Received: (at 57215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2022 14:19:16 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 19 10:19:16 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58982 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oP2qC-0005vI-Bh
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:19:16 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.222.180]:44806)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1oP2qA-0005v4-Vu
for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:19:15 -0400
Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id g16so3316491qkl.11
for <57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 07:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references
:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc;
bh=bXvBa64c7mcQHGvyqP/FCO8kcPrJwT69wN8JxIfzLxY=;
b=jt3UxvCcT3BcZ2vjiKp7xfSq19wHEB3Zx562T+Zduap9sP4nLXYHTeuluuDgQhbNJ+
ixBBJrPoJJgFn1C+PiaZ8wE9xz4v4jQIPQeoPQ2/rjBufNtBaiSI++9ubOTZzyK3FUrm
YEOnMGfS5woYyKS4ew5+289r2F0c6ypkmFpNaonoeD3mkOmiyTPbvahw83ZhJZvgd1Hs
DNZp4GEFJzTGFgO96tIuHZD7giughplUFVejFi/h+TROsXGn62ZsDwDhRzbTHyBn7xVa
e3nOZL98JGl4BfLGlR6pX9U/MzFvpDdiA5P3Oz7ZzvnjGwn/6kys6Oli3UU+kUee3sSR
KR5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references
:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc;
bh=bXvBa64c7mcQHGvyqP/FCO8kcPrJwT69wN8JxIfzLxY=;
b=HhQIUO/D1OPrTacrQI59H9lqaumVJGfurckY5zY9ruZ1M5RUCUK1s2yfJoBHezddj5
rVvcJKZVlv/7T19D7OTjrPR8DZ3ZfHzqeQXBgTu5UiV56/ME3swqqUHnRd5cQveX/k+q
6+Ezhs4y2nvYWzWnkD6I9jRuqBgqzWGPu4jgbKLgWHKjUMpZDUPsw8eGKnPWc8Q8Tz9P
N3EJNqimW+VK4ovvmYyisGwV+wHWcsvip1VKFA7Nvk8fYblF+YktYWfubk0VRaYynE5K
Vi1IscLJDGQ1tuhTGsnjC20wLATNQV5A2n/XGVlRMcTPfi06SFvSAPPRQZdO3WSmeCRJ
LJcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1ltvOz4ueSyU5+/ONEJwCLtcxwg3ZcuGop0hmqihNYwbWuhX4R
h0pRH673Yufji79KjsFIW8tqYT5VECs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5ZcSgDnvGnMcM1oD32W5nHlY0clfRbVEQD0ri+W68VzPI0PuBzLcQOYG2T7AX9CqcFJhg5zA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4489:b0:6bb:8e2b:a51f with SMTP id
x9-20020a05620a448900b006bb8e2ba51fmr5067511qkp.217.1660918749221;
Fri, 19 Aug 2022 07:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hurd (dsl-10-149-103.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.149.103])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
w18-20020a05620a445200b006b5c061844fsm4348683qkp.49.2022.08.19.07.19.08
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Fri, 19 Aug 2022 07:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#57215: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification
References: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:19:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sun, 14
Aug 2022 21:56:58 +0200")
Message-ID: <87fshsz57n.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57215
Cc: 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Since commit 0565cde, Cuirass fails to evaluate the guix
> specification. The error messages do not give any clue, for instance:
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/504294/log/raw.
>
> I tried to strace an evaluation process of the guix specification, it
> ends this way:
>
> [pid 74060] write(1, "(values (value (result (((#:job-name . guix.i686-linux) (#:derivation . \"/gnu/store/ap7sixkbikfw1xib3aisbcaw6i2005m2-guix-a5f199732.drv\") (#:inputs \"/gnu/store/4mdqwn29pvjqd6hs1q842g5wzamjy3dk-module-import-compiled.drv\" \"/gnu/store/4nv9xf9qyabcw2gz9zvxlq9ymknq7wad-guix-daemon.drv\" \"/gnu/store/a6f7jk08bs6clingcw3j8kmz3cbsj6iq-guix-command.drv\" \"/gnu/store/fl7hls4j08hp45j32xjjrjc6d49qmbmy-guix-a5f199732-modules.drv\" \"/gnu/store/h9aagy9mv2bqg7b8q3k6aksi7fa20qzc-guix-manual.drv\" \"/gnu/store/iz11170b9da1i3pkjdv6314swzvzkgvk-guile-3.0.7.drv\") (#:outputs (\"out\" . \"/gnu/store/ivs9raslmb77zn0hrcza0wbv3r9lspay-guix-a5f199732\")) (#:nix-name . \"guix-a5f199732\") (#:system . \"i686-linux\") (#:max-silent-time . 3600) (#:timeout . 18000))))))\n", 737) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
> [pid 74060] --- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=74060, si_uid=997} ---
> [pid 74060] futex(0x7f1110e6f330, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 2147483647) = 0
> [pid 74060] write(1, "(exception (arguments system-error (value \"fport_write\") (value \"~A\") (value (\"Broken pipe\")) (value (32))) (stack (#f (\"ice-9/boot-9.scm\" 1779 13)) (raise-exception (\"ice-9/boot-9.scm\" 1684 16)) (newline (#f #f #f)) (#f (\"guix/repl.scm\" 104 8)) (with-exception-handler (\"ice-9/boot-9.scm\" 1751 10)) (with-exception-handler (\"ice-9/boot-9.scm\" 1746 15)) (#f (\"guix/repl.scm\" 125 7))))\n", 385) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
> [pid 74060] --- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=74060, si_uid=997} ---
>
> The evaluation process receives a SIGPIPE when trying to write the
> evaluation result to the pipe connecting it to "cuirass register".
It seems the evaluations are now completing correctly?
Perhaps it was related to the Shepherd issue that we are having on
Berlin, where after a while it seems to hang, which makes it impossible
to even SSH in.
Thanks,
Maxim
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#57215; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 57215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2022 11:04:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 16 07:04:10 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45081 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oNuMj-0003qJ-R1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:04:10 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:41394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1oNuMg-0003q7-IG for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:04:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:54d1:d5d4:280e:f699]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1E5227BBE9; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 12:04:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c8613653; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:04:00 +0000 (UTC) References: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r11hd8bh.fsf@HIDDEN> <87mtc5d64w.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmh0fwq5.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmh0injd.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r11gczov.fsf@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.11; emacs 28.1 From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#57215: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:56:04 +0100 In-reply-to: <87r11gczov.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <87leroih5x.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57215 Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>, 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> writes: > Hey, > >> So, I think there's some involvement of grafts that mean you end up >> building things when just trying to compute the derivation. But that's >> as far as I got, I don't really understand why this is the case, or what >> can be done about it. > > Thanks for sharing Chris, I tried to disable grafts, but I was not able > to go any further: > > mathieu@berlin ~$ guix pull -s powerpc64le-linux -v3 --no-grafts ... > guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/z7jij9k33bl8dm50zrhy97jxqwylx1s8-compute-guix-derivation.drv' failed > > Maybe we should open a specific bug-report for that particular issue? I think the grafting comes in here [1], within the build-self.scm script, and I think that the --no-grafts argument to guix pull doesn't currently affect the behaviour at that point. 1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/build-aux/build-self.scm#n350 That's where the patch here [2] comes in, as it makes it possible to control the grafting behaviour at that point, at least enough to demonstrate that there's some change in behaviour. 2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/txtgzexu0El5b.txt --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmL7eZpfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xce0hAAsp5A3vvMWHMXZgez3sbhqzpzeEkFWHYV NRzdlMAwsatp6h1fhDTrYB8J/yAmw4mnx1XbwIT9u4r/8fP8wkts1DpEzScpIFhx UZjWnqb0cXfVV3xapT9WMmCEiul51rNdx7mpLTBPiGk7AEvicCfr3L3nwZOW/FlB Pf5LdnLmM+5hsAufh9M6rWTh6QTdNcuB/qJmpN3tfbcu88WmW+n2zAaVgH7Q2p94 0Uvtmm6zHP1eVgcdIVKwQQckehUVlbxMoIPRK2GCg0cy220MzjIhCKZHc1SEkZh4 3BKUxsppDost6CRqkjQEo+sSJXcbTLJ3kQSJhfUFT7OWwGyqw8Rpqrevm5FJXzmi EChs9lPNNrwRnY6xC1GqpQX305Gtrm1n0UmhEWLDt82k9FVWN+s/8P59FUgLSfdB +b+6A91KnegJwPspqIDpxeLfsFPe0/RBV/StufgSEh5r01bCJmCc+en1nSexCtz8 eDS1Mj3avHPx3QkD3DEeS5/YTYlJAeewZX/cXIPsDVNnAlMwqJZwxpEyfxScbCeO lVgGbUrsvEx0xsHRheW5U9/RNUMfimYn14481XNt2u7qQVl2iaCQHq3XLKmOYiFG 5p41vUDlvFWY6Rx0D+iPryLaz31DXig/7q0oRSouUbOoywqs4Y8V4UF2olSFfo7K w9ljZoR6seo= =kNu4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#57215; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 57215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2022 09:20:57 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 16 05:20:57 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oNskq-0000Vg-L4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 05:20:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47002) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNskp-0000VS-0w for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 05:20:55 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNska-00036h-5i; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 05:20:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=K/I1Lh96qvsf4FvR/nwENPmimsKMhipCIdQ7Bex8/MM=; b=qLPjGrVQfwCJSez96Y+a vzVJLtZTxXiQ17VLTtgyC2TgjlccZ93drz2VnCPwZzKTOQ+SnbzZlCrJJt4V5e1xlDKgqD61WCr3m gQwXZwmwUXxxww4aC9z1q/cGvZdE4cMaoJc5jnwtV0BLtgNhep1S64NL1NRnb5Pl/AH2cnetC0uAQ OvlVvQ35NmOoCJaogpqCJCFylT95pGUou6xN6pOR25I5JSM/gNrwmyMLlCGZrKl6lxUQpeE2nHaT5 uGLbTYp2tmcaKCn4ue3dVbUUlY/mFQXJhlkWGgylRDLP63Z91+PyfBvDN6Zn4w1fO1S9+yAQ97oLU ux64poeFTjzbjA==; Received: from 2a02-8429-81d2-3d01-94c9-8097-ea5c-2775.rev.sfr.net ([2a02:8429:81d2:3d01:94c9:8097:ea5c:2775]:55774 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNskF-0001E4-3O; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 05:20:38 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#57215: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification References: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r11hd8bh.fsf@HIDDEN> <87mtc5d64w.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmh0fwq5.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmh0injd.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:20:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pmh0injd.fsf@HIDDEN> (Christopher Baines's message of "Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:41:31 +0100") Message-ID: <87r11gczov.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57215 Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>, 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey, > So, I think there's some involvement of grafts that mean you end up > building things when just trying to compute the derivation. But that's > as far as I got, I don't really understand why this is the case, or what > can be done about it. Thanks for sharing Chris, I tried to disable grafts, but I was not able to go any further: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- mathieu@berlin ~$ guix pull -s powerpc64le-linux -v3 --no-grafts Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Building from this channel: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 0598b5d building /gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv... @ unsupported-platform /gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv powerpc64le-linux while setting up the build environment: a `powerpc64le-linux' is required to build `/gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv', but I am a `x86_64-linux' builder for `/gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/m7/ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv.gz'. cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/xd1sxx07rbynhhgb693vdw1rqlqd4a93-bash-minimal-5.1.8.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/wmqmkvgfs3cab3kf269d4p9lkphkwzdm-binutils-2.37.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/8nmr09ik10j36hghg2kil51jkjnj06q6-binutils-cross-boot0-2.37.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/04ngqmmifwqmlmga1ax9sxk09xv131xk-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/f3azd8szmzhxr020jia5072kc5izxjfj-coreutils-8.32.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/gjn725x4h9skb20zgi0pa92vlxgkgavs-diffutils-3.8.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/vp5pwmylb79zni917rk8y6l35v452p6d-diffutils-boot0-3.8.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/av4s8y2s91njxxv23rai319adk65w85z-file-boot0-5.39.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/xfpd2plqyzbrj8i509rdwcl01y3jbfgd-findutils-4.8.0.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/8k74lss8j7gczv24l30vppbsbps3adra-findutils-boot0-4.8.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/qa8v3sfgi0832w5q524vkgqw4168f40p-gcc-10.3.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/8nq5sgw7qw8flawdza94i8g9ybbq2qmq-glibc-2.33.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/nkph22a5q6y6vwc5lcrn8z207wbdh3an-grep-3.6.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/5k20iw84477c3i2fjadjvx27flwxv2gg-guile-3.0.7.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/kkghmiz85q072fznybdzkhqqp8h0givf-gzip-1.10.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/7rj3x1mpw27bsngmkny8ivwqbkcxzsmb-ld-wrapper-boot0-0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/1q67mcy2jjvfg0lbmca94inrhqwpi05r-ld-wrapper-boot3-0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/dpxnqbrjnlj5q8l9mi0g1i51bni61m7v-libgc-8.0.4.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/6pb0ihb8y3r7skh69vdjcxc2n0h2qbx1-libunistring-0.9.10.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/5c8wan41scm0j9dgcmq0rpcsb59n0l9v-linux-libre-headers-5.10.35.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/df9xgziafs0qpr7sxdcrxqbqd07a1h92-make-4.3.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/c0g8jj22ikdr6k53135rfrjj7mv234g1-make-boot0-4.3.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/wxqi4ibkxq2943krxf2xpxvyz0bjz1kx-patch-2.7.6.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/9wg27g47gqz9dr7grx2cv7l00kkm34bs-perl-5.34.0.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/1kq8l3m29nsaifsk1k0g1g0c6sk6ch4g-perl-boot0-5.34.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/1apai9zqhdc6zaj2r0fbxqipash5fnzx-sed-4.8.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/kl7934a54ykm9g3majmxlawks1xaz97y-tar-1.34.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/z7jij9k33bl8dm50zrhy97jxqwylx1s8-compute-guix-derivation.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/z7jij9k33bl8dm50zrhy97jxqwylx1s8-compute-guix-derivation.drv' failed --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Maybe we should open a specific bug-report for that particular issue? Mathieu
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#57215; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 57215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2022 08:46:23 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 16 04:46:23 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44743 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oNsDP-00084C-CH for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:46:23 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:41392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1oNsDL-000841-Qc for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:46:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:54d1:d5d4:280e:f699]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D438327BBE9; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:46:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a0992f71; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:46:17 +0000 (UTC) References: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r11hd8bh.fsf@HIDDEN> <87mtc5d64w.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmh0fwq5.fsf@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.11; emacs 28.1 From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#57215: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:41:31 +0100 In-reply-to: <87pmh0fwq5.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <87pmh0injd.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57215 Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>, 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> writes: > Now there are multiple unclear points to me: > > 1. Why do we need an available machine with the foreign architecture to > compute the corresponding "guix" derivation? Note that the evaluation of > package derivations for foreign systems works even though a > corresponding machine is not available: > > mathieu@berlin ~$ guix build -s powerpc64le-linux -d hello > /gnu/store/spzmh79qi21k26p15w27r3jjg95szg17-hello-2.12.1.drv This has been something I've been interested in as well, since the Guix Data Service has the same problem when computing these derivations. I think the latest information I have is set out here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00196.html So, I think there's some involvement of grafts that mean you end up building things when just trying to compute the derivation. But that's as far as I got, I don't really understand why this is the case, or what can be done about it. Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmL7WVZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XcRNg//RBFklWCJdeTab3MtHW1tgwmpvVoXUSti gMt3UqRK8gf/Cnf9uBDkVcQ8okc7ALY7laqdWVIICmOFbKTgP4XtmfimfqsSJn/Q pJ2TfJ0nSzTH3+fU27ZQVjY6H+wCtTti7C26cEVLb2nor2OSk39K5UgiM8ZWZXvl hINFhSXrFM6bYI4PLRmhK8YHSmmVcOxUgFSLu0mXV7f9OW+bLZjKRzEZZKH3a/Qp 5uuFYS4RmLbfsyqoxs+PUuafAWOwFbxwwhuK74O2LcJAoczxxGkody45Ri3OjOA2 XAtpe3R2Q8J2/M9TDiSXQ0T+YLtnPGqQRardNebo7CrfPkTdsfZqrOIyP+h6quYv nXJSborpU0t3vh00MobYLwu2B3JdDYZ+wj7LQFXenvbN59op677PY2n6DFIQWNKA rxB6sEjHVyvvIUDMWpy7d4kID6X7ZFalSmlUIzopNi5SOpJXsF9fvpNcTQsl4hYq 73Nfcl6Yw3wB8pxZeRzLqdg92Hj2ESTodimm/wxbqda9JpmmgCp3VbeY+AVYxS3E 6MHxSQ8LNqY1jgMd8VDojeoZxR72Ur1zI32OwEsGL/Dn8SExUQy3NgaoBZj1WlO+ yQYMwtGynBdsAuU/gUUAcenzMwwLgGVclFwx9F0qBCP/x3BJHxH5sUndC/uyJg/N cA/d0iBNkgY= =4j0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#57215; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 57215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2022 07:56:17 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 16 03:56:17 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oNrQv-0006nO-EN for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 03:56:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNrQt-0006nB-Kt for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 03:56:16 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNrQm-0007iH-MK; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 03:56:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=d+EfKZHm8i7hSAxRJJUgfB9eZ2qZAX8sovN7f8u7qDg=; b=kz3sBWXa/15fGGrLfsG7 gpRplr1tQ8YRzcm5JVDjfPcNgvMagwZhex3bHwjXhUf0f2fNfjo6G/wBhNh/8TNALXFpRYUt9Xf78 NrRF6uL25eKjliJ7JkMDWHdCE4FZsGaSxP1g/YLdY7TIIit04ta9lbYXLERuoSD0fuhSGgX98v0Wg 9c4zqL8yFlp5srBH/SWyLutBc6Zevdlm5QUtLavAbT375WuVz08jIJ+puohm/0FF6KUOFUzq/Vmv9 WP/Bpd+aYczKqmsUFwNBGmzDvrcES+OhXbhwOJgy2c+tHp+bp3SlWG/Oieui2xn5pRvQGLFDRPqSO 3xHBud8DDMRiVQ==; Received: from 2a02-8429-81d2-3d01-94c9-8097-ea5c-2775.rev.sfr.net ([2a02:8429:81d2:3d01:94c9:8097:ea5c:2775]:36164 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNrQj-0001vj-5P; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 03:56:08 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN> To: 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#57215: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification References: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r11hd8bh.fsf@HIDDEN> <87mtc5d64w.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:56:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mtc5d64w.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:48:47 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmh0fwq5.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57215 Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Some news on this one: I discovered that the evaluation failure of the "guix" specification is correlated with the selected systems. When disabling "aarch64-linux" and "powerpc64le-linux", the evaluation succeeded. Now, when running: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- mathieu@berlin ~$ guix pull -s powerpc64le-linux -v3 Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Building from this channel: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 0598b5d building /gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv... @ unsupported-platform /gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv powerpc64le-linux while setting up the build environment: a `powerpc64le-linux' is required to build `/gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv', but I am a `x86_64-linux' builder for `/gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/m7/ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv.gz'. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It fails in the same way with aarch64-linux. That's because there's no offload or binfmt mechanism on berlin at the moment. I restored the /etc/guix/machines.scm to enable offloading, and suddenly "aarch64-linux" system is working again for the "guix" specification. "powerpc64le-linux" is still failing as we do not have a machine for that architecture currently available: p9.tobias.gr is commented out. Tobias, I'm not sure to remember why? Now there are multiple unclear points to me: 1. Why do we need an available machine with the foreign architecture to compute the corresponding "guix" derivation? Note that the evaluation of package derivations for foreign systems works even though a corresponding machine is not available: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- mathieu@berlin ~$ guix build -s powerpc64le-linux -d hello /gnu/store/spzmh79qi21k26p15w27r3jjg95szg17-hello-2.12.1.drv --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- 2. Why the following traces are not reported back by the inferior in charge of the evaluation of the "guix" derivation? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- @ unsupported-platform /gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv powerpc64le-linux while setting up the build environment: a `powerpc64le-linux' is required to build `/gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv', but I am a `x86_64-linux' builder for `/gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/m7ppw9lb65g99dajwkb56w05zqmydsdh-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv failed --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- 3. Why does the "cuirass evaluate" process crashes when an inferior crashes (see the backtrace in my previous email)? I'll try to come-up with simple reproducers for those different points. In the meantime, the "guix" specification is working again for x86_64-linux, i686-linux and aarch64-linux systems which is a good news. Thanks, Mathieu
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#57215; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 57215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2022 12:48:57 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 15 08:48:57 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41207 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oNZWb-00008Q-CF
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:48:57 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59734)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNZWZ-00008E-SS
for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:48:56 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38312)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNZWU-00044y-JW
for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:48:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:
From; bh=t8FWQPdYcof/215CE0xGMKi/+KuekY3iRkqJ4smMtS8=; b=P6WoVQH0dMPaQ0piAp3M
UI5K8OQyrOCsoxXoPHmGi75FeGBPxzhxiwuVW7W3sPCK8dJOK4fHAf4D1Bvf+CcgYYLFU+fu+ijAV
UhIqjCgf4dE6rgIqwAi+qsv17tZb6i6TnUu2Tas8ybH1ZOwttcCU0vzF7mACT5wQRPYRMtIZ1AqC0
BdOztU2sPDJMGmBu1wmBhyQuh8ptNRa62omiaFV2+OpsVnJKfz7DC9jJWPcjTMKuLL/3bAWytK9se
jkYBUGhTBQYV0CoWoLEiWc2n4+ef4tZEuQlfU1UmA/btUcEzKqCKxKwLKT9/+Pt7z1bO6K9uVgEv2
Ql8eyb7RmqgUBg==;
Received: from 2a02-8429-81d2-3d01-94c9-8097-ea5c-2775.rev.sfr.net
([2a02:8429:81d2:3d01:94c9:8097:ea5c:2775]:42416 helo=meije)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNZWU-00007X-5H
for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:48:50 -0400
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
To: 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57215: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification
References: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN> <87r11hd8bh.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:48:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87r11hd8bh.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Mon, 15
Aug 2022 14:01:38 +0200")
Message-ID: <87mtc5d64w.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57215
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
With symbols:
#0 0x00007f63a4b15030 in raise () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f63a4aff526 in abort () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007f63a5091198 in scm_dynstack_unwind_1.isra.0 (dynstack=<optimized out>) at dynstack.c:426
#3 0x00007f63a5135728 in scm_dynstack_unwind (base=<optimized out>, dynstack=<optimized out>) at dynstack.c:443
#4 abort_to_prompt (thread=0x7f639a182000, saved_mra=<optimized out>) at vm.c:1454
#5 0x00007f637620b25f in ?? ()
#6 0x00007f639cf5bacc in ?? ()
#7 0x00007f63806f08a0 in ?? ()
#8 0x0000000000000006 in ?? ()
#9 0x00007f63a50d3ccc in scm_jit_enter_mcode (thread=0x7f639a182000, mcode=0x7f637620b276 "L\213c\030I\213L$\020H\215", <incomplete sequence \315>) at jit.c:6038
#10 0x00007f63a5128f3c in vm_regular_engine (thread=0x7f639a182000) at vm-engine.c:360
#11 0x00007f63a51365e9 in scm_call_n (proc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, nargs=0) at vm.c:1608
#12 0x00007f63a509aa0e in scm_call_with_unblocked_asyncs (proc=0x7f6374320f40) at async.c:406
#13 0x00007f63a5129336 in vm_regular_engine (thread=0x7f639a182000) at vm-engine.c:972
#14 0x00007f63a51365e9 in scm_call_n (proc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, nargs=0) at vm.c:1608
#15 0x00007f63a5125be6 in really_launch (d=0x7f6374290240) at threads.c:778
#16 0x00007f63a509c85a in c_body (d=0x7f6371e2bd80) at continuations.c:430
#17 0x00007f63761b3482 in ?? ()
#18 0x00007f639cf5b7e0 in ?? ()
#19 0x00007f639b24ae30 in ?? ()
#20 0x0000000000000048 in ?? ()
#21 0x00007f63a50d3ccc in scm_jit_enter_mcode (thread=0x7f639a182000, mcode=0x80d4f4 "\034<\003") at jit.c:6038
#22 0x00007f63a5128f3c in vm_regular_engine (thread=0x7f639a182000) at vm-engine.c:360
#23 0x00007f63a51365e9 in scm_call_n (proc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, nargs=2) at vm.c:1608
#24 0x00007f63a509e09a in scm_call_2 (proc=<optimized out>, arg1=<optimized out>, arg2=<optimized out>) at eval.c:503
#25 0x00007f63a5154752 in scm_c_with_exception_handler.constprop.0 (type=0x404, handler_data=handler_data@entry=0x7f6371e2bd10, thunk_data=thunk_data@entry=0x7f6371e2bd10, thunk=<optimized out>, handler=<optimized out>)
at exceptions.c:170
#26 0x00007f63a512688f in scm_c_catch (tag=<optimized out>, body=<optimized out>, body_data=<optimized out>, handler=<optimized out>, handler_data=<optimized out>, pre_unwind_handler=<optimized out>,
pre_unwind_handler_data=0x7f639d0e8000) at throw.c:168
#27 0x00007f63a509ee66 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier (pre_unwind_handler=0x7f63a509eb80 <pre_unwind_handler>, pre_unwind_handler_data=0x7f639d0e8000, handler_data=0x7f6371e2bd80, handler=0x7f63a50a58b0 <c_handler>,
body_data=0x7f6371e2bd80, body=0x7f63a509c850 <c_body>) at continuations.c:368
#28 scm_c_with_continuation_barrier (func=<optimized out>, data=<optimized out>) at continuations.c:464
#29 0x00007f63a5125b39 in with_guile (base=0x7f6371e2be08, data=0x7f6371e2be30) at threads.c:645
#30 0x00007f63a4ffc0ba in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /gnu/store/2lczkxbdbzh4gk7wh91bzrqrk7h5g1dl-libgc-8.0.4/lib/libgc.so.1
#31 0x00007f63a511e16d in scm_i_with_guile (dynamic_state=<optimized out>, data=0x7f6374290240, func=0x7f63a5125b70 <really_launch>) at threads.c:688
#32 launch_thread (d=0x7f6374290240) at threads.c:787
#33 0x00007f63a4fd2d7e in ?? () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libpthread.so.0
#34 0x00007f63a4bd0eff in clone () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libc.so.6
Mathieu
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#57215; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 57215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2022 12:01:50 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 15 08:01:50 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oNYmz-0007L1-Ls
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:01:50 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50724)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNYmw-0007KV-Md
for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:01:47 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37190)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNYmr-0004jD-Gd
for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:01:41 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:
From; bh=dfpvckPFGYOpqvIk8iEXtbEQKNWOuUj/SCwAL8l3FSc=; b=XpEqhvYxUTXDcISUffiV
G7Hn4/W3uFz+HsZND1AEi1qg6imhLqCf7DXi6HXSsG4ATcXPTSgkzbcK7E7JNbs+PUTlniV8A92Lk
ImVaai1eMhbkiENjDJvigkJfYQC5YNDATUVnshhDGGR2kxYB1NnlB1GRwfSahyCGZGxFJVkU3VLDD
/emIym6YP0Fz/Xqiy1QfEiagBwvtIBqCWVk1YBHTfO57wg9qVSPt7yzxg5w5OToQ79xw4btPVAvAn
4ideWCJIe0+xvTRaIQhfrFwnMYas3eG/cYZAMR1MQhNBOwleE2R9syOsB56FstIakKEVw1I78iZmb
iXFzU+VUqSbdPA==;
Received: from 2a02-8429-81d2-3d01-94c9-8097-ea5c-2775.rev.sfr.net
([2a02:8429:81d2:3d01:94c9:8097:ea5c:2775]:46336 helo=meije)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNYmr-0002tT-3b
for 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 08:01:41 -0400
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
To: 57215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57215: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification
References: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:01:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sun, 14
Aug 2022 21:56:58 +0200")
Message-ID: <87r11hd8bh.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57215
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
Hello,
> [pid 74060] --- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=74060, si_uid=997} ---
>
> The evaluation process receives a SIGPIPE when trying to write the
> evaluation result to the pipe connecting it to "cuirass register".
I think this is a wrong lead. The cuirass evaluation process looks like:
--- pipe B ---> inferior I1
"cuirass register" <--- pipe A ---> "cuirass evaluate" <--|
--- pipe C ---> inferior I2
In short, "cuirass register" is a daemon monitoring Git repositories and
triggering sporadic "cuirass evaluate" processes. Those processes use
inferiors to evaluate the new derivations.
The SIGPIPE observed with strace doesn't correspond to pipe A but to
pipe B or C. The issue here is probably that "cuirass evaluate" dies
unexpectedly which causes the inferior I1 or I2 to receive a SIGPIPE
when writing to a pipe which is not listened to anymore.
Stracing the "cuirass evaluate" process shows indeed that it dies
unexpectedly by receiving a SIGABRT signal.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [], 8) = 0
pselect6(242, [3 227 241], [], [], NULL, NULL
<unfinished ...>) = ?
+++ killed by SIGABRT +++
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I tried to use gdb to get more details:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Thread 28 "guile" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to LWP 113115]
0x00007f890b618030 in raise () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f890b618030 in raise () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f890b602526 in abort () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007f890bb94198 in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#3 0x00007f890bc38728 in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#4 0x00007f88dcce625f in ?? ()
#5 0x00007f8903a5eacc in ?? ()
#6 0x00007f88e31eb8a0 in ?? ()
#7 0x0000000000000006 in ?? ()
#8 0x00007f890bbd6ccc in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#9 0x00007f890bc2bf3c in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#10 0x00007f890bc395e9 in scm_call_n () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#11 0x00007f890bb9da0e in scm_call_with_unblocked_asyncs () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#12 0x00007f890bc2c336 in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#13 0x00007f890bc395e9 in scm_call_n () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#14 0x00007f890bc28be6 in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#15 0x00007f890bb9f85a in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#16 0x00007f88dcc8e482 in ?? ()
#17 0x00007f8903a5e7e0 in ?? ()
#18 0x00007f8901d4be30 in ?? ()
#19 0x0000000000000048 in ?? ()
#20 0x00007f890bbd6ccc in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#21 0x00007f890bc2bf3c in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#22 0x00007f890bc395e9 in scm_call_n () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#23 0x00007f890bba109a in scm_call_2 () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#24 0x00007f890bc57752 in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#25 0x00007f890bc2988f in scm_c_catch () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#26 0x00007f890bba1e66 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#27 0x00007f890bc28b39 in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#28 0x00007f890baff0ba in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /gnu/store/2lczkxbdbzh4gk7wh91bzrqrk7h5g1dl-libgc-8.0.4/lib/libgc.so.1
#29 0x00007f890bc2116d in ?? () from /gnu/store/1jgcbdzx2ss6xv59w55g3kr3x4935dfb-guile-3.0.8/lib/libguile-3.0.so.1
#30 0x00007f890bad5d7e in ?? () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libpthread.so.0
#31 0x00007f890b6d3eff in clone () from /gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33/lib/libc.so.6
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
but the backtrace doesn't help much. I can try to use Guile with symbols
to have a more detailed backtrace.
Anyone knows what could cause Guile to receive a SIGABRT signal?
Thanks,
Mathieu
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#57215; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2022 19:57:08 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 14 15:57:08 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39957 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oNJjQ-0002X4-7q
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:57:08 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35690)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNJjL-0002Wt-4a
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:57:06 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57782)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNJjK-0007IU-TY
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:57:02 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51584)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNJjK-0007Hn-Kd
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:57:02 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to:
references; bh=wR54o/ynfASqtbeMtCa/8NcxqQgnNXcUN1hCMEUYEYw=; b=GpRIpY39YOFUNQ
3c5dLkJXkeRkj6NhfTCf7jryogNB0YAxb//d52Dgklpo+yWkFXbQpPsGRAlttobGhkNMAkrq/6BmL
YAtBsbggoNuazeWv8XS/1y1t+wI1WGhUgkmYYg+gdPQKB2woL5uVA8qnhNBSGJ6WMbLHfq7/ZQM3Z
nr4hGiJK9xfXdyx8nEZY6jqhVkgUXNJ+T3kFZ+snPRScEgDUz0neXAZr5dA2ATfvdRYWgaWLtEmgV
kwSaM5tHj7IkDVrETIvhJw+kHn+L36zWw4NE2kT34OyZ2LhaDbo7ZPHFfxk3+AiGNyipGV0rIJdol
ZHXxMCibvFxdHx1oq8HA==;
Received: from 2a02-8429-81d2-3d01-94c9-8097-ea5c-2774.rev.sfr.net
([2a02:8429:81d2:3d01:94c9:8097:ea5c:2774]:58408 helo=meije)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <othacehe@HIDDEN>) id 1oNJjK-0003Cg-3o
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:57:02 -0400
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: ci: Fail to evaluate Guix specification
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 21:56:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87v8qu1tv9.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
Hello,
Since commit 0565cde, Cuirass fails to evaluate the guix
specification. The error messages do not give any clue, for instance:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/504294/log/raw.
I tried to strace an evaluation process of the guix specification, it
ends this way:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[pid 74060] write(1, "(values (value (result (((#:job-name . guix.i686-linux) (#:derivation . \"/gnu/store/ap7sixkbikfw1xib3aisbcaw6i2005m2-guix-a5f199732.drv\") (#:inputs \"/gnu/store/4mdqwn29pvjqd6hs1q842g5wzamjy3dk-module-import-compiled.drv\" \"/gnu/store/4nv9xf9qyabcw2gz9zvxlq9ymknq7wad-guix-daemon.drv\" \"/gnu/store/a6f7jk08bs6clingcw3j8kmz3cbsj6iq-guix-command.drv\" \"/gnu/store/fl7hls4j08hp45j32xjjrjc6d49qmbmy-guix-a5f199732-modules.drv\" \"/gnu/store/h9aagy9mv2bqg7b8q3k6aksi7fa20qzc-guix-manual.drv\" \"/gnu/store/iz11170b9da1i3pkjdv6314swzvzkgvk-guile-3.0.7.drv\") (#:outputs (\"out\" . \"/gnu/store/ivs9raslmb77zn0hrcza0wbv3r9lspay-guix-a5f199732\")) (#:nix-name . \"guix-a5f199732\") (#:system . \"i686-linux\") (#:max-silent-time . 3600) (#:timeout . 18000))))))\n", 737) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
[pid 74060] --- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=74060, si_uid=997} ---
[pid 74060] futex(0x7f1110e6f330, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 2147483647) = 0
[pid 74060] write(1, "(exception (arguments system-error (value \"fport_write\") (value \"~A\") (value (\"Broken pipe\")) (value (32))) (stack (#f (\"ice-9/boot-9.scm\" 1779 13)) (raise-exception (\"ice-9/boot-9.scm\" 1684 16)) (newline (#f #f #f)) (#f (\"guix/repl.scm\" 104 8)) (with-exception-handler (\"ice-9/boot-9.scm\" 1751 10)) (with-exception-handler (\"ice-9/boot-9.scm\" 1746 15)) (#f (\"guix/repl.scm\" 125 7))))\n", 385) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
[pid 74060] --- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=74060, si_uid=997} ---
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The evaluation process receives a SIGPIPE when trying to write the
evaluation result to the pipe connecting it to "cuirass register".
Thanks,
Mathieu
Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#57215; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.