Received: (at 64861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2025 21:55:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 11 16:55:11 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45191 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tWjRn-000790-H7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 16:55:11 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]:59810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <karl@HIDDEN>) id 1tWjRl-00077v-6f for 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 16:55:09 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-84f1ea04c64so203143239f.3 for <64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:55:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hallsby.com; s=google; t=1736632503; x=1737237303; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o5pzWc6NwSmr54idXvJ+CuCYtecVRn/ajI3sRHWDgiM=; b=CrXq0huOGQYT+IrmQ3DfCv24PpMP71l3iK36lhsip/ufbOtVGtXhO52EFa/Dzdf9x3 uCZSBmSghE9TJGMSD+iU0LtdRmwycia+vUqHkP6x/5oGcnK5S3hMk4yWhs1OjwgAKLUg evuTevRvm0gXFY1wuQXZC4Ec+94zo9h8f8sLWItsAVw6F7GSx2LCier92UVsc/061pXc prN2TCcyqgdzhWO30CDOFt2OpTdKQSl7xwks+BBwOZN3I/Id68ou7cOD4GzzSbOOBBI9 egCNSExc0YOfD7usvGQ6RveM8Un/XLG29dtdUCx89s+lIl4ynatJbvuP4PZCRm0v3n/9 TAkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736632503; x=1737237303; h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=o5pzWc6NwSmr54idXvJ+CuCYtecVRn/ajI3sRHWDgiM=; b=sX8ii84lxbRyjVOd4rPfVHjYqWUp+lcW6T2QtJ/stpJYsYmoOqNoaxOLj29SdDwi4v f8BrTTz6NLsUJsXqkI++PHvK59eWMi4wd7j2+DUrRZyJlPQEXycU/kMoldK2OnV++J5A xTHQpfEH5QZtlkp7n+JQ4C06mpbgVSU+J2wGbrBh+LrYYYFGKeFBHYkFWGrK4jQbEdzS thAEbvDgYEdPSLfbgnje7bI9g7mTj6tX9hmva3g7KiBof6GRTZhu/VLa20E3eRp2yo3f nPjslPwmkEJe8FjveSqqW2RLJywCWIZnusjcawEsGzDTRm3vaChtzq+MCtlLhKfXLxRe x4Yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YztTy8jvpmk1YNTcdBCUgQIJbwmVPqkS9lRK9n6JQCLksaOSEZT fe9R7rj64uV0YXPv4tPDFXLVObFpx0QRJTjRQPF0I1ztFcmbCn34trqE49SmTJCqjD6COkaOXqW 4NA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu+dFjN/WY1X7+1F1c/HK+k2MWjTAJU2nMTTeyK7HF6ygTC3/V+nI5d05Z1hyZ flGoXu5x3snCnPXFSC2jdbKyexKWk9zK9O5+WfJD1Puta58tRK8E9TfrDbxb3dmy1NhkvBc9QCt 0WnONMidkmNjOXDO/7EZfu8/HybY+7cfDyTdJRd4YDmBwuzlRH9qh9cVqznX9J4u6LmTAkYhUeQ 2NeeIyCneg6RLt5ry9eiURyi+N1j7qQiZErscCHswPcseIybg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH5/Qqi1qCU/f2bV8+W4Sz1veGDKWfCnMmAPG94uC+PskvMBG99bHkj7VKKl4D3gVVAbIq/Cg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1706:b0:3ce:6975:b668 with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3ce6975b7fdmr13070925ab.6.1736632503060; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([207.237.222.72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8926c6da1cb9f-4ea1b717d59sm1758415173.97.2025.01.11.13.55.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Jan 2025 13:55:01 -0800 (PST) From: "Karl G. Hallsby" <karl@HIDDEN> To: 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#64861] [PATCH] guix: Add lint check for guix as propagated-input In-Reply-To: <87bkeekqqx.fsf@HIDDEN> (Simon Tournier's message of "Thu, 07 Sep 2023 16:22:14 +0200") References: <388dc9bec6dabc97092eb2009fed304c3f84c6fc.1690308209.git.karl@HIDDEN> <87pm4f7skl.fsf@HIDDEN> <87fs4dqvml.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <87bkeekqqx.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 15:54:59 -0600 Message-ID: <875xmlnhho.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 64861 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi all, What is the state of this patch's proposal? Is this warning check for guix in propagated-inputs something we still want to warn about? I know we have not talked about it in a while. I am going through all of my contributions to Guix & Guix-based projects and closing/merging/resolving them. -- Raven Hallsby
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#64861; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 64861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2023 15:19:12 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 07 11:19:11 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40977 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1qeGml-0002AG-Ho
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 11:19:11 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]:40318)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1qeGmb-00028t-MV
for 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 11:19:02 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id
ffacd0b85a97d-31c3f574ef8so199197f8f.1
for <64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694099934; x=1694704734; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=mQrGfRJDEOaj0RZO7CNjwG/UMQGCG1S2vLErrEszL/A=;
b=rLDuoNVq2w1q+uuCgRV1zbl0J7qf4PVarGo7qScroefeR/Uoe2505yEJDJXea1clhs
HqvzZRc6a5RgfD2Wh0n/Te5TBsDEZqeNtcOnZRlkhOczBNKLqoXifBS0A4fX81sdeOPg
4SAy43AMyHCWTbt/WMxP54W+daqQ4zka2qBP/mV/6YKhJ6aiY7LnlRh/4gvHPw2oUEfn
YoFQTAoPjtswHS7SCkwESohWLbHjiRs+ooZdvL8dxRiqpgu1w4HkNLb7NpBG1OBze6h2
ztHWD/29lZV2U/5UXgAnO8kHjDteNDWWj3z5oKD9bc54igYBaks+b2Sz2bvQgFdOPgQA
wTOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1694099934; x=1694704734;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=mQrGfRJDEOaj0RZO7CNjwG/UMQGCG1S2vLErrEszL/A=;
b=R42Hc5JHAFugcJPvkbQ7tiwhEqhniMw5IOnniAy2xKWYcGhYBKy3P5OKmc4F2RwpQK
M6XJVPJhqfsrtbO4rqOBKHwq1O7I3cagqNd1fuz0EPecQFt97xNgyp1lmG3dAewLu9ME
SpKF+1UAfZkxuqRlpsGanQ/r0us4rcpeuKKQjizpFZ+x0X331eVO1I5ragKo0+xU7gvZ
N/GY7YD+tee9XSkUEzTlguIrrgtRYsV3kodUJODK5MyhUGjZ06f68ybw897d2d11F/Eh
ve5lLQAO/Xu4nbaxmqbIPU+w8W8BZkYoNExBNilLeNpX/nJGGCLWLPqIJE+UrQ/YNoFu
1M0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzM7YPs24aOWl+6yU6KHZWEBuK2ss5ut3eoLZoDPL5u2jGT473b
zygPy4lNmM6gJUGLRmUTv7ru1y5HcQo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHwJeeEyBdHPbJxMjDtK2tKgCuba1/LnKeqRX6NoYLfx6SCO3xXBq3DJZVi/4KsvrvdAoOyCQ==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f291:0:b0:316:ef5f:7d8f with SMTP id
k17-20020adff291000000b00316ef5f7d8fmr14578904wro.3.1694099934151;
Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
cc11-20020a5d5c0b000000b0031f34a395e7sm17301385wrb.45.2023.09.07.08.18.53
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>, Christopher Baines
<mail@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#64861] [PATCH] guix: Add lint check for guix as
propagated-input
In-Reply-To: <87fs4dqvml.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
References: <388dc9bec6dabc97092eb2009fed304c3f84c6fc.1690308209.git.karl@HIDDEN>
<87pm4f7skl.fsf@HIDDEN> <87fs4dqvml.fsf_-_@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 16:22:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87bkeekqqx.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 64861
Cc: Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN>, 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi,
On Sun, 20 Aug 2023 at 22:58, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote:
> Maybe =E2=80=98guile-imanifest=E2=80=99 should be made a Guix extension, =
which Guix
> searches for in $GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATH?
And probably renamed =E2=80=99guix-imanifest=E2=80=99?
Back to the submission, I think that the propagation of the package guix
means something is wrong. From my point of view, there is two cases:
1. The package uses the stable library API and thus it makes sense to
rely on the package =E2=80=99guix=E2=80=99. That=E2=80=99s the case fo=
r =E2=80=99gwl=E2=80=99,
=E2=80=99guix-data-service=E2=80=99 for example.
2. The aim of package is to collaborate with the current Guix and thus
there is no point to have the package =E2=80=99guix=E2=80=99 as inputs.=
Instead,
the package must rely on GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATH. That=E2=80=99s the case=
for
=E2=80=99guix-modules=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=99guile-imanifest=E2=80=99 (so=
that needs a fix ;-))
Therefore, I think this new checker makes sense. WDYT?
About #1, IMHO, this is expected:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix shell -C gwl -- guix --version
guix shell: error: guix: command not found
(define-public gwl
(inputs
[...]
(list guix
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
and this is not expected:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix shell -C guix-data-service -- guix --version
guix (GNU Guix) 1.4.0-10.4dfdd82
Copyright (C) 2023 the Guix authors
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.htm=
l>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
(define-public guix-data-service
[...]
(propagated-inputs
(list guix
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Cheers,
simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#64861; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 64861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2023 20:58:22 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 20 16:58:22 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54936 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qXpV8-00074A-84 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:58:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1qXpV6-00073x-GR for 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:58:21 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1qXpUz-0001qa-9C; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:58:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=+wktX6Zzw3ytO20Q3kNzbxWxzGuh9JD8Efkv6XAVcd8=; b=DvVj1Nd7BlILW45sBE6H /xuyAx5iEn7V/1DFplee1cSj8NvaBDfj9W7Pb+QY+P8fRN/J4DfTbu+VQuji6IxV30pJL3Tpdxm7H 73MOgVfexFqHV9m2SFoXRwTah7GnksDtDH1eaQomPTYpUr+8+dC5ZYlaYR/vXmzcSjcbbQTM76CA/ 65Yrd4oRBzeiz12M075HiWQk4fZqaUh8q7YeSf+Vq7nO8B1EG+MNpGWGotYhicsQdSsmEoHjYa1V3 6W9+xtRrwW1x0EnIZguxK0FunZc3hN7aVTM+iGaLMXBapn9r9a0bHLPR56mB8aJppeHusweKkl5iI AaeWVZs4gE9j2A==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#64861: [PATCH] guix: Add lint check for guix as propagated-input References: <388dc9bec6dabc97092eb2009fed304c3f84c6fc.1690308209.git.karl@HIDDEN> <87pm4f7skl.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 22:58:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pm4f7skl.fsf@HIDDEN> (Christopher Baines's message of "Tue, 25 Jul 2023 19:26:01 +0100") Message-ID: <87fs4dqvml.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 64861 Cc: Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN>, 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> skribis: > Using guile-imanifest breaks: > > =E2=86=92 ./pre-inst-env guix environment --pure --ad-hoc guile guile-i= manifest -- guile -c "(use-modules (imanifest))" > Backtrace: > ... > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:3330:6: In procedure resolve-interface: > no code for module (guix profiles) Maybe =E2=80=98guile-imanifest=E2=80=99 should be made a Guix extension, wh= ich Guix searches for in $GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATH? An example of that is =E2=80=98guix-modules=E2=80=99. Ludo=E2=80=99.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#64861; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 64861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2023 18:46:41 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 25 14:46:40 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qON3Q-0000pv-En for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:46:40 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]:52734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <karl@HIDDEN>) id 1qON3N-0000ph-So for 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:46:38 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3a38953c928so4101398b6e.1 for <64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:46:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hallsby.com; s=google; t=1690310792; x=1690915592; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WYSxOWVAvhjMcvL9br6gtfPi3bKC6S0z8KRrj0JoRAo=; b=ArQ86fNFL4xyRa7M5J5i6+qA0d5IFu1+Kk099D0puKOGdgK607xNO/+KtBOkv0tfE5 I6NhVBNEG9nTt2h+uFcX/18oUpM0UwtD25Ti1pcVySP4wDWq5bUb7L2UTaCN1TByz+Cu 19FEetSJOF8VicDcELvR/AhZ/8qZwEqTi6jLNxcuW9gc6z0hhrVQ6tJ1iKI+X4GaXGjV rB17VG7tYddjLBunhocB9Y7Jgwko0gs1MnNyhSsbsd9t/mi15pB616hhYf3md1y6tuaE ernE4gdQQ+7jbwP7efVIe+p95aLde6Z2guqQ8qmZHBSoipceLS0jvsoM85qTyxufneqk BWdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690310792; x=1690915592; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:user-agent:references:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WYSxOWVAvhjMcvL9br6gtfPi3bKC6S0z8KRrj0JoRAo=; b=CnM3rY0iZs8Pp4fCdK8/57tkB1OAn3Gd23+/tjaR8IfoTcFY+yFNpIKGc5yC8KNSDo D85mk/a7CeUu6Kodd0hHnN0WXc/9r7BP+en9R1G3mgXWQTXOMxZoW1lUTwSVBsZz54sc Q7W1hoghWD5C7zl9KN3PQztnwwSmN8ufQTuw7Ezx12MTjlf6zkUkqFvtIoC+CYbmh0z2 Eh2VWtx/TxWI5efBu407GEOitULUkb/I9/I48B//KjuTlz4Vw3weGJdWp6WISsVmoPt5 PIhZZ4hXzfgR1TrPvTIgamz+REnOKrTn2dc1OJThFog4102tfs7IXhUJmwHqP6sL4RJY iqYA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZXHxrmQEglNa9vfGeru8ThRkoWTEf+J7ySCmmoyYzCQZ6j6ss7 qK6sE146YfeTE/WQCkYrN934q13zJhzdAvL3XsgGoA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlG/JASfHjo81DC8CLISa0PfO8mhS+agvW4IeteZy5Tc/p6AmqcV+lzbrf/twRLJooDZ7Yyj8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1594:b0:3a5:a82f:2cd with SMTP id t20-20020a056808159400b003a5a82f02cdmr11539604oiw.8.1690310791782; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (1459483-v115.1145-static.batvilaa.metronetinc.net. [192.69.181.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s14-20020a0cb30e000000b006238b37fb05sm4567450qve.119.2023.07.25.11.46.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:46:31 -0700 (PDT) References: <388dc9bec6dabc97092eb2009fed304c3f84c6fc.1690308209.git.karl@HIDDEN> <87pm4f7skl.fsf@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.3; emacs 28.2 From: "Karl G. Hallsby" <karl@HIDDEN> To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#64861] [PATCH] guix: Add lint check for guix as propagated-input Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:41:55 -0500 In-reply-to: <87pm4f7skl.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <874jlr96d5.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 64861 Cc: 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN> writes: > >> * guix/lint.scm (new check): Run lint check warning user if the provided >> package uses guix as a propagated-input. >> >> Passing guix as a propagated-input is problematic when users install a p= ackage >> into their profiles. This can cause the guix propagated by the package t= o be >> used in preference of the real one in $HOME/.config/. It was first notic= ed on >> IRC with https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-07-22.log#044534, and repro= duced >> with a different package https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-07-25.log#0= 54737. >> --- >> guix/lint.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > I'm not sure this lint warning is helpful as in both cases mentioned in > the IRC links you provided (guile-imanifest and guix-data-service), > these packages provide Guile modules that depend on Guix, and therefore > the guix package is expected in their propagated inputs. > > If you remove guix or make it a input instead of a propagated input, > then this breaks using the package, for example, with this change: > > modified gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm > @@ -2098,8 +2098,10 @@ (define-public guile-imanifest > (build-system guile-build-system) > (native-inputs > (list guile-3.0)) > + (inputs > + (list guix)) > (propagated-inputs > - (list guile-readline guile-colorized guix)) > + (list guile-readline guile-colorized)) > (home-page "https://sr.ht/~brown121407/guile-imanifest") > (synopsis "Interactive Guix manifests") > (description "This package provides functions to generate Guix m= anifests > > Using guile-imanifest breaks: > > =E2=86=92 ./pre-inst-env guix environment --pure --ad-hoc guile guile-i= manifest -- guile -c "(use-modules (imanifest))" > Backtrace: > ... > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:3330:6: In procedure resolve-interface: > no code for module (guix profiles) > > > I think some other approach is needed to avoid people having problems > with the guix package appearing in their users profile. > > [[End of PGP Signed Part]] That makes sense. Though, this lint is just a warning, so if nothing else, it should make people think if guix really needs to be propagated. If this lint is not the solution, then a way to mark packages that are not recommended to be installed like this would be nice.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#64861; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 64861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2023 18:29:56 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 25 14:29:56 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46940 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1qOMnD-0000QC-QZ
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:29:56 -0400
Received: from mira.cbaines.net
([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:35679)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1qOMnB-0000Q2-4g
for 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:29:54 -0400
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:54d1:d5d4:280e:f699])
by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC62127BBE2;
Tue, 25 Jul 2023 19:29:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 87cd695e;
Tue, 25 Jul 2023 18:29:49 +0000 (UTC)
References: <388dc9bec6dabc97092eb2009fed304c3f84c6fc.1690308209.git.karl@HIDDEN>
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.5; emacs 28.2
From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>
To: Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: [bug#64861] [PATCH] guix: Add lint check for guix as
propagated-input
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 19:26:01 +0100
In-reply-to: <388dc9bec6dabc97092eb2009fed304c3f84c6fc.1690308209.git.karl@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <87pm4f7skl.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 64861
Cc: 64861 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN> writes:
> * guix/lint.scm (new check): Run lint check warning user if the provided
> package uses guix as a propagated-input.
>
> Passing guix as a propagated-input is problematic when users install a pa=
ckage
> into their profiles. This can cause the guix propagated by the package to=
be
> used in preference of the real one in $HOME/.config/. It was first notice=
d on
> IRC with https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-07-22.log#044534, and reprod=
uced
> with a different package https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-07-25.log#05=
4737.
> ---
> guix/lint.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
I'm not sure this lint warning is helpful as in both cases mentioned in
the IRC links you provided (guile-imanifest and guix-data-service),
these packages provide Guile modules that depend on Guix, and therefore
the guix package is expected in their propagated inputs.
If you remove guix or make it a input instead of a propagated input,
then this breaks using the package, for example, with this change:
modified gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm
@@ -2098,8 +2098,10 @@ (define-public guile-imanifest
(build-system guile-build-system)
(native-inputs
(list guile-3.0))
+ (inputs
+ (list guix))
(propagated-inputs
- (list guile-readline guile-colorized guix))
+ (list guile-readline guile-colorized))
(home-page "https://sr.ht/~brown121407/guile-imanifest")
(synopsis "Interactive Guix manifests")
(description "This package provides functions to generate Guix man=
ifests
Using guile-imanifest breaks:
=E2=86=92 ./pre-inst-env guix environment --pure --ad-hoc guile guile-ima=
nifest -- guile -c "(use-modules (imanifest))"
Backtrace:
...
ice-9/boot-9.scm:3330:6: In procedure resolve-interface:
no code for module (guix profiles)
I think some other approach is needed to avoid people having problems
with the guix package appearing in their users profile.
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=P4R2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#64861; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2023 18:05:42 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 25 14:05:41 2023
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46920 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1qOMPl-0008JF-IR
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:05:41 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:42178)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <karl@HIDDEN>) id 1qOMPj-0008J2-Hm
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:05:40 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <karl@HIDDEN>) id 1qOMPc-00059a-BS
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:05:33 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e])
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <karl@HIDDEN>) id 1qOMPa-0001aU-KJ
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:05:32 -0400
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id
af79cd13be357-76c4890a220so166872885a.3
for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=hallsby.com; s=google; t=1690308328; x=1690913128;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc
:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=Us5bBGdVGqarFjcvlUCXkJvAX9reMuPbZJ8HYWet8+g=;
b=RhXJvGQM2jRRwbybvbUf6qPOwoDi20FH5ARmvKHm8NSUrchs4twihStMptbjB6smwj
Xr+s2Mf2wwVnhliJoadDER58tDBi7YBvaaqr/kJ+7s89J5eu4QJR1wPKjpwG5xZmaeYR
O+vlHN6oWJtte+jkGuzijy1egJy6mxg+I9QDU3kY88wyTZd4Cuw1WwkGKOXb8kSz1/Kj
XSflh8oW/lZE/k6xdkiRfQ6J5CevS783kLFehPbj+SF2MAnm3I2oJ84FEvMGdSBwkANe
QOGSi49OnbzEqrS0CglgXacFYsh5xwFpYcT+ONsh0LItpdJx+HQp8pa35TogySKjAJNZ
6pZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690308328; x=1690913128;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc
:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to;
bh=Us5bBGdVGqarFjcvlUCXkJvAX9reMuPbZJ8HYWet8+g=;
b=hIvUNP6UJ5+UEmPtr1CJH3ob2T41ZX2ngM7cVGbt2C/rIvp3uGGlz2aM9npgOu2xtt
Eh2dn5ZWYR2T1muNiyc7UXNXBNHoVzivjcq1dgSsMcM5OVBj3H9XWhpaphfPIbR68pWf
NnlGEiGL2+r+BXkWqO1SO3k3HYs4TqaCCoVrTSRGnEr2si9pzyHSAg/ERWk9FY7NCEyb
SfuiOdjgsN19SBmTcy/8VBaRm3jStUi/Op9aTyVA4Are0v07yW4jrpd1Rxo6csdYPxkl
i+qQg+ScZRnncsq7EqfHzIo8GFG40JRHZBhhKE/l7pXX/Oj16y1ztzi0JcpKrEWO47td
vR+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLa/WKtXN3dVA9nCbBVpZv0YtwzSJKMWXjvq6HZCU7UjzJxNT+oo
F7EzBpWi3hhJjqtnNA6NazlQGBYqYrOQdE3ipgnIpA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFPL65ipNtupeeOTbJrTtH7T2S+XrgBb7iNnCehS9wRuc2kCVPw9s+5sQHfeBfS8KsM7h08Hg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2a01:b0:765:5982:81da with SMTP id
o1-20020a05620a2a0100b00765598281damr4662589qkp.47.1690308328387;
Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Karl-Desktop.raven
(1459483-v115.1145-static.batvilaa.metronetinc.net. [192.69.181.148])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
g28-20020a05620a13dc00b0076730d0b0b9sm3832433qkl.14.2023.07.25.11.05.27
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN>
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN
Subject: [PATCH] guix: Add lint check for guix as propagated-input
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:04:43 -0500
Message-Id: <388dc9bec6dabc97092eb2009fed304c3f84c6fc.1690308209.git.karl@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Debbugs-Cc: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN>, Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@HIDDEN>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e;
envelope-from=karl@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qk1-x72e.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
Cc: Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
* guix/lint.scm (new check): Run lint check warning user if the provided
package uses guix as a propagated-input.
Passing guix as a propagated-input is problematic when users install a package
into their profiles. This can cause the guix propagated by the package to be
used in preference of the real one in $HOME/.config/. It was first noticed on
IRC with https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-07-22.log#044534, and reproduced
with a different package https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-07-25.log#054737.
---
guix/lint.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guix/lint.scm b/guix/lint.scm
index d173563e51..5fae34ca22 100644
--- a/guix/lint.scm
+++ b/guix/lint.scm
@@ -575,6 +575,16 @@ (define (check-input-labels package)
(inputs ,package-inputs)
(propagated-inputs ,package-propagated-inputs))))
+(define (check-guix-propagated-inputs package)
+ (if (and (not (null? (package-propagated-inputs package)))
+ (not (memq (@ (gnu packages package-management) guix)
+ (package-propagated-inputs package))))
+ (list
+ (make-warning package
+ (G_ "are you sure guix should be a propagated-input?")
+ #:field 'propagated-inputs))
+ '()))
+
(define (report-wrap-program-error package wrapper-name)
"Warn that \"bash-minimal\" is missing from 'inputs', while WRAPPER-NAME
requires it."
@@ -1884,6 +1894,10 @@ (define %local-checkers
(name 'input-labels)
(description "Identify input labels that do not match package names")
(check check-input-labels))
+ (lint-checker
+ (name 'warn-guix-propagated-inputs)
+ (description "Emit warning if guix package is propagated-input")
+ (check check-guix-propagated-inputs))
(lint-checker
(name 'wrapper-inputs)
(description "Make sure 'wrap-program' can finds its interpreter.")
base-commit: 9ff1e7652a407b88a3eeeab6a67261f6fee40807
--
2.40.1
Karl Hallsby <karl@HIDDEN>:mail@HIDDEN, dev@HIDDEN, ludo@HIDDEN, othacehe@HIDDEN, rekado@HIDDEN, zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN, me@HIDDEN, guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.mail@HIDDEN, dev@HIDDEN, ludo@HIDDEN, othacehe@HIDDEN, rekado@HIDDEN, zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN, me@HIDDEN, guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#64861; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.