Received: (at 62294-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2023 15:03:49 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 07 11:03:49 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pvfvR-0008KP-5e for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2023 11:03:49 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]:45177) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1pvfvP-0008KA-9u for 62294-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2023 11:03:47 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-3ef3ce7085bso17202021cf.2 for <62294-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 07 May 2023 08:03:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683471822; x=1686063822; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oZGbpeg5qXcC+k8rLxvklE8B1L0xrK2THgTDwXjaH0c=; b=RRLqfp4jAvl3jMnvAZlnoz9puezWkQvfaqLR7xEbYD8PgjAaIJzB6ZPSxt3ddqA6ix WeZjSKgIY7c6cAivb6G/6rypVtd+BLcJkE91xdjwbZdZF2wAHf7eMNC84mavXjt/oTO4 rSf6eZk1BRXh6NJ2L1YSRM752Wr0PaCGm3PpHebfJJz0VX+gXEGH44SZALWVWbhdw1Vl gn26aDkRVVGLg+9AFaaog+2A/cBOIkUdme4QxqbCYr/3StjkN+p45w/hy67Rcr/mB/nx JsEjxPF6DtN8Sjlq88C7VF4kIbi8AkJTX4/Srq8W/B0toh0gq4nYIxeTFqNJQdY7H6oX VyBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683471822; x=1686063822; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=oZGbpeg5qXcC+k8rLxvklE8B1L0xrK2THgTDwXjaH0c=; b=YqzZ422brKLyLU7HPwqRrlBzpzVSTzZIrfmE8gKPhWc+eWl4A8fMRHcrhjYMRiXn5K TS3pzo+fvoZ1GeAWDjn9tIDxuOSveghzaoJId1iuIY6b9nNQrCthX0chGVfepeGk1+ny mAoFJ4vaXP7LtTFPi0pmxiMie6fSrRyDsYe23KIOpzH7iRgbNyh7ow1c5oszJ0wmQBzA o+FkSkkoUKJuwYRJUTctzRGp2fMoh8iFOwht5/zGKpC+MsdoS6If6KDBNSkqLROHmK9r +eRon87lWaNuYEvAx5WRdJGUEyW1TGF5w4jqru22o82AWAGWFVYVN5K2st3SRMRw10ZU okiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwgV6XSLYZlj1105n4Mo6u0Lzg+9HSZNETuMn7bl5YpMEebEQNK pbmpmOuFWBKRfckAI3J9Cm0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5IFvit9K27ZhQ51CkhZO01kD+x0fEPS5X3875NxCFEYZKt26FxPlC7mNa+uDa2oVYq4qwvfg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:347:b0:3d2:7f3b:c691 with SMTP id r7-20020a05622a034700b003d27f3bc691mr11333956qtw.47.1683471821830; Sun, 07 May 2023 08:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-131-119.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.131.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5-20020a05620a14a500b0074e4b1fe0aesm1965472qkj.94.2023.05.07.08.03.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 May 2023 08:03:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> To: Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> <868rf8vuz4.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZCxPC6sPREuu1ipV@HIDDEN> <867curtuyk.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZCzOdruevhvh+7fw@HIDDEN> <861qkyu8m5.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZC7HiWzqXv2EJlIf@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 11:03:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <ZC7HiWzqXv2EJlIf@HIDDEN> (Ethan Blanton's message of "Thu, 6 Apr 2023 09:22:17 -0400") Message-ID: <87bkiw18vn.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62294-done Cc: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>, 62294-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, We're now at 2.2.39 on master. Closing! -- Thanks, Maxim
Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN>
:Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
:Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2023 13:22:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 06 09:22:18 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53666 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pkPZB-0001Zy-OQ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 09:22:17 -0400 Received: from cathode.kb8ojh.net ([162.243.72.198]:55356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <elb@HIDDEN>) id 1pkPZ9-0001Zm-VM for 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 09:22:16 -0400 Received: from anode.kb8ojh.net (pool-68-133-30-163.bflony.fios.verizon.net [68.133.30.163]) by cathode.kb8ojh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D6484047C; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 13:22:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kb8ojh.net; s=cathode; t=1680787335; bh=CIgzHaCKaxU/+JUmfrQOnxwcM3Yrr2CS1JWxKsKDfcA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uAv62RQ7+FMBFMTIlfurObqthqL+y230EX5G5uwRtwfZZBroVYZtAxN0km6joSb1C kXdNw47iHCPZ9K4ImtHA3UKkOGJtE2hG4lPXTOAFHN+beAaCJ1ngnnNLDnIdGOs0M3 hl+9SV63sNlgBhgICYOFHDdTPFPFqoySaUBuhFYo= Received: by anode.kb8ojh.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 512BD418AA; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 09:22:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 09:22:17 -0400 From: Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream Message-ID: <ZC7HiWzqXv2EJlIf@HIDDEN> References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> <868rf8vuz4.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZCxPC6sPREuu1ipV@HIDDEN> <867curtuyk.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZCzOdruevhvh+7fw@HIDDEN> <861qkyu8m5.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <861qkyu8m5.fsf@HIDDEN> X-GnuPG-Fingerprint: 2A9A 7752 8B91 6586 6289 FD3D 6CA9 2AC6 A1A8 AD0E X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62294 Cc: 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Simon Tournier wrote: > Are you proposing to update ’gnupg’ from 2.2.32 to 2.2.33 or why not to > 2.2.41? And remove the graft ’gnupg/fixed’? Personally, I think it should advance farther than 2.2.32, as there are S/MIME bugs prior to 2.2.35 that prevent a variety of commonly-issued S/MIME keys from being imported (see the link in the original bug). Selfishly, I have one of those keys and it's a problem for me, but in general, it seems to include some keys issued by state agencies in Europe, as well as private issuers in the US and possibly other locations.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2023 08:44:07 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 06 04:44:07 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pkLDz-00052v-BL for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 04:44:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:38933) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1pkLDy-00052H-Fz for 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 04:44:06 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-2ef1e98d6bfso36911f8f.0 for <62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 01:44:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680770640; x=1683362640; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=G0wFLkHj8PpRj0PvNOUbrSLOkDLqcLreXtnPQhjBI2s=; b=J5QyyopbtnutrE3bTZxv2yg8Ea13VIvvl8FS0loFPpf4ObeYmfyDI6J9PTaR8SxWHG 7X0VFpMUrObGSz/kJ9f/rdHfY/o8nk692LTVGbxhZ86J7HBALrNmFVo6cNH9rlvLoPKn Tpl5NPrNqF0b3n1ZBFpl635tc0XVLo+tuTqilDzbvR0aS13drP1CzSP2WZeEM5zp7pfg LdFoC+UH34rIbRawLWiccc1BEAr79S3GWsu6X8yPGzYhnSCruwn7meGOSKnbgNefqM+Q 3RGypoDaQrrYMwPKVDdSt3N9DfC716QYWVYfkXcdrTHhTi7uGdUGcXmGnUWDNQ/s1fMI aITg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680770640; x=1683362640; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=G0wFLkHj8PpRj0PvNOUbrSLOkDLqcLreXtnPQhjBI2s=; b=wKmA+gF0+iAljKRJbaL5bZ2cHYbs2NVK/gG9C5Gfua//oxLnTWlikUyaeDMRjS5uCI gzevnJD810/eBWu/EdlhiOKroedDBPuIZatjSGVdpJCaGkfVyq4kv+aohxVn7Peb/HXC WMbacejXaIqxp5+bL/r2nePNKTLXahg5PSNh4RclBaJURbt+kMwqSqJyVjaZoXcdsryK dzFjzjbLRpBCgb9RYOFdO3DgVnnBEleZgM0hEy/a78DxSQePVzRVtHe9p7UmLzzJLW65 ZZQ1uPSwkwKv0mouHDNrNpFZz8fnB2EpRSqCG/4/DuVqNgJ67LLucWgfb1aGsFte4EUW f69w== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dgaoYp6YEKtb6x3v6FoOqCxUpDK40CE3GKkAiypcDNnwPNECaU 8YRjqMju6DwDFzqV5MYvj38Xl2j2hBo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZidAYkqMXi+zpCvh3+H/SXIC/oC1JpgFBzHPF+qmNc9RX7T+MGnGfhHWNKYpob0GtS2EkI/w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e8e:0:b0:2c7:d80:ffc4 with SMTP id e14-20020a5d4e8e000000b002c70d80ffc4mr3016043wru.7.1680770640341; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 01:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j6-20020adff006000000b002e105c017adsm1128708wro.44.2023.04.06.01.43.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Apr 2023 01:43:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream In-Reply-To: <ZCzOdruevhvh+7fw@HIDDEN> References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> <868rf8vuz4.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZCxPC6sPREuu1ipV@HIDDEN> <867curtuyk.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZCzOdruevhvh+7fw@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 08:49:06 +0200 Message-ID: <861qkyu8m5.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62294 Cc: Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN>, 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Hi Leo, On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 at 21:27, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: >> So the impact is ~10% of all the packages. From a quick look, some >> packages are intensive to rebuild, to my knowledge. > > Yes, that's correct. But our build farm can easily build these packages > quickly, if we wanted to use it for that. Well, I do not know. Let=E2=80=99s do it! :-) Are you proposing to update =E2=80=99gnupg=E2=80=99 from 2.2.32 to 2.2.33 o= r why not to 2.2.41? And remove the graft =E2=80=99gnupg/fixed=E2=80=99? Or are you proposing to replace the graft =E2=80=99gnupg/fixed=E2=80=99 by = another version than 2.2.32 as 2.2.33 or higher? Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2023 01:27:29 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 04 21:27:29 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50516 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pjrvt-0007ed-Hf for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 21:27:29 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:35501) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1pjrvr-0007eO-GC for 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 21:27:28 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8035C025D; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 21:27:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 21:27:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1680658042; x=1680744442; bh=5lOI0S8oGSuvYaZn5MvlOVgw57BEM9PmY9FCszmXtc8=; b= h1WjHxXQYk/T5nmNCn4SCFjfjtxSXIcd+9ncgU+YYFP5U/QQd9t1FRc6EJmGtUzT +gdXLXlQeD+xgmufIEA5yODFBVQCQb4nn0aopuQi0alQJLCQVWs6CN+gOjAIdumu N0tw6/vx1VI+0tfNu/HVMXYauiaDSivAYlKTRR37c9c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1680658042; x=1680744442; bh=5lOI0S8oGSuvY aZn5MvlOVgw57BEM9PmY9FCszmXtc8=; b=XCdsqYDFA5pjNJaqYOPYy2Lk92mTW NRAj4iSBJY9wWlAMo76AV8fDSLgw1xuJCGQbWegha4DJbYnnJW5HMUsRlFBkDleZ Rd6lvznVp1Kvoa721Mhf/+9DekZDpdxDdWp8CjLBTjU6c8ioFkWQosq63tGqgTil xyrF8nxlW1ZJsUkvolwaMvpAaO8SE6IUPaoHPe4PIMHaLY3VG+99SfyNMzKzLJ/y J7iBnvE+MIMrNQfhuNVh8SRoebFauHXe1OozB9v3h7oruVhAy51HTptA3QqBM7AW /+I52qMrdfJUhMoE8sZUu+S0owDC+sB9B3BdNfJ7Ku3//OuXH8iP8WrAg== X-ME-Sender: <xms:ec4sZLp5WcL69hAes4AaIY_mj-djeVKJ_XgizxjeAyaIclZo4_vZhw> <xme:ec4sZFoM5O5bnhXL8-x9278dIxEaHdZPSEmc8G0cpYvsRlHUx6EJ4pfQmDHp57HRl nsdDjVNtlaimemCmg> X-ME-Received: <xmr:ec4sZIN2igAYvEQfk_2-pdOjJp4gNw2NLEdUWNzjSHpTFV_ZQB_y9H_G9YORFvvORnuoRO3307lMh6KENjGRZan1> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdejtddggeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiteduheefkeeufeelgeduhfejgf elheefleeuhfeffffgueduleehvdejleeiteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ec4sZO6TFcFrCAea_WcCc_n4WcDt4W4bhrpWdLFyjLdB33DjzqJDAA> <xmx:ec4sZK6Uw5iLnxN9780l4MAs8hgPAjHjLlk92bo--wo_NumRlF1NTQ> <xmx:ec4sZGg-KThlimr9IloQWIBStSwK_rs3EPT6Mhz5T6OZsp5n1Ily6w> <xmx:es4sZATvZZkY8ui1_KtMcEYAD7ZrT8AboFpuR9vNSdg3sMYn2nzMRA> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 21:27:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 21:27:18 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream Message-ID: <ZCzOdruevhvh+7fw@HIDDEN> References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> <868rf8vuz4.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZCxPC6sPREuu1ipV@HIDDEN> <867curtuyk.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <867curtuyk.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62294 Cc: Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN>, 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 07:31:47PM +0200, Simon Tournier wrote: > Maybe I am doing something wrong, I get: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ guix refresh -l gnupg | cut -f1 -d':' > Building the following 1491 packages would ensure 2880 dependent packages are rebuilt > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > So the impact is ~10% of all the packages. From a quick look, some > packages are intensive to rebuild, to my knowledge. Yes, that's correct. But our build farm can easily build these packages quickly, if we wanted to use it for that.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2023 17:32:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 04 13:32:28 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pjkWB-000828-QC for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:32:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:41290) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1pjkW9-00081u-NS for 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:32:26 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-2d17b1b21f1so734711f8f.1 for <62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 10:32:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680629540; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yMDkMpPIpjXzDJv7aG9+yPAKSL4WFTJXTFy+hLnP814=; b=OMCkkSzDQiVGJdFte/mimP6zws/fSk/Z+8oo9A1LSlxWh7sJGEyCdAj6Njg1LdPody TYw2seNlBhpdISm+7bmEN4SKFBjFeje1B7va0sh8UsfahqBj3KxQAw18ps2vKFMv3mgu tuNVkZI1FlERbjgqlhgEdsKM5jMA7b+I9OGDYpB44SmT+hxBa8XBbg94nB+Struq7bBe BujyloBLdo10Yl04qEbmKFpATHy2/zWpzpDkpk6VB9HtuFpmLoghSIT7TI3C9DktqN3F Z//LkZr54ha7RHpPrCODhUgzrixN+9U1zcUn3ryUbE0oQnzMKATEHjPFIssIo0nW7JYc jdsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680629540; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yMDkMpPIpjXzDJv7aG9+yPAKSL4WFTJXTFy+hLnP814=; b=601oSoGoIOSmqE8zRmMRQ/yFO7MLBA73du25R8wtkdI967jNiRQNavZ2ic1Cw0/xpM w3uO/qvzZP5BJ8MrY74VjqVndWHZA9WL6E4PAqMjtB4V8TQvtwfFqqluiwCkcWFaaEx+ fOAwgZAa6Yf3AtF4u8xJPB9dOSFStvg9uWKZjj38s0+P7oi/upd1eJP8BJYM0uetcfpu /6Cn427JEYVdQp/pr1fHm7m1wblIME26C47RL0rXtdCDJhecwUnCg5cLRGCLfw0Uh8Ht xd+Vj+UvMBUDc7iw7qZG1gRZtb60AmFzsN6uSTKr2Aeeg203ftkFIpgz2QQDrhrAbYA7 YPew== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eHK9eBaFpLkIw0+j+dWSJVHpHWlvkwZ7I2TDzq0jnhtOHryB63 xxr84DH7lTxQ75IoP2AyhFHlcIzagHU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YCdeAOqQb9T6XWPdaFpzpIFLd/HeQxTzVbQMbNRWEL9wpIeYTmmKRFxyk+triQJlAs1fZUJA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f0c:b0:3ef:6257:d0e7 with SMTP id l12-20020a05600c4f0c00b003ef6257d0e7mr406077wmq.2.1680629539541; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 10:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v3-20020a1cf703000000b003ed1f6878a5sm16015920wmh.5.2023.04.04.10.32.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 10:32:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream In-Reply-To: <ZCxPC6sPREuu1ipV@HIDDEN> References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> <868rf8vuz4.fsf@HIDDEN> <ZCxPC6sPREuu1ipV@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 19:31:47 +0200 Message-ID: <867curtuyk.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62294 Cc: Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN>, 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Leo, On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 at 12:23, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: >> Well, graft does not seem recommended because it would update to two >> versions. And update the package would be a core-updates. >> >> Well, maybe it could be of the current core-updates dance. Could you >> send a patch for core-updates? > > GnuPG does have a large number of dependent packages, but I'd argue > that's either 1) a bug or 2) something we should ignore and update > freely. It's a critical package, and did not used to have such a large > number of dependents. It's really a problem for the distro if we don't > allow ourselves to update packages like this freely. Maybe I am doing something wrong, I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix refresh -l gnupg | cut -f1 -d':' Building the following 1491 packages would ensure 2880 dependent packages are rebuilt --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So the impact is ~10% of all the packages. From a quick look, some packages are intensive to rebuild, to my knowledge. Are you proposing to graft? Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2023 16:33:47 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 04 12:33:47 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50051 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pjjbP-0005zh-3h for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:33:47 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:36159) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1pjjbN-0005zS-Fa for 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:33:46 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF2D3200916; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:33:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:33:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1680626019; x=1680712419; bh=a6lI/5i7e2TSCY76qw3lEEk5iJbXD6NkdfqL/WU1ovM=; b= we2cKB9r7x/lyz+kRem+Nsx+gyIitz5OrpJyv+Lua1dc2N1oolsntYeSwlyg9bWz trnFRWsunWF53BHDJ4KCwv1aiP9sTGPsNyQu6M9+jZCNJwaRzUNCZY9KCY0y3cuS RSAIO7jSJAsCZSjrMFOS3AF6KZFRS5VVVJzPhab2wEg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1680626019; x=1680712419; bh=a6lI/5i7e2TSC Y76qw3lEEk5iJbXD6NkdfqL/WU1ovM=; b=IoxkhhP+0I3TxglqW4daZsROt08HV XTE3bkaJNGCF17Ahe0JTmWx7hcEQICon5FJ8IhnEWsrW3t9qPFsBE++NPcrxI+xg kg9o76DIbXI2zlLxDTXGt2m5l4bczRmwTpMTzeUH4fTag8U4J9Cd3uPVmhnkihvv ZSOq5n3oaO4B7/pb4cqLXi0p4ZWWutBs9ej8hhbLSe2mZOdxoeJomDeRYSggBz7I PMpTKyJ+MVav7v3ra5j4sb48SllEgTEmFEp3+NH7uLmurLaoeqR31uCFK8+k/TJa WGXceq2z4d4o0k65bGuvWO9EkYb6pJZ7yiyu8Q3IXE0KQtUtisEYwjwrA== X-ME-Sender: <xms:YlEsZMWU5zr3JrvucwAHF3QGVGMJipb2hbMSMVpGdlj2iMoQox0Now> <xme:YlEsZAly1WeL1lwa0_c-sDLtwjmurMaw_2oj_2ZLBBgjKcsxso-WMvuWHskVvDMLX A5dHkt1sOnrBeqKzw> X-ME-Received: <xmr:YlEsZAb8AeA1J6A37WFWlKb86r9n3OdHeFC-fr-o0cyx0Q0RsDTKgWN0O7u6yg-xvy_aLYeDxdRkuaX2C6Cfv4zf> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeiledguddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdortddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefhkefhhefhjeetleejhfegheevheeiuedtveevtedtgffhledvvdevfefg leelueenucffohhmrghinhepmhgrihhlqdgrrhgthhhivhgvrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YlEsZLUesfczakf0Nh_LGNQBRRBHvGM2yzs5xIXWgVdWDrAiP73GuA> <xmx:YlEsZGl1IBmQZtX8HsNutK2DwMZpWf42ATb6X_aIfyWTJ-Y9dJ8Zhw> <xmx:YlEsZAfwAKhbTNtMxQ2YxiNA8UTsnuH-teW8Y6wnB89ppPM8dKG-8A> <xmx:Y1EsZNtT9Gp322h3a7hFSwj2nnk8c_KTsNga5KQh2XS0a6z3eZfkww> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:33:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:33:36 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream Message-ID: <ZCxRYAQwvctrSofb@HIDDEN> References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62294 Cc: 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:01:33AM -0400, Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > However, the bug referenced here is fixed in upstream commit > 4cc724639c012215f59648cbb4b7631b9d352e36, which shipped in gnupg > 2.2.34. Meanwhile, all gnupg releases older than 2.2.35 suffer from > an S/MIME key-parsing bug (referenced in > https://www.mail-archive.com/gnupg-users@HIDDEN/msg40758.html). Does this bug have a CVE ID, or any information from upstream about where it was fixed? It's hard to find release notes on the GnuPG website.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2023 16:33:56 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 04 12:33:56 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pjjbY-000608-Dm for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:33:56 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1pjjbW-000601-Tp for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:33:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1pjjbQ-0003p8-Le for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:33:52 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1pjjbL-0004Mw-Ec for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:33:45 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF2D3200916; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:33:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:33:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1680626019; x=1680712419; bh=a6lI/5i7e2TSCY76qw3lEEk5iJbXD6NkdfqL/WU1ovM=; b= we2cKB9r7x/lyz+kRem+Nsx+gyIitz5OrpJyv+Lua1dc2N1oolsntYeSwlyg9bWz trnFRWsunWF53BHDJ4KCwv1aiP9sTGPsNyQu6M9+jZCNJwaRzUNCZY9KCY0y3cuS RSAIO7jSJAsCZSjrMFOS3AF6KZFRS5VVVJzPhab2wEg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1680626019; x=1680712419; bh=a6lI/5i7e2TSC Y76qw3lEEk5iJbXD6NkdfqL/WU1ovM=; b=IoxkhhP+0I3TxglqW4daZsROt08HV XTE3bkaJNGCF17Ahe0JTmWx7hcEQICon5FJ8IhnEWsrW3t9qPFsBE++NPcrxI+xg kg9o76DIbXI2zlLxDTXGt2m5l4bczRmwTpMTzeUH4fTag8U4J9Cd3uPVmhnkihvv ZSOq5n3oaO4B7/pb4cqLXi0p4ZWWutBs9ej8hhbLSe2mZOdxoeJomDeRYSggBz7I PMpTKyJ+MVav7v3ra5j4sb48SllEgTEmFEp3+NH7uLmurLaoeqR31uCFK8+k/TJa WGXceq2z4d4o0k65bGuvWO9EkYb6pJZ7yiyu8Q3IXE0KQtUtisEYwjwrA== X-ME-Sender: <xms:YlEsZMWU5zr3JrvucwAHF3QGVGMJipb2hbMSMVpGdlj2iMoQox0Now> <xme:YlEsZAly1WeL1lwa0_c-sDLtwjmurMaw_2oj_2ZLBBgjKcsxso-WMvuWHskVvDMLX A5dHkt1sOnrBeqKzw> X-ME-Received: <xmr:YlEsZAb8AeA1J6A37WFWlKb86r9n3OdHeFC-fr-o0cyx0Q0RsDTKgWN0O7u6yg-xvy_aLYeDxdRkuaX2C6Cfv4zf> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeiledguddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdortddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefhkefhhefhjeetleejhfegheevheeiuedtveevtedtgffhledvvdevfefg leelueenucffohhmrghinhepmhgrihhlqdgrrhgthhhivhgvrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YlEsZLUesfczakf0Nh_LGNQBRRBHvGM2yzs5xIXWgVdWDrAiP73GuA> <xmx:YlEsZGl1IBmQZtX8HsNutK2DwMZpWf42ATb6X_aIfyWTJ-Y9dJ8Zhw> <xmx:YlEsZAfwAKhbTNtMxQ2YxiNA8UTsnuH-teW8Y6wnB89ppPM8dKG-8A> <xmx:Y1EsZNtT9Gp322h3a7hFSwj2nnk8c_KTsNga5KQh2XS0a6z3eZfkww> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:33:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:33:36 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream Message-ID: <ZCxRYAQwvctrSofb@HIDDEN> References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=leo@HIDDEN; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:01:33AM -0400, Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > However, the bug referenced here is fixed in upstream commit > 4cc724639c012215f59648cbb4b7631b9d352e36, which shipped in gnupg > 2.2.34. Meanwhile, all gnupg releases older than 2.2.35 suffer from > an S/MIME key-parsing bug (referenced in > https://www.mail-archive.com/gnupg-users@HIDDEN/msg40758.html). Does this bug have a CVE ID, or any information from upstream about where it was fixed? It's hard to find release notes on the GnuPG website.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2023 16:23:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 04 12:23:52 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pjjRo-0005ef-A1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:23:52 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:39095) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1pjjRl-0005eI-GQ for 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:23:50 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E997E3200A18; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:23:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:23:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1680625422; x=1680711822; bh=DmzZg/uM+847ZJpLlGL9yN3OCzPULuifcrUMC+khIsQ=; b= l0wbUE7WGG+lVhzUHIDRDw5V1FweViRxR7gyWiOr1H28pItF/CaGMyOM514mCihc fDzm0fjO0hyoNIijV27GSUNBMC4ph40DcIoyZTKCk30WJeIFGN43ETw74ymQ7poV aYce3Ww8NVoQnzS9xvMlvXF/87sJR8/E6RZlqrqjUDQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1680625422; x=1680711822; bh=DmzZg/uM+847Z JpLlGL9yN3OCzPULuifcrUMC+khIsQ=; b=qtrZwGxMSBFrmaZ8c0H0tDV7Zr/8g hKYJhwEhFrws2SdXFacnlqquiO6ee9DoNbu4dBI2XZIm35EsvLmiWL0In15jDx6Q 1fEmMmsYUMw41YbgM/kpcPZqkOBQahy88uN50OP8sNJn4uSFxGc+c1f5TeM6m7IW uPV2OHDeAdzfUbWHh/6LG5kaG3bYrGPSRI9q/DZopVJdEM36EsQL0SpSSHSBQDOj 5cbHwi3fUsCc5vkY+w335ZG9GAZsYSCfMECZwmtdsTSrXiQ1NyfNsFoXF+V05/FZ SaxhqeJEifnObZWKFpHoX2W3Xg0wCBUJCHHvDuYWsOkX7R5Z3s/6T+i9w== X-ME-Sender: <xms:DU8sZI5Gwx-zM7cgyvS9GRDZehe75giqLa8qooQDCmbU4S57ERGR7w> <xme:DU8sZJ66Zm460HaaiCm2j-R9meqonIQQVoQ2_DgVFq4Mtx20TjNmVETHKWIQ2wocu VuqmfVNIiZhXcg4WA> X-ME-Received: <xmr:DU8sZHfBb1IBUrUgIUIu6DKlppN08H7heBizUKYXcq91FhgUkKljnCkMzFQTyzwB4KdMDT79443GELBDSYP1-VBO> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeiledguddttdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesth dtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhu lhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieetudehfeekueefleegudfhje fgleehfeeluefhfeffgfeuudelhedvjeelieetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Dk8sZNK1_VH62jWdZ6h37WIFFtZCb-wuGMhkkCCGv6EQTPMyMEpytQ> <xmx:Dk8sZMLaPNCGfY-IvTKXyJavcqbdaZ9Pyw9hhwyyzdyeO2qaf1qGgA> <xmx:Dk8sZOwMMr5cIHUVt5dHM27vkGhPOjr_rdsVqZqdfST6Z95Y0GictQ> <xmx:Dk8sZGjpUvbvP05bMohfukKYP22NXTn3nMj0-O1nOCnXPD619JlR7Q> Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:23:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:23:39 -0400 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream Message-ID: <ZCxPC6sPREuu1ipV@HIDDEN> References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> <868rf8vuz4.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <868rf8vuz4.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62294 Cc: Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN>, 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:48:31AM +0200, Simon Tournier wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 09:01, Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> wrote: > > I believe the pin on 2.2.32 can be lifted, but as gnupg is important > > infrastructure I am unsure about directly submitting a patch to update > > to a newer version. Thanks for letting us know! > Well, graft does not seem recommended because it would update to two > versions. And update the package would be a core-updates. > > Well, maybe it could be of the current core-updates dance. Could you > send a patch for core-updates? GnuPG does have a large number of dependent packages, but I'd argue that's either 1) a bug or 2) something we should ignore and update freely. It's a critical package, and did not used to have such a large number of dependents. It's really a problem for the distro if we don't allow ourselves to update packages like this freely.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2023 11:52:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 04 07:52:01 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pjfCj-0000Oe-6Y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:52:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com ([209.85.128.50]:42788) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1pjfCg-0000Nm-Ba for 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:51:58 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id m6-20020a05600c3b0600b003ee6e324b19so19889638wms.1 for <62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:51:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680609112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rxWpnwTUJEmAXagpbmgJUEbqNp4Aj8fEC+4t3YY9AhQ=; b=L0tOrXX4eiteL4u2UsvwwOYfyxAbnQpgViz1ofPQ7L1H5bbSQfJsGQsqqM93v7Xj// g1+Nba8DI7b9UsWfcVtoJVM+3WGurM3nzjtRq2+2usAOjeuZwl/GXSxlws0g1f6pbYi6 E4Ho0+1yrugxrDwYbGqkMvUAgOi4aUZFjD+2Nn8MR8GIcNqkcFAw2Nn/MYB3Y9mZVaFm Mlc0NNvYW/mOUgSKJof0Wka6HsbjxjZFgWjRgXTlRG3im/3zmLnvUe7EuRVWzjHFZKQw DDrIhdHy8A1Wa4W3JaN/5yTqJwq8Ozasq13j4KuyF6C2XXk8xVbQz8DWLx9uLH9TRRX0 fb7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680609112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rxWpnwTUJEmAXagpbmgJUEbqNp4Aj8fEC+4t3YY9AhQ=; b=3kQRMzO+4FjcwwIt2VtkheNf3FqzTA+TVIIC1ojmcndrCqCIClKwDIKr3GJXtjaTt1 DKtEgEMjO34l7xdy1NhhQWqsKEedIXjjWRLjt4iPvd/IH7Ho0qFuxf04Nef9KzipZspE /WY2AH+Ry0vumGM0i7jDM8XnBE141n2dVceR8Wr3ri+tRqZTjQjF5MHLIieHJjJ8X+0z 85uDSUZN/vaLKFuGhC6srNNeFnENQ8nc5nlrQA8xhIzzAGQeEIlD7yLWRThhjEDWK6Ws JvnvWTWOC8N4Td1xuie1p1xgTFNCeIHfcZ9ApbbaUAe0p1eWd3mCq/XNhhsGbO7yLqWN VmBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eneveZ3idyXckjdvHHhgertKMyIuPQXZcRIvWDaMmvLzcxtrpV Uh18w+NHn1fl5P2kCeIAKAPCEw48vBQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YwUcqLnlnm1HXJhbhtSypyey3DSZEUvab2sYpdwlRUKlrRcDWXChRGL8b4nES/+aa1jDRMTg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c1f:b0:3f0:34c4:e76d with SMTP id j31-20020a05600c1c1f00b003f034c4e76dmr2173762wms.0.1680609112686; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y5-20020a1c4b05000000b003edd1c44b57sm14953632wma.27.2023.04.04.04.51.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:51:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN>, 62294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream In-Reply-To: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> References: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:48:31 +0200 Message-ID: <868rf8vuz4.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62294 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 09:01, Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> wrote: > I believe the pin on 2.2.32 can be lifted, but as gnupg is important > infrastructure I am unsure about directly submitting a patch to update > to a newer version. Well, graft does not seem recommended because it would update to two versions. And update the package would be a core-updates. Well, maybe it could be of the current core-updates dance. Could you send a patch for core-updates? Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2023 13:01:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 20 09:01:38 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1peF8s-0007vI-83 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:01:38 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41816) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <elb@HIDDEN>) id 1peF8q-0007vA-Li for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:01:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <elb@HIDDEN>) id 1peF8q-0000fL-8N for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:01:36 -0400 Received: from cathode.kb8ojh.net ([162.243.72.198]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <elb@HIDDEN>) id 1peF8o-0005hm-Cv for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:01:35 -0400 Received: from anode.kb8ojh.net (pool-68-133-30-163.bflony.fios.verizon.net [68.133.30.163]) by cathode.kb8ojh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A78DD40A28 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:01:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kb8ojh.net; s=cathode; t=1679317292; bh=P0xABxPqrP0GMPBEEAxQlI6fD8l1K2oXmNgWi04vPVM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=vnaHgsStFfbkmLOUFfaidcEOEEfn6RIK/0blym2LaGdxnHPDWgqXQi8cLZIRWtHaV C32/kSUBPeDsiokfP2ApZZ2+n4qnR2gbbw1+WA9LSU4+xS1uWPhju5nERU7eF/Xlwe zBbvTDVHoGhwZwGQoIOP1JjEZ6F3Vnk+qb3vp/OU= Received: by anode.kb8ojh.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4C62418AA; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:01:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:01:33 -0400 From: Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream Message-ID: <ZBhZLZwNF5DVW1K1@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GnuPG-Fingerprint: 2A9A 7752 8B91 6586 6289 FD3D 6CA9 2AC6 A1A8 AD0E Received-SPF: pass client-ip=162.243.72.198; envelope-from=elb@HIDDEN; helo=cathode.kb8ojh.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) It looks like the gnupg package is pinned at 2.2.32 with the following note: ;; Note2: 2.2.33 currently suffers from regressions, so do not update to it ;; (see: https://dev.gnupg.org/T5742). However, the bug referenced here is fixed in upstream commit 4cc724639c012215f59648cbb4b7631b9d352e36, which shipped in gnupg 2.2.34. Meanwhile, all gnupg releases older than 2.2.35 suffer from an S/MIME key-parsing bug (referenced in https://www.mail-archive.com/gnupg-users@HIDDEN/msg40758.html). I believe the pin on 2.2.32 can be lifted, but as gnupg is important infrastructure I am unsure about directly submitting a patch to update to a newer version. Ethan
Ethan Blanton <elb@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#62294
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.