GNU bug report logs - #64464
[PATCH] gnu: libostree: Update to 2023.5.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 64464 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 64464 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libostree: Update to 2023.5.
Date: Tue,  4 Jul 2023 14:28:56 -0400

* gnu/packages/package-management.scm (libostree): Update to 2023.5.
---
 gnu/packages/package-management.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm
index e3dba508f0..e90d436823 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm
@@ -1814,7 +1814,7 @@ (define-public msitools
 (define-public libostree
   (package
     (name "libostree")
-    (version "2022.7")
+    (version "2023.5")
     (source
      (origin
        (method url-fetch)
@@ -1822,7 +1822,7 @@ (define-public libostree
              "https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/releases/download/v"
              (version-major+minor version) "/libostree-" version ".tar.xz"))
        (sha256
-        (base32 "07s14awf9ynlp84s08dkbwj9i18g93y0yf0k87nbks4l3hkakqlb"))))
+        (base32 "056v7bz40dx8k2j2pfypc4shl6ijzvx1gy8r0kaw66py67xklndw"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (arguments
      '(#:phases

base-commit: 3b630604d1f6325444509b5badd6cee15b3ce1b4
-- 
2.41.0

Message #8 received at 64464 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 64464 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#64464: [PATCH] gnu: libostree: Update to 2023.5.
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 00:28:29 +0200

kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org> skribis:

> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (libostree): Update to 2023.5.

Hi!  This introduces new build failures according to
<https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/64464>.  Could you take a look?

TIA,
Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 64464 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 64464 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#64464: [PATCH] gnu: libostree: Update to 2023.5.
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:51:55 +0000

Hi Ludo,

On 2023-07-17 22:28, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org> skribis:
> 
>> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (libostree): Update to 2023.5.
> 
> Hi!  This introduces new build failures according to
> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/64464>.  Could you take a look?

Currently this page is down, but I tested locally on the dependents, 
except for plasma since it's very big:

Building the following 6 packages would ensure 9 dependent packages are 
rebuilt: xdg-desktop-portal-gtk <at> 1.14.1 malcontent <at> 0.11.1 
gnome-builder <at> 42.1 plasma <at> 5.25.5 sideload <at> 6.0.2 skopeo <at> 1.2.3

Out of these, malcontent failed to build for reasons unrelated to 
libostree. I sent a patch at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65040

Message #14 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org
Cc: 64464-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#64464] [PATCH] gnu: libostree: Update to 2023.5.
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:34:38 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

kiasoc5--- via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Ludo,
>
> On 2023-07-17 22:28, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> kiasoc5 <kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org> skribis:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (libostree): Update to 2023.5.
>> Hi!  This introduces new build failures according to
>> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/64464>.  Could you take a look?
>
> Currently this page is down, but I tested locally on the dependents,
> except for plasma since it's very big:
>
> Building the following 6 packages would ensure 9 dependent packages
> are rebuilt: xdg-desktop-portal-gtk <at> 1.14.1 malcontent <at> 0.11.1
> gnome-builder <at> 42.1 plasma <at> 5.25.5 sideload <at> 6.0.2 skopeo <at> 1.2.3
>
> Out of these, malcontent failed to build for reasons unrelated to
> libostree. I sent a patch at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65040

The information on QA looks OK to me, so I've gone ahead and pushed this
to master as b696fb41bc0dfcb7130a5aa6d69aff2ae191c283.

Chris

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.