X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#66699: zig: fail to link SDL2 Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Gia Phong <cnx@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.66699.B.16980579284464 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 66699 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 66699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ekaitz@HIDDEN X-Debbugs-Original-To: <bug-guix@HIDDEN>, <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16980579284464 (code B ref -1); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:46:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2023 10:45:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qusR4-00019u-DJ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 06:45:28 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:42054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cnx@HIDDEN>) id 1quphj-0001Hh-MZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:50:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <cnx@HIDDEN>) id 1quphB-0006yj-61 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:49:53 -0400 Received: from tem.loang.net ([2a03:3b40:100::1:2]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <cnx@HIDDEN>) id 1quph8-0003ek-IS for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:49:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=K6ECZNWy5Lm8xE2Fc04JVEIS5fuzpuqwzgmVv/dAmQ8=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loang.net; h=Subject:Subject:Sender:To:To:Cc:From:From:Date:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Message-Id:References:Autocrypt:Openpgp; i=@loang.net; s=default; t=1698046473; v=1; x=1698478473; b=M0EWvpyP1NKgJ82y6dvzFRgWz6bDE92q7pDRwR19qm5sLUa9cpAk4e0EK2UPWjzfGHUToQQi h9Zg00S/SGCuFAZq4Ugg6OwVMBvHzodYmpXh9y8TT12xtyR6YqfU2DAhakcFeeaX9m9RRzpEknj Y/AwvEk80/jWbdt+Ms8ImyvKhjbwKX3Yzdxomt5ORl9voCAjQ9UTGIylapGuH6rCKeqLar8veW+ dR9wEqQwCbWtIE6+okUlSPDARdcN4Cxg3PMmCDjDsbJG9uLSkmcg61JM3KX6+RVMqZ4LDAilXUK kaHJe/vzGK3k6hgPFmT4/4HkiWL3geaTxPn+NK4wiMFWA== Received: by tem.loang.net (envelope-sender <cnx@HIDDEN>) with ESMTPS id f7fc6f41; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 07:34:33 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=6c6ec73e09820687a3edc06cbf781009aa05f1771125beda4beb2ecd18c9; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:34:22 +0900 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Gia Phong <cnx@HIDDEN> Message-Id: <CWFN02XCWX0T.2T2PRVXKN89Y@guix> X-Mailer: aerc 0.15.2 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a03:3b40:100::1:2; envelope-from=cnx@HIDDEN; helo=tem.loang.net X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.1, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I am trying to package Mepo, an OpenStreetMap frontend written in Zig. The currently packaged Zig fails to find transitive dependencies of SDL2: https://paste.sr.ht/~cnx/db21e1ef9a6828f3ec898db43b790d [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.1 MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 'Content-Type' found without required MIME headers X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 06:45:24 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) --6c6ec73e09820687a3edc06cbf781009aa05f1771125beda4beb2ecd18c9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I am trying to package Mepo, an OpenStreetMap frontend written in Zig. The currently packaged Zig fails to find transitive dependencies of SDL2: https://paste.sr.ht/~cnx/db21e1ef9a6828f3ec898db43b790d71b5ef213a Here's a minimal reproducible Zig project: // main.zig const c =3D @cImport(@cInclude("SDL2/SDL.h")); pub fn main() !void { if (c.SDL_Init(c.SDL_INIT_VIDEO) !=3D 0) return error.SDLInitializationFailed; c.SDL_Quit(); } // build.zig pub fn build(b: *@import("std").build.Builder) void { const exe =3D b.addExecutable("sdl2-smoke-test", "main.zig"); exe.linkSystemLibrary("SDL2"); exe.setTarget(b.standardTargetOptions(.{})); exe.setBuildMode(b.standardReleaseOptions()); exe.install(); } For convenience, here goes a manifest for use with guix build -f: (use-modules (guix build-system zig) (guix gexp) (guix licenses) (guix packages) (gnu packages pkg-config) (gnu packages sdl)) (package (name "sdl2-smoke-test") (version "0.0.0") (source (local-file "." "sdl2-smoke-test" #:recursive? #t)) (build-system zig-build-system) (arguments (list #:tests? #f #:zig-release-type "safe")) (native-inputs (list pkg-config)) (inputs (list sdl2)) (synopsis "Zig build system SDL2 linkage failure reproducer") (description (string-append "This is a reproducer of zig-build-system" " failing to link SDL2's transitive dependencies," " as seen when trying to package mepo.")) (home-page "https://larkspur.one/notice/Ab24w1IMGVoZ72J9xg") (license zlib)) --6c6ec73e09820687a3edc06cbf781009aa05f1771125beda4beb2ecd18c9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIQEABYIACwWIQSDiv4NVdwHTjYPlDqEtpzm8/a3ZwUCZTYiAQ4cY254QGxvYW5n Lm5ldAAKCRCEtpzm8/a3Z+agAP9boZoEOJcAnHgH6DVVEMXnqIGmL1n2lWAMRjP0 OsQ+TwD/R0ymTEfk1LkadSDLEOepRuVTKCuwT8EcvmHwmHFKTgI= =jf6+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c6ec73e09820687a3edc06cbf781009aa05f1771125beda4beb2ecd18c9--
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Gia Phong <cnx@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#66699: Acknowledgement (zig: fail to link SDL2) Message-ID: <handler.66699.B.16980579284464.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <CWFN02XCWX0T.2T2PRVXKN89Y@guix> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 66699 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 66699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:46:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-guix@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 66699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 66699: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D66699 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#66699: zig: fail to link SDL2 Resent-From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 20:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.66699.B.169887201818661 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66699 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Gia Phong <cnx@HIDDEN> Cc: 66699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.169887201818661 (code B ref -1); Wed, 01 Nov 2023 20:54:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2023 20:53:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qyIDa-0004qu-7i for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2023 16:53:38 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:33796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1qyIDX-0004qe-7q for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2023 16:53:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1qyICr-0003Ta-Td for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 01 Nov 2023 16:52:54 -0400 Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch ([185.70.40.18]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1qyICo-0003Ql-MJ for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 01 Nov 2023 16:52:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=protonmail2; t=1698871965; x=1699131165; bh=KdBjoW8PUdg88AaM7JDMy5WKwp7nY+A6sucG/WTGXk0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=hOfwnn0cmm+f1h5T9SBOiU0CbFXaal9u5a2D25c025FrVHK+5wsXW9tH4wXmPXbtP hzQ7wvkXWebAsXR4QL9Ku+i98e+4Sn6eXnZ968gfan64OfjTIIsUNNC90kXIPwljZi 9EVdsJNS/Gyk+8h3L8aX79qba10iCnfWACENZDdgtBfoaCwZxpufob1jy42MwKZHFq bTRMUAXWvxJwnmGgeyrb54I8NTu8zKU7I1rguf40vYhjEsp21rSVW6hVB/dPNsPIMk BiEzDr89caNWm6v9NYLZB+eB6z0PfRpAPL8BAVzYga0dPOniLK22FWplUjW+PyN/Or UsjQ1AEQkoN6w== Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 20:52:35 +0000 From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <MFUQhf68MW3SdqqcyO6PFuQ-Ih3I6BkV8N0wDS-xf52TunStisoYtvdxG6KUSOBBkLn-E_4tEJRlD8jvTSnbFUhR88uYuSk8b4l2GmcbFmk=@elenq.tech> In-Reply-To: <CWFN02XCWX0T.2T2PRVXKN89Y@guix> References: <CWFN02XCWX0T.2T2PRVXKN89Y@guix> Feedback-ID: 3263582:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.18; envelope-from=ekaitz@HIDDEN; helo=mail-4018.proton.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) ------- Original Message ------- On Monday, October 23rd, 2023 at 09:34, Nguy=E1=BB=85n Gia Phong <cnx@loang= .net> wrote: > I am trying to package Mepo, an OpenStreetMap frontend written in Zig. > The currently packaged Zig fails to find transitive dependencies of SDL2: > https://paste.sr.ht/~cnx/db21e1ef9a6828f3ec898db43b790d71b5ef213a >=20 > Here's a minimal reproducible Zig project: >=20 > // main.zig > const c =3D @cImport(@cInclude("SDL2/SDL.h")); > pub fn main() !void { > if (c.SDL_Init(c.SDL_INIT_VIDEO) !=3D 0) > return error.SDLInitializationFailed; > c.SDL_Quit(); > } >=20 > // build.zig > pub fn build(b: *@import("std").build.Builder) void { > const exe =3D b.addExecutable("sdl2-smoke-test", "main.zig"); > exe.linkSystemLibrary("SDL2"); > exe.setTarget(b.standardTargetOptions(.{})); > exe.setBuildMode(b.standardReleaseOptions()); > exe.install(); > } >=20 > For convenience, here goes a manifest for use with guix build -f: >=20 > (use-modules (guix build-system zig) > (guix gexp) > (guix licenses) > (guix packages) > (gnu packages pkg-config) > (gnu packages sdl)) > (package > (name "sdl2-smoke-test") > (version "0.0.0") > (source (local-file "." "sdl2-smoke-test" #:recursive? #t)) > (build-system zig-build-system) > (arguments (list #:tests? #f > #:zig-release-type "safe")) > (native-inputs (list pkg-config)) > (inputs (list sdl2)) > (synopsis "Zig build system SDL2 linkage failure reproducer") > (description > (string-append "This is a reproducer of zig-build-system" > " failing to link SDL2's transitive dependencies," > " as seen when trying to package mepo.")) > (home-page "https://larkspur.one/notice/Ab24w1IMGVoZ72J9xg") > (license zlib)) Hi, I have good and bad news for you. I tried to replicate the problem, and I certainly did. I also managed to mi= tigate the problem adding `exe.linkSystemLibrary()` lines to the build.zig = with the transitive dependencies. And later I wondered how did this all work in GCC, just in case. (NOTE: take in account you also need to link with libc! for that you can ad= d it as a linkSystemLibrary("c")) The problem is not Zig specific, look: I tried a random example from a repo in Github using SDL2 and SDL2-Image:= =20 https://github.com/aminosbh/sdl2-image-sample/blob/master/src/main.c Made a shell for it: guix shell sdl2 sdl2-image gcc-toolchain glibc:static And tried to build: $ gcc a.c -static -lSDL2 -lSDL2_image -lm -lc 2>&1 | head ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_d= ynapi.o):(.text+0x27d8): warning: Using 'dlopen' in statically linked appli= cations requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version use= d for linking ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0x48f): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_get_version' ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0xd3e): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_get_version' ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0xd5a): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_marshal_flag= s' ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0xd73): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_add_listener= ' ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0xeb9): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_get_version' ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0xfa8): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_marshal_flag= s' ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0x1002): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_marshal_fla= gs' ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0x1071): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_add_listene= r' ld: /gnu/store/0mhh6ycg8dq6n43qwpvpvr2smbxlixpi-profile/lib/libSDL2.a(SDL_w= aylandvideo.o):(.text+0x107e): undefined reference to `wl_proxy_set_tag' The list of errors are basically the same you have. Zig builds statically if I'm not mistaken so it's triggering the same probl= em GCC would for that case. We need to research this further... I also checked Mepo, how do they manage to build directly? I don't have the Zig knowledge to know how does all this work, but I know i= t's not just the build-system's fault because it happens in GCC too, and al= so with a normal shell with `zig` available, and running the command by han= d. The build-system just replicates that behavior. We need to dig on this further. Are you, Nguy=E1=BB=85n, a Zig programmer? = Maybe you can help me figure out this? Thanks for the report, the patience and the help! All the best, Ekaitz
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#66699: zig: fail to link SDL2 Resent-From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.66699.B66699.169961032014319 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66699 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Gia Phong <cnx@HIDDEN> Cc: 66699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 66699-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B66699.169961032014319 (code B ref 66699); Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:59:01 +0000 Received: (at 66699) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2023 09:58:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r1OHg-0003it-5c for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 04:58:40 -0500 Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch ([185.70.40.18]:56029) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1r1OHa-0003iX-Ad for 66699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 04:58:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=protonmail2; t=1699610267; x=1699869467; bh=V3UrfOaYekr2vfV2VioU4cm/aNa1/R+v6/xLRhLo6SA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=em21TeDzeAmN8pPnOOtmNX/POMEFHubpqxSe4aKI6KFzO1FlGqj1DO7G5PlBRyEH9 KDqjj+koLmw1BRE2HqrXmP88LlJ6pLrv/WhoGn2QStDAtIlQs8cd9OUTVaIYxewor8 PqaHtBLxZ3RvrkljplGzOln55CUSdh4FWZ1MVPXllyjfa+oMEYDPIG0IGareVZV2hS b9/xbvDybXvteyMaHA6olZx/5Bjrnb9YseZc6/KH8KxBX1q4+rd80l/uzAk7UyP/P7 FWT8i/yleRo0VRO3/IgGfJ2ZZTaSRmd5tVYOwRQUk5zqGUraLGtYCJRNhaF1OFJ5wV P0modz5e2Xclw== Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:57:43 +0000 From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <WpV4q86pbeIZROkO_ywSnbkSq4t2_A4QIyV0iLfIC2B0BsM738sOk3HC6BJspkrHljtZjU-oe8jsB_Qq4pKdNGNzn8gcdyoh3n4iS1Y6X_U=@elenq.tech> In-Reply-To: <CWUUZFWJPNL0.20MWDY132FY6E@guix> References: <CWFN02XCWX0T.2T2PRVXKN89Y@guix> <MFUQhf68MW3SdqqcyO6PFuQ-Ih3I6BkV8N0wDS-xf52TunStisoYtvdxG6KUSOBBkLn-E_4tEJRlD8jvTSnbFUhR88uYuSk8b4l2GmcbFmk=@elenq.tech> <CWUUZFWJPNL0.20MWDY132FY6E@guix> Feedback-ID: 3263582:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Friday, November 10th, 2023 at 06:01, =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Gia Phong <cnx@HIDDEN> wrote: > On 2023-11-01 at 20:52+00:00, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > > > On Monday, October 23rd, 2023 at 09:34, =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Gia Phong wrote: > > > > > I am trying to package Mepo, an OpenStreetMap frontend written i [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: libz.so] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 RBL: Excellent reputation (+5) [185.70.40.18 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) Hi, On Friday, November 10th, 2023 at 06:01, Nguy=E1=BB=85n Gia Phong <cnx@loan= g.net> wrote: > On 2023-11-01 at 20:52+00:00, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: >=20 > > On Monday, October 23rd, 2023 at 09:34, Nguy=E1=BB=85n Gia Phong wrote: > >=20 > > > I am trying to package Mepo, an OpenStreetMap frontend written in Zig= . > > > The currently packaged Zig fails to find transitive dependencies of S= DL2: > > > https://paste.sr.ht/~cnx/db21e1ef9a6828f3ec898db43b790d71b5ef213a > >=20 > > The problem is not Zig specific, look: [...] > >=20 > > guix shell sdl2 sdl2-image gcc-toolchain glibc:static > >=20 > > And tried to build: [...] The list of errors are basically the same > > you have. Zig builds statically if I'm not mistaken > > so it's triggering the same problem GCC would for that case. > >=20 > > We need to research this further... > >=20 > > I don't have the Zig knowledge to know how does all this work, > > but I know it's not just the build-system's fault > > because it happens in GCC too, and also with a normal shell > > with `zig` available, and running the command by hand. > > The build-system just replicates that behavior. >=20 >=20 > Thanks, this clears it up for me. So far Zig does not offer a way > to prefer dynamic or static and just search alphabetically: > https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/14111 Maybe there are more flags for this, but I'm not sure. =20 > On 2023-05-23 at 17:11Z, Michael Dusan wrote: >=20 > > A workaround is if you are only using the zig cc driver, > > the syntax -l:<FULLNAME> will find the first fully-named library file > > that matches against search dirs. For example: > >=20 > > * -lz will search dirs, prefer lib<BASENAME>.a over lib<BASENAME>.so > > * -l:libz.so will search directly for libz.so > > and not care about any other name permutations >=20 >=20 > I do wonder though, if it's a generally good idea have separate > shared and static outputs for e.g. SDL2. Obviously Zig programs > would benefit from this, and specifying linkage preference > under GCC is via the same -l:lib*.* flag. I'm not very versed on this so I can't give you a proper answer. > On 2023-11-01 at 20:52+00:00, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: >=20 > > I also checked Mepo, how do they manage to build directly? >=20 > Sorry, could you rephrase this question? > I don't get what you meant by directly here. Yes, it was pretty badly phrased. The question here was about how do the Mepo devs build mepo in other linux distributions... They should have a similar problem to what we have. Or other systems like Nix, how do they build? In Nix the problem should appear too. With *directly* I meant the Mepo repository doesn't contain the transitive dependencies so... It would never work for us, but it should be working for them. Reading your message before seems like they manage to link against the SDL .so so nothing of this happens... I'll try to check all this with the Zig people to see if we can fix. Thanks!
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#66699: zig: fail to link SDL2 Resent-From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 13:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.66699.B66699.169970908223865 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66699 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Gia Phong <cnx@HIDDEN> Cc: 66699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 66699-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B66699.169970908223865 (code B ref 66699); Sat, 11 Nov 2023 13:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 66699) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2023 13:24:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52318 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r1nyb-0006Cr-NU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:24:42 -0500 Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch ([185.70.43.17]:20505) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ekaitz@HIDDEN>) id 1r1nyY-0006Cd-Np for 66699 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:24:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=protonmail2; t=1699709031; x=1699968231; bh=PB4rSJXF5TJs2ocn87XZ+pyyPufzz85OwZdii6Lhouw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=NT1CkahCnX38AJ/KPA0AYGOmkANNWZWTxr5kOg/Zaio9W8wEhrihHc7NwtmxkD+6A DSFPadDtW90xCpvDP81y/R4Pj9EVCl8FrIJrKbDyCYGrGRVkY5TktvdOQotSL8uwHI GGKuTJMDMpBNbkfLI9FaCS6OqOuMsobpFMpR9lRcWp1T6588k1OM2zXYe0Not+iuul L/xqUkxoWifi2HLT1AzrHqiH9B8FIRgIPGdux7zY2G4dMFnixvUOADGHXRykLHQpHp agTDsChO9fL4IGFOq/TwJMGH/R6GkLmbUJ+BsYwKXXzAO+JNaDJsM8RJ6XtysXhQ9X ch4+NUCFYM3Uw== Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 13:23:33 +0000 From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <VogPLQH6oApxEQbHyfSSxYEip9tSK6qWCBObn_SEM4sLgh_BTC8l3MUACnrynd8-zc4QBmZl-31mLSXtfr_goHS9eG5bi7nUtEzCrO4bXf4=@elenq.tech> In-Reply-To: <WpV4q86pbeIZROkO_ywSnbkSq4t2_A4QIyV0iLfIC2B0BsM738sOk3HC6BJspkrHljtZjU-oe8jsB_Qq4pKdNGNzn8gcdyoh3n4iS1Y6X_U=@elenq.tech> References: <CWFN02XCWX0T.2T2PRVXKN89Y@guix> <MFUQhf68MW3SdqqcyO6PFuQ-Ih3I6BkV8N0wDS-xf52TunStisoYtvdxG6KUSOBBkLn-E_4tEJRlD8jvTSnbFUhR88uYuSk8b4l2GmcbFmk=@elenq.tech> <CWUUZFWJPNL0.20MWDY132FY6E@guix> <WpV4q86pbeIZROkO_ywSnbkSq4t2_A4QIyV0iLfIC2B0BsM738sOk3HC6BJspkrHljtZjU-oe8jsB_Qq4pKdNGNzn8gcdyoh3n4iS1Y6X_U=@elenq.tech> Feedback-ID: 3263582:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, I tracked this pretty far: This is a related issue that mentions the `mepo` package: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/12170 And I realized the problem comes from `pkg-config`. It's telling zig to use= the static library first. Removing `pkg-config` from the `native-inputs` in your proposed package mak= e it build but the `runpath` validation phase fails. I'm not sure about what to do now. In the issue the people working on freebsd-ports mention they did this: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/16ada4d8d14a222bd92c4bf332d28= b7c604af457/astro/mepo/Makefile#L31 But I don't know if we can replicate that. I'll keep researching on this a little bit further. Best, Ekaitz
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2025 01:42:55 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 01 21:42:54 2025 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tzn7z-0006Uk-Op for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:42:53 -0400 Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:39822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mcsinyx@HIDDEN>) id 1tzn7r-0006TA-Hc for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:42:48 -0400 Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7006325C5C for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 03:42:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4LtDh_wUeJEN for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 03:42:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1743558160; bh=B0MREDMD73ych1ScEgPeHN/eogKR70hZs3C6guGklM8=; h=Date:Subject:To:From; b=CIyKd/cPXsFpDEcZ+bjmafKMggUd9XUApIAgESZZN4OwzCzsgDB7UDOy8QksOU2vb iYDJCe567GNBMa9Bzs+Go7X587KhenTL3F4rfzcYROaZHD3vRDJmJSpgS1xrsNjjS2 BqloKAs34darFoIY4F8rIBENqRF2mw+IVES3xLIgYJx1uVupXOFDchf4EBOFoAeL8S 2Fnm+CMiJxHkIVMb+xKZ1K//blxWgT7apL3uS5MnR62he8PXFJ+qHkyflP1MhR/Q7Q VZ1oW6uaM/oWq5y3/PANO9rPzdd+a90YkQmCQQrM9S1h5GODe40mshU8L5aE6QpDJs FzrTNQ0/fks8g== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 10:42:36 +0900 Message-Id: <D8VRS7L27C36.1NO7CPS2M67VF@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: zig: fail to link SDL2 To: <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> From: =?utf-8?q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n_Gia_Phong?= <mcsinyx@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 66699
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.