GNU bug report logs -
#66141
29.1; Window size properties not set immediately for window in new frame
Previous Next
Reported by: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:20:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 29.1
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 66141 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 66141 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#66141
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Starting from emacs -Q, enter the following in *scratch*:
(let ((f (make-frame '((fullscreen . maximized)))))
(select-frame-set-input-focus f)
(message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width))
(sleep-for 1)
(message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width)) )
Execute with C-x C-e
Result:
- A new frame is created.
- The message "window-body-width=80" is printed
- The message "window-body-width=190" is printed (exact value depending
on screen size of course)
Expected result:
The first printed message should be the same as the second printed message.
In GNU Emacs 29.1 (build 2, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2023-07-31 built on
AVALON
Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.22621
System Description: Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise (v10.0.2009.22621.2134)
Configured using:
'configure --with-modules --without-dbus --with-native-compilation=aot
--without-compress-install --with-tree-sitter CFLAGS=-O2'
Configured features:
ACL GIF GMP GNUTLS HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON LCMS2 LIBXML2 MODULES NATIVE_COMP
NOTIFY W32NOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SOUND SQLITE3 THREADS TIFF
TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS TREE_SITTER WEBP XPM ZLIB
(NATIVE_COMP present but libgccjit not available)
Important settings:
value of $LANG: SVE
locale-coding-system: cp1252
Major mode: Lisp Interaction
Minor modes in effect:
tooltip-mode: t
global-eldoc-mode: t
eldoc-mode: t
show-paren-mode: t
electric-indent-mode: t
mouse-wheel-mode: t
tool-bar-mode: t
menu-bar-mode: t
file-name-shadow-mode: t
global-font-lock-mode: t
font-lock-mode: t
blink-cursor-mode: t
line-number-mode: t
indent-tabs-mode: t
transient-mark-mode: t
auto-composition-mode: t
auto-encryption-mode: t
auto-compression-mode: t
Load-path shadows:
None found.
Features:
(shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message mailcap yank-media puny dired
dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache epa derived epg rfc6068
epg-config gnus-util mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231
mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums
mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils cl-extra shortdoc text-property-search
help-fns radix-tree help-mode time-date subr-x cl-loaddefs cl-lib rmc
iso-transl tooltip cconv eldoc paren electric uniquify ediff-hook
vc-hooks lisp-float-type elisp-mode mwheel dos-w32 ls-lisp disp-table
term/w32-win w32-win w32-vars term/common-win tool-bar dnd fontset image
regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode lisp-mode
prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch easymenu
timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax font-core
term/tty-colors frame minibuffer nadvice seq simple cl-generic
indonesian philippine cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese
tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek
romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese
composite emoji-zwj charscript charprop case-table epa-hook
jka-cmpr-hook help abbrev obarray oclosure cl-preloaded button loaddefs
theme-loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files window text-properties
overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget keymap
hashtable-print-readable backquote threads w32notify w32 lcms2 multi-tty
make-network-process native-compile emacs)
Memory information:
((conses 16 60177 5492)
(symbols 48 5492 0)
(strings 32 17131 1407)
(string-bytes 1 468887)
(vectors 16 11742)
(vector-slots 8 276217 11742)
(floats 8 81 21)
(intervals 56 303 0)
(buffers 984 12))
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#66141
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 18:16:01 +0200
> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
>
> Starting from emacs -Q, enter the following in *scratch*:
>
> (let ((f (make-frame '((fullscreen . maximized)))))
> (select-frame-set-input-focus f)
> (message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width))
> (sleep-for 1)
> (message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width)) )
>
> Execute with C-x C-e
>
> Result:
> - A new frame is created.
> - The message "window-body-width=80" is printed
> - The message "window-body-width=190" is printed (exact value depending
> on screen size of course)
>
> Expected result:
> The first printed message should be the same as the second printed message.
Isn't it because the actual resizing of the frame is done by the
window-system, and we can only ask it to do so?
IOW, I think your expectation is incorrect, as it assumes that frame
move/resize operations are executed immediately.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#66141
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 21 Sep 2023 18:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Please use Reply All to reply, to keep the bug tracer CC'ed.]
> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 20:48:19 +0200
> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
>
>
>
> On 2023-09-21 18:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 18:16:01 +0200
> >> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
> >>
> >> Starting from emacs -Q, enter the following in *scratch*:
> >>
> >> (let ((f (make-frame '((fullscreen . maximized)))))
> >> (select-frame-set-input-focus f)
> >> (message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width))
> >> (sleep-for 1)
> >> (message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width)) )
> >>
> >> Execute with C-x C-e
> >>
> >> Result:
> >> - A new frame is created.
> >> - The message "window-body-width=80" is printed
> >> - The message "window-body-width=190" is printed (exact value depending
> >> on screen size of course)
> >>
> >> Expected result:
> >> The first printed message should be the same as the second printed message.
> > Isn't it because the actual resizing of the frame is done by the
> > window-system, and we can only ask it to do so?
> >
> > IOW, I think your expectation is incorrect, as it assumes that frame
> > move/resize operations are executed immediately.
> I have no idea, but your explanation sounds very reasonable and it is
> probably right!
>
> Is there a way to get notified when the resize operation has finished?
> Or is sleeping for a short while a reasonable solution?
Yes, calling sleep-for is one way. I would also suggest to try
(sit-for 0)
If that works, it is faster.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#66141
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2023-09-21 20:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> [Please use Reply All to reply, to keep the bug tracer CC'ed.]
>
>> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 20:48:19 +0200
>> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2023-09-21 18:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 18:16:01 +0200
>>>> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
>>>>
>>>> Starting from emacs -Q, enter the following in *scratch*:
>>>>
>>>> (let ((f (make-frame '((fullscreen . maximized)))))
>>>> (select-frame-set-input-focus f)
>>>> (message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width))
>>>> (sleep-for 1)
>>>> (message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width)) )
>>>>
>>>> Execute with C-x C-e
>>>>
>>>> Result:
>>>> - A new frame is created.
>>>> - The message "window-body-width=80" is printed
>>>> - The message "window-body-width=190" is printed (exact value depending
>>>> on screen size of course)
>>>>
>>>> Expected result:
>>>> The first printed message should be the same as the second printed message.
>>> Isn't it because the actual resizing of the frame is done by the
>>> window-system, and we can only ask it to do so?
>>>
>>> IOW, I think your expectation is incorrect, as it assumes that frame
>>> move/resize operations are executed immediately.
>> I have no idea, but your explanation sounds very reasonable and it is
>> probably right!
>>
>> Is there a way to get notified when the resize operation has finished?
>> Or is sleeping for a short while a reasonable solution?
> Yes, calling sleep-for is one way. I would also suggest to try
>
> (sit-for 0)
>
> If that works, it is faster.
Ok, thank you!
/Mattias
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#66141
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 22 Sep 2023 06:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2023-09-21 21:04, Mattias Nyrell wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-09-21 20:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> [Please use Reply All to reply, to keep the bug tracer CC'ed.]
>>
>>> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 20:48:19 +0200
>>> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023-09-21 18:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>>> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 18:16:01 +0200
>>>>> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
>>>>>
>>>>> Starting from emacs -Q, enter the following in *scratch*:
>>>>>
>>>>> (let ((f (make-frame '((fullscreen . maximized)))))
>>>>> (select-frame-set-input-focus f)
>>>>> (message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width))
>>>>> (sleep-for 1)
>>>>> (message "window-body-width=%s" (window-body-width)) )
>>>>>
>>>>> Execute with C-x C-e
>>>>>
>>>>> Result:
>>>>> - A new frame is created.
>>>>> - The message "window-body-width=80" is printed
>>>>> - The message "window-body-width=190" is printed (exact value
>>>>> depending
>>>>> on screen size of course)
>>>>>
>>>>> Expected result:
>>>>> The first printed message should be the same as the second printed
>>>>> message.
>>>> Isn't it because the actual resizing of the frame is done by the
>>>> window-system, and we can only ask it to do so?
>>>>
>>>> IOW, I think your expectation is incorrect, as it assumes that frame
>>>> move/resize operations are executed immediately.
>>> I have no idea, but your explanation sounds very reasonable and it is
>>> probably right!
>>>
>>> Is there a way to get notified when the resize operation has finished?
>>> Or is sleeping for a short while a reasonable solution?
>> Yes, calling sleep-for is one way. I would also suggest to try
>>
>> (sit-for 0)
>>
>> If that works, it is faster.
> Ok, thank you!
>
> /Mattias
I tried (sit-for 0) and even (sit-for 5), but none of those worked.
(sleep-for 0.1) or (sleep-for 0) worked for me.
/Mattias
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#66141
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 22 Sep 2023 06:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 08:47:02 +0200
> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
> Cc: 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> >> Yes, calling sleep-for is one way. I would also suggest to try
> >>
> >> (sit-for 0)
> >>
> >> If that works, it is faster.
> > Ok, thank you!
> >
> > /Mattias
>
> I tried (sit-for 0) and even (sit-for 5), but none of those worked.
>
> (sleep-for 0.1) or (sleep-for 0) worked for me.
I guess this means that some input event from the window-system
interrupts sit-for too early, so sleep-for is really required.
I think we can now close this bug report, right?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#66141
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:25:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2023-09-22 08:58, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 08:47:02 +0200
>> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
>> Cc: 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>>>> Yes, calling sleep-for is one way. I would also suggest to try
>>>>
>>>> (sit-for 0)
>>>>
>>>> If that works, it is faster.
>>> Ok, thank you!
>>>
>>> /Mattias
>> I tried (sit-for 0) and even (sit-for 5), but none of those worked.
>>
>> (sleep-for 0.1) or (sleep-for 0) worked for me.
> I guess this means that some input event from the window-system
> interrupts sit-for too early, so sleep-for is really required.
>
> I think we can now close this bug report, right?
Yes, thank you!
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:08:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:08:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 66141-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:23:56 +0200
> Cc: 66141 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias <at> nyrell.se>
>
> > I think we can now close this bug report, right?
>
> Yes, thank you!
Done.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 203 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.