GNU bug report logs -
#65978
comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 fails on 32-bit powerpc
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65978 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65978 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#65978; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org.
(Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello!
The test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 reproducibly fails on 32-bit powerpc:
Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 backtrace:
signal(ert-test-failed (((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol
ert-fail(((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol-function f-nam
comp-tests-check-ret-type-spec((defun comp-tests-ret-type-spec-f (x)
#f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x221c87d>)()
ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 :document
ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m
ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) #f(co
ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable)))
ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un
command-line-1(("-L" ":/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/build
command-line()
normal-top-level()
Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 condition:
(ert-test-failed
((should
(equal
(cl-third ...)
ret-type))
:form
(equal
(or
(member 0.0 -0.0)
(integer 0 0))
(or
(member -0.0 0.0)
(integer 0 0)))
:value nil :explanation
(list-elt 1
(list-elt 1
(different-atoms 0.0 -0.0)))))
FAILED 145/166 comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 (0.399696 sec)
The full buildlog can be obtained in [1].
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=emacs&arch=powerpc&ver=1%3A28.2%2B1-16&stamp=1690634247&raw=0
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#65978; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 14 Sep 2023 13:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org>
> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de>
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:28:24 +0200
>
> Hello!
>
> The test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 reproducibly fails on 32-bit powerpc:
>
> Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 backtrace:
> signal(ert-test-failed (((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol
> ert-fail(((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol-function f-nam
> comp-tests-check-ret-type-spec((defun comp-tests-ret-type-spec-f (x)
> #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x221c87d>)()
> ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
> ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 :document
> ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m
> ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) #f(co
> ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable)))
> ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un
> command-line-1(("-L" ":/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/build
> command-line()
> normal-top-level()
> Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 condition:
> (ert-test-failed
> ((should
> (equal
> (cl-third ...)
> ret-type))
> :form
> (equal
> (or
> (member 0.0 -0.0)
> (integer 0 0))
> (or
> (member -0.0 0.0)
> (integer 0 0)))
> :value nil :explanation
> (list-elt 1
> (list-elt 1
> (different-atoms 0.0 -0.0)))))
> FAILED 145/166 comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 (0.399696 sec)
Something about the sign of zero, I guess? Adding Andreas, in the
hope that he will have some suggestions.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#65978; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:46:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org>
>> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de>
>> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:28:24 +0200
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> The test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 reproducibly fails on 32-bit powerpc:
>>
>> Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 backtrace:
>> signal(ert-test-failed (((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol
>> ert-fail(((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol-function f-nam
>> comp-tests-check-ret-type-spec((defun comp-tests-ret-type-spec-f (x)
>> #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x221c87d>)()
>> ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
>> ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 :document
>> ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m
>> ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) #f(co
>> ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable)))
>> ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un
>> command-line-1(("-L" ":/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/build
>> command-line()
>> normal-top-level()
>> Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 condition:
>> (ert-test-failed
>> ((should
>> (equal
>> (cl-third ...)
>> ret-type))
>> :form
>> (equal
>> (or
>> (member 0.0 -0.0)
>> (integer 0 0))
>> (or
>> (member -0.0 0.0)
>> (integer 0 0)))
>> :value nil :explanation
>> (list-elt 1
>> (list-elt 1
>> (different-atoms 0.0 -0.0)))))
>> FAILED 145/166 comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 (0.399696 sec)
>
> Something about the sign of zero, I guess? Adding Andreas, in the
> hope that he will have some suggestions.
Mmmh, I guess some of our sorting or compare function behaves
differently on this architecture... I'll try look closer at the code
tomorrow and try to guess something more precise.
Thanks
Andrea
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#65978; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 07 Mar 2024 18:44:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
Hi John,
I *think* this should be fixed. Could you verify and let us know if you
still see the issue?
Thanks
Andrea
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#65978; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org>, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:42:38 -0500
>
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
>
> Hi John,
>
> I *think* this should be fixed. Could you verify and let us know if you
> still see the issue?
Ping! John, could you please verify the fix?
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#65978; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:28:22 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
>
> > Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org>, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
> > Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:42:38 -0500
> >
> > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > I *think* this should be fixed. Could you verify and let us know if you
> > still see the issue?
>
> Ping! John, could you please verify the fix?
Ping! Ping!
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#65978; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Eli,
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 12:21 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Cc: debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:28:22 +0200
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> >
> > > Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org>, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
> > > Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:42:38 -0500
> > >
> > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
> > >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > I *think* this should be fixed. Could you verify and let us know if you
> > > still see the issue?
> >
> > Ping! John, could you please verify the fix?
>
> Ping! Ping!
Sorry, I will give it another try today.
I am currently swamped in work due to Debian's time_t transition and
additional tasks at my day job.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#65978; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 11:39 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 12:21 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Cc: debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:28:22 +0200
> > > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > >
> > > > Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org>, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > > From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
> > > > Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:42:38 -0500
> > > >
> > > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
> > > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > I *think* this should be fixed. Could you verify and let us know if you
> > > > still see the issue?
> > >
> > > Ping! John, could you please verify the fix?
> >
> > Ping! Ping!
>
> Sorry, I will give it another try today.
>
> I am currently swamped in work due to Debian's time_t transition and
> additional tasks at my day job.
All tests pass for me on git master, so I assume the bug has been fixed.
I'm not 100% sure how to run the testsuite in the same way as the Debian
package though.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:14:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de>:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:14:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 65978-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de>
> Cc: acorallo <at> gnu.org, debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:51:59 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 11:39 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 12:21 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > Cc: debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:28:22 +0200
> > > > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > > >
> > > > > Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc <at> lists.debian.org>, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > > > From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
> > > > > Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:42:38 -0500
> > > > >
> > > > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz <at> physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > I *think* this should be fixed. Could you verify and let us know if you
> > > > > still see the issue?
> > > >
> > > > Ping! John, could you please verify the fix?
> > >
> > > Ping! Ping!
> >
> > Sorry, I will give it another try today.
> >
> > I am currently swamped in work due to Debian's time_t transition and
> > additional tasks at my day job.
>
> All tests pass for me on git master, so I assume the bug has been fixed.
Thanks, I'm therefore closing this bug.
> I'm not 100% sure how to run the testsuite in the same way as the Debian
> package though.
I don't think this is our problem, but if I'm wrong, we can always
reopen the bug later with new information.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:24:21 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 98 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.