GNU bug report logs -
#58719
core-updates: Build failure for file on i686-linux
Previous Next
Reported by: Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:04:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 58719 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 58719 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58719
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:04:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 22 Oct 2022 16:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Trying to build 'wine-minimal for x86-64 on core-updates, the following error is hit while building 'file for i686-linux:
/tmp/guix-build-file-5.42.drv-0/file-5.42/src/.libs/file: symbol lookup error: /gnu/store/wb8f0ydwl7458ixgsmx65x5ni54c7zgk-glibc-mesboot-2.16.0/lib/libpthread.so.0: undefined symbol: h_errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE
make[2]: *** [Makefile:857: magic.mgc] Error 127
make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-file-5.42.drv-0/file-5.42/magic'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:462: all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-file-5.42.drv-0/file-5.42'
make: *** [Makefile:371: all] Error 2
The build failure can be easily reproduced with `./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux file`, and I have bisected the failure on core-updates to commit 25b30622b4a77cd4b2965b9d62fa310a22413d54 "gnu: glibc: Update to 2.35.".
I suspect this may be causing many i686 failures on core-updates since `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l file` reports 7732 packages that would have to be built to ensure 16065 dependent packages are rebuilt.
Cheers,
Kaelyn
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58719
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 12 Feb 2023 18:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 58719 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
As a bit of followup, this bug still exists with the latest core-updates commit. This not only affects i686 systems, but also some x86_64 packages like wine/wine64 which require a 32-bit build in addition to a 64-bit one.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58719
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 17 Dec 2023 22:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 58719 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com> writes:
> As a bit of followup, this bug still exists with the latest
> core-updates commit. This not only affects i686 systems, but also some
> x86_64 packages like wine/wine64 which require a 32-bit build in
> addition to a 64-bit one.
Is this problem known upstream? If not, we should forward it to them.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#58719
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:47:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 58719 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Maxim,
On Sunday, December 17th, 2023 at 2:15 PM, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Kaelyn kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com writes:
>
> > As a bit of followup, this bug still exists with the latest
> > core-updates commit. This not only affects i686 systems, but also some
> > x86_64 packages like wine/wine64 which require a 32-bit build in
> > addition to a 64-bit one.
>
>
> Is this problem known upstream? If not, we should forward it to them.
Thank you for the follow-up. I'm fairly certain this bug is outdated and can be closed now (it was from a previous iteration of core-updates). I don't remember what fixed it (possibly the update of file from 5.42 to 5.44), but the issue did get resolved by the time core-updates was merged and I haven't run into issues building wine since then.
Cheers,
Kaelyn
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Maxim
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 58719-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com> writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Sunday, December 17th, 2023 at 2:15 PM, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Kaelyn kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com writes:
>>
>> > As a bit of followup, this bug still exists with the latest
>> > core-updates commit. This not only affects i686 systems, but also some
>> > x86_64 packages like wine/wine64 which require a 32-bit build in
>> > addition to a 64-bit one.
>>
>>
>> Is this problem known upstream? If not, we should forward it to them.
>
> Thank you for the follow-up. I'm fairly certain this bug is outdated
> and can be closed now (it was from a previous iteration of
> core-updates). I don't remember what fixed it (possibly the update of
> file from 5.42 to 5.44), but the issue did get resolved by the time
> core-updates was merged and I haven't run into issues building wine
> since then.
Excellent, thanks for the reply. I'm closing this report by replying in
CC to 58719-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org :-).
--
Thanks,
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 112 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.