GNU bug report logs - #62230
File "elpa-packages.eld" not signed, unlike file "archive-contents"

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:17:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 62230 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 62230 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#62230; Package emacs. (Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Subject: File "elpa-packages.eld" not signed, unlike file "archive-contents"
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:16:30 +0000
Hello,

I have `package-check-signature` set to `all`. When I run the command
`package-vc-install`, it tries to download the file "elpa-package.eld"
from the archive.  However, this file is not signed, so the download fails.

When I disable the checking of signatures, the download succeeds.

It is possible to sign this file with the GNU ELPA key, just like the
file "archive-contents", which downloads successfully?

Thank you.





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#62230; Package emacs. (Fri, 17 Mar 2023 08:25:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 62230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 62230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: bug#62230: File "elpa-packages.eld" not signed, unlike file
 "archive-contents"
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 08:24:48 +0000
Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com> writes:

> Hello,

Hi,

> I have `package-check-signature` set to `all`. When I run the command
> `package-vc-install`, it tries to download the file "elpa-package.eld"
> from the archive.  However, this file is not signed, so the download fails.
>
> When I disable the checking of signatures, the download succeeds.

I assume you have configured `package-check-signature' or something like
that?  Because I don't appear to have any issues fetching the file.

> It is possible to sign this file with the GNU ELPA key, just like the
> file "archive-contents", which downloads successfully?

It should be, but I actually don't know how it is generated or at least
I am missing something in elpa-admin.el.  I have Cc'ed Stefan who should
know.

> Thank you.

-- 
Philip Kaludercic




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#62230; Package emacs. (Sat, 18 Mar 2023 14:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 62230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>, 62230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#62230: File "elpa-packages.eld" not signed, unlike file
 "archive-contents"
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 09:58:54 -0400
>> It is possible to sign this file with the GNU ELPA key, just like the
>> file "archive-contents", which downloads successfully?
> It should be, but I actually don't know how it is generated or at least
> I am missing something in elpa-admin.el.  I have Cc'ed Stefan who should
> know.

Yes, that was an oversight  Should be fixed now,


        Stefan





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#62230; Package emacs. (Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:16:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 62230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>,
 Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 62230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#62230: File "elpa-packages.eld" not signed,
 unlike file "archive-contents"
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:14:54 +0000
On 2023-03-18 13:58 UTC, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> It is possible to sign this file with the GNU ELPA key, just like the
>>> file "archive-contents", which downloads successfully?
>> It should be, but I actually don't know how it is generated or at least
>> I am missing something in elpa-admin.el.  I have Cc'ed Stefan who should
>> know.
>
> Yes, that was an oversight  Should be fixed now,
>
>
>          Stefan
>

The file now downloads successfully. I can see that it also downloaded
the signatures.

Thank you.





Reply sent to Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 62230-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 62230-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: bug#62230: File "elpa-packages.eld" not signed, unlike file
 "archive-contents"
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:28:36 +0000
Okamsn <okamsn <at> protonmail.com> writes:

> On 2023-03-18 13:58 UTC, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>>> It is possible to sign this file with the GNU ELPA key, just like the
>>>> file "archive-contents", which downloads successfully?
>>> It should be, but I actually don't know how it is generated or at least
>>> I am missing something in elpa-admin.el.  I have Cc'ed Stefan who should
>>> know.
>>
>> Yes, that was an oversight  Should be fixed now,
>>
>>
>>          Stefan
>>
>
> The file now downloads successfully. I can see that it also downloaded
> the signatures.
>
> Thank you.

OK, I'll close this report then.  Thanks for noticing.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 16 Apr 2023 11:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 28 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.