GNU bug report logs - #57356
libtool-2.4.7 removed as a "duplicate"?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:43:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 57356 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 57356 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#57356; Package guix. (Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:43:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:43:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: libtool-2.4.7 removed as a "duplicate"?
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:42:03 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
In commit 5b6b731c7d8ecbae0ead1600b4cd2f70c66d51ca, the libtool-2.4.7
package was removed as a "duplicate". The commit message doesn't explain at
all why libtool 2.4.7 was being removed, or what it was a duplicate of? As
of latest master, libtool is still version 2.4.6.

Thanks.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Reply sent to Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 01 Sep 2022 13:03:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 01 Sep 2022 13:03:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 57356-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>, 57356-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57356: libtool-2.4.7 removed as a "duplicate"?
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:02:21 +0200
Hi,

Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> In commit 5b6b731c7d8ecbae0ead1600b4cd2f70c66d51ca, the libtool-2.4.7
> package was removed as a "duplicate". The commit message doesn't explain at
> all why libtool 2.4.7 was being removed, or what it was a duplicate of? As
> of latest master, libtool is still version 2.4.6.

Indeed, I think this commit was intended for ‘core-updates’, where
‘libtool’ *is* 2.4.7, and not for ‘master’.

I’m reverting it on ‘master’.  Marius, we’ll have to make sure not to
reintroduce it on the next merge into ‘core-updates’.

Thanks,
Ludo’.




Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#57356; Package guix. (Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 57356-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Michael Ford
 <fanquake <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 57356-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57356: libtool-2.4.7 removed as a "duplicate"?
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 16:35:16 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skriver:

> Hi,
>
> Michael Ford <fanquake <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> In commit 5b6b731c7d8ecbae0ead1600b4cd2f70c66d51ca, the libtool-2.4.7
>> package was removed as a "duplicate". The commit message doesn't explain at
>> all why libtool 2.4.7 was being removed, or what it was a duplicate of? As
>> of latest master, libtool is still version 2.4.6.
>
> Indeed, I think this commit was intended for ‘core-updates’, where
> ‘libtool’ *is* 2.4.7, and not for ‘master’.
>
> I’m reverting it on ‘master’.  Marius, we’ll have to make sure not to
> reintroduce it on the next merge into ‘core-updates’.

Whoops, sorry for the misunderstanding, and thanks for fixing me!  :-)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:24:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 201 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.