GNU bug report logs - #61064
[PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Update to 3.7.8.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 61064 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 61064 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Update to 3.7.8.
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:55:18 -0500

* gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls-latest): Update to 3.7.8.
---

I test build this on Linux x86_64, and was able to use guile-gnutls with
this version. The list reported by `guix refresh -l` wasn't working for
me, so I didn't rebuild all the packages. Upstream claims taht there are
"No changes [ABI or API] since last version," so I think it's pretty
safe.

Release notes: https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2022-September/004765.html

 gnu/packages/tls.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/tls.scm b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
index bdac8a6e63..5dc9866077 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/tls.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ (define-public gnutls
 (define-public gnutls-latest
   (package
     (inherit gnutls)
-    (version "3.7.7")
+    (version "3.7.8")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnutls/v"
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ (define-public gnutls-latest
                                        "gnutls-cross.patch"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "01i1gl15k6qwvxmxx0by1mn9nlmcmym18wdpm7dn9awfsp8474dy"))))
+                "053ic7a9dcvzjx8pqjxn3022189i4f5klppfi9mgw3k7y2dd72n5"))))
 
     ;; Disable Guile bindings: they are now provided by Guile-GnuTLS.
     (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs gnutls)
-- 
2.39.1

Message #10 received at 61064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
To: 61064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#61064 acknowledged by developer         (control message
 for bug #61064)
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:20:56 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, GNU bug Tracking System wrote:

> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
> #61064: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Update to 3.7.8.,
> which was filed against the guix-patches package.
>
> Thank you for your report, which has now been closed.
> You can view the full report at
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61064
>
> If you require further information, please followup to 61064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Hi Maxim,

Thanks for taking the time to clean up some old issues. However, Can you 
say a little bit more about what the thinking is on this one? I notice 
that we still have some packages (e.g. dino via glib-networking) that are 
still on gnutls-3.7. Is the idea tha it would be better to switch those 
over to 3.8 than update 3.7?

Thanks!
Jack

Message #13 received at 61064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
Cc: 61064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#61064 acknowledged by developer         (control message
 for bug #61064)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:13:43 -0500

Hi,

Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us> writes:

> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, GNU bug Tracking System wrote:
>
>> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
>> #61064: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Update to 3.7.8.,
>> which was filed against the guix-patches package.
>>
>> Thank you for your report, which has now been closed.
>> You can view the full report at
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61064
>>
>> If you require further information, please followup to 61064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to clean up some old issues. However, Can
> you say a little bit more about what the thinking is on this one? I
> notice that we still have some packages (e.g. dino via
> glib-networking) that are still on gnutls-3.7. Is the idea tha it
> would be better to switch those over to 3.8 than update 3.7?

There's a single gnutls package, which is grafted with 3.8.2.  So any
updates to anterior versions are obsolete :-).

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #16 received at 61064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 61064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#61064] acknowledged by developer (control message for bug
 #61064)
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:38:18 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:

> There's a single gnutls package, which is grafted with 3.8.2.  So any
> updates to anterior versions are obsolete :-).

Very good, thanks for the explanation. If only I had looked at the Guix 
source first (and pulled as well, thanks for the 3.8.2 update). Next time 
:)

Best,
Jack

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.