GNU bug report logs - #62538
29.0.60; Setting eglot-report-progress dir-locally doesn't work

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 62538 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 29.0.60; Setting eglot-report-progress dir-locally doesn't work
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:56:43 +0200

I set eglot-report-progress to nil in the "nil" section of my project's
.dir-locals.el, but I still see progress reports in the mode line.

If I add a debug message to the corresponding eglot-handle-notification
method, I see that the "(when eglot-report-progress" is evaluated in a
temp buffer and so doesn't pick up the dir-local value.

(By the way, Eglot was feeling very sluggish until I decided to disable
these notifications.  It reminded me of a similar situation with garbage
collection, where disabling a message changed user's perception of
latency in the process.  Or is this an urban legend?)

Message #8 received at 62538 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 62538 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#62538: 29.0.60; Setting eglot-report-progress dir-locally
 doesn't work
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:19:25 +0100

Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel <at> gmail.com> writes:

> I set eglot-report-progress to nil in the "nil" section of my project's
> .dir-locals.el, but I still see progress reports in the mode line.
>
> If I add a debug message to the corresponding eglot-handle-notification
> method, I see that the "(when eglot-report-progress" is evaluated in a
> temp buffer and so doesn't pick up the dir-local value.

Ah.  It wasn't meant to be used buffer-locally.  But if it's an easy
fix, there so reason it shouldn't be.

> (By the way, Eglot was feeling very sluggish until I decided to disable
> these notifications.  It reminded me of a similar situation with garbage
> collection, where disabling a message changed user's perception of
> latency in the process.  Or is this an urban legend?)

OK I will see what I can do.

João

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.