GNU logs - #57789, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 01:05:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B.16631174811959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 20:04:32 -0500
Message-ID: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.33.119.55; envelope-from=rlb@HIDDEN;
 helo=defaultvalue.org
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)


On zelenka.debian.org https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=zelenka
the build crashes with a segfault with current Debian sid (unstable).  I
can produce the crash like this:

  git clone --single-branch --branch emacs-28 .../emacs.git
  cd emacs
  ./autogen.sh
  ./configure --prefix=/home/rlb/opt/emacs-tmp --with-native-compilation
  make check

The debian package produced a similar failure earlier:

  https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=emacs&arch=s390x&ver=1%3A28.1%2B1-3&stamp=1662863442&raw=0

Here's the final bit of the clone build's log, and I'm happy to help
test on the machine if that'd be useful:

  Loading /home/rlb/emacs/lisp/electric.el (source)...
  Loading /home/rlb/emacs/lisp/paren.el (source)...
  Loading /home/rlb/emacs/lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el (source)...
  Loading /home/rlb/emacs/lisp/emacs-lisp/eldoc.el (source)...
  Loading /home/rlb/emacs/lisp/cus-start.el (source)...
  Loading /home/rlb/emacs/lisp/tooltip.el (source)...
  Loading /home/rlb/emacs/lisp/international/iso-transl.el (source)...
  Finding pointers to doc strings...
  Finding pointers to doc strings...done
  Dumping under the name bootstrap-emacs.pdmp
  Dumping fingerprint: b4b1b9ac4d82ce4537c0e1eb6527b2b7f5831cb6de31c7f9b2fd2a1a0c4531c4
  Dump complete
  Byte counts: header=100 hot=14915588 discardable=175392 cold=10410424
  Reloc counts: hot=1048047 discardable=5080
  make -C ../lisp compile-first EMACS="../src/bootstrap-emacs"
  make[2]: Entering directory '/home/rlb/emacs/lisp'
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/macroexp.elc
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/cconv.elc
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/byte-opt.elc
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/bytecomp.elc
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/comp.elc
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/comp-cstr.elc
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/cl-macs.elc
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/rx.elc
    ELC+ELN  emacs-lisp/cl-seq.elc
  Fatal error 11: Segmentation fault
  Backtrace:
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x15deb6)[0x2aa0a7ddeb6]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x4efc4)[0x2aa0a6cefc4]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x4f1fe)[0x2aa0a6cf1fe]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x15c240)[0x2aa0a7dc240]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x15c2d2)[0x2aa0a7dc2d2]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x6a47d8)[0x2aa0ad247d8]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a7de0)[0x2aa0a827de0]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a8ee6)[0x2aa0a828ee6]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a8ee6)[0x2aa0a828ee6]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a8ee6)[0x2aa0a828ee6]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a8ee6)[0x2aa0a828ee6]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a7c3e)[0x2aa0a827c3e]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a9094)[0x2aa0a829094]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x410)[0x2aa0a84cc28]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdc2e)[0x2aa0a84dc2e]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdf10)[0x2aa0a84df10]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x1b8)[0x2aa0a84c9d0]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdeb8)[0x2aa0a84deb8]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x1b8)[0x2aa0a84c9d0]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x2c4)[0x2aa0a84cadc]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cd26a)[0x2aa0a84d26a]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa0a84cd4a]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x4ba)[0x2aa0a84ccd2]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa0a84cd4a]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ce488)[0x2aa0a84e488]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa0a84cd4a]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cd8cc)[0x2aa0a84d8cc]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa0a84cd4a]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdc2e)[0x2aa0a84dc2e]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdf10)[0x2aa0a84df10]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x1b8)[0x2aa0a84c9d0]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x2c4)[0x2aa0a84cadc]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdc2e)[0x2aa0a84dc2e]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(Ffuncall+0x1f2)[0x2aa0a84a202]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cc6a4)[0x2aa0a84c6a4]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ce26c)[0x2aa0a84e26c]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x638)[0x2aa0a84ce50]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ce7ec)[0x2aa0a84e7ec]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa0a84cd4a]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdc2e)[0x2aa0a84dc2e]
  ../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdf10)[0x2aa0a84df10]
  ...
  make[2]: *** [Makefile:316: emacs-lisp/cl-seq.elc] Segmentation fault
  make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/rlb/emacs/lisp'
  make[1]: *** [Makefile:870: bootstrap-emacs.pdmp] Error 2
  make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/rlb/emacs/src'
  make: *** [Makefile:449: src] Error 2

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#57789: Acknowledgement (Emacs 28.1 clone build with native
 compilation crashes on s390x)
Message-ID: <handler.57789.B.16631174811959.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 57789
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 01:05:01 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
57789: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D57789
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:43:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166312336511374 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:42:19 +0300
Message-Id: <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Rob
 Browning on Tue, 13 Sep 2022 20:04:32 -0500)
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 20:04:32 -0500
> 
> On zelenka.debian.org https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=zelenka
> the build crashes with a segfault with current Debian sid (unstable).  I
> can produce the crash like this:
> 
>   git clone --single-branch --branch emacs-28 .../emacs.git

If you build the current emacs-28 branch, then it isn't Emacs 28.1,
it's Emacs 28.2.50, right?

>   cd emacs
>   ./autogen.sh
>   ./configure --prefix=/home/rlb/opt/emacs-tmp --with-native-compilation
>   make check
> 
> The debian package produced a similar failure earlier:
> 
>   https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=emacs&arch=s390x&ver=1%3A28.1%2B1-3&stamp=1662863442&raw=0
> 
> Here's the final bit of the clone build's log, and I'm happy to help
> test on the machine if that'd be useful:

Please run the crashing command under GDB, and when it segfaults,
produce the C-level and Lisp-level backtrace, and post them here.

Thanks.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 03:07:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166312480613908 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 22:06:41 -0500
Message-ID: <874jxairi6.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

> If you build the current emacs-28 branch, then it isn't Emacs 28.1,
> it's Emacs 28.2.50, right?

Right, sorry, the clone test was the current branch tip, and the buildd
log was for (Debian's partially altered) tree, derived from the
emacs-28.1 tag.  I can easily re-test the 28.1 tag if we like.

> Please run the crashing command under GDB, and when it segfaults,
> produce the C-level and Lisp-level backtrace, and post them here.

Will attempt.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 03:21:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166312565115317 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166312565115317
          (code B ref 57789); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 03:21:01 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2022 03:20:51 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oYIxH-0003yz-8K
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:20:51 -0400
Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:59674 ident=postfix)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1oYIxF-0003yn-6V
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:20:49 -0400
Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN)
 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87A0620343;
 Tue, 13 Sep 2022 22:20:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id B9C0D14E081; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 22:20:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <874jxairi6.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <874jxairi6.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 22:20:46 -0500
Message-ID: <871qseiqup.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:

> Will attempt.

Hmm, so I ran "make V=1" from the same tree and saw thw command that
repeatably crashed, which was:

  EMACSLOADPATH= '../src/bootstrap-emacs' -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp --eval '(setq load-prefer-newer t)'  \
    -l comp -f batch-byte+native-compile international/titdic-cnv.el

I then ran that manually via 

  (cd lisp
   && EMACSLOADPATH= '../src/bootstrap-emacs' -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp --eval '(setq load-prefer-newer t)'  \
      -l comp -f batch-byte+native-compile international/titdic-cnv.el)

which ran for a bit and succeeded.  After that a make worked fine until
bindings.el where it crashed again, this time with an "Aborted", and
running it manually didn't help.

In any case, I'm going to start over and try to get the backtraces for
the titdic-cnv.el failure.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 20:20:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166318677128626 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166318677128626
          (code B ref 57789); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 20:20:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2022 20:19:31 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56339 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oYYr3-0007Rd-VZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:19:30 -0400
Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:59676 ident=postfix)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1oYYqz-0007RR-Dx
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:19:28 -0400
Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN)
 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A003020348;
 Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:19:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 34E1C14E081; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:19:24 -0500 (CDT)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:19:24 -0500
Message-ID: <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

> Please run the crashing command under GDB, and when it segfaults,
> produce the C-level and Lisp-level backtrace, and post them here.

Starting from scratch with the emacs-28.1 commit I can reproduce the
failure when building via

  ./configure --prefix=/home/rlb/opt/emacs-tmp --with-native-compilation

It crashes with the same segfault repeatably, i.e. if you run make
again, it crashes again on the previously mentioned "... -l comp -f
batch-byte+native-compile international/titdic-cnv.el" invocation.  That
crash output is attached below.

After adjusting the Makefile.in invocation so I could run it with gdb in
exactly the same environment once it's failing on that command, I
captured the backtrace and included it below.

With respect to the Lisp-level backtrace, I imagined you probably meant
an xbacktrace?  If so (and assuming I'm guessing right about how I
should do that), I haven't figured out how to arrange sourcing the
src/.gdbinit from the src/Makefile.in command.  I'm likely doing
something wrong, but it doesn't seem to want to load the file.

It looked like it might be because there were no debug symbols, so I
tried adding a CFLAGS=-g3 to the end of the ./configure, but that caused
the crash to disappear entirely.

Finally (and this was just a random guess based on previous experiences,
particularly with programs like guile that play (normal, traditional)
tricks with pointers/coercions/etc.) I noticed that emacs doesn't
specify -fno-strict-aliasing, and unless all the C code has been written
with that in mind, I assume that might open a window allowing the
optimizer to introduce undesirable changes.  So I added a
CFLAGS=-fno-strict-aliasing to the end of the ./configure command, and
then the build and tests worked fine (twice in a row):

  ./configure --prefix=/home/rlb/opt/emacs-tmp --with-native-compilation \
    CFLAGS=-fno-strict-aliasing

Of course that's not remotely conclusive, but if all of the C code
wasn't written with strict-aliasing in mind, then I wondered if it might
make sense to consider adding -fno-strict-aliasing as a default option.

Also, even if that ends up being desirable, I'm not sure it'll be
sufficient.  That is, I suspect I might want to run the full build/check
with -fno-strict-aliasing in a loop for a bit to make sure the clean
build/check is reliable, since I think I may have seen some test crashes
(not the build crash) on one earlier run with that option, but I'm not
sure that was a clean attempt.

The make crash:


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=emacs-s390x-crash
Content-Description: emacs-s390x-crash

make[2]: Entering directory '/home/rlb/emacs/lisp'
EMACSLOADPATH= '../src/bootstrap-emacs' -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp --eval '(setq load-prefer-newer t)'  \
-l comp -f batch-byte+native-compile international/titdic-cnv.el
Fatal error 11: Segmentation fault
Backtrace:
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x15deb6)[0x2aa293ddeb6]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x4efc4)[0x2aa292cefc4]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x4f1fe)[0x2aa292cf1fe]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x15c240)[0x2aa293dc240]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x15c2d2)[0x2aa293dc2d2]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x6a47d8)[0x2aa299247d8]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a7fa8)[0x2aa29427fa8]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a8ee6)[0x2aa29428ee6]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a8ee6)[0x2aa29428ee6]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a8ee6)[0x2aa29428ee6]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a7c3e)[0x2aa29427c3e]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1a9094)[0x2aa29429094]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(Ffuncall+0x2de)[0x2aa2944a2ee]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ca42c)[0x2aa2944a42c]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1f0c72)[0x2aa29470c72]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1f7fb0)[0x2aa29477fb0]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1f8474)[0x2aa29478474]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x5e4)[0x2aa2944cdfc]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ce488)[0x2aa2944e488]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa2944cd4a]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ce488)[0x2aa2944e488]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa2944cd4a]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ce8cc)[0x2aa2944e8cc]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa2944cd4a]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ce488)[0x2aa2944e488]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa2944cd4a]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cd824)[0x2aa2944d824]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(eval_sub+0x532)[0x2aa2944cd4a]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1cdc2e)[0x2aa2944dc2e]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(Ffuncall+0x1f2)[0x2aa2944a202]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1ca4b0)[0x2aa2944a4b0]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1f90e4)[0x2aa294790e4]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1f9462)[0x2aa29479462]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(+0x1c9ef0)[0x2aa29449ef0]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(Ffuncall+0x182)[0x2aa2944a192]
/home/rlb/emacs/native-lisp/28.2-87d45215/comp-7672a6ed-ac6bcf4e.eln(F636f6d702d2d6e61746976652d636f6d70696c65_comp__native_compile_0+0x804)[0x3ff91d6b0d4]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(Ffuncall+0x23e)[0x2aa2944a24e]
/home/rlb/emacs/native-lisp/28.2-87d45215/comp-7672a6ed-ac6bcf4e.eln(F62617463682d6e61746976652d636f6d70696c65_batch_native_compile_0+0x1d2)[0x3ff91d6c592]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(Ffuncall+0x23e)[0x2aa2944a24e]
/home/rlb/emacs/native-lisp/28.2-87d45215/comp-7672a6ed-ac6bcf4e.eln(F62617463682d627974652b6e61746976652d636f6d70696c65_batch_bytenative_compile_0+0x108)[0x3ff91d6c728]
../src/bootstrap-emacs(Ffuncall+0x23e)[0x2aa2944a24e]
...
make[2]: *** [Makefile:321: international/titdic-cnv.elc] Segmentation fault
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/rlb/emacs/lisp'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:845: ../lisp/loaddefs.el] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/rlb/emacs/src'
make: *** [Makefile:449: src] Error 2

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


The gdb backtrace:


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=emacs-s390x-backtrace
Content-Description: emacs-s390x-backtrace

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
mark_object (arg=<optimized out>) at alloc.c:6809
6809            if (symbol_marked_p (ptr))
(gdb) backtrace
#0  mark_object (arg=<optimized out>) at alloc.c:6809
#1  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa00ac54a8) at alloc.c:6607
#2  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa00ac54a0) at alloc.c:6382
#3  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa007f4ca8) at alloc.c:6607
#4  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa007f4ca0) at alloc.c:6382
#5  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa007c3b10) at alloc.c:6607
#6  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa007c3b08) at alloc.c:6382
#7  0x000002aa001a7c3e in visit_static_gc_roots (visitor=...) at alloc.c:5926
#8  0x000002aa001a9094 in garbage_collect () at alloc.c:6132
#9  0x000002aa001a9d0c in maybe_garbage_collect () at alloc.c:6045
#10 0x000002aa001ca2ee in maybe_gc () at lisp.h:5142
#11 Ffuncall (nargs=nargs@entry=3, args=args@entry=0x3ffffffa6a0) at eval.c:3007
#12 0x000002aa001ca42c in call2 (fn=fn@entry=0x155f3675830, arg1=arg1@entry=0x2aa00a75e43, arg2=arg2@entry=0x0) at eval.c:2890
#13 0x000002aa001f0c72 in readevalloop_eager_expand_eval (val=val@entry=0x2aa00a75e43, macroexpand=macroexpand@entry=0x155f3675830) at lread.c:2133
#14 0x000002aa001f7fb0 in readevalloop (readcharfun=readcharfun@entry=0x2aa00aa27b5, infile0=<optimized out>, 
    infile0@entry=0x0, sourcename=sourcename@entry=0x2aa00a7fff4, printflag=printflag@entry=false, unibyte=unibyte@entry=0x0, readfun=0x0, start=0x0, end=<optimized out>) at lread.c:2324
#15 0x000002aa001f8474 in Feval_buffer (buffer=<optimized out>, printflag=0x0, filename=0x2aa00a7fff4, unibyte=0x0, do_allow_print=<optimized out>) at lread.c:2397
#16 0x000002aa001ccdfc in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2512
#17 0x000002aa001ce488 in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#18 Flet (args=0x3b) at eval.c:1051
#19 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#20 0x000002aa001ce488 in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#21 Flet (args=0x36) at eval.c:1051
#22 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#23 0x000002aa001ce8cc in Funwind_protect (args=0x3fff3cf7f0b) at lisp.h:1420
#24 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#25 0x000002aa001ce488 in Fprogn (body=0x3fff3cf7d6b) at eval.c:465
#26 Flet (args=0x2d) at eval.c:1051
#27 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#28 0x000002aa001cd824 in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#29 Fif (args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:421
#30 Fif (args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:407
#31 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#32 0x000002aa001cdc2e in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#33 funcall_lambda (fun=0x3fff3cf7c9b, nargs=nargs@entry=4, arg_vector=arg_vector@entry=0x3ffffffb650) at eval.c:3305
#34 0x000002aa001ca202 in Ffuncall (nargs=nargs@entry=5, args=args@entry=0x3ffffffb648) at eval.c:3039
#35 0x000002aa001ca4b0 in call4 (fn=<optimized out>, arg1=arg1@entry=0x2aa00a7fff4, arg2=arg2@entry=0x2aa00a7fff4, arg3=arg3@entry=0x0, arg4=arg4@entry=0x30) at eval.c:2905
#36 0x000002aa001f90e4 in Fload (file=file@entry=0x3fff362bcbc, noerror=noerror@entry=0x0, nomessage=nomessage@entry=0x30, nosuffix=nosuffix@entry=0x0, must_suffix=<optimized out>, 
    must_suffix@entry=0x30) at lread.c:1473
#37 0x000002aa001f9462 in save_match_data_load (file=0x3fff362bcbc, noerror=noerror@entry=0x0, nomessage=nomessage@entry=0x30, nosuffix=nosuffix@entry=0x0, must_suffix=must_suffix@entry=0x30)
    at lread.c:1629
#38 0x000002aa001c9ef0 in Fautoload_do_load (fundef=0x3fff362bc4b, funname=funname@entry=0x155f2f7a340, macro_only=macro_only@entry=0x0) at eval.c:2295
#39 0x000002aa001ca192 in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x3ffffffbba0) at eval.c:3042
#40 0x000003fff306b0d4 in F636f6d702d2d6e61746976652d636f6d70696c65_comp__native_compile_0 () at /home/rlb/emacs/native-lisp/28.2-87d45215/comp-7672a6ed-ac6bcf4e.eln
#41 0x000002aa001ca24e in Ffuncall (nargs=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at lisp.h:2110
#42 0x000003fff306c592 in F62617463682d6e61746976652d636f6d70696c65_batch_native_compile_0 () at /home/rlb/emacs/native-lisp/28.2-87d45215/comp-7672a6ed-ac6bcf4e.eln
#43 0x000002aa001ca24e in Ffuncall (nargs=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at lisp.h:2110
#44 0x000003fff306c728 in F62617463682d627974652b6e61746976652d636f6d70696c65_batch_bytenative_compile_0 () at /home/rlb/emacs/native-lisp/28.2-87d45215/comp-7672a6ed-ac6bcf4e.eln
#45 0x000002aa001ca24e in Ffuncall (nargs=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at lisp.h:2110
#46 0x000002aa001ccfc4 in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2470
#47 0x000002aa001cd824 in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#48 Fif (args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:421
#49 Fif (args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:407
#50 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#51 0x000002aa001cd8cc in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#52 Fcond (args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:445
#53 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#54 0x000002aa001ce732 in Fprogn (body=0x3fff36e1b43) at eval.c:465
#55 FletX (args=0x3fff36e1b03) at eval.c:983
#56 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#57 0x000002aa001cd6ae in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#58 prog_ignore (body=<optimized out>) at eval.c:476
#59 Fwhile (args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:1072
#60 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#61 0x000002aa001ce732 in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#62 FletX (args=0x3fff36e1a83) at eval.c:983
#63 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#64 0x000002aa001cd1d6 in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#65 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#66 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#67 0x000002aa001ce488 in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#68 Flet (args=0x12) at eval.c:1051
#69 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#70 0x000002aa001ce488 in Fprogn (body=0x3fff35d3a73) at eval.c:465
#71 Flet (args=0xe) at eval.c:1051
#72 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#73 0x000002aa001cdc2e in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#74 funcall_lambda (fun=0x3fff35d39e3, fun@entry=0x3fff35d39d3, nargs=nargs@entry=1, arg_vector=arg_vector@entry=0x3ffffffd280) at eval.c:3305
#75 0x000002aa001cdf10 in apply_lambda (fun=fun@entry=0x3fff35d39d3, args=<optimized out>, count=2929176661299, count@entry=15) at eval.c:3172
#76 0x000002aa001cc9d0 in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2575
#77 0x000002aa001ce488 in Fprogn (body=0x3fff37a209b) at eval.c:465
#78 Flet (args=0x8) at eval.c:1051
#79 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#80 0x000002aa001cdc2e in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#81 funcall_lambda (fun=0x3fff37a1e7b, fun@entry=0x3fff37a1e6b, nargs=nargs@entry=0, arg_vector=arg_vector@entry=0x3ffffffd740) at eval.c:3305
#82 0x000002aa001cdf10 in apply_lambda (fun=fun@entry=0x3fff37a1e6b, args=<optimized out>, count=2929176221524, count@entry=11) at eval.c:3172
#83 0x000002aa001cc9d0 in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2575
#84 0x000002aa001ce8cc in Funwind_protect (args=0x3fff380e7a3) at lisp.h:1420
#85 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#86 0x000002aa001ce488 in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#87 Flet (args=0x3ffffffe658) at eval.c:1051
#88 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#89 0x000002aa001cd824 in Fprogn (body=0x3fff380e233) at eval.c:465
#90 Fif (args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:421
#91 Fif (args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:407
#92 0x000002aa001ccd4a in eval_sub (form=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2451
#93 0x000002aa001cdc2e in Fprogn (body=0x0) at eval.c:465
#94 funcall_lambda (fun=0x3fff380e0e3, fun@entry=0x3fff380e0d3, nargs=nargs@entry=0, arg_vector=arg_vector@entry=0x3ffffffdf88) at eval.c:3305
#95 0x000002aa001cdf10 in apply_lambda (fun=fun@entry=0x3fff380e0d3, args=<optimized out>, count=4398046502696, count@entry=4) at eval.c:3172
#96 0x000002aa001cc9d0 in eval_sub (form=form@entry=0x3fff3f3ef1b) at eval.c:2575
#97 0x000002aa001cee52 in Feval (form=0x3fff3f3ef1b, lexical=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2327
#98 0x000002aa001c8fb6 in internal_condition_case (bfun=bfun@entry=0x2aa00142860 <top_level_2>, handlers=handlers@entry=0x90, hfun=hfun@entry=0x2aa00148ca8 <cmd_error>) at eval.c:1450
#99 0x000002aa001435d2 in top_level_1 (ignore=ignore@entry=0x0) at keyboard.c:1150
#100 0x000002aa001c8ed4 in internal_catch (tag=tag@entry=0xe850, func=func@entry=0x2aa001435a0 <top_level_1>, arg=arg@entry=0x0) at eval.c:1181
#101 0x000002aa001427e0 in command_loop () at keyboard.c:1110
#102 0x000002aa001487bc in recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:720
#103 0x000002aa00148bcc in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:803
#104 0x000002aa00051d7a in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x3ffffffea28) at emacs.c:2358

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

--=-=-=--

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 20:22:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166318690428879 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166318690428879
          (code B ref 57789); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 20:22:01 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2022 20:21:44 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56343 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oYYtE-0007Vi-5t
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:21:44 -0400
Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:59678 ident=postfix)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1oYYtC-0007Vb-7G
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:21:42 -0400
Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN)
 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C045520348;
 Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:21:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 42FF114E081; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:21:41 -0500 (CDT)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:21:41 -0500
Message-ID: <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:

> Starting from scratch with the emacs-28.1 commit I can reproduce the
> failure when building via

Oops, meant the emacs-28.2 commit for all of that testing.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:12:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.16632258805590 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>, Andrea Corallo <akrl@HIDDEN>, Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.16632258805590
          (code B ref 57789); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:12:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2022 07:11:20 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56857 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oYj1r-0001S6-ET
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 03:11:19 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39304)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1oYj1o-0001Rp-Kb
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 03:11:18 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37310)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oYj1i-0001sG-Bx; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 03:11:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=et/s5qPu1g+PcpPDTSg+zOkk5vJVkQkUT/i5mTSr5FU=; b=SW5L6nzEkRSc
 UUrgY0wpTGDSPZWcJcHjQZMsWVSdSejdUyORC50se1+HBaQo4egf28sNbGVxIH/vnTJjsdiCIGU5O
 q10NVkWxP58Ub9TO0AxkhFU25OrRkDimEtPmDOHO9xaknlpO6QPHK1QRLBa7xrcCegfot7I4u0VYs
 F1ukXrIPekIsuVf4exEWE7+KxdKx/9VKh4Logg+1T9j7l7rSItWat3dqGMT/iOL+bm+sAKWhtsVgU
 j7hYO9BX2SxbcDPJdcz5lBw7mfOIxKtYOFGC9LomOBMHvZBvbVfOvpKlmP+46t3KUnoc3pfh24qC5
 A+JFKluf4Ab+1R7KWk8M+A==;
Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2798 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oYj1h-0000M8-2B; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 03:11:09 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:10:59 +0300
Message-Id: <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Rob
 Browning on Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:19:24 -0500)
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
> Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:19:24 -0500
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
> 
> > Please run the crashing command under GDB, and when it segfaults,
> > produce the C-level and Lisp-level backtrace, and post them here.
> 
> Starting from scratch with the emacs-28.1 commit I can reproduce the
> failure when building via
> 
>   ./configure --prefix=/home/rlb/opt/emacs-tmp --with-native-compilation
> 
> It crashes with the same segfault repeatably, i.e. if you run make
> again, it crashes again on the previously mentioned "... -l comp -f
> batch-byte+native-compile international/titdic-cnv.el" invocation.  That
> crash output is attached below.
> 
> After adjusting the Makefile.in invocation so I could run it with gdb in
> exactly the same environment once it's failing on that command, I
> captured the backtrace and included it below.

Thanks.  The backtrace indicates that the crash is in GC.  This
probably means we have some fundamental problem on that architecture.
Andrea, any advice for how to investigate?

Does the build of the same code with the same options sans
"--with-native-compilation" succeed, or does it also crash with
similar symptoms?  If the build without native-compilation succeeds,
my first question would be how mature and stable is libgccjit on that
platform?  Perhaps take this up with the GCC's libgccjit developers.

> With respect to the Lisp-level backtrace, I imagined you probably meant
> an xbacktrace?  If so (and assuming I'm guessing right about how I
> should do that), I haven't figured out how to arrange sourcing the
> src/.gdbinit from the src/Makefile.in command.

You can source it manually from the GDB prompt, when the segfault
happens, and then invoke xbacktrace manually, can't you?

> It looked like it might be because there were no debug symbols, so I
> tried adding a CFLAGS=-g3 to the end of the ./configure, but that caused
> the crash to disappear entirely.

Too bad, it means we have a heisenbug on our hands, which will make it
even harder to debug (as if debugging crashes in GC were not hard
enough already).

What happens if you modify this variable:

  (defcustom native-comp-debug (if (eq 'windows-nt system-type) 1 0)

to have the value 1 or even zero, and then rebuild from scratch? does
the build succeed then?

> Finally (and this was just a random guess based on previous experiences,
> particularly with programs like guile that play (normal, traditional)
> tricks with pointers/coercions/etc.) I noticed that emacs doesn't
> specify -fno-strict-aliasing, and unless all the C code has been written
> with that in mind, I assume that might open a window allowing the
> optimizer to introduce undesirable changes.  So I added a
> CFLAGS=-fno-strict-aliasing to the end of the ./configure command, and
> then the build and tests worked fine (twice in a row):
> 
>   ./configure --prefix=/home/rlb/opt/emacs-tmp --with-native-compilation \
>     CFLAGS=-fno-strict-aliasing
> 
> Of course that's not remotely conclusive, but if all of the C code
> wasn't written with strict-aliasing in mind, then I wondered if it might
> make sense to consider adding -fno-strict-aliasing as a default option.

I don't know enough about this.  Perhaps Andrea or Paul could comment.

> Also, even if that ends up being desirable, I'm not sure it'll be
> sufficient.  That is, I suspect I might want to run the full build/check
> with -fno-strict-aliasing in a loop for a bit to make sure the clean
> build/check is reliable, since I think I may have seen some test crashes
> (not the build crash) on one earlier run with that option, but I'm not
> sure that was a clean attempt.

Yes, running the full test suite would be the logical next step.

> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> mark_object (arg=<optimized out>) at alloc.c:6809
> 6809            if (symbol_marked_p (ptr))
> (gdb) backtrace
> #0  mark_object (arg=<optimized out>) at alloc.c:6809

Any idea what cause SIGSEGV here?  Was 'ptr' an invalid pointer for
some reason, and if so, what exactly makes it invalid?

Thanks.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:53:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166325352615730 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>, Andrea Corallo <akrl@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166325352615730
          (code B ref 57789); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:53:01 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2022 14:52:06 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58861 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oYqDm-00045d-CS
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:52:06 -0400
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:40048)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>) id 1oYqDh-00043U-DD
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:52:04 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2ED160073;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)
 with ESMTP id SiRBPfZ4WIn0; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309EC160075;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 zimbra.cs.ucla.edu 309EC160075
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu;
 s=78364E5A-2AF3-11ED-87FA-8298ECA2D365; t=1663253515;
 bh=gmOFL9kkkWKenkTmRuAimUzGvL3ax6vjCw6yfoMTL1Y=;
 h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding;
 b=NC614LSIv/C9KOL1rB31JPLlYPO9+CbsCuWSQOmlWs4s48DMlRCQhEo6jmY95xKC+
 HTVxsB/LHMOipGyfiwhZktAH9ElsTneqsCvGFcUtRET+jK1X34AdikHq6ibbMIymwO
 WO7uf9L4aMUBwC8Ep3gpMk3HBRt4hDsRfHC7Y8l8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id DYT8xVTHUHAo; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.205] (ip72-206-2-24.fv.ks.cox.net [72.206.2.24])
 by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDE68160073;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <020828f9-c137-e584-89a5-f1ad0c38df9c@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:51:54 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN> <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

On 9/15/22 02:10, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Of course that's not remotely conclusive, but if all of the C code
>> wasn't written with strict-aliasing in mind, then I wondered if it might
>> make sense to consider adding -fno-strict-aliasing as a default option.
> I don't know enough about this.  Perhaps Andrea or Paul could comment.
>
Throwing -fno-strict-aliasing in the mix is a bit like throwing -O1 into 
the mix. I'm not surprised it would cause a Heisenbug to vanish; it 
doesn't mean strict aliasing is the problem.

Emacs should work with strict aliasing. At least, that's true in the 
default build. I suppose it could be possible there's a strict aliasing 
bug in the native compiler - I'm not that familiar with that code.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:27:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166325921726244 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, Andrea Corallo <akrl@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166325921726244
          (code B ref 57789); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:27:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2022 16:26:57 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oYrhY-0006pE-TU
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:26:57 -0400
Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:59680 ident=postfix)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1oYrhV-0006p3-8W
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:26:55 -0400
Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN)
 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B0A3203B5;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:26:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id E723114E081; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:26:51 -0500 (CDT)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <020828f9-c137-e584-89a5-f1ad0c38df9c@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <020828f9-c137-e584-89a5-f1ad0c38df9c@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:26:51 -0500
Message-ID: <87h718had0.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> writes:

> Throwing -fno-strict-aliasing in the mix is a bit like throwing -O1 into 
> the mix. I'm not surprised it would cause a Heisenbug to vanish; it 
> doesn't mean strict aliasing is the problem.

Agreed.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 06:05:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.16633082574523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.16633082574523
          (code B ref 57789); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 06:05:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2022 06:04:17 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41271 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZ4SX-0001At-I6
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 02:04:17 -0400
Received: from mail-ej1-f42.google.com ([209.85.218.42]:45708)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>) id 1oZ4ST-0001Ac-Su
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 02:04:16 -0400
Received: by mail-ej1-f42.google.com with SMTP id dv25so46983978ejb.12
 for <57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 23:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date;
 bh=700qDJZwJ4Ifn9qLzLoCOkpVJS1deirLm4c7cENYKog=;
 b=USkx/dPTJA3b3ur18RO/Ptkmzl/U2HH5x8y9flBjBuXpjYneOgs038kDVegiO0BJN+
 bvXpvakQwGj5JvlUikfH7IIoyni3OFDBZJddKw+y5Gk8A6r51sxTtMcznS7v8lQUB+Ru
 3FhZqqyvHWdvNAwwJmrvCTouNAN6ZJzpF5iPQmfHytaO/3/SwKUGdFCd0ve7o2EGuPYU
 8wgsu497faa/UPT2QcVtSLS/J9qfy1Qx0sl3wfz/w46N+KQUPmElv5onLrN8pljtRr65
 isSil8N73KCofUhCxLb/fTT9X94Ss5GdnpfIzCq+dYBbHbntUzr/XLfZuXQxLgDtEgNA
 73jw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date;
 bh=700qDJZwJ4Ifn9qLzLoCOkpVJS1deirLm4c7cENYKog=;
 b=AFhPjoML7mROSmDU9enwwDMFAoB+0upEgm204fVzXzWkNP4obAooSt67XeASonUfkd
 jbGWsw5dglS49bJ7kt3l2m+HdGbUoO0nmMcWVLqicd1CCUIs/09TEm0sN2kHDt45FvFs
 tLc0dHLyxbKxMyKy33KI/MU1KqJhfAshqNmqH3TDn5s7WaM/d4lz8/tEINMLwdfY6X09
 t9j4297z1Pf0wu18qZrzfqZZc0nhOB0frzCswZdNpJ6MDCNC7MF8D+IZ1piAsln+Rvin
 Ox4aCaqTvhAdOB56YR/dS10etiBLwYsoibTDWaI2+i2z5A1KTTCeWngfHF5mc06Baj5P
 Wv3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0BIlX6AqzH/IZSYs7atPTxu3sJGMQCW+9XZPAQ4giPtjys/48B
 T+BIApkKg845OSL44kdD8m6vRwtCZ2swXg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4+Mxuv+zLLaBd5uckqw3K3Sv12ZzFlPFFpKW2C3xAO5UVNfPPU61lqof4C+Ym+aLzh2gCPiQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7e8c:b0:77d:fecf:c24a with SMTP id
 qb12-20020a1709077e8c00b0077dfecfc24amr2477397ejc.134.1663308247573; 
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 23:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mini.fritz.box (pd9e36af3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de.
 [217.227.106.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 2-20020a170906210200b00730979f568fsm10020832ejt.150.2022.09.15.23.04.06
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 23:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN> (Rob Browning's message
 of "Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:21:41 -0500")
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:04:06 +0200
Message-ID: <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:

> Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Starting from scratch with the emacs-28.1 commit I can reproduce the
>> failure when building via
>
> Oops, meant the emacs-28.2 commit for all of that testing.

Looking at Rob's backtrace, 

#0  mark_object (arg=<optimized out>) at alloc.c:6809
#1  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa00ac54a8) at alloc.c:6607
#2  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa00ac54a0) at alloc.c:6382
#3  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa007f4ca8) at alloc.c:6607
#4  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa007f4ca0) at alloc.c:6382
#5  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa007c3b10) at alloc.c:6607
#6  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa007c3b08) at alloc.c:6382
#7  0x000002aa001a7c3e in visit_static_gc_roots (visitor=...) at alloc.c:5926

and seeing frame#7, would it be a way forward to determine which
staticpro (I assume it is a staticpro) that is?  Maybe that can give a
clue which one can then use together with a bisect, perhaps?

WDYT?

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:40:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166331759120345 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166331759120345
          (code B ref 57789); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:40:01 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2022 08:39:51 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZ6t4-0005I5-VD
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 04:39:51 -0400
Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:58799)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <akrl@HIDDEN>) id 1oZ6t2-0005Hv-85
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 04:39:49 -0400
Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33])
 by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 28G8dZX5027378
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO);
 Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:39:36 GMT
From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 15 Sep
 2022 10:10:59 +0300")
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN> <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:39:35 +0000
Message-ID: <xjfzgezbtmg.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

>> From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
>> Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:19:24 -0500
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
>> 
>> > Please run the crashing command under GDB, and when it segfaults,
>> > produce the C-level and Lisp-level backtrace, and post them here.
>> 
>> Starting from scratch with the emacs-28.1 commit I can reproduce the
>> failure when building via
>> 
>>   ./configure --prefix=/home/rlb/opt/emacs-tmp --with-native-compilation
>> 
>> It crashes with the same segfault repeatably, i.e. if you run make
>> again, it crashes again on the previously mentioned "... -l comp -f
>> batch-byte+native-compile international/titdic-cnv.el" invocation.  That
>> crash output is attached below.
>> 
>> After adjusting the Makefile.in invocation so I could run it with gdb in
>> exactly the same environment once it's failing on that command, I
>> captured the backtrace and included it below.
>
> Thanks.  The backtrace indicates that the crash is in GC.  This
> probably means we have some fundamental problem on that architecture.
> Andrea, any advice for how to investigate?

Mmmh one cheap way to maybe gather more info is to have a run under
valgrind.

Other than that I typically start debugging with GDB and possibly
rr. Like what is (or was) the object the GC is crashing on?  Why?
What's the last piece of code that touched it? Why?  IIUC here we have
no debug symbols so this makes it very difficult.

BTW the fact that -g has an impact on the crash is very odd

  Andrea

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:44:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166331782120717 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166331782120717
          (code B ref 57789); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:44:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2022 08:43:41 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZ6wn-0005O5-KE
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 04:43:41 -0400
Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:58407)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <akrl@HIDDEN>) id 1oZ6wl-0005Nx-9R
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 04:43:39 -0400
Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33])
 by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 28G8hbp5000340
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO);
 Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:43:38 GMT
From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <020828f9-c137-e584-89a5-f1ad0c38df9c@HIDDEN> (Paul Eggert's
 message of "Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:51:54 -0500")
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN> <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <020828f9-c137-e584-89a5-f1ad0c38df9c@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:43:37 +0000
Message-ID: <xjfsfkrbtfq.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> writes:

> On 9/15/22 02:10, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Of course that's not remotely conclusive, but if all of the C code
>>> wasn't written with strict-aliasing in mind, then I wondered if it might
>>> make sense to consider adding -fno-strict-aliasing as a default option.
>> I don't know enough about this.  Perhaps Andrea or Paul could comment.
>>
> Throwing -fno-strict-aliasing in the mix is a bit like throwing -O1
> into the mix. I'm not surprised it would cause a Heisenbug to vanish;
> it doesn't mean strict aliasing is the problem.

Hi Paul,

totally agree with you.  The fact that even -g has an impact here
clearly shows that initial conditions are not necessary directly
connected with the final symptom we observe.

Best Regards

  Andrea

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 21:01:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166344842116344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, Andrea Corallo <akrl@HIDDEN>, Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166344842116344
          (code B ref 57789); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 21:01:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2022 21:00:21 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZevF-0004FX-4y
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:00:21 -0400
Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:59682 ident=postfix)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1oZevC-0004FJ-9Q
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:00:20 -0400
Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN)
 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 819AE2015F;
 Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:00:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 1D36414E081; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:00:17 -0500 (CDT)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83wna5yuws.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:00:17 -0500
Message-ID: <87wna1k97i.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)


Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

> Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:

> Does the build of the same code with the same options sans
> "--with-native-compilation" succeed, or does it also crash with
> similar symptoms?

Works fine.

> You can source it manually from the GDB prompt, when the segfault
> happens, and then invoke xbacktrace manually, can't you?

Yep.

  Breakpoint 1 at 0x2aa0004ef30: file emacs.c, line 400.
  Breakpoint 2 at 0x2aa0010f168: file xterm.c, line 10291.
  (gdb) xbacktrace
  "Automatic GC" (0x0)
  "internal-macroexpand-for-load" (0xffffa6a8)
  "eval-buffer" (0xffffaa28)
  "let" (0xffffac10)
  "let" (0xffffae28)
  "unwind-protect" (0xffffaff0)
  "let" (0xffffb1f8)
  "if" (0xffffb3c8)
  "load-with-code-conversion" (0xffffb650)
  "time-since" (0xffffbba8)
  "comp--native-compile" (0xffffbd38)
  "batch-native-compile" (0xffffbef0)
  "batch-byte+native-compile" (0xffffc080)
  "funcall" (0xffffc078)
  "if" (0xffffc268)
  "cond" (0xffffc438)
  "let*" (0xffffc618)
  "while" (0xffffc7e8)
  "let*" (0xffffc9c8)
  "progn" (0xffffcb98)
  "if" (0xffffccc0)
  "let" (0xffffceb8)
  "let" (0xffffd0b0)
  "command-line-1" (0xffffd280)
  "let" (0xffffd570)
  "command-line" (0xffffd740)
  "unwind-protect" (0xffffd9f0)
  "let" (0xffffdbe8)
  "if" (0xffffddb8)
  "normal-top-level" (0xffffdf88)

> Too bad, it means we have a heisenbug on our hands, which will make it
> even harder to debug (as if debugging crashes in GC were not hard
> enough already).
>
> What happens if you modify this variable:
>
>   (defcustom native-comp-debug (if (eq 'windows-nt system-type) 1 0)
>
> to have the value 1 or even zero, and then rebuild from scratch? does
> the build succeed then?

No, appears to crash in the same way.

> Yes, running the full test suite would be the logical next step.

Oh, I had run it, I just meant that I'd likely want to double-check via
testing in a loop to try to see if it might be an intermittent failure.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 21:05:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166344867416758 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166344867416758
          (code B ref 57789); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 21:05:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2022 21:04:34 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47268 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZezK-0004MD-DD
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:04:34 -0400
Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:59684 ident=postfix)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1oZezI-0004M6-Nk
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:04:33 -0400
Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN)
 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A7392015F;
 Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:04:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 0C18114E081; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:04:32 -0500 (CDT)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN> <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:04:31 -0500
Message-ID: <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Gerd M=C3=B6llmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN> writes:

> Looking at Rob's backtrace,=20
>
> #0  mark_object (arg=3D<optimized out>) at alloc.c:6809
> #1  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=3D<optimized out>, obj=3D0x2aa0=
0ac54a8) at alloc.c:6607
> #2  mark_vectorlike (header=3D0x2aa00ac54a0) at alloc.c:6382
> #3  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=3D<optimized out>, obj=3D0x2aa0=
07f4ca8) at alloc.c:6607
> #4  mark_vectorlike (header=3D0x2aa007f4ca0) at alloc.c:6382
> #5  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=3D<optimized out>, obj=3D0x2aa0=
07c3b10) at alloc.c:6607
> #6  mark_vectorlike (header=3D0x2aa007c3b08) at alloc.c:6382
> #7  0x000002aa001a7c3e in visit_static_gc_roots (visitor=3D...) at alloc.=
c:5926
>
> and seeing frame#7, would it be a way forward to determine which
> staticpro (I assume it is a staticpro) that is?  Maybe that can give a
> clue which one can then use together with a bisect, perhaps?

Not completely sure I followed, but moving up to that frame and printing
visitor didn't work: "optimized out".

--=20
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:23:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166347857716216 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166347857716216
          (code B ref 57789); Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:23:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2022 05:22:57 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZmlc-0004DU-OK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:22:57 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com ([209.85.221.47]:41827)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>) id 1oZmlb-0004DH-D3
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:22:55 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id t14so42201717wrx.8
 for <57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date;
 bh=2oOVIV1aAkUOVpaY9FcVlfS9FuQMCM3odg9T0xaTz9c=;
 b=AC+LWRbcLRLo5R9Vgy9Nu+DR4KDtP4BhxA5LSjVdJqj2ht32jy8Wjd8m05/LzskvEh
 7HUr/7woqQDiUXhiDqLKfDYGzK6/YZEBwQOs4BCzjRBbB2QTnaE8ceJCYf7I8fZv5gqD
 UojJZTJWKFZ5BySurwkpLHZn5AVlyGvs4lEujdhWH15NZOyg42fuj+h5weukYuU782aM
 nlt4gcLRaS0k42HtYr+NkBTKpB23oHumXkZiJ8+W2qKw/qUDOTmX9Jw+mo5Aoeg5Llb4
 E/+8c7XN6vp7tgF+BQC+SbP2MJQ2dLNsg99NvS90z8cALAmF1RuVJ8+5eNl4yvAOFK77
 jx6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date
 :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from
 :to:cc:subject:date;
 bh=2oOVIV1aAkUOVpaY9FcVlfS9FuQMCM3odg9T0xaTz9c=;
 b=gO3ik1Qbn9sVf9PQLhgWUNgCzrztNa3ukz8JW1POog9ag1hAmVN3a1vfU1s+OUVae/
 TdQp8vPOok0Xp991mWhZdROBdWFAjKKfoWon/GAfSF20crmwWU3G3jCIZ0tKsOAaLNEe
 6YYl88ZeRDabqF0ZlwNiNNiAi4Ix94c3ny/XFtIC287VqlxiVZfm90uiM1+JTfhWfiQ+
 IX8EuVLr3ma17vg+z6YIAnl4XVf3XdrgsSYGshcKhz0mvwef4UyZrAT22qq1aSwT84GG
 TNkOfsxbWX9+BTpn5Na52XY2PPjH79nXOezhctUbALJQ/BqHM27T/dl7H8UCv+6IC75N
 H3JQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0AZkCakyCwKCFG1kOGdKKYon/OPb4xhXV0jiQmGVMsBORp5R18
 E/5LYRxGofoGYb/PrD9A5u/7okNOdjZdWA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5QUYHhlBSU3cvXem20TvRq+Roh4HpqxArQ0edUFFWMBY6RxZyFhOtSdh72FZykRcfzI+BUlA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:178e:b0:22a:d7be:3878 with SMTP id
 e14-20020a056000178e00b0022ad7be3878mr7307328wrg.91.1663478567818; 
 Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mini.fritz.box (pd9e3614c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.97.76])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 g3-20020a056000118300b00228c375d81bsm1510099wrx.2.2022.09.17.22.22.46
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN> (Rob Browning's message
 of "Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:04:31 -0500")
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 07:22:45 +0200
Message-ID: <m2a66xxnmi.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:

> Gerd M=C3=B6llmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Looking at Rob's backtrace,=20
>>
>> #0  mark_object (arg=3D<optimized out>) at alloc.c:6809
>> #1  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=3D<optimized out>, obj=3D0x2aa=
00ac54a8) at alloc.c:6607
>> #2  mark_vectorlike (header=3D0x2aa00ac54a0) at alloc.c:6382
>> #3  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=3D<optimized out>, obj=3D0x2aa=
007f4ca8) at alloc.c:6607
>> #4  mark_vectorlike (header=3D0x2aa007f4ca0) at alloc.c:6382
>> #5  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=3D<optimized out>, obj=3D0x2aa=
007c3b10) at alloc.c:6607
>> #6  mark_vectorlike (header=3D0x2aa007c3b08) at alloc.c:6382
>> #7  0x000002aa001a7c3e in visit_static_gc_roots (visitor=3D...) at alloc=
.c:5926
>>
>> and seeing frame#7, would it be a way forward to determine which
>> staticpro (I assume it is a staticpro) that is?  Maybe that can give a
>> clue which one can then use together with a bisect, perhaps?
>
> Not completely sure I followed, but moving up to that frame and printing
> visitor didn't work: "optimized out".

Sorry, I thought another Emacs developer would chime in, when I wrote
that.

Let me try to explain what I'm after.  Frame#7, the call to
visit_static_gc_roots shows that we are at the very beginning of a GC,
recursively marking everything that we know must survice the GC.

void
visit_static_gc_roots (struct gc_root_visitor visitor)
{
  visit_buffer_root (visitor,
                     &buffer_defaults,
                     GC_ROOT_BUFFER_LOCAL_DEFAULT);
  visit_buffer_root (visitor,
                     &buffer_local_symbols,
                     GC_ROOT_BUFFER_LOCAL_NAME);

  for (int i =3D 0; i < ARRAYELTS (lispsym); i++)
    {
      Lisp_Object sptr =3D builtin_lisp_symbol (i);
      visitor.visit (&sptr, GC_ROOT_C_SYMBOL, visitor.data);
    }

  for (int i =3D 0; i < staticidx; i++)
    visitor.visit (staticvec[i], GC_ROOT_STATICPRO, visitor.data);
}

First interesting thing would be where in this function we are when the
crash happens.  I was assuming it is somewhere in the last for-loop, for
reasons, but that doesn't have to be the case.

If I'm right, we are currently in the process of marking Lisp objects
referenced from C variables that are known to contains Lisp objects.
Such variables are added to staticvec with a call to staticpro.  That's
what the staticpro in my last mail menat.

But let's first see where in visit_... we are.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:34:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166347920317568 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Cc: gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN, 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166347920317568
          (code B ref 57789); Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:34:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2022 05:33:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZmvj-0004ZG-4j
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:33:23 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45070)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1oZmvg-0004Z2-Mg
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:33:21 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58056)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oZmvb-0004TI-3x; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:33:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=b68E7V5jy2XPMw/ClKFd2lSlem/y/SYeq8GJXR+KmFo=; b=kkOAnx/ZlU2PtJQ4EIVu
 eZnqvFYXyg4Jw+h1SpAG6qLDdk4t3tkFBVcSXB8Vl26CKD8yp1utKInx6dhiBRnb4e9lMsgtCAYVZ
 DCGYYoouUaPBjjDwuM6BH0mKswmzoxMaYx0b9aaG9JFRLO6EfA03R7XE/seyruG2ZfSL1JpUxfOfi
 nsoPrWZI5ptEC6NKYKvhP2hF/ZCvUnzQ5taZcJBKM/YBLl13rCDbnxQ2uBfydn5qYdMKSnJnBH8qg
 gDJHPShlUXJeL0rdp/Aezz6Bs2Wd5WzELufk4aoxkQf7L9n5MDYa42VBuFUqK4iCX6jU8f4EMd2Px
 sjcvR64BwZjkkQ==;
Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2809 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oZmvT-0003RN-Gy; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:33:14 -0400
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:33:08 +0300
Message-Id: <83pmftz1pn.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Rob
 Browning on Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:04:31 -0500)
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN> <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>, 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:04:31 -0500
> 
> Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN> writes:
> 
> > Looking at Rob's backtrace, 
> >
> > #0  mark_object (arg=<optimized out>) at alloc.c:6809
> > #1  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa00ac54a8) at alloc.c:6607
> > #2  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa00ac54a0) at alloc.c:6382
> > #3  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa007f4ca8) at alloc.c:6607
> > #4  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa007f4ca0) at alloc.c:6382
> > #5  0x000002aa001a8ee6 in mark_objects (n=<optimized out>, obj=0x2aa007c3b10) at alloc.c:6607
> > #6  mark_vectorlike (header=0x2aa007c3b08) at alloc.c:6382
> > #7  0x000002aa001a7c3e in visit_static_gc_roots (visitor=...) at alloc.c:5926
> >
> > and seeing frame#7, would it be a way forward to determine which
> > staticpro (I assume it is a staticpro) that is?  Maybe that can give a
> > clue which one can then use together with a bisect, perhaps?
> 
> Not completely sure I followed, but moving up to that frame and printing
> visitor didn't work: "optimized out".

The code where this happens is this:

  for (int i = 0; i < staticidx; i++)
    visitor.visit (staticvec[i], GC_ROOT_STATICPRO, visitor.data);

So one way of knowing which staticpro is being handled here is to see
what is the value of 'i' and look at staticvec[i].  I'm guessing that
'i' is also "optimized out", though, so 2 possible ways forward:

  . disassemble visit_static_gc_roots, find in which register or where
    on the stack or in memory is 'i; or staticvec[i] stored, and go
    from there; or
  . add a printf to the above loop to show the value of 'i', and
    re-run the build, fingers crossed, hoping that the additional
    printf won't make the crash go away.

Once you know which staticpro is being processed here, we'd need to
examine its contents and try to figure out which parts cause the crash
in GC.

Thanks.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:50:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166348015019171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rlb@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166348015019171
          (code B ref 57789); Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:50:01 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2022 05:49:10 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZnAz-0004z8-N1
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:49:09 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46614)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1oZnAx-0004yt-CB
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:49:07 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59080)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oZnAr-0006Ll-Tt; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:49:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=wJax2u9ZiHg6ydtTf3H2dkcqECGVc0cR3+m99EKaQDc=; b=hSfv5qSiwlgmXGfGANTd
 AxxKTgtDeymrxKUjjH8wnAETukG+aLB48pWuVBkGBnDdU8qsqml1S9P2pieEQDTwGmNqF6q+IAFGm
 dQcLnif8RK+vHoqpqqeh3+vyrUy4+GaPr0249cgo+fiHuRny/hKEmzBWGDCrF2g4ts6EVNukpD9El
 Bn0DcFzEqlsOGFGoeIipPYarRiUQQXQTgEJb/VH2o9KYkcUXV+ExfNbvlGYGpHZCcrQcMkRtEIOKT
 Pd0Ar5kvOy83SWifMlEJjOIgVcB1m+hUOpAgOAv0a3QrU/JvXRaoqVlXqjVMTQasgTBnn4vsR8mNy
 hEzFAov7S8InmQ==;
Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3793 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1oZnAr-0001QM-CO; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:49:01 -0400
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:49:02 +0300
Message-Id: <83k061z0z5.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <m2a66xxnmi.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Gerd
 =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Sun, 18 Sep 2022 07:22:45 +0200)
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN> <m2a66xxnmi.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>,  57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 07:22:45 +0200
> 
> But let's first see where in visit_... we are.

I think the backtrace tells that, if you look at the sources from the
emacs-28 branch.  See my other message.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:56:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.166348053320544 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rlb@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.166348053320544
          (code B ref 57789); Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:56:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2022 05:55:33 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oZnHA-0005LI-RW
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:55:33 -0400
Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:46662)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>) id 1oZnH6-0005L3-JH
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2022 01:55:32 -0400
Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id bj12so57639253ejb.13
 for <57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to
 :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
 :from:to:cc:subject:date;
 bh=AA2HgF2bwW5ifZi2ngptfxt8ydlZ4tbY1fEBvUtdE5o=;
 b=o3lcNeFLY2jdhXR73ryjdSr15yTbbXSDf0oBys+/FYeXPVUUIwTsnYDSDFrt6NkECn
 2nQZZZXzmDSJ8LLnhViMsjv8WfsiJWx4crlyH78WteQu+Q+hBjV59t54J56p/Upv1qwR
 Bcs25hwU2Ybh8Fda+/BEvbWH4gVHAr+SGpEnf/fqBJ5JJoPuEOz0vCKuiRcxPtO2INYB
 FuKPazQemgpwoMkjnR9L7K2KT6o9AVRZR7TZgHtMgoeVmCPxe9BcfPDdGaAEgXZpi+w/
 Dtmc4bSgR6zw5imZwjUkfkDspfIgL9QLc6QIeLU7Qyj0f+XkCk3M8f6QhO3NEXn203V2
 PgXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to
 :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date;
 bh=AA2HgF2bwW5ifZi2ngptfxt8ydlZ4tbY1fEBvUtdE5o=;
 b=lx2vriFyfXvLj2ZzZpMxROB3+2lOw6m+XymgMiGs8tEumeAzLwBY03dNDKlk6/g2nY
 2pBMOkexGjsBfmA7/Iyzys0DMpRX/oC+xiG+/PqBU5oGZJ5m1VkmD0yuoiZKLWL9XYfG
 OqPk572AFAkVjdZ/mmRnNZK2j6Iw8MWnirF5XRu0WRrLWTzUKQDtv2+bqjilczYVlCa0
 YLKErvmYaaPivSh7b/XOIVc3TfAF1VgkDbeEQGJC9LlFiPGhbSZ/OJLODei7vjKQKyOc
 aYDi3PGLFnGamxrpJ2inoON4JyqGkHcaEfC3H/HIsePQED9CZutBtg+p7/Y8VzvI0WZQ
 oLnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf31UL2/9CLvB4Z0HZTS3X4zctgtoJ+ZdZ18h4BPdMnyvh/th6om
 CwaK9noKJRzQ3rkBreIrd1c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM70/s7e0fbY3LpZYSi/RuXwXnP8ZKA9x8VnOks84+Z8pz6vsYB83cionOvrYpdFYboorwwTbA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:75c5:b0:77a:fd9f:12d1 with SMTP id
 jl5-20020a17090775c500b0077afd9f12d1mr8550329ejc.82.1663480522727; 
 Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pd9e3614c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de.
 [217.227.97.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 se28-20020a170906ce5c00b00730b3bdd8d7sm13439364ejb.179.2022.09.17.22.55.21
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d8771915-4bdd-fc21-3542-1d694609ba0f@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 07:55:19 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN> <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN> <m2a66xxnmi.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83k061z0z5.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <83k061z0z5.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)

On 22-09-18 7:49 , Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>,  57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 07:22:45 +0200
>>
>> But let's first see where in visit_... we are.
> 
> I think the backtrace tells that, if you look at the sources from the
> emacs-28 branch.  See my other message.

Ah, right, visit_buffer_root.  EINSUFFICIENTCOFFEE.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 21:07:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.16640535731096 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN, 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.16640535731096
          (code B ref 57789); Sat, 24 Sep 2022 21:07:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2022 21:06:13 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45368 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ocCLl-0000Hc-0i
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 17:06:13 -0400
Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:59686 ident=postfix)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ocCLf-0000HR-TE
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0400
Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN)
 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E764820616;
 Sat, 24 Sep 2022 16:06:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 6F7E914E081; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 16:06:06 -0500 (CDT)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <83pmftz1pn.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN> <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN> <83pmftz1pn.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 16:06:06 -0500
Message-ID: <871qs0trcx.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

> Once you know which staticpro is being processed here, we'd need to
> examine its contents and try to figure out which parts cause the crash
> in GC.

Thanks, and I'll try to look in to this further when I have time.  For
now I'm changing the debian packages to avoid native compilation on some
architectures (currently mips64el[1] and s390x).

[1] There ./configure fails at the moment with "Error: -march=mips1 is
    not compatible with the selected ABI" when testing libgccjit.
    That's on eller.debian.org (mipsel host in a mips64el schroot).

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:16:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.168617254822368 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Cc: gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN, 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.168617254822368
          (code B ref 57789); Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:16:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jun 2023 21:15:48 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1q70VP-0005oi-VR
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 17:15:48 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35212)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <acorallo@HIDDEN>) id 1q70VO-0005oV-Kl
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 17:15:47 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <acorallo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1q70VI-0005Sp-2k; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 17:15:40 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:
 From; bh=MYPYHCtYb4cUTzRL5Pu+niYraTwtcF7F5uTC6udcw6A=; b=c4H30gEE7cCMgpdUEhZM
 nuKn4Q/GYb7BkNAt8B3SZWlNr54qmxPNGtzgP5ymaGmPGUsGNFi076q/t4ESyWUxi+j9TYGArOS9+
 3lp/hmiiURTZBSp4LB9OHwwemp8SdDfd9oL8zyw+PTgRh4Hs91hmO9kVTM6p+P7SoiXDnq4nnfgen
 pR03WC4CGtJHfNBmnllia64QgJphrvlzphRiUXPuhPHO95Gm1j2RYnOKZbrZUHQaOWsKFa0Z5Mul9
 cebPgi5fe5pLSZAITPJG5y/4CujQstD/pUBCABCVMMDPdgKbijk1HIY9CZZgczoic1PkLiG7U4d6n
 06rMUdoZrhNqzg==;
Received: from acorallo by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <acorallo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1q70VG-0001Iu-CW; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 17:15:38 -0400
From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <871qs0trcx.fsf@HIDDEN> (Rob Browning's message
 of "Sat, 24 Sep 2022 16:06:06 -0500")
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN> <83pmftz1pn.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <871qs0trcx.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 17:15:38 -0400
Message-ID: <yp1pm679dol.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Once you know which staticpro is being processed here, we'd need to
>> examine its contents and try to figure out which parts cause the crash
>> in GC.
>
> Thanks, and I'll try to look in to this further when I have time.  For
> now I'm changing the debian packages to avoid native compilation on some
> architectures (currently mips64el[1] and s390x).
>
> [1] There ./configure fails at the moment with "Error: -march=mips1 is
>     not compatible with the selected ABI" when testing libgccjit.
>     That's on eller.debian.org (mipsel host in a mips64el schroot).

Hi Rob,

any progress with this investigation?  Is the bug still reproducible
with a recent codebase?

Thanks

  Andrea

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes on s390x
Resent-From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:09:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.57789.B57789.169445570814468 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57789
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@HIDDEN>, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Cc: gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN, 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 57789-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B57789.169445570814468
          (code B ref 57789); Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:09:02 +0000
Received: (at 57789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2023 18:08:28 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54747 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1qflKl-0003lH-G1
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:08:27 -0400
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::232]:50308)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1qflKi-0003kv-C9
 for 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:08:25 -0400
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id
 38308e7fff4ca-2bcc14ea414so78053161fa.0
 for <57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694455694; x=1695060494; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=H20Bs0hmhwoPTWQfYakzvnWXAcTa/UNotYpiKUmG3k4=;
 b=KnWDSzQgNh4+NE884KVPNBbfSXMnvRdtUJPpu2ZOQc1dIEVa8HjamkK593Re4dfX7k
 3GtXLgUl4sHF73OqNjsXA1bPB5DncGwili7/DHMt7SE7qoozVL7dDnLtN8ToWV7KnVu7
 uuZKenTDWZ93yjOtBSsCmjat6ABMaJ4EVkTdMrI4VfaqOu08yZVabEvn/ea8CGfqp7Cx
 MQ5taFG9LPlaWO3otBe4ax45yeMXtAUJs3n21fKRG5Fpjj4F7qSLF0WksyPFZQaCqxx3
 R+6paTHAnRlQE8LAVefSWKyz432UARKKbkW+HpD69hkoAXWT75MSldjFv1Cg9Yo0wcmq
 vJ+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694455694; x=1695060494;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=H20Bs0hmhwoPTWQfYakzvnWXAcTa/UNotYpiKUmG3k4=;
 b=GqgYsmKGmAy/sCcJOc2ttIBZkEDBcaOVfn5dGVmaH+07bhp93g5Vm6bN8ueUsReVZq
 HdhSnaF4BAzOr7X7n0DKOvuVJxStQbGi5aaIDcGCiHSD8Xyub3J7zRIIyfOApsaJrCA5
 4ZVXHWUiEaIJHP9fpHDAOdA/Vb3QF7RJnZNx6GpjLTKGXiESwJrAtKXvDbgpG0dpt26+
 Bc+mGacdONZHMr5Amf79BviMBdbc7Ye3f/G9Wn3wQBv02mRQ1P5UPIJ1Mhv7O8kG0XRW
 dklCxxN6Bm4n4yP9UGRICq++rtmqDOwIloW8iPNveCWojJSGWBiriBTO9B1lxi+V5YTL
 YMZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx17W+c8Ji9+DTNITc8pXuZN4WpUV4RqhUEpkPUPmRbfCU0Wf8f
 i+XaagXaVD+i7bo9Hm9q7qP6R3QclocdgQNhgZQQ/ymA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE9pJwpwWdGpv2qr0fOJSMP8C+8aAd9DpE53n2PbMLDKMW45p3qXsOX5BWZdmGVjzuMv8xzXzSq2ht2ZKQcOtg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9987:0:b0:2bb:c212:5589 with SMTP id
 w7-20020a2e9987000000b002bbc2125589mr8436764lji.17.1694455693978; Mon, 11 Sep
 2023 11:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:08:13 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <yp1pm679dol.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83pmftz1pn.fsf@HIDDEN> <871qs0trcx.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <yp1pm679dol.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:08:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkmkfHjoZUReHNqx6s6xq0ORy8q6wqJQdVWydD=shBWRNuQ@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

tags 57789 + moreinfo
thanks

Andrea Corallo <acorallo@HIDDEN> writes:

> Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> Once you know which staticpro is being processed here, we'd need to
>>> examine its contents and try to figure out which parts cause the crash
>>> in GC.
>>
>> Thanks, and I'll try to look in to this further when I have time.  For
>> now I'm changing the debian packages to avoid native compilation on some
>> architectures (currently mips64el[1] and s390x).
>>
>> [1] There ./configure fails at the moment with "Error: -march=mips1 is
>>     not compatible with the selected ABI" when testing libgccjit.
>>     That's on eller.debian.org (mipsel host in a mips64el schroot).
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> any progress with this investigation?  Is the bug still reproducible
> with a recent codebase?

Ping.  Rob, any updates here?

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2023 18:08:28 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 11 14:08:28 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1qflKl-0003lJ-Rp
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:08:28 -0400
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::132]:50309)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1qflKi-0003kx-Df
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:08:25 -0400
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id
 2adb3069b0e04-5007abb15e9so8082282e87.0
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694455694; x=1695060494; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=H20Bs0hmhwoPTWQfYakzvnWXAcTa/UNotYpiKUmG3k4=;
 b=KnWDSzQgNh4+NE884KVPNBbfSXMnvRdtUJPpu2ZOQc1dIEVa8HjamkK593Re4dfX7k
 3GtXLgUl4sHF73OqNjsXA1bPB5DncGwili7/DHMt7SE7qoozVL7dDnLtN8ToWV7KnVu7
 uuZKenTDWZ93yjOtBSsCmjat6ABMaJ4EVkTdMrI4VfaqOu08yZVabEvn/ea8CGfqp7Cx
 MQ5taFG9LPlaWO3otBe4ax45yeMXtAUJs3n21fKRG5Fpjj4F7qSLF0WksyPFZQaCqxx3
 R+6paTHAnRlQE8LAVefSWKyz432UARKKbkW+HpD69hkoAXWT75MSldjFv1Cg9Yo0wcmq
 vJ+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694455694; x=1695060494;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=H20Bs0hmhwoPTWQfYakzvnWXAcTa/UNotYpiKUmG3k4=;
 b=LRB/dPgOaK7Zfhc7PohfRfu5KiR0wO79FQMoBbTlDePa6fTWbMKFEJbiVahT3XEsgn
 jACvWRV14jAD2uUVYG+u6eRpnGtJB6Tob8zner02fc2OuEr4lL74NuzXmxu3OF8jba9E
 U3OjggX3c0uVvMxkz8IO29q2fMJ9tTqn5txko0R6p+2RfIm4L88tYbZNjYOzaAryh/+1
 aa6m3KYp7bRECTONKg+29UsdBugc8T9kZK5Yn7sdXJtOYudzqTyS4evRJD3SCIT92NUM
 IUD4wQHCzOVSMQBy9I4AnwxAHYbtRrnIciM70BdJh4iZWDtNgGot1XWRIpJNOJh52VYK
 axYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzAuxBdTsZ5fV3q4NopjDq0TCqP0sms4o7jVT6Mim/oJhi+r9z0
 mitpJ9NKFpSiH/A/a9hqRLSNMupdttJt0sWRmEM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE9pJwpwWdGpv2qr0fOJSMP8C+8aAd9DpE53n2PbMLDKMW45p3qXsOX5BWZdmGVjzuMv8xzXzSq2ht2ZKQcOtg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9987:0:b0:2bb:c212:5589 with SMTP id
 w7-20020a2e9987000000b002bbc2125589mr8436764lji.17.1694455693978; Mon, 11 Sep
 2023 11:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:08:13 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <yp1pm679dol.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87h71aix5r.fsf@HIDDEN> <83tu5a3cdw.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87pmfxhfoz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <87mtb1hfl6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <m2y1ujlusp.fsf@HIDDEN> <87tu55k90g.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <83pmftz1pn.fsf@HIDDEN> <871qs0trcx.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <yp1pm679dol.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:08:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkmkfHjoZUReHNqx6s6xq0ORy8q6wqJQdVWydD=shBWRNuQ@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#57789: Emacs 28.1 clone build with native compilation crashes
 on s390x
To: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@HIDDEN>, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Bcc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: gerd.moellmann@HIDDEN, 57789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

tags 57789 + moreinfo
thanks

Andrea Corallo <acorallo@HIDDEN> writes:

> Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> Once you know which staticpro is being processed here, we'd need to
>>> examine its contents and try to figure out which parts cause the crash
>>> in GC.
>>
>> Thanks, and I'll try to look in to this further when I have time.  For
>> now I'm changing the debian packages to avoid native compilation on some
>> architectures (currently mips64el[1] and s390x).
>>
>> [1] There ./configure fails at the moment with "Error: -march=mips1 is
>>     not compatible with the selected ABI" when testing libgccjit.
>>     That's on eller.debian.org (mipsel host in a mips64el schroot).
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> any progress with this investigation?  Is the bug still reproducible
> with a recent codebase?

Ping.  Rob, any updates here?

Last modified: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:15:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.