GNU bug report logs -
#61160
5 test failures on Android
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 61160 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-sed <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61160
; Package
sed
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-sed <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Building GNU sed from its git repo, with current Gnulib,
after working around
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/sed-devel/2023-01/msg00001.html>,
I see 5 test failures on Android 11, within the Termux app
(as described in https://gitlab.com/ghwiki/gnow-how/-/wikis/Platforms/Android ):
FAIL: testsuite/compile-errors
FAIL: testsuite/mb-y-translate
FAIL: testsuite/normalize-text
These are platform-independent, already reported at
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61159 .
FAIL: testsuite/mb-bad-delim
FAIL: testsuite/bsd-wrapper
Do you need my help for investigating these?
Bruno
[test-suite.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-sed <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61160
; Package
sed
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 01:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 61160 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 4:58 PM Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org> wrote:
> Building GNU sed from its git repo, with current Gnulib,
> after working around
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/sed-devel/2023-01/msg00001.html>,
> I see 5 test failures on Android 11, within the Termux app
> (as described in https://gitlab.com/ghwiki/gnow-how/-/wikis/Platforms/Android ):
>
> FAIL: testsuite/compile-errors
> FAIL: testsuite/mb-y-translate
> FAIL: testsuite/normalize-text
Thanks. I pushed a fix for the above.
> These are platform-independent, already reported at
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61159 .
>
> FAIL: testsuite/mb-bad-delim
> FAIL: testsuite/bsd-wrapper
>
> Do you need my help for investigating these?
I would appreciate your time, indeed.
Information forwarded
to
bug-sed <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61160
; Package
sed
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 02:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 61160 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> > FAIL: testsuite/mb-bad-delim
> > FAIL: testsuite/bsd-wrapper
> >
> > Do you need my help for investigating these?
>
> I would appreciate your time, indeed.
What should I look into, more exactly? You're more familiar with the
'sed' codebase. What are the hypotheses to check? Which values to print?
Bruno
Information forwarded
to
bug-sed <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61160
; Package
sed
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 02:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 61160 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 6:28 PM Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org> wrote:
> > > FAIL: testsuite/mb-bad-delim
> > > FAIL: testsuite/bsd-wrapper
> > >
> > > Do you need my help for investigating these?
> >
> > I would appreciate your time, indeed.
>
> What should I look into, more exactly? You're more familiar with the
> 'sed' codebase. What are the hypotheses to check? Which values to print?
I have barely even looked at the latter one. Didn't dig deep enough
to be able to give a useful hint. I'll be happy to deal with it, but won't
have more time for sed for a couple of days.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 280 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.