GNU bug report logs - #60207
ci build of latest guix for armhf

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>; dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:12:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Changed bug title to 'ci build of latest guix for armhf' from 'subversion fails on armhf when "guix pull"' Request was from "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.

Message received at 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 60207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2022 12:10:03 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 26 07:10:03 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1p9mIt-00048s-1n
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 07:10:03 -0500
Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de ([188.68.63.98]:51515)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>)
 id 1p9mIp-00048G-Ur; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 07:10:01 -0500
Received: from mors-relay-2501.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mors-relay-2501.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ngc6Z332Xz5y4T;
 Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:09:58 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: mors-relay-2501.netcup.net;
 dkim=permerror (bad message/signature format)
Received: from policy02-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.35])
 by mors-relay-2501.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ngc6Z2GF8z4xQQ;
 Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:09:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at policy02-mors.netcup.net
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1,
 BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mxe217.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by policy02-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ngc6Y1pgRz8sb0;
 Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:09:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from florianrock64 (ip5b40a50f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de
 [91.64.165.15])
 by mxe217.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B80427FF35;
 Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:09:48 +0100 (CET)
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>
To: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#60207: ci build of latest guix for armhf
References: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN>
 <87wn6mifjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <033742a9-7892-b837-2d04-422704b84385@HIDDEN>
 <874jtozsk6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <05cafc66-0812-4134-58d6-5b53814e3c11@HIDDEN>
 <87tu1kzdi3.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <f5c50fb2-4b82-2953-c3de-d5fea1100217@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:09:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <f5c50fb2-4b82-2953-c3de-d5fea1100217@HIDDEN> (Julius
 Schwartzenberg's message of "Sun, 25 Dec 2022 16:35:34 +0100")
Message-ID: <87cz86z7qs.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B80427FF35
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.07 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-5.47)[99.93%];
 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:3209, ipnet:91.64.0.0/14, country:DE];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com];
 TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]
X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd-worker-8404
X-NC-CID: kBMVWK9XDd551y7slXoufZfZE/TksceLjZTIdi3fOF+keTsSdRcOh3Rj
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60207
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>, control <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN> writes:
> Op 24-12-2022 om 22:40 schreef pelzflorian (Florian Pelz):
>> If you want `guix pull` without compiling, then look at
>> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Channels-with-Substit=
utes.html>.
>
> I added the lines to my personal .config/guix/channels.scm, but guix
> pull then shows:
> guix pull: waarschuwing: could not find available substitutes at
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org
>
> And it still ends up compiling. I also tried replacing ci with
> bordeaux in the URL, but then it shows a 404.
>
> I think I'm still missing something?

Bah, it appears ci.guix.gnu.org currently just doesn=E2=80=99t build for
armhf-linux.  Bordeaux does not offer the needed Cuirass API.

I believe but do not know that Bordeaux does not actually build the
latest guix, just the packages.

I don=E2=80=99t know if offering the latest guix would even be feasible.
Probably not?  armhf builds take a long time.

Cc to Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, Ricardo Wurmus
<rekado@HIDDEN>.

Regards,
Florian




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#60207; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 60207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2022 15:37:27 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 25 10:37:27 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1p9T43-0003MF-0U
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 10:37:27 -0500
Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com ([209.85.208.50]:42634)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>) id 1p9T41-0003M0-7f
 for 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 10:37:25 -0500
Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id u18so11723228eda.9
 for <60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 25 Dec 2022 07:37:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version
 :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=lWFwdSKP6V9pUihMhiI3BF7DpAUDdQoWTkBtgrKGH0M=;
 b=SOBh/mis3mACLrmXWu2zQKmz+UqLj7TM2dz6DutB0n65ncBjL1WmPqRUvwl/atWwit
 YQO5Xl+fwZuz/s1eYaAcvRuWSNiMVhCmWo2TjFVZQgLwRgwoHlEftLQSPssHj6O0wWSc
 qlFMgNhxZpvaCkFHMrUxJHwCoRC1TB2ZuzKfDW/Cn1v53SRH8cVJlx11ONG1/hlQlcGx
 w1+ycD9M5waFro6vF+rEEqqiXUpeGjxj+tu+rQNEXKpNK7VSp98g2kTxTHchBMW4Y9Ii
 H/FkOuykfEhUFI8IkbYlYVhFzk2PXRSt/JZyz076mGTjSY5qa/8DkR4E5KojolnL8xSa
 FQeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version
 :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=lWFwdSKP6V9pUihMhiI3BF7DpAUDdQoWTkBtgrKGH0M=;
 b=bffiCXYsc99LX4cThkKUUncWDhPykfSr9ZM2RiIui4kpjvfoiseTgHehuGzisLAmty
 vjjxiOtSbOqnGJ7c1uyPpM0VXcajLfoYYz4UowLu8Y0tDQMWqCg3Hl+y9YM3JY4y6L9J
 sCDC//DUYFi1Pz7B9N8Sgz4gwgY19MYPJznZdHaIhVybeXypkqqPFPHkJd1llJrsiKZq
 UH3PPsdMVLDuDcdJHqp4bt5gBSWdVdWV5HoO/RIktu0avJrkCX+5as3+x8U0LUOPGtld
 DjU/zlzfy+ZGDA5fYNGuHrYZ2RhmCOV5BQPdBsVg5XnFJ1zzjes6jKsYctMkbRE3pbHg
 HheQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krcHYy+wtFq2ddrUjGIZDLcKrMaiKQuIuhoThGSYirxXB17LqjF
 KugGGjfwoPCTjyUAjxw7RHSqKl+RKbU5hw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtkKebxdEgzRqWmghcUT++rJRRE/0zLbULiWGh56Vv3EzJ3IisbJ+/ZqCJ8e6px00CJsFH/Sw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3983:b0:475:c640:ddd2 with SMTP id
 fk3-20020a056402398300b00475c640ddd2mr14550184edb.26.1671982639201; 
 Sun, 25 Dec 2022 07:37:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a10:3781:2b33::b66? ([2a10:3781:2b33::b66])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 v11-20020aa7d64b000000b0047013a9cd76sm3718409edr.56.2022.12.25.07.37.18
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 25 Dec 2022 07:37:18 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: bug#60207: Bug report
To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>
References: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN>
 <87wn6mifjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <033742a9-7892-b837-2d04-422704b84385@HIDDEN>
 <874jtozsk6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <05cafc66-0812-4134-58d6-5b53814e3c11@HIDDEN>
 <87tu1kzdi3.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <f5c50fb2-4b82-2953-c3de-d5fea1100217@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 16:35:34 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87tu1kzdi3.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60207
Cc: 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)

Hi Florian,

Op 24-12-2022 om 22:40 schreef pelzflorian (Florian Pelz):
>> […]
>> Is there a way to enforce only binaries are fetched and compilation is
>> never attempted? Even if that means I might not always run the latest
>> version?
> 
> Yes there is a way.  Look at the output from `guix weather` (see
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-weather.html>
> in the English manual); if substitute coverage is bad, you could wait a
> few days or maybe look at `guix build --log-file` if compilation fails
> at the build farm (see
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Additional-Build-Options.html>).
> 
> If you want `guix pull` without compiling, then look at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Channels-with-Substitutes.html>.

I added the lines to my personal .config/guix/channels.scm, but guix 
pull then shows:
guix pull: waarschuwing: could not find available substitutes at 
https://ci.guix.gnu.org

And it still ends up compiling. I also tried replacing ci with bordeaux 
in the URL, but then it shows a 404.

I think I'm still missing something?

Best regards,
Julius




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#60207; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 60207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2022 21:41:11 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 24 16:41:11 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1p9CGU-0005JK-IH
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 16:41:11 -0500
Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de ([185.244.194.184]:51195)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1p9CGP-0005Iv-JW
 for 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 16:41:08 -0500
Received: from relay01-mors.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by relay01-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NfctP1dCNz8wWB;
 Sat, 24 Dec 2022 22:41:01 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: relay01-mors.netcup.net;
 dkim=permerror (bad message/signature format)
Received: from policy02-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.35])
 by relay01-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NfctP1D6Hz7v13;
 Sat, 24 Dec 2022 22:41:01 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at policy02-mors.netcup.net
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1,
 BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mxe217.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by policy02-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NfctM40BRz8shG;
 Sat, 24 Dec 2022 22:40:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from florianrock64 (ip5b40a50f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de
 [91.64.165.15])
 by mxe217.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A1CA7FCB2;
 Sat, 24 Dec 2022 22:40:53 +0100 (CET)
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>
To: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#60207: Bug report
References: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN>
 <87wn6mifjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <033742a9-7892-b837-2d04-422704b84385@HIDDEN>
 <874jtozsk6.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <05cafc66-0812-4134-58d6-5b53814e3c11@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 22:40:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: <05cafc66-0812-4134-58d6-5b53814e3c11@HIDDEN> (Julius
 Schwartzenberg's message of "Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:00:49 +0100")
Message-ID: <87tu1kzdi3.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1A1CA7FCB2
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.58 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-5.48)[99.95%];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
 FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:3209, ipnet:91.64.0.0/14, country:DE];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]
X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd-worker-8404
X-NC-CID: Zraml58GNLY1tFfTc+RSdPmTux1uUr5MX6zkxPdfkN1o9ouy+g67z2m5
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60207
Cc: 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hello Julius.

Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN> writes:
> I didn't imagine
> I would need to do a 'guix pull' after running it. It seems I ran it
> at a bad moment, just as 1.4.0 was about to be released.

Indeed, but upgrading without compiling will be easier with bordeaux.
(Probably it would also have been possible to download guix 1.4.0
manually and then insert that into the store with `guix download` or
so.)


> [=E2=80=A6]
> Is there a way to enforce only binaries are fetched and compilation is
> never attempted? Even if that means I might not always run the latest
> version?

Yes there is a way.  Look at the output from `guix weather` (see
<https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-weather.ht=
ml>
in the English manual); if substitute coverage is bad, you could wait a
few days or maybe look at `guix build --log-file` if compilation fails
at the build farm (see
<https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Additional-Build-Options=
.html>).

If you want `guix pull` without compiling, then look at
<https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Channels-with-Substitute=
s.html>.

I hope it helps.

Regards,
Florian




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#60207; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 60207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2022 20:02:42 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 23 15:02:42 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38586 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1p8oFe-0001Jg-9j
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:02:42 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:41587)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>) id 1p8oFc-0001JZ-FP
 for 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:02:40 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-f47.google.com with SMTP id u19so14038775ejm.8
 for <60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 12:02:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version
 :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=oBD7i7WT+vH4Zag1XqnUP5M3TmsJ/rSO7sq2a9B/sEc=;
 b=NhLYSF4u3a/UtrcUDNUwIYOlKiyNyYf071bRm2vYc67oNasWrqiD3IeS4osXAatg7s
 w7WocA70ejAG6aznWWSQUAqkmW2/hbPIbMNTxq7LNEPJITxG0UwubhNF2wsjZFcFfXxF
 FAYL8jAvjpooS/5lHHf8dxLhzOq6LoAlRRJMthieKTFy1b6Y4KmuwkYO3KSGFVTtc/a9
 nf1y8AyW1ZtDabeIgGHcTKj6XCEbvM1bIvL9lkGlok56yeCT9RidpHlPG5gAWcAnIeOj
 TOwKJeM8+NGdYFCPepPVNjcMjceDyoNldiex6LRD0OKIJqmSsm8BOwh0g50TI56k5eSB
 3LOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version
 :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=oBD7i7WT+vH4Zag1XqnUP5M3TmsJ/rSO7sq2a9B/sEc=;
 b=2Nf8wNnVtwAS0rqxiKUmDTLV6wEMDrWR7qgxWjNw4qcjeFwBYab7LdPFNoFzf/n3eZ
 DwzZgidZSWmqXQ+uwU0sRyGQxlKKGutUR5d3K8AXhxSmtfw9Z4pOqpwSRRB/k55p5B71
 XyNsrUrEaQSMm1gYMulqxYXF8TkjwON59Ku+RWNHpNGdeQKP5pSyM6O+7+I4KhaCkZyZ
 28Y9WNiCpDvd0ZjYMH2QiiMz3YB+D0xgBeuAjmGAccjtTScnof699Wf/k9WcFFQq+Ofn
 MMF3IcKZgFuu/ueu1XWrWwITJ4N/EYerrgiecxt/iP0z9j5JjLzlFmT2eYKOoVM8PHrm
 m53w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr9hJ8N2mgawKHAdw4WoXi8wr9uUTta1qRt/jkfRLzjX92WyAfF
 /qfjETM1/S7jt7C/iR1hO4C1Y/RhX9VzqQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsbqnPHXTC5NXz3arQSjtq0LoN5xjCAFPhjdODKHr96HPOZdv3A+V+6Tc09ulTtXeiAKKxWbQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:158c:b0:7c4:f752:e959 with SMTP id
 k12-20020a170906158c00b007c4f752e959mr8161579ejd.33.1671825754263; 
 Fri, 23 Dec 2022 12:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a10:3781:2b33::b66? ([2a10:3781:2b33::b66])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 bt1-20020a170906b14100b0074134543f82sm1720389ejb.90.2022.12.23.12.02.33
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 23 Dec 2022 12:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: bug#60207: Bug report
To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>
References: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN>
 <87wn6mifjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <033742a9-7892-b837-2d04-422704b84385@HIDDEN>
 <874jtozsk6.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <05cafc66-0812-4134-58d6-5b53814e3c11@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:00:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <874jtozsk6.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60207
Cc: 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)

Op 21-12-2022 om 16:26 schreef pelzflorian (Florian Pelz):
> Oops, my mistake.  You wrote your guix is at version 1.3.0, which is
> older than the bordeaux build farm.

No problem! I used the installation script just a few days earlier and I 
presumed it would give me the latest of everything. I didn't imagine I 
would need to do a 'guix pull' after running it. It seems I ran it at a 
bad moment, just as 1.4.0 was about to be released.


> So how would you get an updated Guix?  One way would be to delete /gnu
> and /var/guix and then just download and install the 1.4.0 version, but
> deleting would invalidate all links to the store.

I did this as I am working with essentially a fresh installation.

Unfortunately it is still not working out. While more packages seem to 
be downloaded, some very large ones are still being compiled and this 
simply ends up hanging my system.

Is there a way to enforce only binaries are fetched and compilation is 
never attempted? Even if that means I might not always run the latest 
version?

Thank you!

Best regards,
Julius




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#60207; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 60207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2022 15:27:04 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:27:04 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1p80zj-0007JB-JA
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:27:04 -0500
Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de ([188.68.63.162]:45649)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1p80zc-0007J5-P9
 for 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:26:57 -0500
Received: from mors-relay-8201.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mors-relay-8201.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ncck15gC5z3rjP;
 Wed, 21 Dec 2022 16:26:49 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: mors-relay-8201.netcup.net;
 dkim=permerror (bad message/signature format)
Received: from policy02-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.35])
 by mors-relay-8201.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ncck14ydMz3rhM;
 Wed, 21 Dec 2022 16:26:49 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at policy02-mors.netcup.net
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1,
 BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mxe217.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by policy02-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Nccjs0DF2z8sbC;
 Wed, 21 Dec 2022 16:26:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from florianrock64 (ip5b40a50f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de
 [91.64.165.15])
 by mxe217.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AE2D7FF97;
 Wed, 21 Dec 2022 16:26:34 +0100 (CET)
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>
To: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#60207: Bug report
References: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN>
 <87wn6mifjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <033742a9-7892-b837-2d04-422704b84385@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 16:26:33 +0100
In-Reply-To: <033742a9-7892-b837-2d04-422704b84385@HIDDEN> (Julius
 Schwartzenberg's message of "Tue, 20 Dec 2022 20:51:45 +0100")
Message-ID: <874jtozsk6.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9AE2D7FF97
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.60 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-5.50)[99.99%];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
 FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:3209, ipnet:91.64.0.0/14, country:DE];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]
X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd-worker-8404
X-NC-CID: jUo1exRCyCQ1cn0O2VU10jJciMSUrxNpkmNKYJeFqkh6ocZDZQHNEza7
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60207
Cc: 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN> writes:
> Op 20-12-2022 om 10:34 schreef pelzflorian (Florian Pelz):
>> does it work if you do this before pull?
>> sudo guix archive --authorize < $(dirname $(which
>> guix))/../share/guix/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org.pub
>
> When I do this, I get:
>> julius@tinkerboard:~$ sudo guix archive --authorize < $(dirname
>> $(which guix))/../share/guix/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org.pub
>> bash: /usr/local/bin/../share/guix/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org.pub: No such file or directory
>
> Might there be something wrong with the installation?

Oops, my mistake.  You wrote your guix is at version 1.3.0, which is
older than the bordeaux build farm.

So how would you get an updated Guix?  One way would be to delete /gnu
and /var/guix and then just download and install the 1.4.0 version, but
deleting would invalidate all links to the store.

Alternatively, you run guix pull to some in-between version of guix,
maybe:

guix pull --commit=26499816a973b3aab9aaf8e13b909d0bde4e2dd5

and then run

sudo guix archive --authorize < $(dirname $(which guix))/../share/guix/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org.pub

and guix pull.

Regards,
Florian




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#60207; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 60207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2022 19:53:43 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 14:53:43 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46852 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1p7igE-0007Vd-GH
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 14:53:43 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:34682)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>) id 1p7ig8-0007VR-8O
 for 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 14:53:37 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id t17so31847689eju.1
 for <60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:53:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version
 :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=mmVheCfgkthvjgmwfyQxbroJYoRWRqW8KrvSVFKg7+s=;
 b=DJYta2NOjixSBQtkxjtlPihUxS021rLp9W1rYSkLHJ4+oelP+Y10jmB81XVeUx0zDL
 Rqd0aYLta4kP7Zbw8np/VEnBPqowzqN4xOlGi1VRHH4b2QI8u5jklurU0xY7JanupvbI
 PVhGNiUIee/WK6VepRRfF/z730SsY+ClVwtStCathFT3ZVZDRCAgEfSuzuHdiSz7grF8
 2KuyWlTHiKGp5SoVrzVBD4v56rqJ7ArojAsctZyxbpa6wDDXI7OP5RLXAsUGXjorFvpp
 D/2InHy1UinMC/KnwsfeXPUEnuSygjjsiaTsXOmBbEDTQhTnRo8Rj4nAaw7QUVOb/qih
 qU4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version
 :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=mmVheCfgkthvjgmwfyQxbroJYoRWRqW8KrvSVFKg7+s=;
 b=sMJBR/ZTZAyNFMRKEudVMKPo2WYkqSRhAJE1JNX6iXVunLZZJaJLzIahno9/TTHlJP
 yL4f1TwGYhoqGequEfr4iWKghRHX/vigDUOBEtIui51cvtNJKENOnejCfcndFfnQdocG
 UXcvG7X/shsLDXs1P1PAalC/dz8rVhEurzvMHhmDkwNkTWLI0xiIKGavDughSbMyeQQj
 4DuQSAWvT42HtVRbsj30U+wBCH9tljsd8aCYJfFadFrHZwxodBt8Q6nuAJpI08Lrzp4U
 BI52jdQGH/r4fAgZtb13zcBC1A3NYjzulN5sTbOIe0p48cxAdEtzBiRQpDWNTafGPr+l
 9/hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plMjFrr01UyEalwfK5Eoky7orOYzK0760d+cDAX/jRYMrvOIGM3
 ZLBIcSwxtShoMCK8hxMwhMBnnd+ChFuX8w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4j0778S4hddIDhoRQe7UCVI+Xk3YqRbMXeZOYAkNjhIIGWBdKHshXxpfX/zErYl87CY+pdww==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1818:b0:7c1:8ba6:6eaf with SMTP id
 v24-20020a170906181800b007c18ba66eafmr33578295eje.5.1671566006105; 
 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:53:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a10:3781:2b33::b66? ([2a10:3781:2b33::b66])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 i26-20020a170906a29a00b00782e3cf7277sm6010493ejz.120.2022.12.20.11.53.25
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:53:25 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: bug#60207: Bug report
To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>
References: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN>
 <87wn6mifjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <033742a9-7892-b837-2d04-422704b84385@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 20:51:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87wn6mifjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60207
Cc: 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Florian,

Op 20-12-2022 om 10:34 schreef pelzflorian (Florian Pelz):
> does it work if you do this before pull?
> 
> sudo guix archive --authorize < $(dirname $(which guix))/../share/guix/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org.pub

When I do this, I get:
> julius@tinkerboard:~$ sudo guix archive --authorize < $(dirname $(which guix))/../share/guix/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org.pub
> bash: /usr/local/bin/../share/guix/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org.pub: No such file or directory

Might there be something wrong with the installation?


> Then it would compile fine on the bordeaux build farm and you could
> download the substitute from there.

Yes, I am not sure why it seems to try to compile so much. I assumed ARM 
builds might not be available. I'd rather avoid compiling anything 
locally as this ARM board has little resources for this.

Thanks!!
Julius




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#60207; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 60207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2022 09:35:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 04:35:31 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1p7Z1z-0003TS-TZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 04:35:31 -0500
Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de ([188.68.63.174]:60847)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>) id 1p7Z1o-0003Sh-9U
 for 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 04:35:21 -0500
Received: from mors-relay8204.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mors-relay8204.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Nbryp4Lrtz8YNC;
 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:35:14 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mors-relay8204.netcup.net;
 dkim=permerror (bad message/signature format)
Received: from policy02-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.35])
 by mors-relay8204.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Nbryp3dvkz8YGC;
 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:35:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at policy02-mors.netcup.net
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1,
 BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mxe217.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by policy02-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Nbryd64Lwz8sb2;
 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:35:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from florianrock64 (ip5b40a50f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de
 [91.64.165.15])
 by mxe217.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06A887FEAD;
 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:34:57 +0100 (CET)
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@HIDDEN>
To: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#60207: Bug report
References: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:34:57 +0100
In-Reply-To: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN> (Julius
 Schwartzenberg's message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:48:12 +0100")
Message-ID: <87wn6mifjy.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 06A887FEAD
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.52 / 15.00]; BAYES_HAM(-5.42)[99.80%];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
 FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:3209, ipnet:91.64.0.0/14, country:DE];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]
X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd-worker-8404
X-NC-CID: mSki9bOA/F30MZJZJdB13a3ln08Si2fOEhc17aLvkhflKd7uPVHqMNDv
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60207
Cc: 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hello Julius,

does it work if you do this before pull?

sudo guix archive --authorize < $(dirname $(which guix))/../share/guix/bordeaux.guix.gnu.org.pub

Then it would compile fine on the bordeaux build farm and you could
download the substitute from there.

Regards,
Florian




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#60207; Package guix. Full text available.
Changed bug title to 'subversion fails on armhf when "guix pull"' from 'Bug report' Request was from zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2022 18:11:22 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 19 13:11:22 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1p7Kbg-0005f4-Bg
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:11:22 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52036)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>) id 1p7KH2-0005SB-Ux
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:50:01 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>)
 id 1p7KH2-00058N-P9
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:50:00 -0500
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>)
 id 1p7KH0-0000hc-CD
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:50:00 -0500
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id jo4so14463876ejb.7
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:49:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:mime-version:user-agent
 :date:message-id:subject:from:to:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to; bh=DJUhl25E4lohdlGZtoQkjPEBpVWQr4H15yclPNv/KtI=;
 b=Ueuh+07VWgcZynlv0DHx5z5yNCu0vZjQTfCVixP6phV5I5TQvYSiQhZ2fwYzjBk4D5
 gYAGj/0zajdSZx2QMsA4VzYyJntsKyScFhVHj4Sc43jZw6S4RSFE7WXDKT3kXawElxC4
 3sDm0JZ0qVhlwbvOM8DJ73dCgFknW3PKm3h1Tkq3VmZgdXd8zZstzrzr7k2z+/94TeA2
 WpOZqyg6ARxwSrHn23hk25nDPWTxfC+dcNL9Oz3ka89v4dou+KPWue5XBZtrqakbuRsP
 eSSbN0kwl5PsDRa5mk7Sy4UQ2uXig2Ohu126umQq0WpCqEjqfdEiG3Z64JzAiHB4CFZH
 fqZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:mime-version:user-agent
 :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=DJUhl25E4lohdlGZtoQkjPEBpVWQr4H15yclPNv/KtI=;
 b=31N6tt5RqwxGUWNxUTATJZSOhFvx+Vfz2GLC9qy/7lE9PZ0Ss9KEGZQ1FBPBRK3mEq
 4jbscLJgooXr+rGCOHTI+bztYj4QrHZ5V8wGmHZrokGOG/H4Ib6qr8kucNbzI5MANeVf
 5bKsXOali7Tamb7PlBCJl+Kts3aZHKa1rpz0RS76XRAbafRHg/kTN3nfr1/P9GPGMu4i
 PaiGvgn2h1LBB7sLKBr1te9yxeB3EMmlXmH8xuige6zDGaYEgkEA2QVDiIRJBzuEmexd
 RdLvl7vz0lTGbh5sn5VxCrxDkXuntKkLIBT6GGuIHOnikLSl+uLVcnn8rPP99fB3MF+n
 mq/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr4dyLa9arWZ3bVZnEfeoTTFzOJRpZ+rALGpd3eNZ6v/WjNbiYq
 W5pgZ764IusKntViNZHOqPkz/Fj3KVKhFQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXt3zi8uvE2F+2qMQGtuCK5ZgyxFifO4Fm/zg1W7T90CHV9/CCtiqGKID4s8bRYHdeh2h2FA2w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9714:b0:7db:55c1:6534 with SMTP id
 jg20-20020a170907971400b007db55c16534mr16432007ejc.5.1671472196265; 
 Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a10:3781:2b33::b66? ([2a10:3781:2b33::b66])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 n11-20020a170906088b00b007c11e5ac250sm4693676eje.91.2022.12.19.09.49.55
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:49:55 -0800 (PST)
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
From: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>
Subject: Bug report
Message-ID: <fc26fd57-8650-daca-0d7a-9faa2507a013@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:48:12 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62e;
 envelope-from=julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN; helo=mail-ej1-x62e.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:11:19 -0500
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Hi all, I was requested to send this mail by the tool. Please see the 
output below. I hope it can help. I am running Armbian 22.11 on an ASUS 
Tinker Board.

Best regards,
Julius

julius@tinkerboard:~$ guix pull
hint: Consider installing the `glibc-utf8-locales' or `glibc-locales' 
package and
defining `GUIX_LOCPATH', along these lines:

      guix install glibc-utf8-locales
      export GUIX_LOCPATH="$HOME/.guix-profile/lib/locale"

See the "Application Setup" section in the manual, for more info.

Kanaal 'guix' bijwerken vanuit Git-repository op 
'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...
Authenticatiekanaal 'guix', kent 9edb3f6 toe aan 5d48d9b (24 nieuwe 
toekenningen)...
Aan het bouwen uit dit kanaal:
   guix      https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git	5d48d9b
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
/gnu/store/894c9cqdl7h8agc98911w816s85v7m6n-compute-guix-derivation.drv 
bouwen...
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
  guix-1.4.0-checkout  9.7MiB          1.1MiB/s 00:09 
[##################] 100.0%
/gnu/store/ram1dk48llha4y9lz42288ylrqjk8nmz-subversion-1.14.1.drv bouwen...
/ 'build' faseild-log 31802 181
subversion/libsvn_subr/sysinfo.c:693:9: warning: cast to pointer from 
integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
   693 |   ptr = (const unsigned char*)val;
       |         ^
100% 'check' 
[################################################################\Backtrace:
           13 (primitive-load 
"/gnu/store/824kiadrljmz6g4ad8bjqd00idl8iv5b-compute-guix-derivation")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
     155:9 12 (_ _)
     159:9 11 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> 
?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
     152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
     152:2  9 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
   2170:24  8 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 b3708cf8> _ 
#:guile-for-build _ #:system _ #:target _)
    1998:8  7 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
    299:22  6 (_ _)
    1180:2  5 (_ _)
    1046:2  4 (_ _)
     892:4  3 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
   2055:12  2 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 b2334708>)
    1403:5  1 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99 b2334708> 
#<procedure b1eb9768 at ./guix/store.scm:20?> ?)
   1419:15  0 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 b2334708> _ _)

./guix/store.scm:1419:15: ERROR:
   1. &store-protocol-error:
       message: "build of 
`/gnu/store/ram1dk48llha4y9lz42288ylrqjk8nmz-subversion-1.14.1.drv' failed"
       status: 100
guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program 
'/gnu/store/824kiadrljmz6g4ad8bjqd00idl8iv5b-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: 
"5d48d9b90575b126911cb942f7894ebd93770903"; system: "armhf-linux";
host version: "1.3.0"; pull-version: 1).
Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@HIDDEN>.




Acknowledgement sent to Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#60207; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 12:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.