GNU bug report logs -
#61147
[PATCH] gnu: emacs-org-board: Not dependent on emacs-org
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 61147 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 61147 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61147
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 12:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 12:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-org-board): remove emacs-org
Org is already included with emacs.
---
gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
index 4b2fc8f0dc..92a11e18b5 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
@@ -25142,7 +25142,7 @@ (define-public emacs-org-board
(inputs
(list wget))
(propagated-inputs
- (list emacs-org emacs-ztree))
+ (list emacs-ztree))
(home-page "https://github.com/charlesroelli/org-board")
(synopsis "Bookmarking and web archival system for Org mode")
(description
base-commit: b9e6e31877cdb96cceba4d1ec6268f86b824dec4
--
2.39.1
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61147
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Cayetano Santos via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-org-board): remove emacs-org
>
> Org is already included with emacs.
This is a fair point, and there are multiple occurrences of similar
situations in our code base (with, e.g., emacs-seq).
However, I think there is no consensus at the moment; it is not clear if
we should use the bundled package, or the latest one. I lean towards the
second idea, as long as our packages are up-to-date. In any case,
you may want to raise the subject on the devel mailing list instead of
trying to changes status package-wise.
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61147
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61147
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 18:57:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>dim. 29 janv. 2023 at 15:50, Nicolas Goaziou
><mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> ...
> Hello,
>
> Cayetano Santos via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
> writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-org-board): remove
>> emacs-org
>>
>> Org is already included with emacs.
>
> This is a fair point, and there are multiple occurrences of
> similar
> situations in our code base (with, e.g., emacs-seq).
>
> However, I think there is no consensus at the moment; it is not
> clear if
> we should use the bundled package, or the latest one. I lean
> towards the
> second idea, as long as our packages are up-to-date. In any
> case,
> you may want to raise the subject on the devel mailing list
> instead of
> trying to changes status package-wise.
>
> WDYT?
You’re right. Devel list is the place to discuss about this before
going
any further.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61147
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 18:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61147
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Cayetano Santos via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> You’re right. Devel list is the place to discuss about this before
> going
> any further.
OK. Then, for the time being, I'm closing this bug report. You can
always re-open it depending on how it turns out on the devel ML.
Reply sent
to
Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:48:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 58 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.