Received: (at 64670) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2023 11:18:35 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 11 07:18:35 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qUQA7-0001FM-8E for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:18:35 -0400 Received: from ms-10.1blu.de ([178.254.4.101]:44892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qUQA3-0001F2-Td for 64670 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:18:33 -0400 Received: from [176.199.211.189] (helo=dolos) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qUQA2-0006DS-FI for 64670 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:18:30 +0200 From: Tim Johann <t1m@HIDDEN> To: 64670 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: referenced patch does not apply to openjdk10 Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:56:30 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 1.10.5; emacs 29.0.92 Message-ID: <871qg9aku1.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Con-Id: 303810 X-Con-U: 0-timjohann X-Originating-IP: 176.199.211.189 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 64670 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="==-=-=" --==-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Hello again, said issue is merged (<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63327>) now. Unfortunately, it does not affect openjdk10, since it uses a different file system organisation than the former version. I already suggested this solution to bug#63069 (<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63069>) where a fix along the lines of separate patch files was proposed as a better alternative to issue #63327. Still keeping this open until a patch for openjdk10 has been merged, too, which I would love to see soon. Cheers Tim --==-=-= Content-Type: text/html Content-Disposition: inline <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><head><!-- 2023-08-11 Fri 13:18 --><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8"/><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/><meta name="generator" content="Org Mode"/></head><body> <div style="font-family:"Arial";font-size:10pt;line-height:11pt;" id="content"> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> Hello again,<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> said issue is merged (<a style="color:#0071c5;" href="https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63327">https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63327</a>) now.<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> Unfortunately, it does not affect openjdk10, since it uses a different file system organisation than the former version.<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> I already suggested this solution to bug#63069 (<a style="color:#0071c5;" href="https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63069">https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63069</a>) where a fix along the lines of separate patch files was proposed as a better alternative to issue #63327.<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> Still keeping this open until a patch for openjdk10 has been merged, too, which I would love to see soon.<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> Cheers<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> Tim<br/></p> </div> </body></html> --==-=-=-- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN
:bug#64670
; Package guix-patches
.
Full text available.Received: (at 64670) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2023 15:45:24 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 17 11:45:24 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qLQPc-0000h6-3h for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:45:24 -0400 Received: from ms-10.1blu.de ([178.254.4.101]:50114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qLQPX-0000gr-6h for 64670 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:45:22 -0400 Received: from [129.206.148.250] (helo=dolos) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qLQPV-0000SJ-A1 for 64670 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:45:17 +0200 From: Tim Johann <t1m@HIDDEN> To: 64670 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: This seems to be a duplicate issue to the on by Christopher Baines. Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:41:34 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 1.10.3; emacs 30.0.50 Message-ID: <87v8eir183.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Con-Id: 303810 X-Con-U: 0-timjohann X-Originating-IP: 129.206.148.250 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 64670 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="==-=-=" --==-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I just found a kinda duplicate of this from May 06: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63327> So, why isn't this already pushed? I'll keep this one open until one of our patches is applied. Cheers Tim --==-=-= Content-Type: text/html Content-Disposition: inline <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><head><!-- 2023-07-17 Mon 17:45 --><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8"/><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/><meta name="generator" content="Org Mode"/></head><body> <div style="font-family:"Arial";font-size:10pt;line-height:11pt;" id="content"> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> Hello,<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> I just found a kinda duplicate of this from May 06:<br/><a style="color:#0071c5;" href="https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63327">https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63327</a><br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> So, why isn't this already pushed?<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> I'll keep this one open until one of our patches is applied.<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> Cheers<br/></p> <p style="text-decoration:none;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:10px;line-height:11pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";"> Tim<br/></p> </div> </body></html> --==-=-=-- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN
:bug#64670
; Package guix-patches
.
Full text available.Received: (at 64670) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2023 21:16:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 16 17:16:37 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qL96a-00052r-JM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:16:37 -0400 Received: from ms-10.1blu.de ([178.254.4.101]:54706) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qL96Y-00052h-2s for 64670 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:16:36 -0400 Received: from [176.199.211.189] (helo=dolos.fritz.box) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qL96W-0001RZ-Mq; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:16:32 +0200 From: Tim Johann <t1m@HIDDEN> To: 64670 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: openjdk: patches for aarch64 build (openjdk9|openjdk10). Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:16:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20230716211629.181979-1-t1m@HIDDEN> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Con-Id: 303810 X-Con-U: 0-t1m X-Originating-IP: 176.199.211.189 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 64670 Cc: Tim Johann <t1m@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) OpenJDK source code prior to version 11 have a duplicate 'using' statement in hotspot's interp_masm_aarch64.hpp, which let's compilation of openjdk@HIDDEN fail on aarch64, and in consequence all openjdk versions, since each version larger than major 9 depends on the next lower major version of openjdk. This patch will make openjdk available on aarch64, again. * gnu/packages/java.scm (openjdk9|openjdk10)[source](patches): adding patches to remove duplicate 'using' statements causing build to fail on aarch64. * gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch, gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch: New files --- gnu/packages/java.scm | 6 ++++-- .../openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch | 15 +++++++++++++++ .../openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch | 15 +++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm index 5a6288581e..69c4e604a8 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/java.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/java.scm @@ -873,7 +873,8 @@ (define-public openjdk9 (base32 "1v92nzdqx07c35x945awzir4yk0fk22vky6fpp8mq9js930sxsz0")) (patches (search-patches "openjdk-9-pointer-comparison.patch" - "openjdk-9-setsignalhandler.patch")))) + "openjdk-9-setsignalhandler.patch" + "openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (outputs '("out" "jdk" "doc")) (arguments @@ -1060,7 +1061,8 @@ (define-public openjdk10 (patches (search-patches "openjdk-10-idlj-reproducibility.patch" "openjdk-10-pointer-comparison.patch" - "openjdk-10-setsignalhandler.patch")))) + "openjdk-10-setsignalhandler.patch" + "openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch")))) (arguments (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments openjdk9) ((#:phases phases) diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..48cded60e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +Patch from changeset of openjdk11: +https://hg.openjdk.org/jdk-updates/jdk11u/rev/15cc1c8a6371 + +diff -u -r openjdk-10.alt/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/interp_masm_aarch64.hpp openjdk-10/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/interp_masm_aarch64.hpp +--- openjdk-10.alt/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/interp_masm_aarch64.hpp 2023-07-16 14:33:27.570165136 +0200 ++++ openjdk-10/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/interp_masm_aarch64.hpp 2023-07-16 14:34:55.325163199 +0200 +@@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ + protected: + + protected: +- using MacroAssembler::call_VM_leaf_base; +- + // Interpreter specific version of call_VM_base + using MacroAssembler::call_VM_leaf_base; + diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3fa933ad36 --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +Patch from changeset of openjdk11: +https://hg.openjdk.org/jdk-updates/jdk11u/rev/15cc1c8a6371 + +diff -u -r openjdk-9.alt/hotspot/src/cpu/aarch64/vm/interp_masm_aarch64.hpp openjdk-9/hotspot/src/cpu/aarch64/vm/interp_masm_aarch64.hpp +--- openjdk-9.alt/hotspot/src/cpu/aarch64/vm/interp_masm_aarch64.hpp 2023-07-15 19:03:09.063790084 +0200 ++++ openjdk-9/hotspot/src/cpu/aarch64/vm/interp_masm_aarch64.hpp 2023-07-15 19:01:12.289447197 +0200 +@@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ + protected: + + protected: +- using MacroAssembler::call_VM_leaf_base; +- + // Interpreter specific version of call_VM_base + using MacroAssembler::call_VM_leaf_base; + -- 2.41.0
guix-patches@HIDDEN
:bug#64670
; Package guix-patches
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2023 20:36:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 16 16:36:11 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qL8TS-00040C-Sa for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 16:36:11 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:47528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qL8TO-0003zd-Hc for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 16:36:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qL8TJ-0000zR-07 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 16:36:01 -0400 Received: from ms-10.1blu.de ([178.254.4.101]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qL8TH-0003Ws-4N for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 16:36:00 -0400 Received: from [176.199.211.189] (helo=dolos.fritz.box) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <t1m@HIDDEN>) id 1qL8TD-0004X8-0f; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 22:35:55 +0200 From: Tim Johann <t1m@HIDDEN> To: guix-patches@HIDDEN Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Fixing failing builds of openjdk on aarch64 Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 22:35:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20230716203552.180767-1-t1m@HIDDEN> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Con-Id: 303810 X-Con-U: 0-t1m X-Originating-IP: 176.199.211.189 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.254.4.101; envelope-from=t1m@HIDDEN; helo=ms-10.1blu.de X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Tim Johann <t1m@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) When I wanted to install Clojure on my Raspberry Pis, I was stumped to see that there was no installable version of openjdk available on aarch64. Seeing the build fail, I saw that this was a very simple issue fixed in openjdk11 (cf.: [1] and [2]). So, I created a patch and applied it to openjdk9 and openjdk10, after which I was able to build openjdk@HIDDEN, openjdk@HIDDEN, and openjdk@HIDDEN successfully on one of my RPis. I hope that subsequently all versions of openjdk can be built on aarch64. [1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8237885 [2] https://hg.openjdk.org/jdk-updates/jdk11u/rev/15cc1c8a6371). Tim Johann (1): gnu: openjdk: patches for aarch64 build (openjdk9|openjdk10). gnu/packages/java.scm | 6 ++++-- .../openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch | 15 +++++++++++++++ .../openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch | 15 +++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-10-duplicate-using-declaration.patch create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/openjdk-9-duplicate-using-declaration.patch base-commit: 796c823a0d1d0aec9f4af908eca462e58e5675b5 -- 2.41.0
Tim Johann <t1m@HIDDEN>
:guix-patches@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN
:bug#64670
; Package guix-patches
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.