GNU bug report logs -
#65668
[PATCH] gnu: gst-plugins-bad: Remove the svt-hevc input.
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65668 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65668 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com, maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com, rg <at> raghavgururajan.name, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65668
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 01 Sep 2023 03:09:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com, maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com, rg <at> raghavgururajan.name, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 01 Sep 2023 03:09:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (gst-plugins-bad)
[inputs]: Remove svt-hevc; add comment.
---
gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm b/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
index 86886c025f..f38d2157bd 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
@@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ (define-public gst-plugins-bad
(inputs
(append
(if (target-x86?) (list mediasdk) '())
- (if (target-x86-64?) (list svt-hevc) '())
+ ;; Note: svt-hevc cannot be used, as it would break the package for
+ ;; older x86_64 CPUs such as Core 2 Duo that lack AVX2 (see:
+ ;; https://github.com/OpenVisualCloud/SVT-HEVC/issues/573#issuecomment-680678144).
(list bluez
bzip2
cairo
base-commit: d6966b8a5b4f2ddda2bc685b9642e7a1c2cbe17c
prerequisite-patch-id: c9372a1255e3bfb4f2e820f4e7c9706e3bf04203
prerequisite-patch-id: 5cbcf4b4ec5ee0db003b10898a2197c6b741973e
prerequisite-patch-id: 0a763f65a4b5042a187bd4aa039e80a3c173015d
prerequisite-patch-id: 71a9ea33b991aa2829aef26c51a3e892d34ab4e1
--
2.41.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65668
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 01 Sep 2023 04:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 65668 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Donnerstag, dem 31.08.2023 um 23:08 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> * gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (gst-plugins-bad)
> [inputs]: Remove svt-hevc; add comment.
> ---
> gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm b/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
> index 86886c025f..f38d2157bd 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
> @@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ (define-public gst-plugins-bad
> (inputs
> (append
> (if (target-x86?) (list mediasdk) '())
> - (if (target-x86-64?) (list svt-hevc) '())
> + ;; Note: svt-hevc cannot be used, as it would break the
> package for
> + ;; older x86_64 CPUs such as Core 2 Duo that lack AVX2 (see:
> + ;;
> https://github.com/OpenVisualCloud/SVT-HEVC/issues/573#issuecomment-680678144
> ).
> (list bluez
> bzip2
> cairo
I think you should put that comment above the commented existing line
rather than deleting it outright. We should also look into building
svt-hevc without those CPU extensions; perhaps using tuning instead.
The comment could itself be shortened to
svt-hevc is broken on older x86_64 CPUs [such as…]
see also <URL>
but you do you in terms of phrasing :)
Cheers
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65668
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 02 Sep 2023 01:52:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 65668 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 31.08.2023 um 23:08 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> * gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (gst-plugins-bad)
>> [inputs]: Remove svt-hevc; add comment.
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm b/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
>> index 86886c025f..f38d2157bd 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
>> @@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ (define-public gst-plugins-bad
>> (inputs
>> (append
>> (if (target-x86?) (list mediasdk) '())
>> - (if (target-x86-64?) (list svt-hevc) '())
>> + ;; Note: svt-hevc cannot be used, as it would break the
>> package for
>> + ;; older x86_64 CPUs such as Core 2 Duo that lack AVX2 (see:
>> + ;;
>> https://github.com/OpenVisualCloud/SVT-HEVC/issues/573#issuecomment-680678144
>> ).
>> (list bluez
>> bzip2
>> cairo
> I think you should put that comment above the commented existing line
> rather than deleting it outright. We should also look into building
> svt-hevc without those CPU extensions; perhaps using tuning instead.
It's not possible to build svt-hevc without those extensions: they are
depended upon. Because it can't be used, I think it makes sense to not
leave dead code (since it's not going to be resolved in the future and
re-enabled).
> The comment could itself be shortened to
> svt-hevc is broken on older x86_64 CPUs [such as…]
> see also <URL>
> but you do you in terms of phrasing :)
:-) I've moved things a bit. Is it a 'LGTM' from you?
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65668
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 02 Sep 2023 05:00:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 65668 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Freitag, dem 01.09.2023 um 21:51 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Hi Liliana,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 31.08.2023 um 23:08 -0400 schrieb Maxim
> > Cournoyer:
> > > * gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (gst-plugins-bad)
> > > [inputs]: Remove svt-hevc; add comment.
> > > ---
> > > gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
> > > b/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
> > > index 86886c025f..f38d2157bd 100644
> > > --- a/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
> > > +++ b/gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm
> > > @@ -849,7 +849,9 @@ (define-public gst-plugins-bad
> > > (inputs
> > > (append
> > > (if (target-x86?) (list mediasdk) '())
> > > - (if (target-x86-64?) (list svt-hevc) '())
> > > + ;; Note: svt-hevc cannot be used, as it would break the
> > > package for
> > > + ;; older x86_64 CPUs such as Core 2 Duo that lack AVX2
> > > (see:
> > > + ;;
> > > https://github.com/OpenVisualCloud/SVT-HEVC/issues/573#issuecomment-680678144
> > > ).
> > > (list bluez
> > > bzip2
> > > cairo
> > I think you should put that comment above the commented existing
> > line rather than deleting it outright. We should also look into
> > building svt-hevc without those CPU extensions; perhaps using
> > tuning instead.
>
> It's not possible to build svt-hevc without those extensions: they
> are depended upon. Because it can't be used, I think it makes sense
> to not leave dead code (since it's not going to be resolved in the
> future and re-enabled).
Looking at the code of svt-hevc, these additional libraries appear to
be just adding versions of the methods already implemented in C.
You might want to look into commenting the following lines
add_subdirectory(ASM_SSE2)
add_subdirectory(ASM_SSSE3)
add_subdirectory(ASM_SSE4_1)
add_subdirectory(ASM_AVX2)
HTH
> > The comment could itself be shortened to
> > svt-hevc is broken on older x86_64 CPUs [such as…]
> > see also <URL>
> > but you do you in terms of phrasing :)
>
> :-) I've moved things a bit. Is it a 'LGTM' from you?
Well, I'd rather keep the svt-hevc issue above open than concluding it
cannot be done, but otherwise, yes, LGTM.
Cheers
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65668
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 03 Sep 2023 17:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 65668 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
[...]
>> It's not possible to build svt-hevc without those extensions: they
>> are depended upon. Because it can't be used, I think it makes sense
>> to not leave dead code (since it's not going to be resolved in the
>> future and re-enabled).
> Looking at the code of svt-hevc, these additional libraries appear to
> be just adding versions of the methods already implemented in C.
>
> You might want to look into commenting the following lines
>
> add_subdirectory(ASM_SSE2)
> add_subdirectory(ASM_SSSE3)
> add_subdirectory(ASM_SSE4_1)
> add_subdirectory(ASM_AVX2)
From my understanding and per upstream comments linked earlier, svt-hevc
is all about implementing some video codec using latest Intel
technologies. The project synopsis on Github reads:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- SVT
HEVC encoder. Scalable Video Technology (SVT) is a software-based video
coding technology that is highly optimized for Intel® Xeon® processors
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
So I don't think it can be made to work (at least usefully) on older
processors, and it's explicitly an upstream non-goal.
[...]
> Well, I'd rather keep the svt-hevc issue above open than concluding it
> cannot be done, but otherwise, yes, LGTM.
I think it's safe to conclude that it cannot be done, given what I've
written above. Does it make sense?
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 06 Sep 2023 03:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 06 Sep 2023 03:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 65668-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
[...]
>> Well, I'd rather keep the svt-hevc issue above open than concluding it
>> cannot be done, but otherwise, yes, LGTM.
>
> I think it's safe to conclude that it cannot be done, given what I've
> written above. Does it make sense?
I've now installed the change; closing.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 04 Oct 2023 11:24:33 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 220 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.