GNU bug report logs - #66171
[PATCH] gnu: git: Install shell completions.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 66171 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 66171 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: git: Install shell completions.
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 21:43:07 +0200

* gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[outputs]: Add “completion”.
[#:phases]: Add ‘install-completion’.
---
 gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
index 9716a6f27a..54b2ed74fb 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ (define-public git
                "credential-netrc"       ; git-credential-netrc
                "credential-libsecret"   ; git-credential-libsecret
                "subtree"                ; git-subtree
+               "completion"             ; git-completion and git-prompt
                "gui"))                  ; gitk, git gui
     (arguments
      `(#:make-flags `("V=1"             ;more verbose compilation
@@ -482,6 +483,20 @@ (define-public git
                              (string-append subtree "/bin"))
                (install-file "contrib/subtree/git-subtree.1"
                              (string-append subtree "/share/man/man1")))))
+         (add-after 'install 'install-completion
+           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+             (let ((completion (assoc-ref outputs "completion")))
+               (define (install-as file storename)
+                 (let ((storename (string-append completion storename)))
+                   (mkdir-p (dirname storename))
+                   (copy-file file storename)))
+               (with-directory-excursion "contrib/completion"
+                 (for-each (cut apply install-as <>)
+                           `(("git-prompt.sh" "/bin/git-prompt")
+                             ("git-completion.bash"
+                              "/share/bash-completion/completions/_git")
+                             ("git-completion.zsh"
+                              "/share/zsh/site-functions/_git")))))))
          (add-after 'install 'restore-sample-hooks-shebang
            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))

base-commit: 4f35ff1275e05be31f5d41464ccf147e9dbfd016
prerequisite-patch-id: ee5d7299c5790d77e0d409f34165063fcff10a8b
-- 
2.41.0

Message #8 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>, 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#66171] [PATCH] gnu: git: Install shell completions.
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:12:52 +0200

Hi,

On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 at 21:43, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[outputs]: Add “completion”.
> [#:phases]: Add ‘install-completion’.

Naive question: this also adds “completion” to git-minimal, no?  I mean,
does the phase need to be deleted in git-minimal?

Cheers,
simon

Message #11 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] gnu: git: Install shell completions.
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 21:43:07 +0200

* gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[outputs]: Add “completion”.
[#:phases]: Add ‘install-completion’.
(git-minimal)[#:phases]: Adjust accordingly.
---
Am Montag, dem 25.09.2023 um 13:12 +0200 schrieb Simon Tournier:
> Naive question: this also adds “completion” to git-minimal, no?  I mean,
> does the phase need to be deleted in git-minimal?
Indeed it does; updated the patch accordingly.

Cheers

 gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
index 9716a6f27a..35d17d434e 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ (define-public git
                "credential-netrc"       ; git-credential-netrc
                "credential-libsecret"   ; git-credential-libsecret
                "subtree"                ; git-subtree
+               "completion"             ; git-completion and git-prompt
                "gui"))                  ; gitk, git gui
     (arguments
      `(#:make-flags `("V=1"             ;more verbose compilation
@@ -482,6 +483,20 @@ (define-public git
                              (string-append subtree "/bin"))
                (install-file "contrib/subtree/git-subtree.1"
                              (string-append subtree "/share/man/man1")))))
+         (add-after 'install 'install-completion
+           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+             (let ((completion (assoc-ref outputs "completion")))
+               (define (install-as file storename)
+                 (let ((storename (string-append completion storename)))
+                   (mkdir-p (dirname storename))
+                   (copy-file file storename)))
+               (with-directory-excursion "contrib/completion"
+                 (for-each (cut apply install-as <>)
+                           `(("git-prompt.sh" "/bin/git-prompt")
+                             ("git-completion.bash"
+                              "/share/bash-completion/completions/_git")
+                             ("git-completion.zsh"
+                              "/share/zsh/site-functions/_git")))))))
          (add-after 'install 'restore-sample-hooks-shebang
            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
@@ -639,6 +654,7 @@ (define-public git-minimal
             (delete 'install-subtree)
             (delete 'install-credential-netrc)
             (delete 'install-credential-libsecret)
+            (delete 'install-completion)
             (add-after 'install 'remove-unusable-perl-commands
               (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
                 (let* ((out     (assoc-ref outputs "out"))

base-commit: e134686cead6db62ea8b941b2ed7c0bd660804da
-- 
2.41.0

Message #14 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#66171: [PATCH] gnu: git: Install shell completions.
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:51:42 -0400

Hello,

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:

> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[outputs]: Add “completion”.
> [#:phases]: Add ‘install-completion’.
> (git-minimal)[#:phases]: Adjust accordingly.

Did something change in git?  I've always had completion in git, so I'm
not sure what this extra phase does, or when it's useful?  Does it add
*extra* completion or... ?

Also, a completion output seems a bit over the top.  I doubt its weigh
justifies the annoyance of special casing it.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #17 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#66171: [PATCH] gnu: git: Install shell completions.
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 20:41:05 +0200

Am Montag, dem 25.09.2023 um 13:51 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Hello,
> 
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[outputs]: Add
> > “completion”.
> > [#:phases]: Add ‘install-completion’.
> > (git-minimal)[#:phases]: Adjust accordingly.
> 
> Did something change in git?  I've always had completion in git, so
> I'm not sure what this extra phase does, or when it's useful?  Does
> it add *extra* completion or... ?
Which shell are you using?  If it's zsh, then the completion is baked
in.  If it's bash, idk, I haven't tried.  I personally use this for the
included git-prompt, which allows me to have my prompt look like the
following:

  \u@\h /path/to/guix [$branch env] ($SHLVL) \$

> Also, a completion output seems a bit over the top.  I doubt its
> weigh justifies the annoyance of special casing it.
I special-cased it because it *is* a contrib script, but also as it
might be able to conflict with whatever shell builtins you have.  Now
it isn't particularly likely to do so given that other distros include
it as part of their git-core, but I prefer safe over sorry.

That being said, I could just write it to out if you prefer that.

Cheers

Message #20 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#66171: [PATCH] gnu: git: Install shell completions.
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:36:09 -0400

Hi,

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Am Montag, dem 25.09.2023 um 13:51 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[outputs]: Add
>> > “completion”.
>> > [#:phases]: Add ‘install-completion’.
>> > (git-minimal)[#:phases]: Adjust accordingly.
>> 
>> Did something change in git?  I've always had completion in git, so
>> I'm not sure what this extra phase does, or when it's useful?  Does
>> it add *extra* completion or... ?
> Which shell are you using?  If it's zsh, then the completion is baked
> in.  If it's bash, idk, I haven't tried.  I personally use this for the
> included git-prompt, which allows me to have my prompt look like the
> following:
>
>   \u@\h /path/to/guix [$branch env] ($SHLVL) \$

I see.  I use Bash.

>
>> Also, a completion output seems a bit over the top.  I doubt its
>> weigh justifies the annoyance of special casing it.
> I special-cased it because it *is* a contrib script, but also as it
> might be able to conflict with whatever shell builtins you have.  Now
> it isn't particularly likely to do so given that other distros include
> it as part of their git-core, but I prefer safe over sorry.

Ah, if it's just a contrib I guess a dedicated output is fine, although
i'd perhaps call such output 'contrib', as completions seem to imply
that without it there are no auto-completion support, which is clearly
not the case, at least for Bash.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #23 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#66171] [PATCH] gnu: git: Install shell completions.
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 17:41:18 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 08:41:05PM +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 25.09.2023 um 13:51 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[outputs]: Add
> > > “completion”.
> > > [#:phases]: Add ‘install-completion’.
> > > (git-minimal)[#:phases]: Adjust accordingly.
> > 
> > Did something change in git?  I've always had completion in git, so
> > I'm not sure what this extra phase does, or when it's useful?  Does
> > it add *extra* completion or... ?
> Which shell are you using?  If it's zsh, then the completion is baked
> in.  If it's bash, idk, I haven't tried.  I personally use this for the
> included git-prompt, which allows me to have my prompt look like the
> following:
> 
>   \u@\h /path/to/guix [$branch env] ($SHLVL) \$

/gnu/store/p7zln1rzsccq8vgpnrm4ibz5hcgxrqd9-git-2.41.0/etc/bash_completion.d/git
It looks like there is a bash completion from git. I thought maybe it
was from the bash-completions package.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #26 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] gnu: git: Install zsh completions and git-prompt.
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 21:43:07 +0200

* gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[#:phases]<install-shell-completion>:
Also install git-prompt and zsh _git site function.
---
 gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
index 9716a6f27a..d8c9bf4009 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
@@ -448,12 +448,17 @@ (define-public git
                      "DOCBOOK2X_TEXI=docbook2texi" "PERL_PATH=perl")))
          (add-after 'install 'install-shell-completion
            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
-             (let* ((out         (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
-                    (completions (string-append out "/etc/bash_completion.d")))
-               ;; TODO: Install the tcsh and zsh completions in the right place.
-               (mkdir-p completions)
+             (let* ((out  (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
+                    (bash (string-append out "/etc/bash_completion.d"))
+                    (zsh  (string-append out "/share/zsh/site-functions")))
+               ;; TODO: Install the tcsh completions in the right place.
+               (for-each mkdir-p (list bash zsh))
                (copy-file "contrib/completion/git-completion.bash"
-                          (string-append completions "/git")))))
+                          (string-append bash "/git"))
+               (copy-file "contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh"
+                          (string-append out "/bin/git-prompt"))
+               (copy-file "contrib/completion/git-completion.zsh"
+                          (string-append zsh "/_git")))))
          (add-after 'install 'install-credential-netrc
            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
              (let* ((netrc (assoc-ref outputs "credential-netrc")))

base-commit: ce0cc6137df81919389f61671096a6ce701c0889
prerequisite-patch-id: ee5d7299c5790d77e0d409f34165063fcff10a8b
prerequisite-patch-id: 369548fa905a48e7e2164ca4b6c9897e392a5025
prerequisite-patch-id: 7650e691c505ecc63e3b1a1265b3cb3a2869443e
prerequisite-patch-id: 5e7e47f338fa42c4f5c654a803f062b5e3f757a6
-- 
2.41.0

Message #29 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gnu: git: Install zsh completions and git-prompt.
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 23:34:56 -0400

Hi Liliana,

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:

> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[#:phases]<install-shell-completion>:
> Also install git-prompt and zsh _git site function.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
> index 9716a6f27a..d8c9bf4009 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
> @@ -448,12 +448,17 @@ (define-public git
>                       "DOCBOOK2X_TEXI=docbook2texi" "PERL_PATH=perl")))
>           (add-after 'install 'install-shell-completion
>             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> -             (let* ((out         (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
> -                    (completions (string-append out "/etc/bash_completion.d")))
> -               ;; TODO: Install the tcsh and zsh completions in the right place.
> -               (mkdir-p completions)
> +             (let* ((out  (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
> +                    (bash (string-append out "/etc/bash_completion.d"))
> +                    (zsh  (string-append out "/share/zsh/site-functions")))
> +               ;; TODO: Install the tcsh completions in the right place.
> +               (for-each mkdir-p (list bash zsh))
>                 (copy-file "contrib/completion/git-completion.bash"
> -                          (string-append completions "/git")))))
> +                          (string-append bash "/git"))
> +               (copy-file "contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh"
> +                          (string-append out "/bin/git-prompt"))
> +               (copy-file "contrib/completion/git-completion.zsh"
> +                          (string-append zsh "/_git")))))
>           (add-after 'install 'install-credential-netrc
>             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>               (let* ((netrc (assoc-ref outputs "credential-netrc")))

Sorry if my previous reply was not clear, but with your clarifications I
think it'd be best to keep the 'contrib' output, perhaps documenting in
the description that it contains the 'git-prompt' command as well as
completions for Zsh?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #32 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gnu: git: Install zsh completions and git-prompt.
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 06:30:59 +0200

Am Sonntag, dem 01.10.2023 um 23:34 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Hi Liliana,
> 
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > [...]
> Sorry if my previous reply was not clear, but with your
> clarifications I think it'd be best to keep the 'contrib' output,
> perhaps documenting in the description that it contains the 'git-
> prompt' command as well as completions for Zsh?
IMHO, a ‘contrib’ output would be silly, since so much of what we
install in other outputs are part of contrib.  The name lacks meaning.

As for why I put it in ‘out’ instead of ‘completion’, I did miss the
fact that we already install git completions for bash, so not that I
know, I just extended the phase that does that.

Cheers

Message #35 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gnu: git: Install zsh completions and git-prompt.
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:12:10 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 06:30:59AM +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 01.10.2023 um 23:34 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> > Hi Liliana,
> > 
> > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > > [...]
> > Sorry if my previous reply was not clear, but with your
> > clarifications I think it'd be best to keep the 'contrib' output,
> > perhaps documenting in the description that it contains the 'git-
> > prompt' command as well as completions for Zsh?
> IMHO, a ‘contrib’ output would be silly, since so much of what we
> install in other outputs are part of contrib.  The name lacks meaning.
> 
> As for why I put it in ‘out’ instead of ‘completion’, I did miss the
> fact that we already install git completions for bash, so not that I
> know, I just extended the phase that does that.

It's not uncommon to see shell completions in a contrib directory. I
think it'd make more sense to install them to a 'completions' output
than to a 'contrib' output, but I think it would make the most sense to
just install them to the 'out' output.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #38 received at 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>, 66171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gnu: git: Install zsh completions and git-prompt.
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 20:35:43 -0400

Hi,

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 06:30:59AM +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, dem 01.10.2023 um 23:34 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> > Hi Liliana,
>> > 
>> > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> > 
>> > > [...]
>> > Sorry if my previous reply was not clear, but with your
>> > clarifications I think it'd be best to keep the 'contrib' output,
>> > perhaps documenting in the description that it contains the 'git-
>> > prompt' command as well as completions for Zsh?
>> IMHO, a ‘contrib’ output would be silly, since so much of what we
>> install in other outputs are part of contrib.  The name lacks meaning.
>> 
>> As for why I put it in ‘out’ instead of ‘completion’, I did miss the
>> fact that we already install git completions for bash, so not that I
>> know, I just extended the phase that does that.
>
> It's not uncommon to see shell completions in a contrib directory. I
> think it'd make more sense to install them to a 'completions' output
> than to a 'contrib' output, but I think it would make the most sense to
> just install them to the 'out' output.

Sounds good!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #43 received at 66171-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, 66171-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#66171] [PATCH v3] gnu: git: Install zsh completions and
 git-prompt.
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 23:33:15 -0400

Hello,

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:

> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git)[#:phases]<install-shell-completion>:
> Also install git-prompt and zsh _git site function.

Applied to core-updates, after resolving the conflict.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.