GNU bug report logs -
#64157
stale intro in doc
Previous Next
Reported by: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:45:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 64157 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 64157 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-libtool <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64157
; Package
libtool
.
(Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:45:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-libtool <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:45:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
The "Libtool paradigm" in libtool.texi says:
Version 0.7 of libtool was a complete redesign and rewrite of libtool to
reflect this new paradigm. So far, it has proved to be successful:
libtool is simpler and more useful than before.
This seems rather stale. It feels odd to read a self-congratulatory
comment about something that happened many years ago. -k
Information forwarded
to
bug-libtool <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64157
; Package
libtool
.
(Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 64157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Ileana - good to have a first commit :). All looks good to me. I'll
bcc 64157-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org to close the bug -- although in general you
should feel free to close bugs yourself when appropriate, since original
submitters often fail to confirm or get back. They can always reply
later if they disagree, as you're probably well aware of from your
Debian work.
FYI, I noticed that the libtool-commit mailing list did not receive a
message from your commit, or indeed anything since January 2017. I asked
the Savannah folks to repair ...
https://savannah.nongnu.org/support/index.php?111008
All the best,
Karl
Reply sent
to
Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:31:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-libtool <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64157
; Package
libtool
.
(Sun, 14 Jan 2024 08:01:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 64157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Fixes libtool bug https://bugs.gnu.org/64157
* libtool.texi: Removed old and stale introduction from documentation.
---
doc/libtool.texi | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/libtool.texi b/doc/libtool.texi
index 5973bac0..84f565e5 100644
--- a/doc/libtool.texi
+++ b/doc/libtool.texi
@@ -409,10 +409,6 @@ libraries and programs.
In summary, ``libraries are programs with multiple entry points, and
more formally defined interfaces.''
-Version 0.7 of libtool was a complete redesign and rewrite of libtool to
-reflect this new paradigm. So far, it has proved to be successful:
-libtool is simpler and more useful than before.
-
The best way to introduce the libtool paradigm is to contrast it with
the paradigm of existing library systems, with examples from each. It
is a new way of thinking, so it may take a little time to absorb, but
--
2.43.0
[OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-libtool <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64157
; Package
libtool
.
(Sun, 14 Jan 2024 08:01:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 64157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I pushed a small change to clean this up. It was my first commit for
libtool, so I hopefully didn't miss anything, although if I did please
let me know!
--
Ileana Dumitrescu
GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354
[OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:24:10 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 88 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.