GNU bug report logs -
#61864
[PATCH] scripts: expose 'allow-collisions' for 'guix install'
Previous Next
Reported by: Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 06:29:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 61864 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 61864 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61864
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 28 Feb 2023 06:29:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 28 Feb 2023 06:29:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* guix/scripts/install.scm: 'allow-collisions' option of 'package'
exposed for 'install' alias
---
guix/scripts/install.scm | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/install.scm b/guix/scripts/install.scm
index 63e625f266..4ab64b5b54 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/install.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/install.scm
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ (define (show-help)
(display (G_ "
-p, --profile=PROFILE use PROFILE instead of the user's default profile"))
;; '--bootstrap' not shown here.
+ (display (G_ "
+ --allow-collisions do not treat collisions in the profile as an error"))
(display (G_ "
-v, --verbosity=LEVEL use the given verbosity LEVEL"))
(newline)
@@ -61,7 +63,8 @@ (define %options
;; Preserve some of the 'guix package' options.
(append (filter (lambda (option)
(any (cut member <> (option-names option))
- '("profile" "dry-run" "verbosity" "bootstrap")))
+ '("profile" "dry-run" "verbosity" "bootstrap"
+ "allow-collisions")))
%package-options)
%transformation-options
base-commit: cb0d8100b288b5b0d130820207db17764b7d2140
prerequisite-patch-id: 2ab0872d80951bb6f8df7bc8c4211f008a5cc6b8
prerequisite-patch-id: 1fa93a6e05a30a2a3a92d11ff1d7bdf7912e2724
prerequisite-patch-id: 8027f51c310a66f545421b43e1283ed516d41afc
--
2.39.1
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61864
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 02 Mar 2023 20:04:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 61864 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:28:46PM -0800, Andy Tai wrote:
> * guix/scripts/install.scm: 'allow-collisions' option of 'package'
> exposed for 'install' alias
I'm curious, what's the rationale for this?
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61864
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 02 Mar 2023 20:40:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 61864 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I run into collisions in profile from time to time and I can resolve it via
guix package --allow-collosions -i (or -u)
so it is useful to make that available in the two "alias" commands as well
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:02 PM Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:28:46PM -0800, Andy Tai wrote:
> > * guix/scripts/install.scm: 'allow-collisions' option of 'package'
> > exposed for 'install' alias
>
> I'm curious, what's the rationale for this?
>
--
Andy Tai, atai <at> atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai, Line: andy_tai, WeChat:
andytai1010
Year 2023 民國112年
自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟
自動的行為力是勞動與技能
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61864
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:08:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 61864 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* guix/scripts/install.scm: Expose 'allow-collisions' option
of 'package' for 'install' alias
---
guix/scripts/install.scm | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/install.scm b/guix/scripts/install.scm
index 63e625f266..4ab64b5b54 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/install.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/install.scm
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ (define (show-help)
(display (G_ "
-p, --profile=PROFILE use PROFILE instead of the user's default profile"))
;; '--bootstrap' not shown here.
+ (display (G_ "
+ --allow-collisions do not treat collisions in the profile as an error"))
(display (G_ "
-v, --verbosity=LEVEL use the given verbosity LEVEL"))
(newline)
@@ -61,7 +63,8 @@ (define %options
;; Preserve some of the 'guix package' options.
(append (filter (lambda (option)
(any (cut member <> (option-names option))
- '("profile" "dry-run" "verbosity" "bootstrap")))
+ '("profile" "dry-run" "verbosity" "bootstrap"
+ "allow-collisions")))
%package-options)
%transformation-options
base-commit: ea870a70e93e7ea93e35fa8e0afc3cfdb1b66ba2
--
2.39.1
Reply sent
to
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 01 Apr 2023 16:55:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Andy Tai <atai <at> atai.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 01 Apr 2023 16:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 61864-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 12:38:45PM -0800, Andy Tai wrote:
> I run into collisions in profile from time to time and I can resolve it via
>
> guix package --allow-collosions -i (or -u)
>
> so it is useful to make that available in the two "alias" commands as well
I see, that makes sense. Sorry I'm slow to reply, I thought about it for
a while.
Allowing profile collisions is a risky action that can cause subtle and
hard to diagnose bugs, and it often is done without understanding the
consequences. In my experience, collisions are often allowed by people
who don't understand the negative effects of collisions, or how profiles
are constructed.
When reported, the consequent problems can take up a lot of time for the
people trying to help.
Because of those reasons, I prefer to only expose this option in `guix
package`, which is a more advanced interface. My hope is that
segregating the option like this will discourage use of
'--allow-collisions' and prevent an increase in bug reports of the "user
error" type.
If you disagree, please feel free to reopen the bug and optionally CC
some other reviewers, or bring it up on IRC.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 30 Apr 2023 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 14 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.