why this happens.  What seems weird is that the error is
not caught at all!

Does anyone have a clue?

Best,
-- 
Josselin Poiret

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57095: another "inappropriate ioctl" bug :)
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:54:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57095.B57095.16601432218555 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57095
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 57095-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57095.16601432218555
          (code B ref 57095); Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:54:01 +0000
Received: (at 57095) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2022 14:53:41 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oLn5Y-0002Dv-DZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:53:40 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35950)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1oLn5W-0002Dh-IN
 for 57095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:53:39 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35104)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oLn5Q-0004jm-Ln; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:53:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:
 From; bh=FkICelX0t0ZI2LIspmlBj45LCZim4KGtzLMBHZRz/Gs=; b=ZgBBPmGBNcwkzTIHu5cz
 BdTk7LgkQoHO1S9OoXox6I+LEu3hYV+78zGPc4wQbgJBAge1jbzNdbmxgZY2Zuwn0mgdWhu2coSCj
 00hrmZeoIJKLE3sL+izknJlm53ZHlTdKdf4ivn3Tf6t7wgvtzBjD5ssjMpqiwuHyM/svtBMMBYltb
 LsNdT9XgqsIPPlvgb4EU/HsVdvmV0DyLpOSfrfhYjdjBZLW5ZfGCqM+whbMYYr/4ZxWhXaOo+/6e+
 PjLKm9q6nZDBwaGZ2JJE2OypI2x8LbjBVzRNi6zFrbMU9pt7ZGCzGfSlR4uu0cEjvF6w44hSc4yni
 Z4x2hfRaSG5CrQ==;
Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:51654
 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oLn5Q-0001cb-9Y; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:53:32 -0400
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
References: <874jylf1v8.fsf@HIDDEN> <87bkssjjt5.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 16:53:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87bkssjjt5.fsf@HIDDEN> (Josselin Poiret's message of "Wed, 
 10 Aug 2022 15:43:18 +0200")
Message-ID: <87lerwywt2.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)

Hi!

Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN> skribis:

> We also use a big wrapping `with-error-handling` to display errors
> properly in the case when they are not caught.  The difference is that
> `with-error-handling` adds a non-unwinding handler, while catch is
> unwinding.  My first thought was that non-unwinding handlers, even outer
> ones would get priority over unwinding ones, since once the stack's
> unwound you can't really go back (I have no idea if that last part is
> actually true).  In practice this is actually false, I tested with a
> very simple example, but that lead me to test by setting `#:unwind? #t`
> for the `guard*` definition in guix/ui.scm and the issue went away, so I'm
> clueless as to why this happens.  What seems weird is that the error is
> not caught at all!

The inner handler, even if it=E2=80=99s unwinding and the outer one is not,
appears to have higher precedence:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guix read-print)> (with-exception-handler (lambda args (pk 'outer a=
rgs))
			    (lambda ()
			      (with-exception-handler
				  (lambda args (pk 'inner args))
				(lambda()
				  (rmdir "/"))
				#:unwind? #t))
			    #:unwind? #f)

;;; (inner (#<&compound-exception components: (#<&external-error> #<&origin=
 origin: "rmdir"> #<&message message: "~A"> #<&irritants irritants: ("Devic=
e or resource busy")> #<&exception-with-kind-and-args kind: system-error ar=
gs: ("rmdir" "~A" ("Device or resource busy") (16))>)>))
$17 =3D (#<&compound-exception components: (#<&external-error> #<&origin or=
igin: "rmdir"> #<&message message: "~A"> #<&irritants irritants: ("Device o=
r resource busy")> #<&exception-with-kind-and-args kind: system-error args:=
 ("rmdir" "~A" ("Device or resource busy") (16))>)>)
scheme@(guix read-print)> (with-exception-handler (lambda args (pk 'outer a=
rgs))
			    (lambda ()
			      (catch 'system-error
				(lambda ()
				  (rmdir "/"))
				(lambda args
				  (pk 'inner args))))
			    #:unwind? #f)

;;; (inner (system-error "rmdir" "~A" ("Device or resource busy") (16)))
$18 =3D (system-error "rmdir" "~A" ("Device or resource busy") (16))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

This appears to work:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix build syscalls)
scheme@(guile-user)> (terminal-columns)
$19 =3D 119
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix ui)
scheme@(guile-user)> (with-error-handling (terminal-columns))
$20 =3D 119
scheme@(guile-user)> (terminal-columns (open-input-string ""))
$21 =3D 143
scheme@(guile-user)> (with-error-handling (terminal-columns (open-input-str=
ing "")))
$22 =3D 143
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Needs more investigation=E2=80=A6

Ludo=E2=80=99.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2022 13:01:45 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 29 09:01:45 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60351 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oSeOf-0005YG-9s
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:01:45 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48632)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1oSeOd-0005Y0-LC
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:01:43 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46236)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1oSeOY-0002vV-EV
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:01:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:Subject:From:To:Date:in-reply-to:
 references; bh=Pq2mmbabmHws+jrsgHTmJB4BkELWDDU5O5pmeFPLT4k=; b=TAUsu/4a9yhn2b
 7n+tYlYgsKpb7O59Cg+zHI18nzbK9+u0sKrCVXwOUV1jnqU2tm66jLoqWAPi5sSbsXpIi/+qGzi8l
 3YkvZj15NpqVv5SMitHsYgOkkJCuUl+R7pE5YY8/W4YseWlJYld3RRHDR94DywH9SsBisgYB9GyX6
 DZLvSvOhKuRhTkD+b03NJxT3Fn0+qXAcMS3Xt5GBWVzlgE/u5ECr+8zPU8imQPSDO4f221dgw/vfM
 7w7j+/G3v5+o+d0DBojhHVPLD3dXIHdqBiTNpZPZQw3H0LAHaRerWL9Xju26JC+PrzEAwVwRWKfHE
 IypjlfcI7kgE8OyT3EwA==;
Received: from [193.50.110.104] (port=35536 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1oSeOX-0002qC-1z
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:01:38 -0400
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:01:34 +0200
Message-Id: <87fshf6w5t.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #57095
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

severity 57095 important
quit

Last modified: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 13:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.