GNU bug report logs -
#61070
gnu: packages: Add guile-simple-iterators.
Previous Next
Reported by: "J. Sims" <jtsims <at> protonmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 03:17:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 61070 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 61070 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61070
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 26 Jan 2023 03:17:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"J. Sims" <jtsims <at> protonmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 26 Jan 2023 03:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
guile-simple-iterators is a collection of macros to provide iteration inspired by Racket in Guile. I use them and find them delightful, so I thought other Guix users would appreciate ready access to them.
Thanks,
Juli
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-gnu-packages-Add-guile-simple-iterators.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61070
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 28 Jan 2023 06:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 61070 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Donnerstag, dem 26.01.2023 um 03:16 +0000 schrieb J. Sims:
> +(define-public guile-simple-iterators
> + (let ((commit "50f16a2b2aa57e657e52e19fb3c35bdc182cfa36")
> + (revision "0"))
> + (package
> + (name "guile-simple-iterators")
> + (version (git-version "0.0.0" revision commit))
> + (source (origin
> + (method git-fetch)
> + (uri (git-reference
> + (url
> +
> "https://gitlab.com/dustyweb/guile-simple-iterators")
> + (commit commit)))
> + (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> + (sha256
> + (base32
> +
> "1m1wirlnfwmp5a4rpszd5qsbwabz4ji033w6p2714p1r524ylah8"))))
It's better to dedent this a little so that url can fit on a line.
> + (build-system guile-build-system)
> + (native-inputs (list guile-3.0))
> + (home-page
> "https://gitlab.com/dustyweb/guile-simple-iterators")
> + (synopsis "Simple iterators for Guile")
> + (description
> + "This is a collection of iteration macros for Guile. They are
> inspired by
> +@code{racket}'s family of iterators. Specifically, the following
> iterators are
> +available:
> +@itemize
> +@item @code{for}
> +@item @code{for/map}
> +@item @code{for/c}
> +@item @code{for/fold}
> +@item @code{for/fold-right}
> +@item @code{for/folder}
> +@item @code{folder}
> +@end itemize")
> + (license license:expat))))
License should be asl2.0.
I'll wait for the CI results and schedule this towards pushing it on
February 5th (with adjustments for the above points).
Cheers
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61070
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 61070 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
On Saturday, January 28th, 2023 at 00:32, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll wait for the CI results and schedule this towards pushing it on
> February 5th (with adjustments for the above points).
Just to clarify, do I need to make the adjustments or are you making them before pushing? Either way is fine; the wording is just ambiguous.
> It's better to dedent this a little so that url can fit on a line.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Dedent the hash? And how so?
Also, thanks for catching the license; I'm not sure why my brain read "Apache Software License 2.0" and went, "Ah, yeah, expat" XD
Thanks,
Juli
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61070
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:15:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 61070 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Saturday, January 28th, 2023 at 11:58, J. Sims <jtsims <at> protonmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Dedent the hash? And how so?
Scratch that, I figured it out. I really need to start double-checking guix style's work...
I've gone ahead and written up the patch, too, so just ignore my previous message.
Thanks,
Juli
[0001-gnu-packages-Add-guile-simple-iterators.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61070
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 61070 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 17:58 +0000 schrieb J. Sims:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, January 28th, 2023 at 00:32, Liliana Marie Prikler
> <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'll wait for the CI results and schedule this towards pushing it
> > on
> > February 5th (with adjustments for the above points).
>
> Just to clarify, do I need to make the adjustments or are you making
> them before pushing? Either way is fine; the wording is just
> ambiguous.
They're small changes I can do as a reviewer ;)
> > It's better to dedent this a little so that url can fit on a line.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Dedent the hash? And how so?
No, dedent the entire origin.
Cheers
Reply sent
to
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 05 Feb 2023 06:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
"J. Sims" <jtsims <at> protonmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 05 Feb 2023 06:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 61070-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 19:26 +0100 schrieb Liliana Marie
Prikler:
> Am Samstag, dem 28.01.2023 um 17:58 +0000 schrieb J. Sims:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday, January 28th, 2023 at 00:32, Liliana Marie Prikler
> > <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'll wait for the CI results and schedule this towards pushing it
> > > on February 5th (with adjustments for the above points).
> >
> > Just to clarify, do I need to make the adjustments or are you
> > making them before pushing? Either way is fine; the wording is just
> > ambiguous.
> They're small changes I can do as a reviewer ;)
>
> > > It's better to dedent this a little so that url can fit on a
> > > line.
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Dedent the hash? And how
> > so?
> No, dedent the entire origin.
Aaaand it's pushed.
Thanks
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 05 Mar 2023 12:24:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 58 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.