GNU bug report logs - #66949
[PATCH] * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-extra.el: Add two docstrings

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 66949 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 66949 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jeremy Bryant <jb <at> jeremybryant.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-extra.el:  Add two docstrings
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 12:27:51 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Tags: patch

Hi,

Here is a proposed patch to add two docstrings where there were none.  I
believe this fits the conventions, otherwise please let me know what is
needed.  The patch is attached for install for your consideration.

Best,
Jeremy

[0001-lisp-emacs-lisp-cl-extra.el-Add-two-docstrings.patch (text/patch, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 66949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jeremy Bryant <jb <at> jeremybryant.net>
Cc: 66949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66949: [PATCH] * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-extra.el: Add two
 docstrings
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 12:19:32 +0200

> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 12:27:51 +0000
> From:  Jeremy Bryant via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Here is a proposed patch to add two docstrings where there were none.  I
> believe this fits the conventions, otherwise please let me know what is
> needed.  The patch is attached for install for your consideration.

Thanks, but it doesn't apply to the current Emacs Git.  Would you like
to rebase it onto the current emacs-29 branch, and then resubmit?

Message #11 received at 66949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jeremy Bryant <jb <at> jeremybryant.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 66949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66949: [PATCH] * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-extra.el: Add two
 docstrings
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:12:15 +0000

[0001-lisp-emacs-lisp-cl-extra.el-Add-two-docstrings.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[Message part 2 (text/plain, inline)]

OK, I now understand that documentation patches ought to be based on the
last release.  Please find attached the same patch as a diff to
emacs-29.  Please confirm if this is suitable to install in this form.

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 12:27:51 +0000
>> From:  Jeremy Bryant via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> 
>> Here is a proposed patch to add two docstrings where there were none.  I
>> believe this fits the conventions, otherwise please let me know what is
>> needed.  The patch is attached for install for your consideration.
>
> Thanks, but it doesn't apply to the current Emacs Git.  Would you like
> to rebase it onto the current emacs-29 branch, and then resubmit?

Message #16 received at 66949-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jeremy Bryant <jb <at> jeremybryant.net>
Cc: 66949-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66949: [PATCH] * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-extra.el: Add two
 docstrings
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 21:16:46 +0200

> From: Jeremy Bryant <jb <at> jeremybryant.net>
> Cc: 66949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:12:15 +0000
> 
> OK, I now understand that documentation patches ought to be based on the
> last release.  Please find attached the same patch as a diff to
> emacs-29.  Please confirm if this is suitable to install in this form.

Thanks, installed on the emacs-29 branch (after some minor adjustment
of the commit log message), and closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.