GNU bug report logs - 
#60843
30.0.50; Build failure on old GNU/Linux system
Previous Next
  Reported by: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
  Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 01:20:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 30.0.50
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
 
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 60843 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 60843 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to 
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#60843; Package 
emacs.
 (Mon, 16 Jan 2023 01:20:02 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Acknowledgement sent
to 
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to 
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org.
 (Mon, 16 Jan 2023 01:20:02 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Since the last gnulib merge, Emacs refuses to build on Fedora 9:
qcopy-acl.c: In function ‘is_attr_permissions’:
qcopy-acl.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘attr_copy_action’
qcopy-acl.c:36: error: ‘ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS’ undeclared (first use in this function)
qcopy-acl.c:36: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
qcopy-acl.c:36: error: for each function it appears in.)
Would someone please take a look at this?  Thanks.
Information forwarded
to 
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#60843; Package 
emacs.
 (Mon, 16 Jan 2023 06:56:02 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Message #8 received at 60843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> Since the last gnulib merge, Emacs refuses to build on Fedora 9:
>
> qcopy-acl.c: In function ‘is_attr_permissions’:
> qcopy-acl.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘attr_copy_action’
> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: ‘ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: for each function it appears in.)
>
> Would someone please take a look at this?  Thanks.
Probably because the version of libattr in Fedora 9 is too low, Fedora 9
using the libattr-2.4.41, `ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS' is not defined.
I see the `ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS' first defined in 2008-05-19
(https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/attr.git/commit/?id=467bbfa56a14c1571082cab2385d272bead78fdc)
You can also disable xattr to solve the problem:
    $ ./configure --disable-xattr
I compiled successfully in Fedora 9:
  [root <at> localhost emacs]# lsb_release -a
  LSB Version:	:core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-noarch
  Distributor ID:	Fedora
  Description:	Fedora release 9 (Sulphur)
  Release:	9
  Codename:	Sulphur
  [root <at> localhost emacs]# emacs --version
  GNU Emacs 30.0.50
  Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  GNU Emacs comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
  You may redistribute copies of GNU Emacs
  under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
  For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING.
Information forwarded
to 
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#60843; Package 
emacs.
 (Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:52:02 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Message #11 received at 60843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
lux <lx <at> shellcodes.org> writes:
> Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> Since the last gnulib merge, Emacs refuses to build on Fedora 9:
>>
>> qcopy-acl.c: In function ‘is_attr_permissions’:
>> qcopy-acl.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘attr_copy_action’
>> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: ‘ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>
>> Would someone please take a look at this?  Thanks.
>
> Probably because the version of libattr in Fedora 9 is too low, Fedora 9
> using the libattr-2.4.41, `ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS' is not defined.
>
> I see the `ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS' first defined in 2008-05-19
> (https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/attr.git/commit/?id=467bbfa56a14c1571082cab2385d272bead78fdc)
>
> You can also disable xattr to solve the problem:
>
>     $ ./configure --disable-xattr
>
> I compiled successfully in Fedora 9:
>
>   [root <at> localhost emacs]# lsb_release -a
>   LSB Version:	:core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-noarch
>   Distributor ID:	Fedora
>   Description:	Fedora release 9 (Sulphur)
>   Release:	9
>   Codename:	Sulphur
>   [root <at> localhost emacs]# emacs --version
>   GNU Emacs 30.0.50
>   Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>   GNU Emacs comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
>   You may redistribute copies of GNU Emacs
>   under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
>   For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING.
Yes, but it should be fixed in gnulib.  Emacs should compile cleanly
without any arguments to configure.
Information forwarded
to 
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#60843; Package 
emacs.
 (Tue, 05 Sep 2023 21:12:02 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Message #14 received at 60843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> lux <lx <at> shellcodes.org> writes:
>
>> Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>> Since the last gnulib merge, Emacs refuses to build on Fedora 9:
>>>
>>> qcopy-acl.c: In function ‘is_attr_permissions’:
>>> qcopy-acl.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘attr_copy_action’
>>> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: ‘ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>>> qcopy-acl.c:36: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>>
>>> Would someone please take a look at this?  Thanks.
>>
>> Probably because the version of libattr in Fedora 9 is too low, Fedora 9
>> using the libattr-2.4.41, `ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS' is not defined.
>>
>> I see the `ATTR_ACTION_PERMISSIONS' first defined in 2008-05-19
>> (https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/attr.git/commit/?id=467bbfa56a14c1571082cab2385d272bead78fdc)
>>
>> You can also disable xattr to solve the problem:
>>
>>     $ ./configure --disable-xattr
>>
>> I compiled successfully in Fedora 9:
>>
>>   [root <at> localhost emacs]# lsb_release -a
>>   LSB Version:	:core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-noarch
>>   Distributor ID:	Fedora
>>   Description:	Fedora release 9 (Sulphur)
>>   Release:	9
>>   Codename:	Sulphur
>>   [root <at> localhost emacs]# emacs --version
>>   GNU Emacs 30.0.50
>>   Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>   GNU Emacs comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
>>   You may redistribute copies of GNU Emacs
>>   under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
>>   For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING.
>
> Yes, but it should be fixed in gnulib.  Emacs should compile cleanly
> without any arguments to configure.
Paul, do you have any comments here?
Information forwarded
to 
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#60843; Package 
emacs.
 (Wed, 06 Sep 2023 00:36:01 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Message #17 received at 60843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2023-09-05 14:11, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> Paul, do you have any comments here?
The bug was supposed to be fixed in Gnulib here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=5e3e0a70eb55ea628d080f3ca06612da0c656e0f
Didn't that work?
Information forwarded
to 
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#60843; Package 
emacs.
 (Wed, 06 Sep 2023 02:21:02 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Message #20 received at 60843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> writes:
> On 2023-09-05 14:11, Stefan Kangas wrote:
>> Paul, do you have any comments here?
>
> The bug was supposed to be fixed in Gnulib here:
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=5e3e0a70eb55ea628d080f3ca06612da0c656e0f
>
> Didn't that work?
It did, I think.
Reply sent
to 
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility.
 (Wed, 06 Sep 2023 06:33:01 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Notification sent
to 
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer.
 (Wed, 06 Sep 2023 06:33:02 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
Message #25 received at 60843-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> writes:
>
>> On 2023-09-05 14:11, Stefan Kangas wrote:
>>> Paul, do you have any comments here?
>>
>> The bug was supposed to be fixed in Gnulib here:
>>
>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=5e3e0a70eb55ea628d080f3ca06612da0c656e0f
>>
>> Didn't that work?
>
> It did, I think.
OK, closing this as fixed then.
Sorry for the noise, Paul.
bug archived.
Request was from 
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to 
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
 (Wed, 04 Oct 2023 11:24:21 GMT) 
Full text and 
rfc822 format available.
 
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 31 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.