GNU bug report logs -
#65302
[PATCH] gnu: profanity: Update to 0.14.0.
Previous Next
Reported by: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 04:20:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65302 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65302 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65302
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 15 Aug 2023 04:20:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 15 Aug 2023 04:20:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packagex/messaging.scm (profanity): Update to 0.14.0.
---
guix lint says that profanity might be vulnerable to CVE-2022-40769, but that's for a different profanity.
I'm not sure quite the best way to solve that as I don't know if profanity has a preferred cpe-name.
gnu/packages/messaging.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/messaging.scm b/gnu/packages/messaging.scm
index f47e1ac0f3..5fccbc8d07 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/messaging.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/messaging.scm
@@ -2129,7 +2129,7 @@ (define-public libstrophe
(define-public profanity
(package
(name "profanity")
- (version "0.13.0")
+ (version "0.14.0")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
@@ -2138,7 +2138,7 @@ (define-public profanity
version ".tar.gz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "14n45zwc6fxjargqhwqan8fyb7x0ql0hmw56rbjkjfkhpba2qmks"))))
+ "0zygsxxwdxmpppr7vyzi2r7d854yjl6918w0lrs7k41iib9zy8zx"))))
(build-system glib-or-gtk-build-system)
(arguments
`(#:configure-flags
base-commit: 82407391f74dc491662736f03ef031d31ca3913c
--
2.41.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65302
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:06:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us> writes:
> * gnu/packagex/messaging.scm (profanity): Update to 0.14.0.
> ---
>
> guix lint says that profanity might be vulnerable to CVE-2022-40769, but that's for a different profanity.
> I'm not sure quite the best way to solve that as I don't know if profanity has a preferred cpe-name.
>
> gnu/packages/messaging.scm | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This looks good to me, I've pushed it to master as
456790c29953d15f164e0f55dc8f566b40952530.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 226 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.