GNU bug report logs -
#63393
[PATCH 0/2] Fix libstdc++.so and gcc-toolchain
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 63393 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 63393 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
mail <at> cbaines.net, dev <at> jpoiret.xyz, ludo <at> gnu.org, othacehe <at> gnu.org, rekado <at> elephly.net, zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com, me <at> tobias.gr, guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Tue, 09 May 2023 17:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
mail <at> cbaines.net, dev <at> jpoiret.xyz, ludo <at> gnu.org, othacehe <at> gnu.org, rekado <at> elephly.net, zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com, me <at> tobias.gr, guix-patches <at> gnu.org.
(Tue, 09 May 2023 17:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
This patch fixes #63267 [1] by adding the output 'lib' to gcc-toolchain. The
aim of gcc-toolchain is to be a battery included of GCC. Maybe, this 'lib'
output could be directly included with the 'out'. Well, I do not know. WDYT?
For sure, it seems to help people using 'gcc:lib'. :-)
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env guix shell gcc-toolchain:lib
[...]
$ ls $GUIX_ENVIRONMENT/lib
audit libatomic.a libc.so.6 libitm.so.1.0.0 libnss_files.so.2 libssp_nonshared.a libtsan_preinit.o
bfd-plugins libatomic.la libctf.a libitm.spec libnss_hesiod.so libssp_nonshared.la libtsan.so
crt1.o libatomic.so libctf.la liblsan.a libnss_hesiod.so.2 libssp.so libtsan.so.2
crti.o libatomic.so.1 libctf-nobfd.a liblsan.la libopcodes.a libssp.so.0 libtsan.so.2.0.0
crtn.o libatomic.so.1.2.0 libctf-nobfd.la liblsan_preinit.o libopcodes.la libssp.so.0.0.0 libubsan.a
gcc libbfd.a libdl.a liblsan.so libpcprofile.so libstdc++.a libubsan.la
gconv libbfd.la libdl.so.2 liblsan.so.0 libpthread.a libstdc++fs.a libubsan.so
gcrt1.o libBrokenLocale.so libgcc_s.so liblsan.so.0.0.0 libpthread.so.0 libstdc++fs.la libubsan.so.1
grcrt1.o libBrokenLocale.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1 libmemusage.so libquadmath.a libstdc++.la libubsan.so.1.0.0
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 libcc1.la libgomp.a libm.so libquadmath.la libstdc++.so libutil.a
libanl.a libcc1.so libgomp.la libm.so.6 libquadmath.so libstdc++.so.6 libutil.so.1
libanl.so libcc1.so.0 libgomp.so libmvec.so libquadmath.so.0 libstdc++.so.6.0.30 Mcrt1.o
libanl.so.1 libcc1.so.0.0.0 libgomp.so.1 libmvec.so.1 libquadmath.so.0.0.0 libstdc++.so.6.0.30-gdb.py rcrt1.o
libasan.a libc_malloc_debug.so libgomp.so.1.0.0 libnsl.so.1 libresolv.so libsupc++.a Scrt1.o
libasan.la libc_malloc_debug.so.0 libgomp.spec libnss_compat.so libresolv.so.2 libsupc++.la
libasan_preinit.o libc_nonshared.a libitm.a libnss_compat.so.2 librt.so.1 libthread_db.so
libasan.so libcrypt.so libitm.la libnss_db.so libsanitizer.spec libthread_db.so.1
libasan.so.8 libcrypt.so.1 libitm.so libnss_db.so.2 libssp.a libtsan.a
libasan.so.8.0.0 libc.so libitm.so.1 libnss_dns.so.2 libssp.la libtsan.la
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Well, another annoyance is that libstdc++ could be built using another
version. Let for later. :-)
1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/63267
Cheers,
simon
Simon Tournier (2):
gnu: gcc-toolchain: Do not use gcc-final.
gnu: make-gcc-toolchain: Add 'lib' outputs.
gnu/packages/commencement.scm | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
base-commit: 76a3deb8675576a6ce64874234c9d3881060db3b
--
2.38.1
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Tue, 09 May 2023 17:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/commencement.scm (gcc-toolchain): Bind to the default
gcc-toolchain-11 being consitent with others.
(gcc-toolchain-11): Make it from gcc-11.
(gcc-toolchain-aka-gcc): Bind to gcc-toolchain.
---
gnu/packages/commencement.scm | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
index ab07fb37ab..7ec177e206 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
@@ -3486,8 +3486,6 @@ (define* (make-gcc-toolchain gcc
("libc-debug" ,libc "debug")
("libc-static" ,libc "static"))))))
-(define-public gcc-toolchain
- (make-gcc-toolchain gcc-final))
(define-public gcc-toolchain-4.8
(make-gcc-toolchain gcc-4.8))
@@ -3514,15 +3512,19 @@ (define-public gcc-toolchain-10
(make-gcc-toolchain gcc-10))
(define-public gcc-toolchain-11
- gcc-toolchain)
+ (make-gcc-toolchain gcc-11))
(define-public gcc-toolchain-12
(make-gcc-toolchain gcc-12))
+;; The default GCC
+(define-public gcc-toolchain
+ gcc-toolchain-11)
+
(define-public gcc-toolchain-aka-gcc
;; It's natural for users to try "guix install gcc". This package
;; automatically "redirects" them to 'gcc-toolchain'.
- (deprecated-package "gcc" gcc-toolchain-11))
+ (deprecated-package "gcc" gcc-toolchain))
(define-public gdc-toolchain-10
--
2.38.1
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Tue, 09 May 2023 17:06:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/commencement.scm (make-gcc-toolchain): Add 'lib' outputs.
---
gnu/packages/commencement.scm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
index 7ec177e206..94d5884a9c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2021 Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
;;; Copyright © 2022 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
;;; Copyright © 2022 Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>
+;;; Copyright © 2023 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -3444,15 +3445,30 @@ (define* (make-gcc-toolchain gcc
(filter-map (match-lambda
(("libc-debug" . _) #f)
(("libc-static" . _) #f)
+ (("gcc-lib" . _) #f)
+ (("gcc-debug" . _) #f)
((_ . directory) directory))
%build-inputs))
(union-build (assoc-ref %outputs "debug")
(list (assoc-ref %build-inputs
- "libc-debug")))
+ "libc-debug")
+ (assoc-ref %build-inputs
+ "gcc-debug")))
+
(union-build (assoc-ref %outputs "static")
(list (assoc-ref %build-inputs
"libc-static")))
+
+ (union-build (assoc-ref %outputs "lib")
+ (list (assoc-ref %build-inputs
+ "ld-wrapper")
+ (assoc-ref %build-inputs
+ "binutils")
+ (assoc-ref %build-inputs
+ "gcc-lib")
+ (assoc-ref %build-inputs
+ "libc")))
#t))))
(native-search-paths
@@ -3474,7 +3490,7 @@ (define* (make-gcc-toolchain gcc
binaries, plus debugging symbols in the @code{debug} output), and Binutils. GCC
is the GNU Compiler Collection.")
(home-page "https://gcc.gnu.org/")
- (outputs '("out" "debug" "static"))
+ (outputs '("out" "debug" "static" "lib"))
;; The main raison d'être of this "meta-package" is (1) to conveniently
;; install everything that we need, and (2) to make sure ld-wrapper comes
@@ -3484,8 +3500,9 @@ (define* (make-gcc-toolchain gcc
("binutils" ,binutils-final)
("libc" ,libc)
("libc-debug" ,libc "debug")
- ("libc-static" ,libc "static"))))))
-
+ ("libc-static" ,libc "static")
+ ("gcc-lib" ,gcc "lib")
+ ("gcc-debug" ,gcc "debug"))))))
(define-public gcc-toolchain-4.8
(make-gcc-toolchain gcc-4.8))
--
2.38.1
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Tue, 09 May 2023 18:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
I like the direction of this patch. However, if gcc-toolchain:lib is intended to provide the runtime libraries when the full compiler isn't needed, then I think the .a and .la files should be moved back to the main gcc-toolchain output (or a separate :static output) since they are for static linking and the .a files in particular can be sizeable.
Cheers,
Kaelyn
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Thu, 11 May 2023 13:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (make-gcc-toolchain): Add 'lib' outputs.
[...]
> (filter-map (match-lambda
> (("libc-debug" . _) #f)
> (("libc-static" . _) #f)
> + (("gcc-lib" . _) #f)
> + (("gcc-debug" . _) #f)
I would include gcc:lib in “out” (thus not adding a “lib” output to
‘gcc-toolchain’).
Yes, gcc:lib includes *.a and *.la, but those are already part of the
‘gcc-toolchain’ closure:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix size gcc-toolchain |head -6
store item total self
/gnu/store/jv78mm3dmr6fl2hhy1bkbhfpm702v3gq-gcc-12.3.0 292.6 169.4 41.2%
/gnu/store/zh4x65snfis7svs6906gj1z8i7dx2j3m-binutils-2.38 95.5 54.9 13.4%
/gnu/store/g8p09w6r78hhkl2rv1747pcp9zbk6fxv-guile-3.0.9 134.0 53.1 12.9%
/gnu/store/gsjczqir1wbz8p770zndrpw4rnppmxi3-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 9.4%
/gnu/store/gmv6n5vy5qcsn71pkapg2hnknyn1p7g3-gcc-12.3.0-lib 76.8 36.2 8.8%
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
However, I’d leave out gcc:debug because (0) it’s unrelated :-), (1)
‘gcc-final’ has no “debug” output, and (2) it’s really for a niche
(folks developing compiler plugins, typically).
I’d also leave out the /lib directory of Binutils, which is again rarely
useful.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Sun, 16 Jul 2023 18:35:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 03:38 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (make-gcc-toolchain): Add 'lib' outputs.
>
> [...]
>
>> (filter-map (match-lambda
>> (("libc-debug" . _) #f)
>> (("libc-static" . _) #f)
>> + (("gcc-lib" . _) #f)
>> + (("gcc-debug" . _) #f)
>
> I would include gcc:lib in “out” (thus not adding a “lib” output to
> ‘gcc-toolchain’).
>
> Yes, gcc:lib includes *.a and *.la, but those are already part of the
> ‘gcc-toolchain’ closure:
>
> $ guix size gcc-toolchain |head -6
> store item total self
> /gnu/store/jv78mm3dmr6fl2hhy1bkbhfpm702v3gq-gcc-12.3.0 292.6 169.4 41.2%
> /gnu/store/zh4x65snfis7svs6906gj1z8i7dx2j3m-binutils-2.38 95.5 54.9 13.4%
> /gnu/store/g8p09w6r78hhkl2rv1747pcp9zbk6fxv-guile-3.0.9 134.0 53.1 12.9%
> /gnu/store/gsjczqir1wbz8p770zndrpw4rnppmxi3-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 9.4%
> /gnu/store/gmv6n5vy5qcsn71pkapg2hnknyn1p7g3-gcc-12.3.0-lib 76.8 36.2 8.8%
>
> However, I’d leave out gcc:debug because (0) it’s unrelated :-), (1)
> ‘gcc-final’ has no “debug” output, and (2) it’s really for a niche
> (folks developing compiler plugins, typically).
>
> I’d also leave out the /lib directory of Binutils, which is again rarely
> useful.
>
> WDYT?
>
I don't have any strong opinions on the organization here of these
outputs, happy to defer to whatever others decide here. It would be nice
to have this sorted and taken care of before we forget about it :)
However, I think this message from Kaelyn only went to the bug number
(just saw that as I went to reply here) so I'm including it here:
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:50 PM, Kaelyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the direction of this patch. However, if gcc-toolchain:lib is
> intended to provide the runtime libraries when the full compiler isn't
> needed, then I think the .a and .la files should be moved back to the
> main gcc-toolchain output (or a separate :static output) since they
> are for static linking and the .a files in particular can be sizeable.
>
> Cheers,
> Kaelyn
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Is there anything I can do to help (a version of) this patch get over
the line?
I'm currently in a state when I want to use libgcc_s.so.1, which is only
provided by gcc:lib, which doesn't set the library path properly.
According to #25072, gcc-toolchain should support my use-case.
Thanks,
Isaac
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:17:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 03:38 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (make-gcc-toolchain): Add 'lib' outputs.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> (filter-map (match-lambda
>>> (("libc-debug" . _) #f)
>>> (("libc-static" . _) #f)
>>> + (("gcc-lib" . _) #f)
>>> + (("gcc-debug" . _) #f)
>>
>> I would include gcc:lib in “out” (thus not adding a “lib” output to
>> ‘gcc-toolchain’).
>>
>> Yes, gcc:lib includes *.a and *.la, but those are already part of the
>> ‘gcc-toolchain’ closure:
>>
>> $ guix size gcc-toolchain |head -6
>> store item total self
>> /gnu/store/jv78mm3dmr6fl2hhy1bkbhfpm702v3gq-gcc-12.3.0 292.6 169.4 41.2%
>> /gnu/store/zh4x65snfis7svs6906gj1z8i7dx2j3m-binutils-2.38 95.5 54.9 13.4%
>> /gnu/store/g8p09w6r78hhkl2rv1747pcp9zbk6fxv-guile-3.0.9 134.0 53.1 12.9%
>> /gnu/store/gsjczqir1wbz8p770zndrpw4rnppmxi3-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 9.4%
>> /gnu/store/gmv6n5vy5qcsn71pkapg2hnknyn1p7g3-gcc-12.3.0-lib 76.8 36.2 8.8%
Moreover, the closure of 'gcc' itself, as can be found with:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix size $(guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages gcc) gcc)' | tail -n1 )'
élément du dépôt total lui-même
/gnu/store/hfppkc3p39rxrwd1g45n3239j9d0f8qd-gcc-11.3.0 267.8 146.1 54.5%
/gnu/store/ln6hxqjvz6m9gdd9s97pivlqck7hzs99-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 14.5%
/gnu/store/k9q9jxsqldxz0yl65rcgpnnncqwha2qi-gcc-11.3.0-lib 75.3 34.7 13.0%
/gnu/store/6ncav55lbk5kqvwwflrzcr41hp5jbq0c-gcc-11.3.0-lib 75.3 34.7 13.0%
/gnu/store/gdy0b065fk8wwxv49ln0c7892pam78z1-isl-0.24 83.2 5.2 1.9%
/gnu/store/dpvr7rj89j7xdnzpjhhll8dpqh3fizz5-gmp-6.2.1 78.0 2.7 1.0%
/gnu/store/4vn8m606saf5i3nvksgvl958c0i0nvsn-mpfr-4.2.0 80.2 2.2 0.8%
/gnu/store/zzyywykw7kriln18rxqd82f0k5kidla7-bash-static-5.1.16 1.8 1.8 0.7%
/gnu/store/v9p25q9l5nnaixkhpap5rnymmwbhf9rp-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.6 1.0 0.4%
/gnu/store/w55122b226ss928lxxg58plalah3xl9h-mpc-1.3.1 80.6 0.5 0.2%
/gnu/store/hl6lb3irs8wrfv49fnirxshsq590pi9v-zlib-1.2.13 75.5 0.2 0.1%
total : 267.8 Mio
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Shows that the main output of GCC already keeps a reference to its "lib"
output within its closure. It seems we could merge "lib" back into
"out" and simplify things?
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:10:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> Shows that the main output of GCC already keeps a reference to its "lib"
> output within its closure. It seems we could merge "lib" back into
> "out" and simplify things?
No, because most packages depend on gcc:lib and we wouldn’t want them to
depend on all of gcc:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix size grep
store item total self
/gnu/store/gsjczqir1wbz8p770zndrpw4rnppmxi3-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 50.2%
/gnu/store/930nwsiysdvy2x5zv1sf6v7ym75z8ayk-gcc-11.3.0-lib 75.3 34.7 44.9%
/gnu/store/zzyywykw7kriln18rxqd82f0k5kidla7-bash-static-5.1.16 1.8 1.8 2.4%
/gnu/store/rib9g2ig1xf3kclyl076w28parmncg4k-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.6 1.0 1.3%
/gnu/store/ixr7c3jadiqg640b8pz3njqhhm5zzmvj-grep-3.8 77.2 0.9 1.2%
total: 77.2 MiB
$ guix size grep gcc
guix size: package 'gcc' has been superseded by 'gcc-toolchain'
store item total self
/gnu/store/5lqhcv91ijy82p92ac6g5xw48l0lwwz4-gcc-11.3.0 223.6 148.1 43.0%
/gnu/store/zh4x65snfis7svs6906gj1z8i7dx2j3m-binutils-2.38 95.5 54.9 16.0%
/gnu/store/g8p09w6r78hhkl2rv1747pcp9zbk6fxv-guile-3.0.9 134.0 53.1 15.4%
/gnu/store/gsjczqir1wbz8p770zndrpw4rnppmxi3-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 11.3%
/gnu/store/930nwsiysdvy2x5zv1sf6v7ym75z8ayk-gcc-11.3.0-lib 75.3 34.7 10.1%
/gnu/store/5iklcps70c0sfkxvlrhg8jhf3q4h18bj-linux-libre-headers-5.15.49 5.9 5.9 1.7%
/gnu/store/wlm2r1789qi5kg242kyk72ipr14xsc0n-libunistring-1.0 77.8 2.5 0.7%
/gnu/store/zzyywykw7kriln18rxqd82f0k5kidla7-bash-static-5.1.16 1.8 1.8 0.5%
/gnu/store/bmcbayp2prca1svm1d5livg4f477i452-pkg-config-0.29.2 76.4 1.1 0.3%
/gnu/store/rib9g2ig1xf3kclyl076w28parmncg4k-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.6 1.0 0.3%
/gnu/store/ixr7c3jadiqg640b8pz3njqhhm5zzmvj-grep-3.8 77.2 0.9 0.3%
/gnu/store/575d59dd56fwiyjv58n0kjc24g3wi1ik-libgc-8.2.2 76.1 0.8 0.2%
/gnu/store/gqld7hz5vm4g904g7nc77z7wzvdrrwyb-zlib-1.2.13 40.8 0.2 0.1%
/gnu/store/q5k9xqnq9fvbvn17xymdvnckcwp8xlp9-libffi-3.4.4 75.5 0.2 0.1%
/gnu/store/fzsz6gk7g5spr7j5jx5zh6rysd5r0n64-gcc-toolchain-11.3.0 343.4 0.1 0.0%
/gnu/store/na1dpbbcxjaa3n8wkwrfpch476f90hlf-ld-wrapper-0 189.1 0.1 0.0%
total: 344.3 MiB
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:12:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Ludo,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Shows that the main output of GCC already keeps a reference to its "lib"
>> output within its closure. It seems we could merge "lib" back into
>> "out" and simplify things?
>
> No, because most packages depend on gcc:lib and we wouldn’t want them to
> depend on all of gcc:
>
> $ guix size grep
> store item total self
> /gnu/store/gsjczqir1wbz8p770zndrpw4rnppmxi3-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 50.2%
> /gnu/store/930nwsiysdvy2x5zv1sf6v7ym75z8ayk-gcc-11.3.0-lib 75.3 34.7 44.9%
> /gnu/store/zzyywykw7kriln18rxqd82f0k5kidla7-bash-static-5.1.16 1.8 1.8 2.4%
> /gnu/store/rib9g2ig1xf3kclyl076w28parmncg4k-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.6 1.0 1.3%
> /gnu/store/ixr7c3jadiqg640b8pz3njqhhm5zzmvj-grep-3.8 77.2 0.9 1.2%
> total: 77.2 MiB
> $ guix size grep gcc
> guix size: package 'gcc' has been superseded by 'gcc-toolchain'
> store item total self
> /gnu/store/5lqhcv91ijy82p92ac6g5xw48l0lwwz4-gcc-11.3.0 223.6 148.1 43.0%
> /gnu/store/zh4x65snfis7svs6906gj1z8i7dx2j3m-binutils-2.38 95.5 54.9 16.0%
> /gnu/store/g8p09w6r78hhkl2rv1747pcp9zbk6fxv-guile-3.0.9 134.0 53.1 15.4%
> /gnu/store/gsjczqir1wbz8p770zndrpw4rnppmxi3-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 11.3%
> /gnu/store/930nwsiysdvy2x5zv1sf6v7ym75z8ayk-gcc-11.3.0-lib 75.3 34.7 10.1%
> /gnu/store/5iklcps70c0sfkxvlrhg8jhf3q4h18bj-linux-libre-headers-5.15.49 5.9 5.9 1.7%
> /gnu/store/wlm2r1789qi5kg242kyk72ipr14xsc0n-libunistring-1.0 77.8 2.5 0.7%
> /gnu/store/zzyywykw7kriln18rxqd82f0k5kidla7-bash-static-5.1.16 1.8 1.8 0.5%
> /gnu/store/bmcbayp2prca1svm1d5livg4f477i452-pkg-config-0.29.2 76.4 1.1 0.3%
> /gnu/store/rib9g2ig1xf3kclyl076w28parmncg4k-bash-minimal-5.1.16 41.6 1.0 0.3%
> /gnu/store/ixr7c3jadiqg640b8pz3njqhhm5zzmvj-grep-3.8 77.2 0.9 0.3%
> /gnu/store/575d59dd56fwiyjv58n0kjc24g3wi1ik-libgc-8.2.2 76.1 0.8 0.2%
> /gnu/store/gqld7hz5vm4g904g7nc77z7wzvdrrwyb-zlib-1.2.13 40.8 0.2 0.1%
> /gnu/store/q5k9xqnq9fvbvn17xymdvnckcwp8xlp9-libffi-3.4.4 75.5 0.2 0.1%
> /gnu/store/fzsz6gk7g5spr7j5jx5zh6rysd5r0n64-gcc-toolchain-11.3.0 343.4 0.1 0.0%
> /gnu/store/na1dpbbcxjaa3n8wkwrfpch476f90hlf-ld-wrapper-0 189.1 0.1 0.0%
> total: 344.3 MiB
Thanks for putting this into perspective. So out -> lib but lib !=
depend on out, which makes it useful to reduce the closure when used standalone.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #35 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi everyone,
(And adding another CC for Isaac, where I think their message went just
to the debbugs address, which goes to no one. Another victim of needing
a "wide reply" which is easy from e.g. Emacs but not obvious especially
for people who don't interact with debbugs much as I can attest to in my
earlier days. Anyway, that's yet another issue to improve elsewhere.)
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 06:33 PM, John Kehayias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 03:38 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (make-gcc-toolchain): Add 'lib' outputs.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> (filter-map (match-lambda
>>> (("libc-debug" . _) #f)
>>> (("libc-static" . _) #f)
>>> + (("gcc-lib" . _) #f)
>>> + (("gcc-debug" . _) #f)
>>
>> I would include gcc:lib in “out” (thus not adding a “lib” output to
>> ‘gcc-toolchain’).
>>
>> Yes, gcc:lib includes *.a and *.la, but those are already part of the
>> ‘gcc-toolchain’ closure:
>>
>> $ guix size gcc-toolchain |head -6
>> store item total self
>> /gnu/store/jv78mm3dmr6fl2hhy1bkbhfpm702v3gq-gcc-12.3.0 292.6 169.4 41.2%
>> /gnu/store/zh4x65snfis7svs6906gj1z8i7dx2j3m-binutils-2.38 95.5 54.9 13.4%
>> /gnu/store/g8p09w6r78hhkl2rv1747pcp9zbk6fxv-guile-3.0.9 134.0 53.1 12.9%
>> /gnu/store/gsjczqir1wbz8p770zndrpw4rnppmxi3-glibc-2.35 40.6 38.8 9.4%
>> /gnu/store/gmv6n5vy5qcsn71pkapg2hnknyn1p7g3-gcc-12.3.0-lib 76.8 36.2 8.8%
>>
>> However, I’d leave out gcc:debug because (0) it’s unrelated :-), (1)
>> ‘gcc-final’ has no “debug” output, and (2) it’s really for a niche
>> (folks developing compiler plugins, typically).
>>
>> I’d also leave out the /lib directory of Binutils, which is again rarely
>> useful.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
To return to this, at the very least so I don't have to give the
incantation (which I got from someone else): guix shell -e '(list (@@
(gnu packages commencement) gcc) "lib")' to someone on IRC every few
days.
I'm sending a V2 of sorts, where it is the first patch from Simon (I had
to make a minor adjustment for it to apply cleanly now, please double
check!) and then my own very basic patch to solve the issue at hand:
just add gcc:lib to the inputs. I checked that building gcc-toolchain
works and includes libstdc++ and libgcc_s, which are the ones everyone
always asks about and assumes would be in gcc-toolchain.
What do we all think?
This is low impact and I don't think should negatively affect anything
so it would be great to get this pushed and close this finally :-)
Hope all is well!
John
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:27:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #38 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Empty Message
[0001-gnu-gcc-toolchain-Do-not-use-gcc-final.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #41 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Empty Message
[0002-gnu-make-gcc-toolchain-Add-gcc-lib.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#63393; Package
guix-patches.
(Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #44 received at 63393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi John,
John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com> skribis:
> I'm sending a V2 of sorts, where it is the first patch from Simon (I had
> to make a minor adjustment for it to apply cleanly now, please double
> check!) and then my own very basic patch to solve the issue at hand:
> just add gcc:lib to the inputs. I checked that building gcc-toolchain
> works and includes libstdc++ and libgcc_s, which are the ones everyone
> always asks about and assumes would be in gcc-toolchain.
>
> What do we all think?
The two patches you sent LGTM. Thanks for getting the ball rolling!
Ludo’.
Reply sent
to
John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #49 received at 63393-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:21 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Kehayias <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com> skribis:
>
>> I'm sending a V2 of sorts, where it is the first patch from Simon (I had
>> to make a minor adjustment for it to apply cleanly now, please double
>> check!) and then my own very basic patch to solve the issue at hand:
>> just add gcc:lib to the inputs. I checked that building gcc-toolchain
>> works and includes libstdc++ and libgcc_s, which are the ones everyone
>> always asks about and assumes would be in gcc-toolchain.
>>
>> What do we all think?
>
> The two patches you sent LGTM. Thanks for getting the ball rolling!
>
> Ludo’.
Thanks everyone! Pushed as b47ae1ecc43baaf726701ab2d2f810ecfaa75428.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Wed, 15 May 2024 11:24:11 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 359 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.