GNU bug report logs - #57103
[PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.2.7

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:01:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 57103 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 57103 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#57103; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:01:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:01:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: artyom <at> atlas.engineer, pierre <at> atlas.engineer
Subject: [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.2.7
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 12:00:14 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Guix,

The tagged 2.2.7 version of sbcl has some issues.  For instance, maxima
failed to build.

This patch updates sbcl while ensuring that all packages that depend on
it build successfully.  I tested it by issuing

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
./pre-inst-env guix build $(./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l sbcl | cut -d ':' -f 2)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Find the patched attached.  Thanks.

-- 
André A. Gomes
"You cannot even find the ruins..."
[0001-gnu-sbcl-Update-to-2.2.7-0.390809a.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0002-gnu-stumpwm-Update-to-22.05-0.9f47673.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#57103; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:25:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <pierre <at> atlas.engineer>
To: André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>,
 guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: artyom <at> atlas.engineer
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.2.7
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:24:04 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Thank you André.  Unfortunately, Guix prefers stable packages and if
there is no urgent need for a specific intermediary version, it's often
best to simply wait for the next stable release.

In the case of SBCL, a new stable version is release at the end of each
month.  The easiest fix (and probably the right thing to do) is to
simply wait some 20 days :)

Pierre
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#57103; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 57103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>
To: "Pierre Neidhardt" <pierre <at> atlas.engineer>, <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>,
 <57103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Cc: artyom <at> atlas.engineer
Subject: Re: [bug#57103] [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.2.7
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:25:54 +0100
On Wed Aug 10, 2022 at 10:24 AM BST, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> In the case of SBCL, a new stable version is release at the end of each
> month.  The easiest fix (and probably the right thing to do) is to
> simply wait some 20 days :)

Maybe we could have an sbcl-next? :)

    -- (




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#57103; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:07:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 57103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <pierre <at> atlas.engineer>
To: "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>, andremegafone <at> gmail.com, 57103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: artyom <at> atlas.engineer
Subject: Re: [bug#57103] [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.2.7
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 12:06:01 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Packages with a -next version mostly make sense when the release
timeline is in the order of a year or more.  For SBCL, it's just too short.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#57103; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:49:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <pierre <at> atlas.engineer>
Cc: artyom <at> atlas.engineer, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.2.7
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 13:48:39 +0300
Pierre Neidhardt <pierre <at> atlas.engineer> writes:

> Thank you André.  Unfortunately, Guix prefers stable packages and if
> there is no urgent need for a specific intermediary version, it's often
> best to simply wait for the next stable release.
>
> In the case of SBCL, a new stable version is release at the end of each
> month.  The easiest fix (and probably the right thing to do) is to
> simply wait some 20 days :)

I see!  Let's wait then :)

-- 
André A. Gomes
"You cannot even find the ruins..."




Reply sent to Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 57103-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 57103-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#57103] [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.2.7
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:05:05 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
SBCL updated to 2.2.10 in 1eee671d7d0bca1486ff8b4259c93b0cf7783e58.
Closing.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 148 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.