GNU logs - #6191, boring messages

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#6191: invert-face: different behaviour under POSIX and MS-Windows systems
Resent-From: Eduard Wiebe <ew@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:08:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6191.B.127382807610724 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 6191 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Eduard Wiebe <ew@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix)
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:06:55 +0200
Message-ID: <86zl02vols.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org


 Hello,

i was to emulate "emacs*reverseVideo: true" under MS-Windows and rant
in some dark corners of `invert-face'.

Here my observations:

0. emacs -Q

1. M-x invert-face RET cursor RET

   MS-Windows: no effect

   FreeBSD:    no effect

   
2. M-x invert-face RET default RET

   MS-Windows: inverts only the background color, not the cursor face, which
               implies that cursor disappears in almost cases (buffer sections).

   FreeBSD:    inverts both


3. M-x invert-face RET cursor RET

   MS-Windows: invert cursor face as expected

   FreeBSD:    no effect


Tested under 23.1, 23.2 und the trunk version.

-- 
Eduard Wiebe

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eduard Wiebe <ew@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#6191: Acknowledgement (invert-face: different behaviour under
 POSIX and MS-Windows systems)
Message-ID: <handler.6191.B.127382807610724.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <86zl02vols.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 6191
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 6191 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:08:01 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with GNU.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 6191 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
6191: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D6191
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#6191: invert-face: different behaviour under POSIX and MS-Windows systems
Resent-From: Kevin Rodgers <kevin.d.rodgers@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 03:51:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6191.B.127389546113367 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
connect(): No such file or directory
From: Kevin Rodgers <kevin.d.rodgers@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 21:50:41 -0600
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <hsl5mg$87h$1@HIDDEN>
References: <86zl02vols.fsf@HIDDEN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@HIDDEN
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-71-237-24-138.hsd1.co.comcast.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
In-Reply-To: <86zl02vols.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----)

Eduard Wiebe wrote:
> i was to emulate "emacs*reverseVideo: true" under MS-Windows and rant
> in some dark corners of `invert-face'.

What is the difference between the --reverse-video command line option (aka -rv
aka -r) and the emacs*reverseVideo:on X resource?

-- 
Kevin Rodgers
Denver, Colorado, USA

Message sent to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#6191: invert-face: different behaviour under POSIX and MS-Windows systems
In-Reply-To: <86zl02vols.fsf@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: Eduard Wiebe <usenet@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 11:48:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6191.B.127392403927353 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
connect(): No such file or directory
From: Eduard Wiebe <usenet@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 13:46:59 +0200
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <86ljblfkuk.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <86zl02vols.fsf@HIDDEN> <hsl5mg$87h$1@HIDDEN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@HIDDEN
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: f055098114.adsl.alicedsl.de
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:J4pLzjaQ5XsqUz2FCAcxvIwnmHQ=
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----)

Kevin Rodgers <kevin.d.rodgers@HIDDEN> writes:

> Eduard Wiebe wrote:
>> i was to emulate "emacs*reverseVideo: true" under MS-Windows and rant
>> in some dark corners of `invert-face'.
>
> What is the difference between the --reverse-video command line option
> (aka -rv aka -r) and the emacs*reverseVideo:on X resource?

Nothing. That was only a trigger. My problem report is about
invert-face.
-- 
Eduard Wiebe

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.