GNU bug report logs -
#66276
Use a seperate time format in rcirc logfiles
Previous Next
Reported by: Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 08:46:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Merged with 67597
Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 66276 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 66276 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#66276; Package
emacs.
(Sat, 30 Sep 2023 08:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org.
(Sat, 30 Sep 2023 08:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I believe that it is best to have two different time formats for
logfiles and normal rcirc buffers. Logfiles need additional precision,
specifically the date and maybe the time zone, while normal buffers do
not.
The patch adds a single variable, rcirc-log-time-format, to control the
time format in logfiles, which is done by replacing the usage of
rcirc-time-format in rcirc-log with it.
I figured "%F %T %z " was a sensible default, although feel free to
change it as you wish.
[0001-Use-a-seperate-time-format-in-rcirc-logfiles-than-in.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
Request was from
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Sat, 30 Sep 2023 23:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Added tag(s) patch.
Request was from
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Sun, 01 Oct 2023 08:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#66276; Package
emacs.
(Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:12:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #12 received at 66276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I believe that it is best to have two different time formats for
> logfiles and normal rcirc buffers. Logfiles need additional precision,
> specifically the date and maybe the time zone, while normal buffers do
> not.
>
> The patch adds a single variable, rcirc-log-time-format, to control the
> time format in logfiles, which is done by replacing the usage of
> rcirc-time-format in rcirc-log with it.
>
> I figured "%F %T %z " was a sensible default, although feel free to
> change it as you wish.
Philip, could you please take a look at this patch?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#66276; Package
emacs.
(Wed, 10 Jan 2024 19:07:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #15 received at 66276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I believe that it is best to have two different time formats for
>> logfiles and normal rcirc buffers. Logfiles need additional precision,
>> specifically the date and maybe the time zone, while normal buffers do
>> not.
>>
>> The patch adds a single variable, rcirc-log-time-format, to control the
>> time format in logfiles, which is done by replacing the usage of
>> rcirc-time-format in rcirc-log with it.
>>
>> I figured "%F %T %z " was a sensible default, although feel free to
>> change it as you wish.
>
> Philip, could you please take a look at this patch?
We have already merged a similar functionality with bug#67597.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#66276; Package
emacs.
(Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #18 received at 66276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I believe that it is best to have two different time formats for
>>> logfiles and normal rcirc buffers. Logfiles need additional precision,
>>> specifically the date and maybe the time zone, while normal buffers do
>>> not.
>>>
>>> The patch adds a single variable, rcirc-log-time-format, to control the
>>> time format in logfiles, which is done by replacing the usage of
>>> rcirc-time-format in rcirc-log with it.
>>>
>>> I figured "%F %T %z " was a sensible default, although feel free to
>>> change it as you wish.
>>
>> Philip, could you please take a look at this patch?
>
> We have already merged a similar functionality with bug#67597.
So what should we do with this one? Close?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#66276; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 11 Jan 2024 07:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #21 received at 66276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> I believe that it is best to have two different time formats for
>>>> logfiles and normal rcirc buffers. Logfiles need additional precision,
>>>> specifically the date and maybe the time zone, while normal buffers do
>>>> not.
>>>>
>>>> The patch adds a single variable, rcirc-log-time-format, to control the
>>>> time format in logfiles, which is done by replacing the usage of
>>>> rcirc-time-format in rcirc-log with it.
>>>>
>>>> I figured "%F %T %z " was a sensible default, although feel free to
>>>> change it as you wish.
>>>
>>> Philip, could you please take a look at this patch?
>>
>> We have already merged a similar functionality with bug#67597.
>
> So what should we do with this one? Close?
We can close it. Does it also have to be marked as duplicate?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#66276; Package
emacs.
(Thu, 11 Jan 2024 20:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #24 received at 66276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
unarchive 67597
forcemerge 67597 66276
thanks
Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So what should we do with this one? Close?
>
> We can close it. Does it also have to be marked as duplicate?
Thanks. It won't hurt to merge the bugs (our way of marking it as a
duplicate), so I did that above.
Forcibly Merged 66276 67597.
Request was from
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Thu, 11 Jan 2024 20:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Fri, 09 Feb 2024 12:24:16 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 109 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.