Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at 63530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2023 08:06:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 16 04:06:11 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pyphD-0000rA-2j for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:06:11 -0400 Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]:50529) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gabriel@HIDDEN>) id 1pyph8-0000qY-OL for 63530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:06:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D4A400ED for <63530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id IU2qCUxDGoAn for <63530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <63530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN> To: 63530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#63530: Missing library in package procps References: <87wn192qh8.fsf@HIDDEN> <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@HIDDEN> (Csepp's message of "Tue, 16 May 2023 00:36:37 +0200") Message-ID: <87mt243dlp.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 63530 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) A little more hacking leads me to the conclusion that (probably with version 4 but it's not exactly clear from the changelog) procps has made some significant changes to it's API. So, unless igt-gpu-tools (and probably others) are fixed upstream they remain broken. Fixes through simple regex-magic in our build-phases might be possible, but I am not confident enough in the matter to guarantee that the package would not just build but be broken in a more specific manner. Is there an easy way to check which dependents of procps are actually broken currently? Or is it really just igt-gpu-tools? There's two ways to go (I'd be happy for some input and volunteer to do the actual leg-work): 1. Add an additional procps-3 package with the older API to fix the broken packages. 2. Leave it as-is and wait for an upstream change of the currently broken packages.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#63530
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 63530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2023 22:38:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 15 18:38:01 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pygpM-0000xm-Ja for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:38:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:44492) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1pygpH-0000xI-El for 63530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:59 -0400 Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QKvQP6zTkzDqP6; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:37:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1684190270; bh=L4Ot0X4LacL21hvHW7i47jtX9Jxxkw3FmrqBeatAhtE=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=COdioPbIGHrPwZYz7mcjHIg4uKl/y3jrwY7RdQGRL4RAp+c63epgHjzZ66RNvKa9e q3ZnQU1JXT0Ebv5uMyZB3e3Tz2v4NCq1Xh36mzGeHhMLpSKQIPC/pCslIwQUaYVx36 5u36ulwggzQdYGUy+srI7ewD3ULtdnu3HTxZ6xQg= X-Riseup-User-ID: D19FFE7F0764034B60883FF3C2BE175C2FF8BAFBB17B4D8AAEDA2C05F0BAF8C7 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QKvQP22sQzFqhs; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:37:49 +0000 (UTC) References: <87wn192qh8.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN> To: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#63530: Missing library in package procps Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 00:36:37 +0200 In-reply-to: <87wn192qh8.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 63530 Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN, 63530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi > > Trying to upgrade a somewhat outdated system (from March 23) I noticed > igt-gpu-tools failed to build. Investigating a bit the build fails due > to some "proc/readproc.h" include missing. I think i managed to fix the > failure in procps's Makefile, but testing the patched build results in a > rather huge rebuild. `guix refresh -l procps` results in 5328 > packages. Are there any other approaches one could take to a) fix the > broken package without b) triggering a world-rebuild? > > I'm not sure if this is an upstream bug and whether other packages are > affected, neither do I know whether the other header files that aren't > being copied to the install dir should be. > > > Thanks for your input in advance! I'll update this issue with a patch > as soon as I manage to verify that my attempt actually works. > > gabber You could test it as a graft, then dependents won't get rebuilt. If the public ABI exported by the package doesn't change, it Should Be Fine TM.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#63530
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2023 22:37:57 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 15 18:37:57 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44690 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pygpJ-0000xW-8A for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:57 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1pygpG-0000xO-Jd for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1pygpG-0007q8-BR for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1pygpE-0002iB-Ck for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:37:54 -0400 Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QKvQP6zTkzDqP6; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:37:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1684190270; bh=L4Ot0X4LacL21hvHW7i47jtX9Jxxkw3FmrqBeatAhtE=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=COdioPbIGHrPwZYz7mcjHIg4uKl/y3jrwY7RdQGRL4RAp+c63epgHjzZ66RNvKa9e q3ZnQU1JXT0Ebv5uMyZB3e3Tz2v4NCq1Xh36mzGeHhMLpSKQIPC/pCslIwQUaYVx36 5u36ulwggzQdYGUy+srI7ewD3ULtdnu3HTxZ6xQg= X-Riseup-User-ID: D19FFE7F0764034B60883FF3C2BE175C2FF8BAFBB17B4D8AAEDA2C05F0BAF8C7 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QKvQP22sQzFqhs; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:37:49 +0000 (UTC) References: <87wn192qh8.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Csepp <raingloom@HIDDEN> To: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#63530: Missing library in package procps Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 00:36:37 +0200 In-reply-to: <87wn192qh8.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <87o7mlkyq8.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@HIDDEN; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN, 63530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi > > Trying to upgrade a somewhat outdated system (from March 23) I noticed > igt-gpu-tools failed to build. Investigating a bit the build fails due > to some "proc/readproc.h" include missing. I think i managed to fix the > failure in procps's Makefile, but testing the patched build results in a > rather huge rebuild. `guix refresh -l procps` results in 5328 > packages. Are there any other approaches one could take to a) fix the > broken package without b) triggering a world-rebuild? > > I'm not sure if this is an upstream bug and whether other packages are > affected, neither do I know whether the other header files that aren't > being copied to the install dir should be. > > > Thanks for your input in advance! I'll update this issue with a patch > as soon as I manage to verify that my attempt actually works. > > gabber You could test it as a graft, then dependents won't get rebuilt. If the public ABI exported by the package doesn't change, it Should Be Fine TM.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#63530
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2023 22:13:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 15 18:13:34 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pygRi-0000Jx-8a for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:13:34 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gabriel@HIDDEN>) id 1pygRf-0000Jo-Ol for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:13:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <gabriel@HIDDEN>) id 1pygRf-0000zp-GT for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:13:31 -0400 Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <gabriel@HIDDEN>) id 1pygRd-000691-Fz for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 15 May 2023 18:13:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C5D400ED for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id HJ5IxTAFPbjP for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: Missing library in package procps Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87wn192qh8.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.132.2.15; envelope-from=gabriel@HIDDEN; helo=chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi Trying to upgrade a somewhat outdated system (from March 23) I noticed igt-gpu-tools failed to build. Investigating a bit the build fails due to some "proc/readproc.h" include missing. I think i managed to fix the failure in procps's Makefile, but testing the patched build results in a rather huge rebuild. `guix refresh -l procps` results in 5328 packages. Are there any other approaches one could take to a) fix the broken package without b) triggering a world-rebuild? I'm not sure if this is an upstream bug and whether other packages are affected, neither do I know whether the other header files that aren't being copied to the install dir should be. Thanks for your input in advance! I'll update this issue with a patch as soon as I manage to verify that my attempt actually works. gabber
Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#63530
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.