GNU bug report logs - #61882
emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other path issues

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>; dated Wed, 1 Mar 2023 03:04:01 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 61882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2023 12:49:34 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 02 07:49:34 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pXiNK-00073b-4a
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 07:49:34 -0500
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:36786)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1pXiNI-00073M-TM
 for 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 07:49:33 -0500
Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PS9sR5p0LzDrlK;
 Thu,  2 Mar 2023 12:49:15 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1677761366; bh=4iojBqR2ss6YnHvSGDZmUDBgolQLHOaemFX8YFuFsDg=;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From;
 b=l8R9qgO4z5EGocTxrIXyLbTEJFxgtLN1QwzODjLVxZxnBKJvhhOfFT0XPXdHrYVHn
 UynOt2dJK4KP8jsNNNi8XvT2UmfumHUoZKpwCtLtRzjJpyDM0ivvxjb8mlz1Yoae4z
 e+TV+x5HIMBcHzt2QUADQJoLSSBDVVJSEjWB6pPg=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 2F74145C3773B8A0335FC6EF95739127E1A1B262D24B89192433D92195515415
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PS9sQ6LcMz1yBT;
 Thu,  2 Mar 2023 12:49:14 +0000 (UTC)
References: <87bkld896j.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <6525e61f911b5c03547594432ff9102636c9a5cf.camel@HIDDEN>
 <87ilfklns5.fsf@HIDDEN> <20230301144027.GA37832@LionPure>
 <87edq8sal2.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <19974c7f997015c1c19c2ebf305996ea32af0199.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#61882: emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other
 path issues
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 13:39:54 +0100
In-reply-to: <19974c7f997015c1c19c2ebf305996ea32af0199.camel@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <87a60v9v3z.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61882
Cc: 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bokr@HIDDEN
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)


Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes:

>> % ls ~/.guix-profile/share/emacs/site-lisp/
>> 
>> This does not print any org-roam directory.
> Which leads me to believe that
> $ ls /gnu/store/bxxjy8ydm62fr0bckxfrj27xnlvqbfmy-emacs-org-roam-2.2.2-
> 0.74422df/share/emacs/site-lisp
> does not report any such directory either.

It definitely reports it, I just didn't paste the result to save space.

I'll try running a repair when I get home, since FS corruption could
lead to any kind of weird behaviour, but I haven't had any corruption on
that machine ever, BTRFS has been pretty reliable for me.

Sorry for being so grumpy, I guess I should have highlighted the profile
corruption thing over the emacs-next-pgtk specific bits.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61882; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 61882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2023 07:11:25 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 02 02:11:24 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55654 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pXd64-0004JR-Aj
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 02:11:24 -0500
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:45626)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1pXd61-0004JA-M3
 for 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2023 02:11:22 -0500
Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PS2MT2tYYz3whG;
 Thu,  2 Mar 2023 08:11:17 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1677741077;
 bh=afpNiULnBSPRmBMkZ933531wae8W6drFEPve/Zz4WmI=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=Q6yGBluNKrkkZ5PWjcJmzUW7nqXjr9wUkIBWZvZWhPV57lfEyBAMqSpz5zR0Ttjk1
 ePb/LNSouqVnBIHDsaijaxIvMFbkbp1GLPYZ4Q7sUKUPsndCTcR46NbDPwJPkokue8
 H6wHHit9ezbujOXYLfopsosr3rT1glE+CZLtMzDQ=
Message-ID: <19974c7f997015c1c19c2ebf305996ea32af0199.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#61882: emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other
 path issues
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
To: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>, bokr@HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 08:11:16 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87edq8sal2.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87bkld896j.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <6525e61f911b5c03547594432ff9102636c9a5cf.camel@HIDDEN>
 <87ilfklns5.fsf@HIDDEN> <20230301144027.GA37832@LionPure>
 <87edq8sal2.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ
X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 
X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61882
Cc: 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Am Mittwoch, dem 01.03.2023 um 17:11 +0100 schrieb Csepp:
>=20
> bokr@HIDDEN=C2=A0writes:
>=20
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > On +2023-03-01 12:16:56 +0100, Csepp wrote:
> > [...]
> > > How the hell would my paths affect what's in the bin folder?=C2=A0
> > > Like, the flatpak binary is literally not present in the profile,
> > > that's why it's not showing up in $PATH.
> >=20
> > Could something in one of your path directories
> > accidentally have gotten a name starting with '-' ?
> > (or full name '-')?
> >=20
> > Surprising things can happen depending on how an
> > app rejects an unexpected option, or tries to use it :)
> >=20
> > BTW: If you can't delete a file named '-'
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 try emacs dirmode. IIRC emacs seems to see
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 anything and be able to delete it.
> >=20
> > Do you have any scripts that are both sourced and executed?
> > If so, are they doing return or exit respectively or
> > something trickier as intended?
>=20
> So, first things first:
> % guix package -I | grep -E '(flatpak|roam)'
> emacs-org-roam=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A02.2.2-
> 0.74422df=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0out=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0/gn=
u/store/bxxjy8ydm62fr0bckxfrj27x
> nlvqbfmy-emacs-org-roam-2.2.2-0.74422df
> flatpak=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A01.14.1=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
out=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0/gnu/
> store/mf0k987xvpgk79l74lmdjv9jz8gy8cdf-flatpak-1.14.1
>=20
> Both are installed.
>=20
> ls $(guix build flatpak)/bin/
> flatpak=C2=A0 flatpak-bisect=C2=A0 flatpak-coredumpctl
>=20
> The store paths also match.
>=20
> This path also exists:
> $(guix build emacs-org-roam)/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-roam-2.2.2-
> 0.74422df
You're comparing apples to oranges here.  `guix build' need not
reproduce the contents of your profile, especially if you pulled a new
version of guix in between.  Instead, try listing the contents of the
reported store paths.

As for `guix build' and `guix shell' producing different results within
a single generation, the only instance I know of which has this
requires the presence of grafts (and IIRC might already be fixed?)

> I don't know the details of how Emacs loads things, but org-roam has
> an org-roam-autoloads.el while lsp-mode (a package that does work)
> does not.
There ought to be a subdirs.el in your $GUIX_PROFILE/share/emacs/site-
lisp, which explicitly mentions the directories to add to your load
path.  These are store paths.  Thus, even in the off chance that some
symlink in your profile is gone (which I'd find highly alerting in the
first place), it should correctly see the package to add.

> Some relevant paths:
> EMACSLOADPATH=3D/home/raingloom/.guix-profile/share/emacs/site-lisp
> PATH=3D/home/raingloom/.local/bin:/run/setuid-
> programs:/home/raingloom/.config/guix/current/bin:/home/raingloom/.gu
> ix-profile/bin:/home/raingloom/.guix-profile/sbin:/run/current-
> system/profile/bin:/run/current-system/profile/sbin
>=20
> The only additional item is on PATH and at worst it would shadow an
> existing flatpak binary.=C2=A0 But it doesn't, there is just a single
> utility
> script there that I should probably get rid of.
>=20
> Also:
> guix shell --check -p .guix-profile
> This seems to hang.=C2=A0 Or at least it's taking an awful long time for
> something so simple.
You could try something easier like the aforementioned `guix shell
emacs-next-pgtk emacs-org-roam --pure --check'.

> I'm running Guix as my system distro and I'm not in the habit of
> adding random junk to my dotfiles, so I would be rather surprised if
> this turned out to be a path issue
Good to know.

> especially when it's obvious the packages are literally not even
> showing up in the profile they are supposed to show up in.
This was not obvious from your previous report, which see
> emacs-org-roam is installed in my default profile and all the other
> emacs packages work with the emacs-next-pgtk package in the same
> profile.
> guix shell emacs-org-roam emacs-next-pgtk does not work, guix shell
> emacs-org-roam emacs does.
Basing my response on this rather than the otherwise inconsequential
bit about flatpak, it would appear as though you are reporting a bug
specific to emacs-next-pgtk rather than emacs-org-roam.

> % ls ~/.guix-profile/share/emacs/site-lisp/
>=20
> This does not print any org-roam directory.
Which leads me to believe that
$ ls /gnu/store/bxxjy8ydm62fr0bckxfrj27xnlvqbfmy-emacs-org-roam-2.2.2-
0.74422df/share/emacs/site-lisp
does not report any such directory either.

If that is indeed the case, try `guix build --repair'-ing it.

This still does not explain the different behaviour of emacs vs. emacs-
next-pgtk in your shell, which has further debugging complexities due
to the lack of isolation.

Cheers




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61882; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 61882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2023 16:25:28 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 01 11:25:28 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pXPGh-0001MM-Ur
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 11:25:28 -0500
Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:39216)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1pXPGe-0001M4-1B
 for 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 11:25:26 -0500
Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
 by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PRfjB0nntz9t2X;
 Wed,  1 Mar 2023 16:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1677687918; bh=zo2hU3i1I9+I8EIe6AbK09UPGZ3hD+AbGQCpn9f74js=;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From;
 b=q/G/QLM/CeTp6fvaCRRdE+O1XGGv6Qw5VEMhbLsAojWMIpNqraEiaSy4fueCNCw4L
 iI2mo3bTRPu6Xbkqm3Gv68ykpyTZRKLAHWttZlLaBBdMPjjBmgizRC7VgAErP0TPbM
 8uJ/zXhRYxHB5sijkZmnACBnM/hk1z3CLu27yA00=
X-Riseup-User-ID: D35D44672FD7BCE7EC3CDF5B87E069B683258AE5177455C5C47E19B4DEF72177
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PRfj90rldz1y8Z;
 Wed,  1 Mar 2023 16:25:16 +0000 (UTC)
References: <87bkld896j.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <6525e61f911b5c03547594432ff9102636c9a5cf.camel@HIDDEN>
 <87ilfklns5.fsf@HIDDEN> <20230301144027.GA37832@LionPure>
From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: bokr@HIDDEN
Subject: Re: bug#61882: emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other
 path issues
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 17:11:12 +0100
In-reply-to: <20230301144027.GA37832@LionPure>
Message-ID: <87edq8sal2.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61882
Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,
 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)


bokr@HIDDEN writes:

> Hi,
>
> On +2023-03-01 12:16:56 +0100, Csepp wrote:
> [...]
>> How the hell would my paths affect what's in the bin folder?  Like, the
>> flatpak binary is literally not present in the profile, that's why it's
>> not showing up in $PATH.
>
> Could something in one of your path directories
> accidentally have gotten a name starting with '-' ?
> (or full name '-')?
>
> Surprising things can happen depending on how an
> app rejects an unexpected option, or tries to use it :)
>
> BTW: If you can't delete a file named '-'
>      try emacs dirmode. IIRC emacs seems to see
>      anything and be able to delete it.
>
> Do you have any scripts that are both sourced and executed?
> If so, are they doing return or exit respectively or
> something trickier as intended?

So, first things first:
% guix package -I | grep -E '(flatpak|roam)'
emacs-org-roam      	2.2.2-0.74422df   	out       	/gnu/store/bxxjy8ydm62fr0bckxfrj27xnlvqbfmy-emacs-org-roam-2.2.2-0.74422df
flatpak             	1.14.1            	out       	/gnu/store/mf0k987xvpgk79l74lmdjv9jz8gy8cdf-flatpak-1.14.1

Both are installed.

ls $(guix build flatpak)/bin/
flatpak  flatpak-bisect  flatpak-coredumpctl

The store paths also match.

This path also exists:
$(guix build emacs-org-roam)/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-roam-2.2.2-0.74422df

I don't know the details of how Emacs loads things, but org-roam has an
org-roam-autoloads.el while lsp-mode (a package that does work) does
not.

Some relevant paths:
EMACSLOADPATH=/home/raingloom/.guix-profile/share/emacs/site-lisp
PATH=/home/raingloom/.local/bin:/run/setuid-programs:/home/raingloom/.config/guix/current/bin:/home/raingloom/.guix-profile/bin:/home/raingloom/.guix-profile/sbin:/run/current-system/profile/bin:/run/current-system/profile/sbin

The only additional item is on PATH and at worst it would shadow an
existing flatpak binary.  But it doesn't, there is just a single utility
script there that I should probably get rid of.

Also:
guix shell --check -p .guix-profile
This seems to hang.  Or at least it's taking an awful long time for
something so simple.

I'm running Guix as my system distro and I'm not in the habit of adding
random junk to my dotfiles, so I would be rather surprised if this
turned out to be a path issue, especially when it's obvious the packages
are literally not even showing up in the profile they are supposed to
show up in.

% ls ~/.guix-profile/share/emacs/site-lisp/

This does not print any org-roam directory.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61882; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 61882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2023 14:40:55 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 01 09:40:55 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53119 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pXNdX-0003jE-8x
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 09:40:55 -0500
Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.200.34]:33456)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <bokr@HIDDEN>) id 1pXNdU-0003iy-TM
 for 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 09:40:53 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5DD68ADB;
 Wed,  1 Mar 2023 14:40:46 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail;
 t=1677681646; bh=aSnO0hUMDSRAO/Q9x4DPhpYfcTyUVReRqiKFXPv/FPE=;
 h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=h2B0mIX226t+bZT83NVciZWyxQFBCD2H0ZDkyGa27EZ6w1zlaUCWO51/CqzJcQSKA
 y38B7CP1SbiJAbjRfiqr/jKsM3Nrv7gYBBw1vTDvbkTGvZYkgp4psSx+9UQDXCL9T6
 yd91AY4woOqwc/Mu14dLTnMqJAtACT7x1N5f3qTfrO3I6l8aRFZxi82kZuq30yem3/
 SABBlojeEj0Ttj5yixYA1hGQPZpd0AT+blHEGFK/QKry+op34gbW3w1kNRzj5Lt14h
 X95+q1r2uCm3mmAp+9pTFo5wVrLlKEza8/zYg9/a9gPLGQ+jCBKlfYicOzHvd9v2qX
 uluEf8PzXY5PA==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at emo07-pco.easydns.vpn
Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (emo07-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id lQg3J_ZzXDDS; Wed,  1 Mar 2023 14:40:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (m5-242-216-138.cust.tele2.se [5.242.216.138])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
 SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
 by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E197607A7;
 Wed,  1 Mar 2023 14:40:45 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail;
 t=1677681646; bh=aSnO0hUMDSRAO/Q9x4DPhpYfcTyUVReRqiKFXPv/FPE=;
 h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=h2B0mIX226t+bZT83NVciZWyxQFBCD2H0ZDkyGa27EZ6w1zlaUCWO51/CqzJcQSKA
 y38B7CP1SbiJAbjRfiqr/jKsM3Nrv7gYBBw1vTDvbkTGvZYkgp4psSx+9UQDXCL9T6
 yd91AY4woOqwc/Mu14dLTnMqJAtACT7x1N5f3qTfrO3I6l8aRFZxi82kZuq30yem3/
 SABBlojeEj0Ttj5yixYA1hGQPZpd0AT+blHEGFK/QKry+op34gbW3w1kNRzj5Lt14h
 X95+q1r2uCm3mmAp+9pTFo5wVrLlKEza8/zYg9/a9gPLGQ+jCBKlfYicOzHvd9v2qX
 uluEf8PzXY5PA==
From: bokr@HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:40:28 +0100
To: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#61882: emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other
 path issues
Message-ID: <20230301144027.GA37832@LionPure>
References: <87bkld896j.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <6525e61f911b5c03547594432ff9102636c9a5cf.camel@HIDDEN>
 <87ilfklns5.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87ilfklns5.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61882
Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>,
 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: bokr@HIDDEN
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Hi,

On +2023-03-01 12:16:56 +0100, Csepp wrote:
[...]
> How the hell would my paths affect what's in the bin folder?  Like, the
> flatpak binary is literally not present in the profile, that's why it's
> not showing up in $PATH.

Could something in one of your path directories
accidentally have gotten a name starting with '-' ?
(or full name '-')?

Surprising things can happen depending on how an
app rejects an unexpected option, or tries to use it :)

BTW: If you can't delete a file named '-'
     try emacs dirmode. IIRC emacs seems to see
     anything and be able to delete it.

Do you have any scripts that are both sourced and executed?
If so, are they doing return or exit respectively or
something trickier as intended?

--
Regards,
Bengt Richter




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61882; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 61882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2023 11:22:23 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 01 06:22:23 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pXKXP-000433-I3
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 06:22:23 -0500
Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:42308)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1pXKXN-00042o-8P
 for 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 06:22:22 -0500
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
 by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PRWzW2XvMz9s3N;
 Wed,  1 Mar 2023 11:22:15 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1677669735; bh=qGbpA7oCKU0dzCCK5p/RS0+Z0UaYaMbTMw00TNxlg6w=;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From;
 b=qTkbz0TRWhD2jMK3jRlEvu6WDbWCPJmJqU8E+2Ra7b+WFu9WV+pdCPNoPqqXrQmRI
 gBWUG+BesH6Am1YWg5NcS1lBc73GH2UvBnQ2dV8nw+oUkl2vd1wpIcq292I6+Iimog
 Cfout1f+cbuttGXfChzpmy00Qf0EvrQc34U8JfRU=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 385A679598CFBA16014F84F7CD9DEC96320096EC1DC85D59D7DF19973DC75273
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PRWzV4VmLz5vTc;
 Wed,  1 Mar 2023 11:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
References: <87bkld896j.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <6525e61f911b5c03547594432ff9102636c9a5cf.camel@HIDDEN>
From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other path issues
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:16:56 +0100
In-reply-to: <6525e61f911b5c03547594432ff9102636c9a5cf.camel@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <87ilfklns5.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61882
Cc: 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)


Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN> writes:

> Am Mittwoch, dem 01.03.2023 um 02:58 +0000 schrieb Csepp:
>> emacs-org-roam is installed in my default profile and all the other
>> emacs packages work with the emacs-next-pgtk package in the same
>> profile.
>> guix shell emacs-org-roam emacs-next-pgtk does not work, guix shell
>> emacs-org-roam emacs does.
>>=20
>> Possibly related: when I had flatpak installed it was not showing up
>> in my profile's bin directory, so I had to open it through guix
>> shell.
>>=20
>> Maybe this is related to the bug where shell and build produce
>> differen derivations?
> You probably messed up some of your paths.  As a hint,
>   guix shell --pure -E DISPLAY emacs-next-pgtk emacs-org-roam -- emacs
> should run without any issues (apart from your init.el not working as
> intended =E2=80=93 in that case, supply -Q).
>
> Try adding --check to your invocation of guix shell to see whether your
> rc files are borked.
How the hell would my paths affect what's in the bin folder?  Like, the
flatpak binary is literally not present in the profile, that's why it's
not showing up in $PATH.
Well, I'll check next time I'm on that machine, right now I'm writing
from the netbook and I'm in a bit of a hurry and don't want to wait for
derivation computations.
But I'm like 99% sure it's not due to my paths, because all other emacs
packages work.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61882; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 61882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2023 09:25:53 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 01 04:25:53 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pXIib-0004Yj-5O
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 04:25:52 -0500
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:39009)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>) id 1pXIiY-0004YY-D2
 for 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 04:25:47 -0500
Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PRTP21Jrlz3wd0;
 Wed,  1 Mar 2023 10:25:42 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at;
 s=mailrelay; t=1677662743;
 bh=1TGX4TWVeUnnCeN+NXzz0/HpJeHmlIQULnxo6ERYLzg=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=V1or5PXGFdIiUTa0A9vinluBDmRofArS8HYku1PzxInY5pJkTeaoOY8mzMxwgWi0v
 0L+4hmzlb5krE1Ko9Q7JZO+P6IRKCN3naBVunoCXCrwn7YmeTB7h2eAtREilmpcCM+
 tRLmnXcQr9hLFDa3fiqyzlzoHn0zYCBXP48bk7/0=
Message-ID: <6525e61f911b5c03547594432ff9102636c9a5cf.camel@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other path issues
From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@HIDDEN>
To: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>, 61882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 10:25:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87bkld896j.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87bkld896j.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ
X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 
X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61882
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Am Mittwoch, dem 01.03.2023 um 02:58 +0000 schrieb Csepp:
> emacs-org-roam is installed in my default profile and all the other
> emacs packages work with the emacs-next-pgtk package in the same
> profile.
> guix shell emacs-org-roam emacs-next-pgtk does not work, guix shell
> emacs-org-roam emacs does.
>=20
> Possibly related: when I had flatpak installed it was not showing up
> in my profile's bin directory, so I had to open it through guix
> shell.
>=20
> Maybe this is related to the bug where shell and build produce
> differen derivations?
You probably messed up some of your paths.  As a hint,
  guix shell --pure -E DISPLAY emacs-next-pgtk emacs-org-roam -- emacs
should run without any issues (apart from your init.el not working as
intended =E2=80=93 in that case, supply -Q).

Try adding --check to your invocation of guix shell to see whether your
rc files are borked.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61882; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2023 03:03:57 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 22:03:57 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52293 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1pXCl2-0005Lz-Rw
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:03:57 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53640)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1pXCl1-0005Lr-VE
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:03:56 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>)
 id 1pXCl0-0000nU-Bl
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:03:54 -0500
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>)
 id 1pXCkx-0004uE-IA
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:03:53 -0500
Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PRJwP1KLyzDqMD
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed,  1 Mar 2023 03:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1677639829; bh=bZuhAABsi44aVNXF3XPFq6HNorlCcIDRAcEtWko63yM=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=bkq/dXZ0Ij03HSBA5ml+7peYIAyZQuiHayWaxC3iOpyr1ct3+o/obaioTu3fSQ6pe
 BibCG2VbOQaxGYrKDp70gIumtTP/JzwH4QGRp0gFpAhTMUa6IUs+GTJI0lv9KIFE4v
 Jfdi/WVo2ilchnwEssITmQnmiPJeHkeLF6b7yVCY=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 60E0ED6350CFF691941E7AEF5623487A181DC07E7D895E5E0A72FA2998BC0D48
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PRJwN3hX2z5vgM
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed,  1 Mar 2023 03:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other path issues
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 02:58:15 +0000
Message-ID: <87bkld896j.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129;
 envelope-from=raingloom@HIDDEN; helo=mx1.riseup.net
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

emacs-org-roam is installed in my default profile and all the other
emacs packages work with the emacs-next-pgtk package in the same
profile.
guix shell emacs-org-roam emacs-next-pgtk does not work, guix shell
emacs-org-roam emacs does.

Possibly related: when I had flatpak installed it was not showing up in
my profile's bin directory, so I had to open it through guix shell.

Maybe this is related to the bug where shell and build produce different
derivations?

current guix describe output (but this has been going on for at least a
month or so)
Generation 186	Feb 28 2023 02:57:13	(current)
  guix ff5fbcc
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: ff5fbcc19bce6e94ead0cc79b27ae8ed0307463d
  raingloom c75fd77
    repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~raingloom/guix-packages
    branch: master
    commit: c75fd77980c7c5b45c91b0d921a25d8558266f41
  guix-science 5fc5e3e
    repository URL: https://github.com/guix-science/guix-science.git
    branch: master
    commit: 5fc5e3e855c298a692c62129e9edd0fcc7c6949f
  nonguix 3a1e9f0
    repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix.git
    branch: master
    commit: 3a1e9f0507d99403d1ba0f5557ee868b95b61eef




Acknowledgement sent to Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#61882; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 13:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.