GNU bug report logs -
#61182
What is different about Emacs 29?
Previous Next
Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:32:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Fixed in version 29.0.60
Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 61182 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 61182 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61182
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:32:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:32:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
In the GNU Emacs FAQ there is the node "What is different about Emacs 28?",
but not yet the node "What is different about Emacs 29?". Should this node
be just the reverse copy of Antinews, i.e. Anti-Antinews?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61182
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 61182 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:11:22 +0200
>
> In the GNU Emacs FAQ there is the node "What is different about Emacs 28?",
> but not yet the node "What is different about Emacs 29?". Should this node
> be just the reverse copy of Antinews, i.e. Anti-Antinews?
More or less. It doesn't have to list exactly the same items, though.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61182
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 01 Feb 2023 05:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 61182 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > In the GNU Emacs FAQ there is the node "What is different about Emacs 28?",
> > but not yet the node "What is different about Emacs 29?". Should this node
> > be just the reverse copy of Antinews, i.e. Anti-Antinews?
> More or less. It doesn't have to list exactly the same items, though.
This summary of Emacs 29 news should list helpful things for you to
know to use Emacs 29 based on an Emacs 28 manual.
The Emacs 28 Antinews describes things important for you to know
to use Emacs 28 based on an Emacs 29 manual.
It's the same kind of idea, but the details are different -- usually
there is no overlap.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
bug marked as fixed in version 29.0.60, send any further explanations to
61182 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Request was from
Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 05 Feb 2023 18:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 06 Mar 2023 12:24:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 44 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.