Received: (at 65978) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2023 14:45:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 14 10:45:20 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qgnaq-0002Y4-AM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:45:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39956) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <acorallo@HIDDEN>) id 1qgnan-0002Xn-5d for 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:45:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <acorallo@HIDDEN>) id 1qgnab-0001Jn-1N; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:45:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=osnSVvV98/jzBxkOlpIZVfQSRqzpvYN9O4heK64P6DQ=; b=KLeXzDQ72uJ4ssSqofEy 6A1PWRQBgTbur3pRKaTDPujY6sEgxLb5LUgo4tG7JUPfHy2EC5bB/SuxAQ3CLQY0R/hG2yCtWsJla jaq1zvpxXt1NOi8b+V+swt5alTUrDDBYjdpso6y14zJEfkkUOmN5msaqRgvcpzkofiS6q7UfPv4Wo K/xNXQeoAinAvkNtBOT41PPlC+NSzdvGgonHx9fC8kGtijqE/XM4V37P8Sz9Jrm+kfChxvtyktYwb GuaoH1Bw1nnC4L9rwNne6Qfz14lb4EzH0oILAvXOJVB4239B0TVj4GifjW0YNbqleRYPRR43IZlv5 /9c+b6PSNltqbQ==; Received: from acorallo by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <acorallo@HIDDEN>) id 1qgnaQ-0004QK-Ak; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:45:02 -0400 From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@HIDDEN> To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#65978: comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 fails on 32-bit powerpc In-Reply-To: <83v8cclxgt.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:02:10 +0300") References: <026e745ae9fdd42e5dfefb878001a2213fe4a2b4.camel@HIDDEN> <83v8cclxgt.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:44:54 -0400 Message-ID: <yp11qf03jbt.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65978 Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@HIDDEN>, debian-powerpc@HIDDEN, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: >> Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc@HIDDEN> >> From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@HIDDEN> >> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:28:24 +0200 >> >> Hello! >> >> The test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 reproducibly fails on 32-bit powerpc: >> >> Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 backtrace: >> signal(ert-test-failed (((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol >> ert-fail(((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol-function f-nam >> comp-tests-check-ret-type-spec((defun comp-tests-ret-type-spec-f (x) >> #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x221c87d>)() >> ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test >> ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 :document >> ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m >> ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) #f(co >> ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) >> ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un >> command-line-1(("-L" ":/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/build >> command-line() >> normal-top-level() >> Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 condition: >> (ert-test-failed >> ((should >> (equal >> (cl-third ...) >> ret-type)) >> :form >> (equal >> (or >> (member 0.0 -0.0) >> (integer 0 0)) >> (or >> (member -0.0 0.0) >> (integer 0 0))) >> :value nil :explanation >> (list-elt 1 >> (list-elt 1 >> (different-atoms 0.0 -0.0))))) >> FAILED 145/166 comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 (0.399696 sec) > > Something about the sign of zero, I guess? Adding Andreas, in the > hope that he will have some suggestions. Mmmh, I guess some of our sorting or compare function behaves differently on this architecture... I'll try look closer at the code tomorrow and try to guess something more precise. Thanks Andrea
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#65978
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at 65978) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2023 13:02:48 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 14 09:02:48 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qglzb-0002SV-Jg for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 09:02:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1qglzR-0002Rx-0o for 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 09:02:46 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1qglzE-0005XX-GY; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 09:02:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=8iHbpawgNj/Or1xMj9b45031DFygIhp/dprG4AMx2dM=; b=ohNj73nbP4ri sdxJd1cyIGQ+nRPODf88eILZF8c8lgSmn2KzzDFrQppIUNuxFqITCjeO99zrKSPUeI7OxwIFsLigJ hMRtWjItv9x55Bk7L3Hk9EewbsyINRuDY0KKBNpeBC6YoWZlNsaPjO3t2ztzQVhYnH5DXdMYz8p8g JRZKV7YXm3X6KrgIaS39+u4J+S6B/52gCCNr9zOoKxZ0zB6wT8dEndz5BJrJrr+y9oQ9TEQmf15yN 6DbWg5qXJSPa4hHaMOCxUztIj6tQDIAEWrAhKh9ddqgG6HjK5AOh8hfIk2w/gOuM9HNxkYrjWxhxE fHbPfgM8wn0cLQNid0mpJw==; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:02:10 +0300 Message-Id: <83v8cclxgt.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@HIDDEN>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <026e745ae9fdd42e5dfefb878001a2213fe4a2b4.camel@HIDDEN> (message from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz on Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:28:24 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#65978: comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 fails on 32-bit powerpc References: <026e745ae9fdd42e5dfefb878001a2213fe4a2b4.camel@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65978 Cc: debian-powerpc@HIDDEN, 65978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc@HIDDEN> > From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@HIDDEN> > Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:28:24 +0200 > > Hello! > > The test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 reproducibly fails on 32-bit powerpc: > > Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 backtrace: > signal(ert-test-failed (((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol > ert-fail(((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol-function f-nam > comp-tests-check-ret-type-spec((defun comp-tests-ret-type-spec-f (x) > #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x221c87d>)() > ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test > ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 :document > ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m > ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) #f(co > ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) > ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un > command-line-1(("-L" ":/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/build > command-line() > normal-top-level() > Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 condition: > (ert-test-failed > ((should > (equal > (cl-third ...) > ret-type)) > :form > (equal > (or > (member 0.0 -0.0) > (integer 0 0)) > (or > (member -0.0 0.0) > (integer 0 0))) > :value nil :explanation > (list-elt 1 > (list-elt 1 > (different-atoms 0.0 -0.0))))) > FAILED 145/166 comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 (0.399696 sec) Something about the sign of zero, I guess? Adding Andreas, in the hope that he will have some suggestions.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#65978
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2023 12:29:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 14 08:29:04 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37899 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qglSy-0001X6-Hy for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:29:04 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:49440) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <glaubitz@HIDDEN>) id 1qglSu-0001WY-Rc for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:29:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <glaubitz@HIDDEN>) id 1qglSh-0002S8-Jr for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:28:47 -0400 Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <glaubitz@HIDDEN>) id 1qglSf-0006sv-40 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:28:47 -0400 Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.95) with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (envelope-from <glaubitz@HIDDEN>) id 1qglSJ-001OUh-Uj; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:28:23 +0200 Received: from p5b13a40a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.19.164.10] helo=[192.168.178.81]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.95) with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (envelope-from <glaubitz@HIDDEN>) id 1qglSJ-003tAr-Nh; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:28:23 +0200 Message-ID: <026e745ae9fdd42e5dfefb878001a2213fe4a2b4.camel@HIDDEN> Subject: comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 fails on 32-bit powerpc From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:28:24 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: glaubitz@HIDDEN X-Originating-IP: 91.19.164.10 X-ZEDAT-Hint: PO Received-SPF: pass client-ip=130.133.4.66; envelope-from=glaubitz@HIDDEN; helo=outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello! The test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 reproducibly fails on 32-bit powerpc: Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 backtrace: signal(ert-test-failed (((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol ert-fail(((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol-function f-nam comp-tests-check-r [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.5 TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT To: lacks brackets + percentage X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: debian-powerpc <debian-powerpc@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Hello! The test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 reproducibly fails on 32-bit powerpc: Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 backtrace: signal(ert-test-failed (((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol ert-fail(((should (equal (cl-third (subr-type (symbol-function f-nam comp-tests-check-ret-type-spec((defun comp-tests-ret-type-spec-f (x) #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x221c87d>)() ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 :document ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) #f(co ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable))) ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un command-line-1(("-L" ":/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/build command-line() normal-top-level() Test comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 condition: (ert-test-failed ((should (equal (cl-third ...) ret-type)) :form (equal (or (member 0.0 -0.0) (integer 0 0)) (or (member -0.0 0.0) (integer 0 0))) :value nil :explanation (list-elt 1 (list-elt 1 (different-atoms 0.0 -0.0))))) FAILED 145/166 comp-tests-ret-type-spec-71 (0.399696 sec) The full buildlog can be obtained in [1]. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=3Demacs&arch=3Dpowerpc= &ver=3D1%3A28.2%2B1-16&stamp=3D1690634247&raw=3D0 --=20 .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@HIDDEN>
:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#65978
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.