GNU bug report logs - #59987
Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph tests failing

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 59987 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 59987 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andrew Patterson <andrewpatt7 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph tests failing
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 01:36:59 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

The `guix` package currently fails to build.  Looking at the build 
log, this is because some tests in tests/graph.scm fail, and the 
actual test log complains about a wrong arg type to 
scm_to_utf8_stringn for both failing tests.  I did recently have a 
transient `guix pull` issue with a similar error, but guix is now 
functioning as usual.

Both the build log and tests/graph.scm test log are attached below

[Message part 2 (text/plain, attachment)]

[Message part 3 (text/plain, attachment)]

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

-- 
Andrew Patterson

Message #8 received at 59987 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Andrew Patterson <andrewpatt7 <at> gmail.com>, 59987 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59987: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph
 tests failing
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 18:25:53 +0100

Hi,

On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 01:36, Andrew Patterson <andrewpatt7 <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> The `guix` package currently fails to build.  Looking at the build 
> log, this is because some tests in tests/graph.scm fail, and the 
> actual test log complains about a wrong arg type to 
> scm_to_utf8_stringn for both failing tests.  I did recently have a 
> transient `guix pull` issue with a similar error, but guix is now 
> functioning as usual.

Thanks for the report.  I have not seen this error about
tests/graph.scm.

Are you running plain “make check” or do you pass an argument as “make
check -j 123”?


Cheers,
simon

Message #11 received at 59987 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andrew Patterson <andrewpatt7 <at> gmail.com>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 59987 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59987: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph
 tests failing
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:38:56 -0500

guix has been building fine recently, so either it's something 
unpredictable or it was inadvertently fixed at some point.  Feel 
free to close the bug report unless you want to hunt down what 
actually happened.

> Are you running plain “make check” or do you pass an argument as 
> “make
> check -j 123”?
The build error was from `guix build guix`, so make check was 
running with whatever that calls it with.  In case it's relevant, 
the build error was on a pinebook pro, so 6-core aarch64.

Otherwise, the issue hasn't resurfaced and it's been a month, so 
the original report and attached build log are gonna be about as 
good a source of information as what I remember.

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew Patterson

Message #14 received at 59987 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Andrew Patterson <andrewpatt7 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 59987 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59987: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph
 tests failing
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 12:39:43 +0100

Hi,

On jeu., 26 janv. 2023 at 16:38, Andrew Patterson <andrewpatt7 <at> gmail.com> wrote:

>> Are you running plain “make check” or do you pass an argument as 
>> “make
>> check -j 123”?
>
> The build error was from `guix build guix`, so make check was 
> running with whatever that calls it with.  In case it's relevant, 
> the build error was on a pinebook pro, so 6-core aarch64.

Well, for reproducing, the usual requirements are your Guix revision
(guix describe) when you see the issue.  Also the architecture and if it
cross-compiled (--target=aarch64-linux-gnu) from which host, often help.

I am in favour of closing if no objection.

Cheers,
simon

Message #17 received at 59987 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andrew Patterson <andrewpatt7 <at> gmail.com>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 59987 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59987: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph
 tests failing
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 17:05:42 -0500

I'm also in favor of closing.  (I'm pretty sure I've garbage 
collected the closest generation to it, anyways).

Thanks for the help!
-- 
Andrew Patterson

Message #22 received at 59987-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Andrew Patterson <andrewpatt7 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 59987-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#59987: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph
 tests failing
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:00:38 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Andrew Patterson 写道：
> I'm also in favor of closing.

Done!

You can close any bug yourself by editing the reply address in the 
CC header, as I did here.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.