GNU bug report logs - #64156
no tests/demo/ subdir mentioned in doc

Previous Next

Package: libtool;

Reported by: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>

Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:45:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95 <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 64156 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 64156 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-libtool <at> gnu.org:
bug#64156; Package libtool. (Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:45:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-libtool <at> gnu.org. (Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:45:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
To: bug-libtool <at> gnu.org
Subject: no tests/demo/ subdir mentioned in doc
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 14:44:16 -0600
The "Makefile rules" node in libtool.texi mentions a tests/demo
subdirectory in the libtool distribution, which does not exist as far as
I can see:

    (hint: examine the @file{Makefile.in} in the @file{tests/demo}
    subdirectory of the libtool distribution <at> dots{} note especially that it
    was automatically generated from the @file{Makefile.am} by Automake).

(Trivial aside: I think a semicolon would be better than @dots{} here.)

There is a file tests/demo.at, and other *demo*.at tests in libtool, but
it is not exactly trivial to turn them into a normal runnable test
hierarchy. Ditto for the examples shown in the manuals.

I'm using libtool with automake.  Is there a runnable hello,world
libtool+automake example somewhere?  I couldn't find one in either the
automake or libtool repos, web pages, etc.  There are various repos
claiming to do it on github, but at first blush, they looked pretty old
(e.g., using configure.in). --thanks, Karl.




Reply sent to Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95 <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 64156-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95 <at> gmail.com>
To: 64156-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Subject: Re: bug#64156: no tests/demo/ subdir mentioned in doc
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 21:26:53 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Thank you for the bug report!

I have updated the development branch [1] with various changes to the
documentation. There should not be any mention of the tests/demo
subdirectory anymore, so I am going to close this.

For the runnable hello,world libtool+automake example, I do not know of
any, but the test directories output from tests/demo.at looks like it
might be a good place to start for generating one.

[1] 
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/commit/?h=development&id=9d99f7fdfd683843cd9071af6c2c92e764b12066

-- 
Ileana Dumitrescu

GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354

[OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:24:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 15 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.