GNU bug report logs - #57505
29.0.50; Is loading seq.el before using it necessary?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>

Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:06:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 57505 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 57505 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#57505; Package emacs. (Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: emacs-bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 29.0.50; Is loading seq.el before using it necessary?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:04:35 +0200

Hi all,

doc/lispref/sequences.texi says this starting in line 448:

    The @file{seq.el} library provides the following additional sequence
  manipulation macros and functions, prefixed with @code{seq-}.  To use
  them, you must first load the @file{seq} library.

Is the last sentence (still?) true?  I'm not really familiar with Emacs'
startup process, but seq.el seems to be preloaded, so require'ing it
isn't necessary.  Or am I missing something?

Best, Arash
Reply sent to Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:17:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 57505-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 57505-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57505: 29.0.50; Is loading seq.el before using it necessary?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 19:16:28 +0300

> From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:04:35 +0200
> 
>     The @file{seq.el} library provides the following additional sequence
>   manipulation macros and functions, prefixed with @code{seq-}.  To use
>   them, you must first load the @file{seq} library.
> 
> Is the last sentence (still?) true?  I'm not really familiar with Emacs'
> startup process, but seq.el seems to be preloaded, so require'ing it
> isn't necessary.  Or am I missing something?

Thanks, fixed.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 207 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.