GNU bug report logs -
#59844
[PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add bugroff license.
Previous Next
Reported by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:37:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 59844 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 59844 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59844
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 05 Dec 2022 20:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 05 Dec 2022 20:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Guixers,
This Common Lisp package mentions a license that we don't have:
https://github.com/fare/fare-csv/search?q=bugroff
Should we add it?
all best,
jgart
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59844
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 05 Dec 2022 21:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 59844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
[Apologies for the previous half-mail sent in unforgivable error.]
Hi,
The author mentions a 'no-restrictions BSD' licence in addition to
[0]. Could they mean 0BSD? We could just use that. It's in
Guix.
jgart via Guix-patches via 写道:
> Should we add it?
Bizarrely, Debian did[1][2]. Debian is not our touchstone, but
it's an excellent smoke test.
What they were smoking when they added that is not clear to me.
A quick search turned up only packages ‘dual’-licenced under
another, actual licence that explicitly grants the required
rights.
In such cases, presumably the joke licence is moot: the real one
does all the work of not getting people sued.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]: http://tunes.org/legalese/bugroff.html
[1]: https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59844
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 59844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm (cl-fare-csv, ecl-fare-csv, sbcl-fare-csv):
New variables.
Hi Tobias,
Thanks for the review. v2 changes the license to bsd-2 but I'm waiting on
the author who might or might not change the license to MIT or Apache 2:
https://github.com/fare/fare-csv/issues/4
all best,
jgart
---
gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
index 57becbe994..4468722740 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
@@ -6601,6 +6601,36 @@ (define-public cl-metabang-bind
(define-public ecl-metabang-bind
(sbcl-package->ecl-package sbcl-metabang-bind))
+(define-public sbcl-fare-csv
+ (let ((commit "39fcada5db2899af172454899ff13a07c62ebdb9")
+ (revision "0"))
+ (package
+ (name "sbcl-fare-csv")
+ (version (git-version "1.0.1" revision commit))
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/fare/fare-csv")
+ (commit commit)))
+ (file-name (git-file-name name version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32 "09iq4mfvqlgfcj8gazdwr8y03jrh10aa2y847sz46wdnr2bkys00"))))
+ (build-system asdf-build-system/sbcl)
+ (native-inputs (list sbcl-hu.dwim.stefil))
+ (home-page "https://fare-csv.github.io/fare-csv")
+ (synopsis "Robust CSV parser and printer")
+ (description "Robust CSV parser and printer that tries to follow the
+fine print of de facto standards. It can be configured to choose which
+standard exactly.")
+ (license license:bsd-2))))
+
+(define-public cl-fare-csv
+ (sbcl-package->cl-source-package sbcl-fare-csv))
+
+(define-public ecl-fare-csv
+ (sbcl-package->ecl-package sbcl-fare-csv))
+
(define-public sbcl-fare-utils
(let ((commit "66e9c6f1499140bc00ccc22febf2aa528cbb5724")
(revision "1"))
--
2.38.1
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59844
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 06 Dec 2022 19:02:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 59844 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm (cl-fare-csv, ecl-fare-csv, sbcl-fare-csv):
New variables.
Hi, here is v3.
I updated to use the MIT license and I chose to use the gitlab source repo.
Let me know if all looks good to you or if I should send a v4.
all best,
jgart
---
gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
index 57becbe994..a6fdbf9b3c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
@@ -6601,6 +6601,36 @@ (define-public cl-metabang-bind
(define-public ecl-metabang-bind
(sbcl-package->ecl-package sbcl-metabang-bind))
+(define-public sbcl-fare-csv
+ (let ((commit "f877a238dcbf587a89359cccf2128919a94a348c")
+ (revision "0"))
+ (package
+ (name "sbcl-fare-csv")
+ (version (git-version "1.0.4" revision commit))
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/frideau/fare-csv")
+ (commit commit)))
+ (file-name (git-file-name name version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32 "0k3mf968w94m4yff1k2jh7xlnpsm016qs4448bvklacjrr72vk8x"))))
+ (build-system asdf-build-system/sbcl)
+ (native-inputs (list sbcl-hu.dwim.stefil))
+ (home-page "https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/frideau/fare-csv/")
+ (synopsis "Robust CSV parser and printer")
+ (description "Robust CSV parser and printer that tries to follow the
+fine print of de facto standards. It can be configured to choose which
+standard exactly.")
+ (license license:expat))))
+
+(define-public cl-fare-csv
+ (sbcl-package->cl-source-package sbcl-fare-csv))
+
+(define-public ecl-fare-csv
+ (sbcl-package->ecl-package sbcl-fare-csv))
+
(define-public sbcl-fare-utils
(let ((commit "66e9c6f1499140bc00ccc22febf2aa528cbb5724")
(revision "1"))
--
2.38.1
Reply sent
to
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 59844-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Patch pushed as 911b0a54514384195331ff6e89163a63b5c2c308.
Thanks.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 09 Jan 2023 12:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 108 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.