Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2023 17:16:25 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 17 12:16:25 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pT4LQ-0008UY-Oa for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:16:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47]:42604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1pT4LH-0008TX-Cb for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:16:15 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id ja15-20020a05600c556f00b003dc52fed235so1340411wmb.1 for <60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:16:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1676654170; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=I67xM01vTFpMEDeDPVthB69R0d11ruPtx2SCdAAQt9o=; b=H66Ogim0KxXeR4KFx6LGi3IVYroVFmCw4ALT1bNaS5Y3/18jC4GMMeWVLUXI5baSqu fIH8K4X/5jQ3fuOxWot6lwmdO1VoSDMhaGMNdMznb7OjRA4271oiuyPf7qwvkvhRCTxZ vBmGUbkDow7KBm5Z5HJDEIAjnACM8OtyxzrxkMFqSNKsJZHKxeQXCRJ85SzmgyBOm+Hq LG41qunn9wfm5PZMal/T5t+QBwBHM4wIRNhOzLiueeBqDK3o8S9DF06NHWw56ZOyTpjR w2ftETb3JOMWwj3PaPtB6rrO5+9gSrJkAV5UEaBJGAidAnmn9Jw8q0tH/JTDhw7xXW1A 0dVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1676654170; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=I67xM01vTFpMEDeDPVthB69R0d11ruPtx2SCdAAQt9o=; b=TlCOQw01wVTCVhj3Brj2mfs0KkGgG1mi3vyG+FweM7i7IcqBzsez+JMJNZRFu6OUn0 dTRf6jTl3k8s9S7Op5Uo2hFoAzT+pFjTu4b44hAylhxouFh6CT8lNeGj2hqh3qFdeUHE 7KxrgjfYnKCrhjngrjPdw/Gn7LI4Be1YNspLTPkixB6+iE+Q6EqdFimJxqoaXnqUoO7Q AbOmwQOG3Vwjh0wjkmapxVQ83zbvBhwvjaziSypUxN2KyllfaszXoLkBzRVqzqGeQEq0 obLQmxc0eZfaPtzT1naPsRh/ZJu08PM2yA5lH+FuXfUAShQF+wxXRTktVhqqwGAjRou+ t4nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXiTrlZ1xc/+yuOlA7JbYBXwcaa1SAV1eKj5wQaxP/5C0GtFfLa 3GPD+aNQkxwGLGFm4FhlXiv5Gk71P4w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8VRq8iI7w3D69DdqenxYHh+pn6lc4xEXG0AVl/Hcl1snH96cQI7yKkimBMgSQx6uO2r6Ytug== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd08:0:b0:3e2:1d9d:f10 with SMTP id f8-20020a7bcd08000000b003e21d9d0f10mr3008727wmj.4.1676654169855; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:16:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o3-20020a1c7503000000b003e20fa01a86sm5711171wmc.13.2023.02.17.09.16.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:16:09 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> Subject: open branches with target merge dates (was Re: [bug#60042] [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.0.) In-Reply-To: <871qonzcc2.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CA+3U0ZmV=50kpOgRGwKnjFA2471O9duKdTJrqdLOZAiQJjeuWQ@HIDDEN> <871qonzcc2.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:55:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87pma8477q.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On dim., 25 d=C3=A9c. 2022 at 17:18, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wr= ote: > Yes, I agree. I once proposed adding a web page that would list open > branches with target merge dates: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49334 > > Perhaps it=E2=80=99s time to pick it up? The difficulty here will be to = honor > the time windows. Does this proposal still make sense in the frame of feature branch as discussed in <https://yhetil.org/guix/Y+Tk0OKTyKKDqqlm@jurong>? Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2023 16:46:22 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 11:46:21 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36032 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pL5OH-00050O-Ja for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:46:21 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:40922) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1pL5OF-00050C-Qh for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:46:20 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id r2so2378315wrv.7 for <60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 08:46:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=rbGI1namFQztlz+fxD5Sg0ohPqR33znFSZZMi0441gM=; b=EZZ8s0OFJ7f1iK2XiGEz5s23mLZA/Du3RJt+PbbUtiECXsz8QwPT6uk1H2oyU+f/dr BvwBDnX/cS0KYkotHhCjHpnQFDUYMAw1sqKD1VJktGRmN7vy+oH0gBymcSZxkc4U/f2l oyutl+YarULsApbV4pdCARaZd4ASgXKA74SzuJg0WbHEYQeLDozpaMkYCVxwAcNBCuyB 68DbjQzc8FrOUuqkCLxDYHNfKHb7ErWS2IcjBH5HXXMZbepe2P6oM4ejnLaE8ZmUj0g/ kLoK9WS8/UJytE30bAP9B9RjkxX7r2GoiRALMHNL91CVrSiUbTcnVNZy3eAYoEt27Kpr 9eeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rbGI1namFQztlz+fxD5Sg0ohPqR33znFSZZMi0441gM=; b=WExpyHcOQLoLfx9kJK51msXsesb5TY95h+plk8MpxguUUU5kPX4hV7vIKJKDWamCZ8 2RC+e1a4FxwOBB1ZervKzk5W230S9Fa+n0Ym0sc3zHTgkwSECFfK9srDi7s6Q41vRSeN ojEcFQ51RfGF0zv3nC3GBBEhNtIpHByGmeqP4s/ncTWP5ARjsXHR5SKgTpYYIO7xOtzO s3ahLL5PFsjoD25iXX3KeU2J9QB3S3AuWuETN2HlPCMT2YXp54QLzniEs0+Ul96bVd/1 ivl/RLRA7uE/XwEhcREA6gdZQkv7LXZdUFJdrbbE7W+JtKji1TLr5pZvMKmylVg+F6X1 8U4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpO4FH7bquw9nRh8D1lmUgk62rA/sc+zW0k3fFBFqrquKpHNtGV r3SO/ZS+o+F//yOb0d7pWFcvY7+SgeI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvluVysWMTqo+Cd9iKWlMcWRxp180O/08IKh/uZQwGW/XKvSwyu/F3DAv1pk8lATxhSr4yhbg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:69d:b0:2be:184:8af6 with SMTP id bo29-20020a056000069d00b002be01848af6mr7092821wrb.0.1674751574238; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 08:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f21-20020a5d58f5000000b00236883f2f5csm1771398wrd.94.2023.01.26.08.46.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 08:46:13 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#60042] What to call pinned package versions In-Reply-To: <87fschkmo9.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> <875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN> <878rifxogc.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h6x0yp57.fsf@HIDDEN> <87fschkmo9.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:45:31 +0100 Message-ID: <86bkmlqm6s.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 18:26, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote: > Would you like to submit a patch? Done with <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/61078>. Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2023 17:27:51 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 11 12:27:51 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43721 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pFetD-0003c5-0T for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:27:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pFetB-0003bs-Eh for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:27:49 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pFet6-0001HT-7W; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:27:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=vYczzkrrG9dTtl4465CeCIpE/RNHsH3jahGroLUZoSw=; b=J31twbKAo1XqGsbFcq+v zjZlpcTKRqyFg2kg8GKh1v0lx8B62miuBBwfiQ2giwSSsLlGcbcFKuprNHCZ/gzR6g/gaU2Z33ObY Rp63IUZcTUIK//0e04tf1LEOuVJdLFAsbWCDxBBe8B2AiXNVsLrgY+K4c+AHnJeUDYVUS8tKaKUgf e2OwnN6Za8liAguAGRhPGyqJCJn+YH2dbYN1Y60TBbSLWAbxe04y+B2VddBdSHupzy5kJH6MGc/dW PrU2/cwS7ag4WgoYO8vioGjV2AsAWuDlwVTm1YVxI362/d0qlvwMOPG1r1yToXKQe+xYH7P7z+Jj4 WWfEqmZiMSaWfA==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pFet4-0000gh-N4; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:27:42 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#60042] What to call pinned package versions References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> <875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN> <878rifxogc.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h6x0yp57.fsf@HIDDEN> <86h6wx5huf.fsf@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Duodi 22 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Sel X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:27:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86h6wx5huf.fsf@HIDDEN> (Simon Tournier's message of "Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:19:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87bkn5kmlu.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> skribis: > Well, we also have another option: > > + Option d.: the version in the symbol; as in htslib-1.14. > > Considering the initial example, > > git-minimal/fixed -> git-minimal-2.33.1 That would require us to update all the users of this package anytime we change versions, so to me that=E2=80=99s much less convenient that =E2=80=98git-minimal/fixed=E2=80=99. It also fails to convey the intent, w= hich is to pin to a version, whichever that is. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2023 17:26:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 11 12:26:30 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43706 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pFerr-0003Yu-Oe for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:26:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41052) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pFern-0003YA-7e for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:26:27 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pFerh-0000rG-Rx; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:26:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=0WKY6AhNzYgV9gKf6S6zXmsB1HJAZ8GahE4fMPK99HY=; b=o3nEDQg6PX6s49NL9/rL y2RHa4g49ip5XW4sXm6Mdw5rOScGnYddeHxfABoFFHMmwkhettvDgEyh4vu2lO6hYTSXa7IYO9iV4 54azBi3rl1ihOwtPbJwIY+OfXIob3HJiaHYcUQ41EhCbewJaEgvKasiImR/Oc5tSXwBu3tWtnATxP SFuqrh2Nbu0qqvUjL967pFmApN3zG8hqiCQnvXDgRU+oKehe54dbDtc5Hj2E44e6evt7QtjsiKfXr T/Al2J7BtOpKxX28IBShhp7Mc6VcxZ3MwL39ds/tA5Sokiy6f6dkqhiV3X0XXJ39HwpGWBpzSZupK 65qGB8VO5BsGCg==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pFerh-0006KE-8I; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:26:17 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#60042] What to call pinned package versions References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> <875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN> <878rifxogc.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h6x0yp57.fsf@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Duodi 22 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Sel X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:26:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h6x0yp57.fsf@HIDDEN> (Simon Tournier's message of "Mon, 09 Jan 2023 11:32:20 +0100") Message-ID: <87fschkmo9.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> skribis: > On ven., 06 janv. 2023 at 23:55, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrot= e: > >>> Here, the suffix /fixed is confusing because it is used for the both >>> cases: >>> >>> 1) You use fixed to describe something which stays the same and does n= ot >>> or cannot vary. >>> 2) If you fix a problem or a bad situation, you deal with it and make = it >>> satisfactory. >> >> I know, English=E2=80=A6 :-) >> >> The first instance of this pattern was =E2=80=98guile/fixed=E2=80=99, pr= obably 10 years >> ago, so I guess it takes precedence. >> >> But maybe we could agree on =E2=80=98/pinned=E2=80=99 instead and adjust= code >> accordingly? > > Sorry, I miss your suggestion. :-) > > From my understanding: > > + Option a. > > version-control.scm:673:(define-public git-minimal/fixed -> git-minimal/p= inned > linux.scm:7674: (define-public libnftnl/fixed -> libnftnl/pinn= ed > samba.scm:295: (define-public samba/fixed -> samba/pinned > guile.scm:424: (define-public guile-3.0/fixed -> guile-3.0/pin= ned > > + Option b. > > onc-rpc.scm:91: (define libtirpc/fixed -> libtirpc/graft= ed > gnupg.scm:257: (define libksba/fixed -> libksba/grafted > gnupg.scm:369: (define gnupg/fixed -> gnupg/grafted > linux.scm:2164: (define-public util-linux/fixed -> util-linux/gra= fted > tls.scm:601: (define openssl/fixed -> openssl/grafted > xml.scm:159: (define expat/fixed -> expat/grafted > compression.scm:1890: (define unzip/fixed -> unzip/grafted > > + Option c. =3D option a. + option b. (remove reference to /fixed) I=E2=80=99m for Option a. Would you like to submit a patch? Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2023 16:11:45 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 11 11:11:45 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43612 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1pFdhZ-0001f2-10
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:11:45 -0500
Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:39669)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1pFdhX-0001el-4j
for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:11:43 -0500
Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id
p3-20020a05600c1d8300b003d9ee5f125bso8254132wms.4
for <60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:11:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=Jv+v4C/SNU1/kkXTEMOdCi6gI3vGHYOkxmhE85Ijuek=;
b=Py1QTCs+LEKiWcwHeiuS8kvMq9g7HxwmsePp8gI5iHlU88gnHYKw7lPdBCB1STxUzq
0fu8qULxaM+Di8tKBmZJrjbGOSqFJAT72+pHkB+LHNnBaW1l0JYYpb1vJdfupbo3975K
eecmUQCdfDxYU9wRPwh7BN07lMCDWqnEy9YGpLPShpDHUax6t9pgzIc3geLkBkjzAqNL
AOv31QuGwfxHxVpe9xqa47BQ95RDGnPvw17uYBySnZ1tAR11IsqdWaLUMuRMhCtmvIoR
08AUqnAP7hb5b0jAAxj7A8zaLZsTIC10tzFzU2b30xFSg/cRiHSZJiP3O9l9NeDoWh8I
TRmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=Jv+v4C/SNU1/kkXTEMOdCi6gI3vGHYOkxmhE85Ijuek=;
b=riDj7dNf8ukrqG9w9aVXcmJ6ncvpfQm8iHRHgeqfUahRDQ3eZCswQtN/G7BtWAKqoJ
ZVYkJaPpiILHAX7pp0m1uJIF9vyDj2uNISLLg3NjAW2OygxLiI5wlrt0ZIV2vL/RkVbP
INBXXyYLH1bV2MZv3TRy37ZSissOep4bnET6lvelH5fhnld97jOZYa8tbvABfCodRuDE
wNFDbNo7O4vEg92Q5Qs/ocKFq5WBlbk3YvV98xwq9y/0ZP1/ihj/R4vhb0y0nDgLBUq1
p6jc66tG19TUygwqaVRvHRNdIOcb7vHW7Ur4r0TsovxGuiB+ZdjZFT6MaJ0Fqzq9zW6R
UuVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqobwSniD9WKHNblbJjoHaUj5eD04PcG6qHGsA3HJUHPorYPNCM
lfoOl6kysYF9/GJxH//QW5RlP3Br2Qg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsLwbLU+VN3qrxIwWrUAcVVwBgp2NP3n505zbJPpdYjyN37leyhAie8zwDstTUsvYgSBAlh2w==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b1e:b0:3d9:f836:3725 with SMTP id
m30-20020a05600c3b1e00b003d9f8363725mr1478797wms.1.1673453497038;
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
az20-20020a05600c601400b003d96bdddd3dsm19502800wmb.15.2023.01.11.08.11.36
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:11:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#60042] What to call pinned package versions
In-Reply-To: <87h6x0yp57.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN>
<86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
<CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN>
<875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN>
<878rifxogc.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87h6x0yp57.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:19:36 +0100
Message-ID: <86h6wx5huf.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042
Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi,
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 at 11:32, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> wro=
te:
> + Option a.
>
> version-control.scm:673:(define-public git-minimal/fixed -> git-minimal/p=
inned
[...]
> + Option b.
>
> onc-rpc.scm:91: (define libtirpc/fixed -> libtirpc/graft=
ed
[...]
> + Option c. =3D option a. + option b. (remove reference to /fixed)
>
>
> From my point of view, option a. is the less =E2=80=9Cdisruptive=E2=80=9D=
because for
> instance we use the term =E2=80=9CFixes=E2=80=9C in commit message when a=
bug is indeed
> fixed.
Well, we also have another option:
+ Option d.: the version in the symbol; as in htslib-1.14.
Considering the initial example,
git-minimal/fixed -> git-minimal-2.33.1
This option d. appears to me the best:
+ it avoids ambiguity.
+ it is explicit =E2=80=93 no need to grep for finding which version
git-minimal/pinned refers to when reading Julia package recipes.
+ we are already doing that for multi-version packages.
Moreover, a =E2=80=99default=E2=80=99 property could be also assigned to de=
fault
version (here the package defined by the symbol git-minimal). And it
would allow to have less surprise when some multi versions package are
exported or incorrectly hidden. See #60200 [1].
WDYT?
If we agree on Option d., then I could prepare a patch set and document
in the manual. Let me know. :-)
1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/Y6LQs9+in964glaz@HIDDEN>
Cheers,
simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2023 12:20:27 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 09 07:20:27 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35948 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pEr8c-0005Xv-Sd for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:20:27 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:36742) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1pEr8b-0005XJ-1h for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:20:25 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id bs20so7966915wrb.3 for <60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 04:20:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=B2vhzvFTDGQjSDu76lCwVxCiTUeqQTlLqA8l9GxlWfY=; b=iP7GlZAsNxYHG9veaDsWPcDvtsKkkdKZh7TM9lH9m9TBfggC/BZXk4gOOdBh7z3cqf zwJhILPmqUoMzlAlsXgHwdE1TyeJXoMfi8IqAn/CzwGd8Dos6fl6WlJdPQ2Lqwit8J6T gvD5Laxnqtg25ICvcAsT9UlQhYLdDR/ID7+cLWiDfUhCe+ZnQ+Rl1z24lLnLy0JPBjhH x3VceYxdlCdLofzz5SNbBpgIXZ7ZwDxba34n/l9p6fVsPskiD5XfH+7vWdtXPDpKrR6D T7TwABwy550WDpbF9V8OQypz9O2jxAIJwY+jkqPUOgFO4G6eOxi0ImtZi2BSpjinkgJm QYhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B2vhzvFTDGQjSDu76lCwVxCiTUeqQTlLqA8l9GxlWfY=; b=fXeedZc6bHYJmGakFhU5hfkID3ULv2xIB38aairIy0/Vi2c05Nc3vzeQvv3GIbPAsG Zt49Qqwc3XQSG3BnlSRfUqr23ovtyZbTVgHRikneOmXpUbBJjW1IWZFHpNQSzWp/01PP YR8EOJHu9Lr76iqbBegk7TTYRfK20FFX55dEIR+Q2gPWyplPuHGN4o/b5avF0FG1EJ/V SlVOttc3zFLyqKcRyRSf6PvYmyO2TTWpJ/nwQ4bZ+od0oJw76gpVVp98KM9Uob1jikp2 qxX5aWi4WZw7fwky/b2/+p7ELi/IpNeYROCYug1vGqzwoQjIbBa/QPTX7v97a30EorM1 YAsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr1ZjxmVhMtu6fLtpMnRE3bmKlgjQpstIZDC7pq9Bgevpplfc6W HhwrBB2X9j/7NLdV6r8fRHJ8FOisD0c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvclXIEDEv1/RdqGU7fOoVgHB3VTzxnuaq4va4HkjG0/ZIG+HByV9NgshJU/FOZjf/f8Lz4qg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5d8a:0:b0:254:e300:df15 with SMTP id ci10-20020a5d5d8a000000b00254e300df15mr9199030wrb.1.1673266819449; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 04:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g11-20020a5d488b000000b002bc7e5a1171sm1495985wrq.116.2023.01.09.04.20.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Jan 2023 04:20:19 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#60042] What to call pinned package versions In-Reply-To: <878rifxogc.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> <875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN> <878rifxogc.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 11:32:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87h6x0yp57.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On ven., 06 janv. 2023 at 23:55, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote: >> Here, the suffix /fixed is confusing because it is used for the both >> cases: >> >> 1) You use fixed to describe something which stays the same and does not >> or cannot vary. >> 2) If you fix a problem or a bad situation, you deal with it and make it >> satisfactory. > > I know, English=E2=80=A6 :-) > > The first instance of this pattern was =E2=80=98guile/fixed=E2=80=99, pro= bably 10 years > ago, so I guess it takes precedence. > > But maybe we could agree on =E2=80=98/pinned=E2=80=99 instead and adjust = code > accordingly? Sorry, I miss your suggestion. :-) From my understanding: + Option a. version-control.scm:673:(define-public git-minimal/fixed -> git-minimal/pin= ned linux.scm:7674: (define-public libnftnl/fixed -> libnftnl/pinned samba.scm:295: (define-public samba/fixed -> samba/pinned guile.scm:424: (define-public guile-3.0/fixed -> guile-3.0/pinned + Option b. onc-rpc.scm:91: (define libtirpc/fixed -> libtirpc/grafted gnupg.scm:257: (define libksba/fixed -> libksba/grafted gnupg.scm:369: (define gnupg/fixed -> gnupg/grafted linux.scm:2164: (define-public util-linux/fixed -> util-linux/graft= ed tls.scm:601: (define openssl/fixed -> openssl/grafted xml.scm:159: (define expat/fixed -> expat/grafted compression.scm:1890: (define unzip/fixed -> unzip/grafted + Option c. =3D option a. + option b. (remove reference to /fixed) From my point of view, option a. is the less =E2=80=9Cdisruptive=E2=80=9D b= ecause for instance we use the term =E2=80=9CFixes=E2=80=9C in commit message when a b= ug is indeed fixed. WDYT? Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2023 22:56:08 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 06 17:56:08 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56026 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pDvdA-0006UB-I8 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:56:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46630) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pDvd9-0006Tl-4m for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:56:07 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pDvd3-0000Kg-SB; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:56:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=wiLvSyB+VqMsH1HkX1QRrIPujX7osabGo80QcZe3kJk=; b=MCwSyPVt/qUCBBVryQYP hMlIVYPEt/oaHzgWUXpIIeRoQXs2Ks67oQffz9h5eDekAlapQPPyrsEi+riMAvF2ha3XN6YjfSI6m 2y8peqbPKXjWQCVUw6imnTDTXsfCg0iJIazdits++52ut1ll50dtkO0n6S3ayECrp48HFN3HyyX6l 17hRASk+rRajxVtOclRJK/sldZEHFLMSrk+5yxBQlXF+qKyhXFwh73orW8KooN24lLBvrv3cGA73C /Eq45O3XPIBfZ3FRsqh2KsDiq6YfanFxd6BoHJuXL7+Ai1gxBrwob8AEtcqwm8AnYmtR79GvRzsSe ui+B+C8EAuYhzw==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1pDvcq-0000lh-NI; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:55:59 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: What to call pinned package versions References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> <875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Septidi 17 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour de la Marne X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 23:55:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Fri, 30 Dec 2022 14:15:29 +0100") Message-ID: <878rifxogc.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> skribis: > Here, the suffix /fixed is confusing because it is used for the both > cases: > > 1) You use fixed to describe something which stays the same and does not > or cannot vary. > 2) If you fix a problem or a bad situation, you deal with it and make it > satisfactory. I know, English=E2=80=A6 :-) The first instance of this pattern was =E2=80=98guile/fixed=E2=80=99, proba= bly 10 years ago, so I guess it takes precedence. But maybe we could agree on =E2=80=98/pinned=E2=80=99 instead and adjust co= de accordingly? Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2023 17:59:47 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 03 12:59:47 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46672 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pClZi-0004lY-OI for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 12:59:46 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:49813) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1pClZh-0004lN-Pu for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 12:59:46 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35A8320095F; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 12:59:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Jan 2023 12:59:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1672768779; x=1672855179; bh=xwuDIyHbpIeZAh/dVKqGpoSiRDzcjHWrIVLM+mE7Bsk=; b=RrqB0xZfEjdL o652o9pO7LuO3yIpxEiEdI5FFdoWDAAVVtT5G5J+pGPXl1WpxNrePJDskxP5KnIH u6AEQdYAFQhkbN6ubiZazFel9megILNaAEIFwOd89WhbkjutRZttAvrV2AcbHbA3 354JN0A1xxEtZpaQrHin+QleVszpz3E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1672768779; x=1672855179; bh=xwuDIyHbpIeZAh/dVKqGpoSiRDzc jHWrIVLM+mE7Bsk=; b=CtCgqDxpi+DKwfvs1G0fJkFvX5kNHu/1SH4vxnUKfXus mVoEJrSEFqnYvbSI9fHP8EbULJaLJz57CByRpmXxMQZoJCfsvRK+Te5T7I4cP4J1 uh6vRZ3Pvv/Gby9hifxQ5XTtZpseeVvyUVKIDCU/E8fSLHLf6E83C1JpUmti39OZ KTY7mAPrcd+uXVoK/dcFTRkv182wmfyYva1euiOuXONZSdOb+bGuJ4VOcFT0tZ67 +Ae86s9aTJohV52QTFiPQxNUvRe2soeZePlFL+KQ3cZkleqNxl+35BUBxDzhwzFL am4BNj0u7jGS3rZYVmFdw9mCWRABFe07UROcMBsZWQ== X-ME-Sender: <xms:C220Yy689F8UJ68mJtuVpoV-eTD4K_MUuJRvsWNb7sDZjNdpjvsWYQ> <xme:C220Y76Po2K5tCZYfqseTt9_1xXPg05Dbna-eeNs5h7CdO33VPGTGGUZFLLBB2w1o ymHQ6Z_7hebMSwPig> X-ME-Received: <xmr:C220YxdAUTHSIhu3F12rrj21pn1i70iKvlKw2RO-UwSykF-KXvlKr6sicnbiIuC65hJZXwfbnWltqvaOSzIt7YDe> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrjeeggddutdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepieetudehfeekueefleegudfhjefgleehfeeluefhfeffgfeuudelhedvjeel ieetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:C220Y_JfREswrW2qL7CDzJtmHfM4cpnwKDgjJ-TEQzeSgkLgmropyg> <xmx:C220Y2IKrAVup1duZZoKkES3uUGagJSTFoc_RsEe45EHI16Cp104zQ> <xmx:C220YwwU0wqr4Hq6N8WX93AOaHWuLOrW0E0q5VPOjOLlSXnyMnVL5Q> <xmx:C220Y9VBlbCYWHZ2A5RrKRLkyPWTkmD8GYsAiKmNgjR6983asd2vOw> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 12:59:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 12:59:36 -0500 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#60042] Julia dependency on Git Message-ID: <Y7RtCAI/u7RKgKlu@HIDDEN> References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> <875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:15:29PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > Therefore, to avoid the confusion I would suggest to use /pinned instead > of /fixed for this stable meaning. Hence, 4 renaming. WDYT? I agree we should improve this confusing situation. An alternative approach would be to replace meaning #2 with /grafted I don't have a preference either way.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2022 14:58:35 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 30 09:58:35 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35905 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1pBGqA-0007OY-Ea
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 09:58:35 -0500
Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:51191)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1pBGpq-0007NV-Gr
for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 09:58:15 -0500
Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id m3so6427697wmq.0
for <60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 06:58:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=2cWaXzLOqzeiAMtGGaaLkSRNwJJlNxkxfRZMBNO+inY=;
b=ogYXw3g0/S+QRt7G1g1TJ5HHOBudS+kGK0M1L7ck3k4Ztbmzkt3VAmP4ut/CD1EN2q
LmfHTs/oWLVmL8ta4GLuJ8DnMuCpUzO1vJo/7aytECSkPRHqm4o6ntH5ESbS2afZCg4k
BHVhVXEYMyooCWFGAhijENQudio2QnqbQ+f6PMZRRzSR+9fO4TLB21tTaSHbdh9ivo8b
mNNVDQDI+Obx6tVzNH0dfJ7QCZdg+QbIXqLpxJXxMUH4gBy27D+jor4f5z4BfW/n5g5y
1w8taIvJq7qp9yRihruiE/J/aiOP7zb0dICI7cz5hOt7D81MXdD++Bc0Yu21kXvPQon9
aXhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=2cWaXzLOqzeiAMtGGaaLkSRNwJJlNxkxfRZMBNO+inY=;
b=NzR2sPA7uYNcePt3zLFdkQTkqdDnEiy14kp2YiPU8OdaY0u1spq+Jm5Ey0GHjRcrj7
hYuZV1Ui4pciBbzgmfAHMFzd9dsz6fbzLnDjR0x6AeDHau1Ccb7r4+3rQCdezv5ZKLDw
771hu/n5Lr23ee1o2DCHSrf80pujqJDta4cb98VldpC7u5P8+gCqlb8PMH2Io/U8XjSy
srls8OugAl+JWxpoSu4edCYtD2W9jX6ukS+8tG5EIwCXMqInNotvxOIWV0S7W+Pi+4Th
WHNDigqztDK/X56W9uP/qZ5I07JtGobjnKpxoEsczdr5Fcbtk/+vupATy30YMxlX5c3S
ZhIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2koLHRnXLDbVdBq02L+HKipAgcOAWg/wMwpHpoWu/e4QpFPqiAUS
yZDKSx5TAZ1+rcRu9yqdXMmKMHdJikw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXskEOQIW0X8Su1juu0BbM9ck7etlyrteey8P39SN1L6RJAXAs321T5ir+W5GSdROWPeWKh9nw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3ba0:b0:3d3:5a4a:9122 with SMTP id
n32-20020a05600c3ba000b003d35a4a9122mr6175330wms.2.1672412288892;
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 06:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
l42-20020a05600c1d2a00b003cfbbd54178sm49730188wms.2.2022.12.30.06.58.08
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 06:58:08 -0800 (PST)
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#60042] Julia dependency on Git
In-Reply-To: <875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN>
<86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
<CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN>
<875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 14:15:29 +0100
Message-ID: <87bknlkp72.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042
Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi Ludo,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2022 at 00:51, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote:
> Oh right. I found that =E2=80=98julia-documenter=E2=80=99 depends on =E2=
=80=98git-minimal=E2=80=99; I
> changed it to depend on =E2=80=98git-minimal/fixed=E2=80=99. (The purpos=
e of =E2=80=98/fixed=E2=80=99
> variants, such as =E2=80=98guile-3.0/fixed=E2=80=99, is to avoid rebuilds=
of unrelated
> sub-graphs.) A few other packages were in a similar situation:
Two things are really hard in computer science: naming and cache
invalidation. :-)
Here, the suffix /fixed is confusing because it is used for the both
cases:
1) You use fixed to describe something which stays the same and does not
or cannot vary.
2) If you fix a problem or a bad situation, you deal with it and make it
satisfactory.
For instance, it is the meaning #2,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define gnupg/fixed
(package
(inherit gnupg)
(source (origin
(inherit (package-source gnupg))
(patches
(append (origin-patches (package-source gnupg))
(search-patches "gnupg-CVE-2022-34903.patch")))))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
therefore, I expect that the package gnupg is replaced (grafted). And
indeed,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define-public gnupg
(package
(name "gnupg")
;; Note: The 2.2.X releases are Long Term Support (LTS), so stick to it
;; for our stable 'gnupg'.
;; Note2: 2.2.33 currently suffers from regressions, so do not update t=
o it
;; (see: https://dev.gnupg.org/T5742).
(version "2.2.32")
(replacement gnupg/fixed)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Well, the situation looks like:
version-control.scm:673:(define-public git-minimal/fixed #1 stable
onc-rpc.scm:91: (define libtirpc/fixed #2
gnupg.scm:257: (define libksba/fixed #2
gnupg.scm:369: (define gnupg/fixed #2
linux.scm:2164: (define-public util-linux/fixed #2
linux.scm:7674: (define-public libnftnl/fixed #1 stable
tls.scm:601: (define openssl/fixed #2
samba.scm:295: (define-public samba/fixed #1 stable
xml.scm:159: (define expat/fixed #2
compression.scm:1890: (define unzip/fixed #2
guile.scm:424: (define-public guile-3.0/fixed #1 stable
Therefore, to avoid the confusion I would suggest to use /pinned instead
of /fixed for this stable meaning. Hence, 4 renaming. WDYT?
Cheers,
simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2022 16:18:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 25 11:18:34 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1p9Thp-0004rF-UB for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:18:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57228) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p9Thn-0004qy-OQ for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:18:32 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p9Thi-0001Mm-EX; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:18:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=8SgrqyoANyMeyPzZLKq1aRbzDn4r7IwwQfyp5RBdFAo=; b=AswcfJu7D0hfGWqoMUkm GoIzQHsRxBXgrjbatSZKb0Nq34Q2ulGQUN+ZJ8NuTz35V4sTVDKwO9wI1pwwW8L1NWAgE2nf78n/q qwti1EjiqprbNNI9SeFDACg7FHyzbX+LNbzzHOU4W4AQqcgrOCyr/XFcQVpmUVuRgCHYrPZDoDDwP LvwViDvGKwKD5qt+mgBvG/57LW2KVt+JgTi5ey5lsLdA2YfDEpGfQFCCf9UpnC3B345QmQAx/Asha UBf8LxybU2iH9aPzX1Gc6VBfV6i+2mlMF0nvcfB21SV+K6CFd93Rp2XAGIOVP0Cvb129gpG0YbQhH 4R4Z5tJ/EcsHzA==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p9Thi-0000FC-1K; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:18:26 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#60042: [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.0. References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CA+3U0ZmV=50kpOgRGwKnjFA2471O9duKdTJrqdLOZAiQJjeuWQ@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 5 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Chien X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 17:18:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <CA+3U0ZmV=50kpOgRGwKnjFA2471O9duKdTJrqdLOZAiQJjeuWQ@HIDDEN> (Greg Hogan's message of "Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:38:40 -0500") Message-ID: <871qonzcc2.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> skribis: > I closed this ticket after noticing that Tobias had hotfixed the > update to the staging branch. Oh good. > In addition to potentially increasing the dependent package > thresholds, we should consider alternatives to the process for > submitting, reviewing, and testing the patches for staging and > core-updates. I think just having an announced window for submissions > (perhaps 1 week for staging and 2 weeks for core-updates) would > eliminate some unnecessary work. There would be little benefit to > submitting simple package updates before the open window when an even > newer release may still become available. Also, this could encourage > more participation in the validation and testing process: similar to > how releases are branched off master, we could encourage developers > and users to test the pre-merge staging and (especially) core-updates. Yes, I agree. I once proposed adding a web page that would list open branches with target merge dates: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49334 Perhaps it=E2=80=99s time to pick it up? The difficulty here will be to ho= nor the time windows. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2022 23:51:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 23 18:51:40 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1p8rpE-0003cs-CG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 18:51:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39530) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p8rpC-0003cj-AT for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 18:51:38 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p8rp5-00029R-4R; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 18:51:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=2pAETajhoXb/pqUV7QtkHaaBlb9//F9yCgX308IjZ7o=; b=GyTQwipI4TSrwpR6hDPc Wwtd4C6l1xHPnpqPOjPGfgrD9Yfts+NyYD+Io+moqhkOA8qkBjtccn7ZBHlOQo7+qkNSQ94SWHKWb f9zeyumgu4/sTMIooC3YwtDS3XnSyHeIUqhNMNDqVJCe7kk/t+9aAVX7syBIF7hPNP8jicdkq/Lzf bbZf8+Xsr2MBjo3In7QW07M2hmBilsITzIo1SnGhhT4Bdj5Abr/yKpaQXYReu8liAoSGMa6WqYKXD NpcRewIRhFCWfhh1QYWEAVQ7h4WZNKaDSZjPrsGFqCpj5X7Qg6dye/En3JbcBtsL2zqPe5rbyI64l 2sedCBcDjIip/g==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p8rp4-0004fh-La; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 18:51:30 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Julia dependency on Git References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 00:51:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> (Simon Tournier's message of "Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:38:46 +0100") Message-ID: <875ye1znjz.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Simon, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> skribis: > On one hand, I agree that these numbers could be revisited on the > light of the new QA. On the other hand, this "trivial" patch implies > a Julia (almost) world rebuild -- so potentially some breakages. Oh right. I found that =E2=80=98julia-documenter=E2=80=99 depends on =E2= =80=98git-minimal=E2=80=99; I changed it to depend on =E2=80=98git-minimal/fixed=E2=80=99. (The purpose = of =E2=80=98/fixed=E2=80=99 variants, such as =E2=80=98guile-3.0/fixed=E2=80=99, is to avoid rebuilds o= f unrelated sub-graphs.) A few other packages were in a similar situation: bae13578f7 gnu: python-scikit-build: Depend on 'git-minimal/fixed'. 8f31575ad1 gnu: gnome-photos: Depend on 'git-minimal/fixed'. 0dcca97c9f gnu: opam: Depend on 'git-minimal/fixed'. 9203de5250 gnu: ocamlformat: Depend on 'git-minimal/fixed'. 83b1a2f682 gnu: julia-documenter: Depend on 'git-minimal/fixed'. This is a simple way to reduce unnecessary rebuilds with potential breakage, making it less risky and less costly to upgrade Git. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2022 17:49:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 12:49:34 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46243 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1p7gk9-0001Pi-VP for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 12:49:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:41571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <code@HIDDEN>) id 1p7gk7-0001PZ-HI for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 12:49:32 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f46.google.com with SMTP id e17-20020a9d7311000000b00678202573f1so4486804otk.8 for <60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:49:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=greghogan-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=wqF7AAkpLY8kb6tdSxUB8QCVXxCB0Yvi8FbenawrzVU=; b=4W5B0q0rzFdEym88r4S004K9n/Kxv23R2ZWfywqzMY/IJm2f4qu0w93R3bDAoAnJ7X AbPj5RfK6McTXKsAH18tqqJVCjCecrAdt0zjNYqX+OWMstawOc91/cWBmPUuKzMHHcQC U3SwJocItK/x04cg7soHobYKWP1tGYWyilb0vmJMbGF3VsILUp6tMGvgIEKHe0yJ0wl6 cv1DfzcO+12BrOA7aLYgPTgOA76tDEzv0YGL6X/KD2FKaX4MOJ+NaFM+jhCpRr6SudQA dX5vHYzmGJTHkwqLV7CusSYH+xv/tVBX3xwhX0MxuGOdX3NxHLdP/+Gpm8SQc3ZgO174 tfjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wqF7AAkpLY8kb6tdSxUB8QCVXxCB0Yvi8FbenawrzVU=; b=NpaI5IXfgyUK1JKFNE5+v8rprScD5DD/JNqyuXiOSwM21e9RtKcP1h3LDcg5jcAVe2 Y2++Y4s3VK0nmdZsFhEbbzkDOz4HDrg3Q/9Chz9xOls6CEIy+5jUe75CNCeJbnU8qF3c QI2IPMKYtxoG8mL2tMTbAoZ2g3G0aTtCXnmvHA7CKKNVY/8pA7BTt2WN4StIjNzU6wSv bOkMo2kZ2n1GHh4IlBYkn1C6eBs13mIpr2IgAuOcM2Tm3WdkwjZJXzTZFuQzu/9AdITQ xAfDLBbl6WTC8vlNa1gfQkuPXhouSiP+HgX8NmLa9AOVvbv984UpMzogrVgGCDTzg5ob lBxw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pntiwJb5K7E05yESH1DWH5hOH5r/UyZUd7FL/3+py+5Q3tN1i+E zTMFSRZUiwK4SJgbg9JBWqIUHKt+zHPbn7W2z+jVOO8J3cNSwZ6v X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4h+QZ8ceNeHhw1I2sgl07S8dkONWLHA2u64QP7BPHAi0w1vOrJUjPQcqvNca5XbC4pW2b7bXn53ymTGm2sUX4= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:4d0:0:b0:721:4ed3:4fa1 with SMTP id u16-20020a5b04d0000000b007214ed34fa1mr3372309ybp.385.1671554331951; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:38:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> From: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:38:40 -0500 Message-ID: <CA+3U0ZmV=50kpOgRGwKnjFA2471O9duKdTJrqdLOZAiQJjeuWQ@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#60042: [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.0. To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 9:52 AM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote: > According to figures in the manual, it=E2=80=99s for =E2=80=98staging=E2= =80=99 (info "(guix) > Submitting Patches"). But I guess those figures are less appropriate > now that the package collection and build farms have grown. We=E2=80=99l= l have > to think about it! I closed this ticket after noticing that Tobias had hotfixed the update to the staging branch. In addition to potentially increasing the dependent package thresholds, we should consider alternatives to the process for submitting, reviewing, and testing the patches for staging and core-updates. I think just having an announced window for submissions (perhaps 1 week for staging and 2 weeks for core-updates) would eliminate some unnecessary work. There would be little benefit to submitting simple package updates before the open window when an even newer release may still become available. Also, this could encourage more participation in the validation and testing process: similar to how releases are branched off master, we could encourage developers and users to test the pre-merge staging and (especially) core-updates.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2022 15:39:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 10:39:06 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45577 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1p7eht-0005x7-L8 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:39:05 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com ([209.85.167.48]:42565) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1p7ehr-0005wj-Kr for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:39:04 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id y25so19147313lfa.9 for <60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 07:39:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Hr/QEe8N5EvW0B9qjyE2UkueG/Xg5H+SyVkLHam98bk=; b=SNNEOWfrwGr93HsOtOuKrNOtm47f1GKLMRlMqJWQ8GS8QHdrO8BeaOnxyECGF8vW5H sSY4VOG+7tG4apLx1lCVJk0z0Law6bRDpEdz2NNHGkCL7X2REc9UhlEJpgVzt0PSYkIr tB6gAQufyvMQ5kkqriPjCkP/nQO49Hq/4qN7meEWk5PDSSoFH0wUoB/Sel9ZoE9NUdtv YqHY4NTCTKyjQz1uRwdJzDzTZeqMCm4ZLGDvDBZCshWmK39FP9iIZWBh9G05L5DbpZof KmI+Qy/Wap5KPEv7sXhUeyukPS7cCCKfyWn8x1o+Xi+EI+8SAKVHwOB4NXaQOUpJDmG6 B4JQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Hr/QEe8N5EvW0B9qjyE2UkueG/Xg5H+SyVkLHam98bk=; b=jkOuHIDuTJ1b8rSN23yeZjUKchbxZpGJwYwVBP2pjzzqX42Ie1T3vJ/u78LMn5CEiP ldyFecmQ1j9Bt8GyzsLF2D+BhDcywahYuXfmEEenuE3NFYZ1ZdJxfwu6Ditsv2Tlaeb1 N5t6ZHIgO+myun+/R7R2NF9sUTkganc/4Ur1Sg4+kbMo/gLnFe+UhgtIRED4wfcaXq/r iEgu6NtvfGEM65+XMEXks3motn/Y4OqghsSaW5mD4M70lxaxijRo9CIU9G2S85gMGzJT VlKfTfof1O6cuLbL13jAVmCiFFBhGPCw811krrpaJlVp/UZXuTXbQBiJBrK9tAQSATw3 XPig== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkRCCs8Rhh6EeoeVO+7ZoZka8G8dR960b1Kpq4LTgZ6qTxK8pJd NXHUJZB+U55nHnuNP9X37Q41BQkqTfiN8HZ3L7o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4W7gnf6c7a7Wz0T5ss8vkO2zjuyB+96n2damrVdRoAgy3gDRRsAXytSZXe50/fEBBeRFZJwAnl7n2r9etn53Y= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3d8b:b0:4b5:b526:93a with SMTP id k11-20020a0565123d8b00b004b5b526093amr2214147lfv.343.1671550737460; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 07:38:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:38:46 +0100 Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ3j+HTATsoGE978b+LGk0KAEM7-BAGSy_Gtm61FzTWwQA@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#60042: [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.0. To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludo, On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 15:52, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote: > According to figures in the manual, it=E2=80=99s for =E2=80=98staging=E2= =80=99 (info "(guix) > Submitting Patches"). But I guess those figures are less appropriate > now that the package collection and build farms have grown. We=E2=80=99l= l have > to think about it! On one hand, I agree that these numbers could be revisited on the light of the new QA. On the other hand, this "trivial" patch implies a Julia (almost) world rebuild -- so potentially some breakages. And personally, I cannot run again and again after broken packages from unrelated changes. :-) Well, if the new QA is able to deal with heavy rebuilds, yeah for sure, if all is green and the patch does not introduce any breakage, there is no reason for not merging. However, if you go to the dashboard [1], it is far from being all green. And do not give a look for other architectures [2] than x86_64. And these breakages often arise from an unrelated minor change. On a side note, personally I am not convinced that moving fast (=3D burning a lot of energy) is something helpful in the world context. For instance, the same source version of a package as FreeCAD is almost rebuilt daily [3] (and each build costs ~50min); aside a minor change elsewhere can easily break it, I am not convinced it brings something to rebuild it again and again. Well, I have mixed feelings about this topic and indeed, we will have to think about it. 1: <http://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/54803/dashboard> 2: <http://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/54803/dashboard?system=3Di686-linux> 3: <https://data.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master/package/freecad/ou= tput-history> Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2022 14:52:25 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 09:52:25 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1p7dyi-0005RX-Np for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:52:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38654) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p7dyg-0005RP-Mh for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:52:23 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p7dyX-0003lA-Mm; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:52:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=VD810IZq8762i50HAS8Lh/Vrh8Uxeyils2XszPrMih0=; b=aJ4KuWhTgCKd56cQS193 RN8QcvjN6c7rQM3b5FDTOpcjQoDnYY/Ux/0TXCVftuBupEPhuQMJj3Ae6svdHobg2Etm4yydcRUth tldMLZ7Co9nmHIUu3/yhV34fSGMtlU7qeq2rfrQQMdJqueKr8PWULcA1wPU/4HpzzjzjPI2JnQaOv U/RYljENDB1vJMOBaHZ9VP9tKRstuwgg5AUscUkAew6qIFUiP3740wXXyzCo2nCR+wVw3ssxOogvN MmUDbKXU5nPu+OyCXSrNtTGsIY+ihY/a+xBFCYNA5MWth59Ogu/iUUHlk/zyXkxhhpn1hW+MKLIkq WtptGVtszshuxA==; Received: from [193.50.110.60] (helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1p7dyW-000645-Ud; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:52:13 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#60042: [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.0. References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:52:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2022 12:35:04 +0100") Message-ID: <87edsu6sbp.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> skribis: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 18:40, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> wrote: >> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git): Update to 2.39.0. > > This change is for staging, IMHO. > > $ guix refresh -l git git-minimal | cut -f1 -d':' > Building the following 302 packages would ensure 664 dependent packages a= re rebuilt According to figures in the manual, it=E2=80=99s for =E2=80=98staging=E2=80= =99 (info "(guix) Submitting Patches"). But I guess those figures are less appropriate now that the package collection and build farms have grown. We=E2=80=99ll = have to think about it! Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 60042-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2022 18:56:16 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 15 13:56:16 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1p5tOx-0008Qw-Vk for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:56:16 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-f170.google.com ([209.85.128.170]:46961) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <code@HIDDEN>) id 1p5tOs-0008Ql-Ou for 60042-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:56:14 -0500 Received: by mail-yw1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3b56782b3f6so1907767b3.13 for <60042-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:56:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=greghogan-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YlwwYkdoeAxh4a1bKTI3dZHyBMC8+6yWRZxY/mSQbgk=; b=cflyBAA/w/jvBDnuipxGygSX+D2ujmIytPb+r3/Tjl2mYKXwmECIhJd+GfkP6i32OR XpqneXemKWrq9TgT5OI5MWH6egRKkoB1LIRhhcTXzU+Jqci+w1pZ9oJ1M2MpIXkajx67 w0rDiSQFq30kREYMJCO/qtWBGfvsJsUWu+uin6mgSYtNgTZe8aDn/Z1VoN6ULl+0f4T0 4xB6jv+G4JmQ3extBPkcBcpjILQ4j/9wW6PoXrB6XhPf2lbmRLc7W21jctZxene9PgBT fb+wq+lDquVf4hZ6Kf28ezk/ve18quClVmV6RTVcnixYq0tyC/GrskOX4MHsn0KTVT8d 860A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YlwwYkdoeAxh4a1bKTI3dZHyBMC8+6yWRZxY/mSQbgk=; b=u3OcaKKwZwIXEJcyU3Jj9hJJmCyqG14+tpWYorS8r998MVHvcMm/J5lElwmT6BKX/k bKu8iWLTynLtCL4V1JN9fnBA3KL/TGf/IyzE3XBoDFQV1NZN8Gd+QKI3U4FPhYMGTg9+ Aq6QTOUb6H+ur1bHv7V8ln83swjBRArTpNL1mWaHfPTcntB5yiTsNJa/O4PyeplBVyfO JKw8JcYYQ8MzM+o+cmhP5TO0fbWsxTfWistJTzAaiVwUiQ+KkxiJ9zow82PHmiyJ0ZUR Id7xMXAOwjcgi4oWt/SAxQkeaq9UhpOVsFB6NT/BETNh+PQPj2e3dUsxSk529UxDWtnl ZfXA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnb5ACjyIA1Ooz3YBdLtBlVVPGnu17Fte75swn507n6ysczWrO8 JqKnlqLonrcrrHVlhMkNiL4aimZZbXezv63cNd5FlHbbJ8ELpqZt X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf65lR/PVgbYoGqkgTWBJ3GWG+XuUL1DT0IJhkpr4idxAsI3D7JQZGQoUtKeAr2Fypxg4cmMgkA7jyWEDD6FYa8= X-Received: by 2002:a81:d54b:0:b0:426:6938:b154 with SMTP id l11-20020a81d54b000000b004266938b154mr1785248ywj.511.1671130564697; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:56:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:55:53 -0500 Message-ID: <CA+3U0ZnU-_yfDxF2pgkRWHQxCon=1W1wH7ODJyV=VZz6+0nG0w@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#60042] [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.0. To: 60042-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 6:39 AM zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 18:40, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> wrote: > > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git): Update to 2.39.0. > > This change is for staging, IMHO. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ guix refresh -l git git-minimal | cut -f1 -d':' > Building the following 302 packages would ensure 664 dependent packages are rebuilt > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Cheers, > simon
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>:Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>:Received: (at 60042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2022 11:39:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 15 06:39:45 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42854 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1p5maW-0002Oi-PO for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 06:39:45 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:38571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1p5maS-0002OH-Tn for 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 06:39:41 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id f18so2736888wrj.5 for <60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 03:39:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=06OWavTfJjxAzaYXa/ehccETTG8nKFLIVo1c/ZKmA7g=; b=cSu/qsANejEldZX30Wd+Qfn1UdFq8iQQuHWrTpIk3Z+vzWeN1Pgl0BAmfMcbkcWPkB 7tBkMrsIWL8tIiWLFotfHrLIEfEoSMWm933dOJ2henBcgsNJd2Tnm9qWlwa/l1Vddc8J h078Cd7OD8RptHETphtder2Q3RcxvjCfeVMHej1r2znfVxkPGxJ8BYEoizgl/Cd+JTAr tlCZarSXQ29dUXf65ZdqC63hgLqT/S0JffdafOz35iKFnQ77UXfGlv9SdI3Km+h4/lG7 46NyVqh63SMIUpwH8lj+KIANM2YM6jCbiTd8DFSrKG2/YmH4iZFlKqEnLFAjR/mC3p9u 30rw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=06OWavTfJjxAzaYXa/ehccETTG8nKFLIVo1c/ZKmA7g=; b=Oi55hP8KTKsZGrlxfSCtPeMYQZd0lLLF3wXZWyzB9SFF3f32NSmCHIO5K5/AmAtF/E eXzO46zpmsNnklqWYiSe0QJM5uMAm7xY9kgCnTTELXunTCIjfkVJF0XoLpa7yB+EqoZv CRaIcj8uijlLnCt+Dd7GIdOZGipNGn0icyg8gu4JzYO3MROEe2iwCJ0jTnRmmVYvAlCx eqMaNUmblCU0yDAmyqTqX3FnLseWGI5rLlBzhMi+r2Of/iAJYyzUn8phqq/1Wvtl9z9O I+DTKg1SeGlUk27oAwfxBUtFYRCQCvcto5ZKH5G1P0qBM88+omQ3ARPhghfO63v59D0c ccVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk04MW3qdhxzHne0Lt1UsT1PJXJ55aeUgW2HEUblQvFs0EG4IjY LkJFibUG51aQixTsZOyuRAPVIAyARqI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf546JbVcSzKocPW7cSH3hes78jvfLQpwcfPlpXGBz9jURj3i5R2txjSYuCni1ujInPdrdCq2A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:664b:0:b0:242:6593:2396 with SMTP id f11-20020a5d664b000000b0024265932396mr3734318wrw.2.1671104375358; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 03:39:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili (eduroam-113070.grenet.fr. [130.190.113.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k13-20020a5d428d000000b00226dba960b4sm5771005wrq.3.2022.12.15.03.39.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Dec 2022 03:39:35 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>, 60042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#60042] [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.0. In-Reply-To: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> References: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 12:35:04 +0100 Message-ID: <86len8dhnb.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60042 Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 18:40, Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN> wrote: > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git): Update to 2.39.0. This change is for staging, IMHO. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix refresh -l git git-minimal | cut -f1 -d':' Building the following 302 packages would ensure 664 dependent packages are rebuilt --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2022 18:40:37 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 13 13:40:37 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1p5ACj-0003jb-Bl
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:40:37 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53732)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <code@HIDDEN>) id 1p5ACh-0003jV-S4
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:40:36 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <code@HIDDEN>)
id 1p5ACh-0007LQ-DA
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:40:35 -0500
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <code@HIDDEN>)
id 1p5ACf-0006ux-K8
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:40:35 -0500
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id cg5so555909qtb.12
for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:40:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=greghogan-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc
:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=5wwniUu8ejdQCKBM97ry8K8Z4GjaqPDdc5PCYBMkYAo=;
b=Q0jZPH+hoO9tjsYU2BqoYWstlcFkNZLKzI7LHF+g5krUHk5z0J6Ro6ZLTTiyvXnjv2
/E8LPQ3grn4aEK/iGhyWzlKvXx8M3a/K8IEAdqOjclBlIdUjtSqmOycAk4DFp1AyG1Rs
5Q1wjSjshXTlC3rNU6IGf0+uQnfiqBv0oNT1xq+Yl3WQRG2pHPgZjfaB3eIYo7s7vfFT
9WGN5npwM21yySs2s8SfwoqDQx/X55jrcucqlAIyQjRW/mNs6GrmRcf9EQqlkI3GNklK
gqDn0SulRdviltVCV0MhHYvQdSgtHiFaFJgljl3B3c4Xsep8FAuag5E/isnRU5jzImkx
1Mdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc
:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to;
bh=5wwniUu8ejdQCKBM97ry8K8Z4GjaqPDdc5PCYBMkYAo=;
b=vvZSavT30c/0maIC46caEny/hM6zV2Zkr2FGjuGSR9DpmrjAIs8eIXOILwBu5iAkpF
KReD6XVJQPL+t8Zrull0py2Y2Ebii4iZgsTPGX7prO7mCXFjuXMCQ4vCZ1FLqYzkiE8d
FdYVB0RWCbmGMBCM0PU8/98pOABF0qMKuKgFaLNpW7KcrgltKxVPWBjNK7A6rqN5/PU9
iqhypypYY9JV9ksB7ZidQsektrooFJkd3AN8nZt96cEWJhMK4Vqp4oHkSmtkWMLZ81Vs
210Vzewg5MZ7Ykq67rxiKRuGpCP33Uh74PqeEHNYq1lokHJDDW/9sJnNMSek0AdNsBpU
qr4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plvftEe6sIQF2LwQCamxlnQV7WeAhFlw56SQDZzqKMbipb/DWsH
A09XfI1l9UNJ9/n9axh697mTRgnmhP4Nh6aXUJk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7DuP3ZbHixJlO6DuEJ0GFS57pYQS2GCS9cKnGGW5tA9vhw94rRvsJmNNcBYPEvh8eGrYYPRg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:72cb:0:b0:3a8:128:82a9 with SMTP id
o11-20020ac872cb000000b003a8012882a9mr6159428qtp.5.1670956832291;
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-10-114-89-162.evoforge.org
(ec2-52-70-167-183.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [52.70.167.183])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
f1-20020a05620a280100b006ff8ac9acfdsm6351968qkp.49.2022.12.13.10.40.31
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:40:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.39.0.
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:40:28 +0000
Message-Id: <d02fff8168a225aa7cdcd1a513f5a0beef4fe0b9.1670956476.git.code@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: none client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a;
envelope-from=code@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qt1-x82a.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
* gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git): Update to 2.39.0.
---
gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
index 5da93fa0ce..fa303ba00b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
@@ -224,14 +224,14 @@ (define git-cross-configure-flags
(define-public git
(package
(name "git")
- (version "2.38.1")
+ (version "2.39.0")
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append "mirror://kernel.org/software/scm/git/git-"
version ".tar.xz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "1n8afjjim30lddhm25cdscdr2xfa518293jhqbxy1fd2b3mgipcp"))))
+ "0nr6d46z3zfxbr1psww7vylva3mw6vbhnywixhywm6aszc9rn6ds"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(native-inputs
`(("native-perl" ,perl)
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ (define-public git
version ".tar.xz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "17bms6d0v5dw34bpsm78gpq1pn0jp6ap8nbcrby4hzfwa810kya7"))))
+ "0rwl3rkj50r1dkrlgf3d2paxbz5fz7bq4azhzb6a4d6c8bazcw3p"))))
;; For subtree documentation.
("asciidoc" ,asciidoc)
("docbook-xsl" ,docbook-xsl)
--
2.38.1
Greg Hogan <code@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#60042; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.