GNU bug report logs - #58119
29.0.50; Is gnus-coding.texi worth keeping around?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:17:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 29.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 58119 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 58119 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#58119; Package emacs. (Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 29.0.50; Is gnus-coding.texi worth keeping around?
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:16:31 -0400
Severity: wishlist

Is gnus-coding.texi worth keeping around?

Perhaps the bits and pieces of useful information there should be moved
elsewhere, where it is more discoverable, and the file removed.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#58119; Package emacs. (Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:33:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 58119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 58119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#58119: 29.0.50; Is gnus-coding.texi worth keeping around?
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:31:57 +0200
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Is gnus-coding.texi worth keeping around?
>
> Perhaps the bits and pieces of useful information there should be moved
> elsewhere, where it is more discoverable, and the file removed.

I didn't see anything of any value in that file, so I've now removed it.




bug marked as fixed in version 29.1, send any further explanations to 58119 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:33:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:24:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 154 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.