Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2023 05:41:51 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 20 00:41:51 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r4x2c-0003eO-HW for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:41:51 -0500 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:15467) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1r4x2Y-0003e8-4z for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:41:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1700458897; x=1700718097; bh=TGjTn+1SLjiN+IZk1A06bHQoB77V2GqlQGPf9TbzNmI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=mF9vY9wT4iO3Hp7AplKXOLCkkJtyi3S7abDYW/EsMRtDYbye9AGuOPGhHAHPDjQSa wB1ldSV9PirZX9FnKxMHL5HP66tHiJd7w/W3rhobtF9uNsGKvJ3ZSHlFVreDziI67c D4JWyOude3buSvedFuih60IUUqLf6/vOhNkwfe6naJjsW0oYvHj1EfzHVew9yKNutP yOyCluXO05D2KWsZUf0Rr33STwaK7ZjMSQXMpn++Q7IhKL4g4kgpW/ubgJuk0qanot Ci+LWuEzXWYvvQkIYKzn7SEsu5LZ/BZvNkG2ElYp/rFpU3oOy2K7xV4Km4lJ55d3Vb rhfFtx8oz37qQ== Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:41:17 +0000 To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: mesa-updates: call for patches Message-ID: <8734x1t213.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87leavfglk.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87v8a3tw0s.fsf@HIDDEN> <87leavfglk.fsf@HIDDEN> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 Cc: 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 11:07 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > > John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> writes: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Update below: >> >> On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:47 PM, John Kehayias wrote: >> [snippy snip snip] >> >> At this point I feel we are just about ready to go, unless there are >> objections? >> >> Substitute coverage, according to >> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates> is good on x86_64 and >> i686 (about 95% and 83%, respectively) while, as usual, other >> architectures are behind. The next best is aarch64 at 54% on bordeaux, >> and then falling to 24% for armhf, with others we build in the teens. >> I think this is to be expected? In any event builds continue very >> slowly and in the past I think this is about where we merge. > > I think some changes have been pushed since this email, since the > aarch64 substitute availability has dropped from 54% to 25%. > Yes, Efraim chimed in to help on some other architectures and some big rebuilds were/are happening for those. I see them slowly ticking up but it will still need some time. >> So, shall I merge this to master in the next couple of days? I've been >> merging master into mesa-updates smoothly so far. Please do check and >> feel free to object if this needs more time. > > I guess this has been held up by the changes on the 15th, but still, I > think we need to wait for substitute availability to improve more prior > to merging, unless there's a specific and significant reason why we > don't want to wait. > Yes, agreed. I'm not as clear on how well we do typically on non-x86 but getting a sense of it now, which is why I wanted to ask. > Targets are arbitrary, but guix weather defines =E2=98=80 as 80%+, so I t= hink > that's what we should aim for at least for x86_64-linux, i686-linux, > aarch64-linux and armhf-linux. This isn't just about substitute > availability though as this is key for discovering what things fail to > build. > I think this is something we could better clarify and quantify as many of us probably only pay attention to x86_64, where for others we can be strapped for both hardware and people. So I didn't want to wait for some substitutes that would never come but also don't want to inconvenience people on other architectures, especially if builds there take much much longer in the first place. Perhaps we can look at some historical data on what we've hit in substitute coverage and try to at least keep up with that if not set some goals for better coverage? While we might also expect further difficulties as some get left behind by upstream (as we've had to work around rust on i686 so far, I believe). All that is to say, yes, let's make sure we have good substitute coverage and are clear on what architectures we want to make sure users get substitutes for. > Obviously delays in merging aren't ideal, but we should tackle the > problems around this, maybe by deciding that testing and providing > substitutes for ARM isn't a priority and thus isn't something we should > wait for, or look at getting more ARM hardware to speed up the process > (we also have a lack of x86_64 hardware on the bordeaux build farm). > Agreed. We should have some clear Guix-wide standards and goals. I'm sure we can get some hardware from Guix-ers and/or funding too, especially if people know exactly what it will go towards improving. Thanks for chiming in here and all your work on this front! In the meantime, I'll go back to refreshing the CI and QA pages every so often to make sure we keep getting closer...
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2023 11:25:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 18 06:25:52 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47908 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r4JSS-0002Oq-D8 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:25:52 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:43030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1r4JSP-0002Og-H3 for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 06:25:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [217.155.61.229]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A42527BBE2; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:25:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9cc4c295; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:25:46 +0000 (UTC) References: <87v8a3tw0s.fsf@HIDDEN> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: mesa-updates: call for patches Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:07:07 +0000 In-reply-to: <87v8a3tw0s.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <87leavfglk.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 Cc: 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@HIDDEN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> writes: > Hi everyone, > > Update below: > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:47 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > [snippy snip snip] >>> >>> Happy to! Substitutes will eventually become available, but there's >>> quite a few builds to be done. This takes care of some ungrafts and >>> updates with I hope minimal disruption. I'll be keeping an eye out and >>> using locally as well. Please test and report, thanks everyone! >>> >>> John >> >> An issue was created to track merging the mesa-updates branch here: >> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66964>. Please use that bug number as >> needed (and cc me or use wide-reply in emacs debbugs). > > At this point I feel we are just about ready to go, unless there are > objections? > > Substitute coverage, according to > <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates> is good on x86_64 and > i686 (about 95% and 83%, respectively) while, as usual, other > architectures are behind. The next best is aarch64 at 54% on bordeaux, > and then falling to 24% for armhf, with others we build in the teens. > I think this is to be expected? In any event builds continue very > slowly and in the past I think this is about where we merge. I think some changes have been pushed since this email, since the aarch64 substitute availability has dropped from 54% to 25%. > So, shall I merge this to master in the next couple of days? I've been > merging master into mesa-updates smoothly so far. Please do check and > feel free to object if this needs more time. I guess this has been held up by the changes on the 15th, but still, I think we need to wait for substitute availability to improve more prior to merging, unless there's a specific and significant reason why we don't want to wait. Targets are arbitrary, but guix weather defines =E2=98=80 as 80%+, so I thi= nk that's what we should aim for at least for x86_64-linux, i686-linux, aarch64-linux and armhf-linux. This isn't just about substitute availability though as this is key for discovering what things fail to build. Obviously delays in merging aren't ideal, but we should tackle the problems around this, maybe by deciding that testing and providing substitutes for ARM isn't a priority and thus isn't something we should wait for, or look at getting more ARM hardware to speed up the process (we also have a lack of x86_64 hardware on the bordeaux build farm). --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmVYnzdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xcz5A/9Ey4YiLv3pk1jl0cuxZG1ebPVCTHesyyP 9Zc98+2ToTm3TAT00OfI4yEe5NDhUYNcOrEa0L8rRBre8+pkxQREoC+d3jTXNYbp o8OWUUBZ+LrE/o6eD21xQRezNaJvMDcad2tu0SbYTIjX4AT76mg/zHBXuVylF2jD uw1YAEPen3ND6r2B9aGpnMlZAPJ+gA7e2E7JzqGhYq9Fgdeyn3QVorngjvXfSkKG Fvb1ssjWIyzsi3yLl19nWJSghs7Q3NiJ42X3iaJcjSUSTdvpOvTcCRbvnvTIltFE o/0C8hb1qC/VBWrpN/Hq7UXPsdE7wRGr3Oo5rz+1tCplZeXjeteZm4poQnBXw/Bd Yaj7pAG6fdAMPkkzHnQVY9azMDXE5ZfWeGmkoz7V3ozJCTj7gEvhMxyxO8jhWXDs MoJNfiXMZ2TszxiKtkvPdQivcecWPZGJK7tdkAGKg7gc1BUk+mg/D7WJXNbs25oD bFnrk/QnUTpYdPsrGhzkuZiHIGvYpidn2/awBBeEUfuv0Qe1Gsm6h24bmnEa9WkV dMkinQUSfIDdJPEazh8g5Nk7uzB/irin2TfM1bf6XgJ8nvVwybH5ex/B5ZMQWpZd f+9tE/AueU9/MOOsFbbGnBnTUCh4T4p2/Mqv/x/jYJ6EQ5GBxubnV2zIGt7ge6x6 4srt9R20N1A= =G/Ul -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2023 15:43:46 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 15 10:43:46 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r3I3L-0000fb-Vq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 10:43:45 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]:56811) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <efraim.flashner@HIDDEN>) id 1r3I3D-0000f8-2h for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 10:43:38 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c83ffcdbe3so50042611fa.1 for <66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 07:43:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1700063010; x=1700667810; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wFBDHwxxN1+YfstfCBLenQc47iWqJqnQYwOdglUjXDk=; b=mjebR01+FHGn4TkxdVw4teIUZ991w2JUWLdufyTIrNipqd+G68C06KGCo1DE4yeSKq FXfVRz6tWV/dktsE5R2Ab4Bd2COU9u2DlBtkf8/3ebDmmiR9ypEEh+THi2QPdPzFZMYO IZb9HX2TpSauaqXxQf8k+2X7+xR3VTqYChEPTYuV0mLvbcUiyjN5BkGNNYuy2d4ngpK8 tjPVHpbBMWAlxGH47/SkjGqxEJmCBW9Qa3UJVhtZzRFtQqBjyay8kXGbifU9IH1AFC+e X+fHiQFH9RMMCqroeTqH4K3T/xZIXB5s5xKJ5vnIGzvcaXtWm97cNyhHOZkHNvqNudnr RQ2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700063010; x=1700667810; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wFBDHwxxN1+YfstfCBLenQc47iWqJqnQYwOdglUjXDk=; b=iXhJg71TJ+q0x1+6O3excnkOT8QJXDNXuwREqUuK2Rkjis8ZweE0H02TtKsusMALbo JrahIVQ3CTsdc0j7+xe7GgEo0qFVM131MicJ8H0w2Akt5GTzJHZC5zBvgzWloKM1+38e nRYZ8rGk9qYyijdpfclRHf2OGUm2TKsTTb0J1cTohBGd9/33TONNJfoSVBohD55MGXGC lqSKPLhf5z3N+Ez0hOnxAP4dDJ4q/hvD7soIdyJljKnLG7mqtCJQyPfUU79nNj6/Nipb yVyqL5bQZ/xfsUx2RM2+MGrcZXwT7mmEZ2V9xG3z4xVitKUfOxEzW+0xiUg+htal1zqs /aZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzptP0bP1tel3l6QvHdlFiltSaU67EjzPsnQyIat6hMbw1qQzSJ ixj2UtdaJ5xAxP4IXwFMxH7liZTsomZ64w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGbHhQ9ni+1b8JmEYxE01XVMML5Kzb9VDwBYofrpNFoRykiS3p6XX81cZ1NjF7H2p6RLV3Ghg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5492:b0:405:40c6:2ba4 with SMTP id iv18-20020a05600c549200b0040540c62ba4mr8765589wmb.5.1700029739326; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:28:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([94.230.83.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b12-20020a05600c150c00b004083a105f27sm19249886wmg.26.2023.11.14.22.28.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:28:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:28:56 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#66964: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <ZVRlKCMfEJNxwkiZ@3900XT> Mail-Followup-To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>, Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi@HIDDEN>, guix-devel@HIDDEN, "66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <878r7b32qm.fsf@HIDDEN> <m-1_kiiKXWXP4nJVxxUfx4CaLLLo-pNr7J3C4dKk0erStH8DfkrwqyQ3s1ou2ibM1cul7813G5q5znMvotRhWsVHSgkTVJqrSRO3jSgyM5w=@protonmail.com> <87y1f0t7s9.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9FtETTDTU9lGmH0X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y1f0t7s9.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, "66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) --9FtETTDTU9lGmH0X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:11:08PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi Kaelyn, >=20 > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:01 PM, Kaelyn wrote: >=20 > > Hi, > > > > I've just submitted a pair of patches for the mesa-updates branch: > > <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67136> updating xorgproto and > > xorg-server-xwayland. The xorgproto is a high-impact update (guix > > refresh reports rebuilding 8710 packages would ensure 22871 dependent > > packages are rebuilt), but required to update to the latest xwayland > > as xwayland requires a newer version of presentproto than in the > > current guix xorgproto package. The updating and ungrafting of mesa > > and a number of X.org related libraries seemed like a good time (and > > place) to update xorgproto as well. > > > > Cheers, > > Kaelyn >=20 > Thanks for the patches. I think mesa-updates in this current iteration > is set on builds (ended up being a lot more due to the ungrafting but > seems done on our main architectures for several days now). I had to > make some other changes to fix some larger breakages but at this point I > think it will just be taking us back in the build queue too much. >=20 > So I think it would make more sense on the next big rebuild, either > core-updates (talk about doing that with more ungrafts right now) or > I'll do mesa-updates again when the next release of mesa hits. Or maybe > it makes sense to just do another branch for xwayland? >=20 > Open to ideas! I'll send a separate message soon on the status of > mesa-updates and see what people think, but my thought was to merge this > to master in the next day or so if there are no objections. If the mesa branch is ready to merge so soon then I think we should just get that merged and then I'll rebase the rust-team branch on top of new master. The rust-team branch is also ready to merge, but we're way behind on aarch64 substitutes. Either way the substitute servers will be rebuilding all of rust so I think it'd be better to merge in mesa-updates and then do rust. --=20 Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 = =D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --9FtETTDTU9lGmH0X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmVUZSgACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1FwDhAAvMsauLw0ubrocKOpbzZzzNlR4TGC6qiOmjc7CXyKuwQhmX9D4LTL6h0c 8Yq7fvxrrYdWejSCfSwSqkaq3C5UqbedsMP81eM8O3Pft2Y9mQUO9vnDRqp+/mRy 9iBqJxWaDz502e4Sif6IIz2qD53Eq3D8PGCDkB68t6L3QwmDVRDghVjO3hsMUt+x r6Z3NGqpWKaTgJ03c57dZMdN1lgAmUhPINfbVVePByUh4/zo6ymFRYi9xhej8wXt v7hsEGGmiJD5WZulC7Q0GTTK5Wy3qveNFoce+0JA/p7rKa3HCFyXlGXka0drUtfD BO0o8RmScD5vHQwFT1tx4FHB7HHh/GbrH1YVHghQ6iCLQp5cr8PdsQ1K1QUrcfx7 4VMU+xxD4QPDsy7fpTI9aXQRSQ5DcOPXmv2tukBJiBTvCxNyl/FXjScNNWc2751U +JxYb5tkSq/9nzr/0a63LDyIrgDOrOMspZ1VNJwq/BC3meL0iMOcy6H11H8bCyDH G4rNiQzYVYgEkzWB10Jfv9NJP7+MtEchIDqeU8XitCKJ7Uhs7k4TJd+QTcLr1r5z EiDgqdmKMfJbo2lX1fGcaWr1zAEglcoFA4QaYTA2TApzug9xpkdG7kAtQNZ7qc6z HqbfgXEMVOyT43sKHGPGHxK+7vD4nA9ny+FSQ0sr2p1kxUGl05o= =HIRp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9FtETTDTU9lGmH0X--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2023 05:41:04 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 15 00:41:03 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34671 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r38e7-00059O-Gf for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:41:03 -0500 Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]:62077) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1r38e4-00058h-Sj for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:41:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1700026812; x=1700286012; bh=zjw1Rd+eQyUTpaWmO1M9JUiJfu79qEeQL6uqVgEdPv8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=xI9p8qEwy/KSTRZLdhwxH/l4AUQGtF2BdFOeFIK/U8zVZLmizSuFYCEtCs8vDXeHx ydxP9YyWYEk+KRogZLXTTc27CwNGNEdN6akekloUqzUck+iOZBWUn4VyuwF5x3CEML 9IFNm/616gDj91rp3iy6KUxLAnU/SV3nhpChXgAvGjv4QwjI2d8aCYtPMpZyfnMhbP S2KNoF2QnRgnrPESszo0cMgvQgkBw8onm87g1CCQN/6vK+P7Ebg9CzdI24c2eSuRnX S4sVL99+3U9e5orJ4b97iFc2ttO1cwEnAiZY7PG9R6uuXD5qMYebilAIZCWqTIH7rr WDl2f22JI1rVg== Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 05:39:55 +0000 To: guix-devel@HIDDEN From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: mesa-updates: call for patches Message-ID: <87v8a3tw0s.fsf@HIDDEN> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 Cc: 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi everyone, Update below: On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:47 PM, John Kehayias wrote: [snippy snip snip] >> >> Happy to! Substitutes will eventually become available, but there's >> quite a few builds to be done. This takes care of some ungrafts and >> updates with I hope minimal disruption. I'll be keeping an eye out and >> using locally as well. Please test and report, thanks everyone! >> >> John > > An issue was created to track merging the mesa-updates branch here: > <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66964>. Please use that bug number as > needed (and cc me or use wide-reply in emacs debbugs). At this point I feel we are just about ready to go, unless there are objections? Substitute coverage, according to <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates> is good on x86_64 and i686 (about 95% and 83%, respectively) while, as usual, other architectures are behind. The next best is aarch64 at 54% on bordeaux, and then falling to 24% for armhf, with others we build in the teens. I think this is to be expected? In any event builds continue very slowly and in the past I think this is about where we merge. I should note: please check for any breakages. I didn't expect too much, but did get more than I thought. It seems the ungrafting version changes caused some things to fail. Also, the libx11 ungraft mean python and rust were rebuilt, with the many packages that entails. I fixed big ones I saw, like QT (unrelated: it was libxkbcommon upgrade), but other leaf packages I saw had tests failing for reasons I didn't see. For instance, php fails tests. The current ones are due to the curl update, but updating php and removing an obsolete patch had a different test fail. It would be great if someone more familiar will take a look. With few dependents I figure this can just be done on master after the merge. So, shall I merge this to master in the next couple of days? I've been merging master into mesa-updates smoothly so far. Please do check and feel free to object if this needs more time. Thanks everyone, John PS: I forgot to email the various patches/issues that are done on mesa-updates, as listed in a previous message. I will do that too.
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2023 20:37:09 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 14 15:37:09 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34223 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r309k-0007Pk-L6 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:37:09 -0500 Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]:37455) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <kaelyn.alexi@HIDDEN>) id 1r309h-0007PG-LD for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:37:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1699994176; x=1700253376; bh=G94SpP/huefVBWBArdIfppAAHTihq4eNsBUZZ9y6Oxs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=CeCexgQRSMDhSSP0CFoji2htzauKabkocsyATF8ZUqT2DPUmrkal/hpbCVUgQYCfd +/BqnUlU62sQfSr2XF6WSE12ei4Cw6wxYmYxjX05o1BlBUddA3SYoE5R/b0DC5tUfR 7HNvHpgQrqgKOussl96SqTHAHWh4d6NuRQu65dReRWMgiZ0PABzU40dLkZNYB/mP8P NePIaBNCaDsU/ZK73c8iTPhzkr/3CCXbVqQtdGkror1GAmfcFISR/2iXTILNuCdhw6 hQ06FU4UMRAem86yrzDph5hlW75b/Y/XyFcVeBs7ISHsUUvAfV+WRPvmQhtKpdrfjy tI3GRXOO3rdyw== Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:36:06 +0000 To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> From: Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#66964: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <7k1WKdjeNkQdy2Sn-n5KIRtaueKF5rV_eePjWm6w9cp5wSdgaTiv-siJxwNeX12FUywY_ezumz-LeYDMKR_bBbdFn2YrD-e3-IvyvneN15E=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87y1f0t7s9.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> References: <878r7b32qm.fsf@HIDDEN> <m-1_kiiKXWXP4nJVxxUfx4CaLLLo-pNr7J3C4dKk0erStH8DfkrwqyQ3s1ou2ibM1cul7813G5q5znMvotRhWsVHSgkTVJqrSRO3jSgyM5w=@protonmail.com> <87y1f0t7s9.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Feedback-ID: 34709329:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, "66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi John, On Tuesday, November 14th, 2023 at 12:11 PM, John Kehayias <john.kehayias@p= rotonmail.com> wrote: >=20 > Hi Kaelyn, >=20 > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:01 PM, Kaelyn wrote: >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > I've just submitted a pair of patches for the mesa-updates branch: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67136 updating xorgproto and > > xorg-server-xwayland. The xorgproto is a high-impact update (guix > > refresh reports rebuilding 8710 packages would ensure 22871 dependent > > packages are rebuilt), but required to update to the latest xwayland > > as xwayland requires a newer version of presentproto than in the > > current guix xorgproto package. The updating and ungrafting of mesa > > and a number of X.org related libraries seemed like a good time (and > > place) to update xorgproto as well. > >=20 > > Cheers, > > Kaelyn >=20 >=20 > Thanks for the patches. I think mesa-updates in this current iteration > is set on builds (ended up being a lot more due to the ungrafting but > seems done on our main architectures for several days now). I had to > make some other changes to fix some larger breakages but at this point I > think it will just be taking us back in the build queue too much. >=20 > So I think it would make more sense on the next big rebuild, either > core-updates (talk about doing that with more ungrafts right now) or > I'll do mesa-updates again when the next release of mesa hits. Or maybe > it makes sense to just do another branch for xwayland? >=20 > Open to ideas! I'll send a separate message soon on the status of > mesa-updates and see what people think, but my thought was to merge this > to master in the next day or so if there are no objections. >=20 > Thanks! > John No worries! I realize I was a little late to the party for the mesa-updates= branch (had some ongoing technical issues), so if core-updates is still ea= rly enough in the process I think it would be good to push the changes to t= hat branch. The current xwayland is pretty old, and the updated version has= quite a few CVEs fixed in comparison (just https://www.phoronix.com/news/X= .Org-Halloween-Bugs-2023 and https://www.phoronix.com/news/X.Org-Server-Hol= iday-2022 list 8 CVEs fixed between xwayland 21.1.3 and 23.2.2). Cheers, Kaelyn
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2023 20:12:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 14 15:12:21 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34208 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r2zlk-0006or-MR for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:12:20 -0500 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:30163) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1r2zlj-0006oe-2T for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:12:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1699992689; x=1700251889; bh=vfCC4LCXJO1EPAkpyT5B2nz0vy5Sas96ASGbOaqzwk0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=teiWzRxsVjwy6FxWmxlzfeWp49DcvowSOlhpLeDrpMJMfBjbWz88sTlMQkn+H7a/R Q5McqwrvYdJSFgp30gs7Gw9MQ/vxOUsU4jOIyvGMA6/UlogcK/gjdl07fcKFKnZ1X2 MbGIKVgob6/xnSjVO1D6ySqa/WuVKXrK8KoTlKNaRfV3WFUnHO1mAsuY7vC03xpcFL ibxqJoz+z69nO7tmskJuQoubT+TJ44ga5xE0pAJ94aBM77wMIGZThwzgQsiT5oRP7X ddvypvlBMphb9zMNr4yQdDgh69Fv4YA8DvCFefcIorBVcP9XMCztfgxte4GzISDBCQ RhSd8JG1Mye5A== Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:11:08 +0000 To: Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi@HIDDEN> From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#66964: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87y1f0t7s9.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <m-1_kiiKXWXP4nJVxxUfx4CaLLLo-pNr7J3C4dKk0erStH8DfkrwqyQ3s1ou2ibM1cul7813G5q5znMvotRhWsVHSgkTVJqrSRO3jSgyM5w=@protonmail.com> References: <878r7b32qm.fsf@HIDDEN> <m-1_kiiKXWXP4nJVxxUfx4CaLLLo-pNr7J3C4dKk0erStH8DfkrwqyQ3s1ou2ibM1cul7813G5q5znMvotRhWsVHSgkTVJqrSRO3jSgyM5w=@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, "66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Kaelyn, On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:01 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > Hi, > > I've just submitted a pair of patches for the mesa-updates branch: > <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67136> updating xorgproto and > xorg-server-xwayland. The xorgproto is a high-impact update (guix > refresh reports rebuilding 8710 packages would ensure 22871 dependent > packages are rebuilt), but required to update to the latest xwayland > as xwayland requires a newer version of presentproto than in the > current guix xorgproto package. The updating and ungrafting of mesa > and a number of X.org related libraries seemed like a good time (and > place) to update xorgproto as well. > > Cheers, > Kaelyn Thanks for the patches. I think mesa-updates in this current iteration is set on builds (ended up being a lot more due to the ungrafting but seems done on our main architectures for several days now). I had to make some other changes to fix some larger breakages but at this point I think it will just be taking us back in the build queue too much. So I think it would make more sense on the next big rebuild, either core-updates (talk about doing that with more ungrafts right now) or I'll do mesa-updates again when the next release of mesa hits. Or maybe it makes sense to just do another branch for xwayland? Open to ideas! I'll send a separate message soon on the status of mesa-updates and see what people think, but my thought was to merge this to master in the next day or so if there are no objections. Thanks! John
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2023 20:06:53 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 14 15:06:53 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34187 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r2zgT-0006fx-0b for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:06:53 -0500 Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]:57367) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1r2zgQ-0006fj-CC for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:06:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1699992361; x=1700251561; bh=ZiNVtanjMTaLnI1LMIBNYQoHJUQPUwxZSU7GhUGIbng=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=NmGc2RIeANORwYtIIFl7Ics09Gh/3WjtOzphZz28snsHmqL3xPAnkeWUJOpY6iaqo gOCAykDMLqHymh3o4/7XSyFkFotNJCqS7MfsKwoa9D4WHYKrrL+AZ0M/SZ4Gy4zS0l gyQXMofPoEub1N/ma3UhyEe8faXQyQE4rVm6/tjzahhyPzQ+eVY2o3vgGX7BEc7QiQ iVmT/OtsXYtc+TMie+IFsDU5v3UE1d8OpSGjrdbd9S4NvbV2+yYt6rV/MFERMIjyjn 5ZAXDAaLUpprmndKygmdy99B8PEhP+d2QLcT8up7BuClLjuTa9PD+L4Ry1UNdAFMCn yEs5qu/bRJ6NA== Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:05:50 +0000 To: dan <i@HIDDEN> From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#66964: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <8734x8umli.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 Cc: 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi dan, On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 09:43 PM, dan wrote: > Hi John, > > I noticed one of my commit #65153 is on the mesa-update branch, it > would be helpful if you could take a look at #65155, an update trying > to export XDG_DATA_DIRS for mesa. Since no one replied there, I'm not > sure if this change is appropriate and if it fits in this update. Apologies I did not see this message as I think you only sent it to the bug number (which does not get sent to anyone else as far as I know). I had meant to respond to #65155 but I think I forgot. I did have a note on the thread on guix-devel about this briefly: > I don't think this is a correct change as written (search-path should > be in vulkan-loader if I'm understanding what is supposed to happen > here). Anyway, will follow up on that issue and left it out for now. I'll follow up on that bug number directly to discuss. Sorry for the miscommunication! John
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2023 20:02:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 12 15:02:39 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r2GfH-0008As-KJ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:02:39 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:49195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <kaelyn.alexi@HIDDEN>) id 1r2GfD-0008Aa-LI for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:02:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1699819307; x=1700078507; bh=v/ZwqTUfPTretWNxuBTjcuPqATTuXCOHgrdaT5U2AcU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=YLI+ZtBGryzUn7or/cXZnLS+aEZlwpU3gyw6ii35m+Ga6aL4P/SqF0/k9dMSyJ/Pk f/j1DCLlV+4NYlDfiX/Yt1aCIg7X5Y3hXaYYHr6PU0rAjjI3aaFcTvjhNrLimRd7LP dHPri6nMXn4i+lU3A2IVQqRsBAEKhcHqJ9yZ2TWtT3rU85G/NFLoZQ++sCoyyFsJOE Mx4CGTZLfAVRU/A4DhV7wkFZcsF7vCj8GTHQRGRFYzso9j7aBpkFH20uErPS4plCZd Fn4bp7buF+JbPVyNuTeLlwd95Q1wfWJI/uEgvsyroo8DBmCg3ptrfuGJ3vmuTqKiyY 21f0SPx/5gIKw== Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 20:01:28 +0000 To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> From: Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: mesa-updates: call for patches Message-ID: <m-1_kiiKXWXP4nJVxxUfx4CaLLLo-pNr7J3C4dKk0erStH8DfkrwqyQ3s1ou2ibM1cul7813G5q5znMvotRhWsVHSgkTVJqrSRO3jSgyM5w=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <878r7b32qm.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <878r7b32qm.fsf@HIDDEN> Feedback-ID: 34709329:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 Cc: guix-devel@HIDDEN, "66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, I've just submitted a pair of patches for the mesa-updates branch: <https:/= /issues.guix.gnu.org/67136> updating xorgproto and xorg-server-xwayland. Th= e xorgproto is a high-impact update (guix refresh reports rebuilding 8710 p= ackages would ensure 22871 dependent packages are rebuilt), but required to= update to the latest xwayland as xwayland requires a newer version of pres= entproto than in the current guix xorgproto package. The updating and ungra= fting of mesa and a number of X.org related libraries seemed like a good ti= me (and place) to update xorgproto as well. Cheers, Kaelyn
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 66964) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2023 13:46:59 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 09 08:46:59 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r15N4-0003PK-Oc for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 08:46:59 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:51721) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <i@HIDDEN>) id 1r15N1-0003P4-9G for 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 08:46:58 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5856B5C078C for <66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:46:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 08:46:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dan.games; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1699537569; x=1699623969; bh=t/KPM1hb6XV2YV0M/fFM1sIpi 0j7ZoogGieGQsQAOdY=; b=W+x0WZGFw5u6bfcmA9qCvFwRMUf/FXmpX/h7Q5hH4 RgkO+UtQEz7YgyQHMDUTIeEqfxipTKIwyDGuqSwvsuz/XEFy8gFNTBSj0t1egMA7 YtKInzV+igzAOGHj2i/eyduAMPp1Hpl1fkrAOInxYl0gSLmbxgM8ZJWOVAKnehns VKeGnpkcOZmlVtqsPZXzlT+1jxIpjBi77Tpxomc73UUtrrpRjDOXeXgInFMaZSuC 12nlzR6tOT7Qfl9XVAc2Mmglp/bQx7Jcl1Nm6OZ3oAARoOmqhwmBVeNH0ZGpI9MB nVId3eqZFv9VTjiwj6DSYb+uc4XdxqU7n+nspSBzWHfHw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1699537569; x=1699623969; bh=t/KPM1hb6XV2YV0M/fFM1sIpi0j7ZoogGie GQsQAOdY=; b=MLz0dqKh5Pzq11eDHu0AVH8Y8ne/pSK2Ti5PZ8J/n769LLxsjx9 nQ4WKfEwsJX7L28D093o8bvio4JGNq6gQ7cNc+C8+ytDNeYU09ZGVX2iMvtoeYg9 Jly17iDjlNEHciz7iy3bleT8ZrJajHIf4MMOLo0LrS+cPAqCVUORDMHWsPaPDZKo gb/WudS/0O2X+b1WZ1Y0snUtb40sEUL3WfWZNZ0vVs66nZsohDwVajbo5PA5GLtg /UaK3PB5+0Af7iDRyj8EK7i9ZBBX4wEeAJJw1dEZzHy8f2WwMBdw64MNC63w5re2 wVzWzB3bPcq83byyHAul4gknTNFNze9uPBQ== X-ME-Sender: <xms:oeJMZUKCrMP59xWij6BOw3BH4_KWiH7AeYHXQ0eJ9I3eOrTKDNkDqw> <xme:oeJMZULeSOaB-zU4OijON4ULYud3O8VAwrdCXi6fatfm4WZW5dMCIupncZKpTe9w_ Mta-ZmpmD-Y6I-dACc> X-ME-Received: <xmr:oeJMZUtG7pxfbC3LBz6UrZgBDa86vUFQkzMQBhCT7bHoKKtvEscdiA> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedruddvuddgheehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegfhffvufffkfggtgesthdtredttd ertdenucfhrhhomhepuggrnhcuoehisegurghnrdhgrghmvghsqeenucggtffrrghtthgv rhhnpeejkeefjeevveelledvueevkeeuheegteetjefffffggffhlefgfeejledvtdfhve enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehisegu rghnrdhgrghmvghs X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:oeJMZRa8ogCIDmt2H3Op93M_JSv4dxhe43m4bFeXHMbg2sA6tbWEvQ> <xmx:oeJMZbad0S7_UdPy4RiaXOH3cVVYWWjiZ5YxUraWpu2dP-Td-onnOw> <xmx:oeJMZdBGoPvyRRE7jiPpTJOGOnwNLf1E-UCmVklEL2l2Tgl9wtHurA> <xmx:oeJMZV3XvX753E2cMQXpdGDghD5aVp9eps8ywKx8bcmioACV7OV9uw> Feedback-ID: i3b5946ed:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:46:08 -0500 (EST) User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 From: dan <i@HIDDEN> To: 66964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: re: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 21:43:02 +0800 Message-ID: <875y2b6nvs.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66964 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi John, I noticed one of my commit #65153 is on the mesa-update branch, it would be helpful if you could take a look at #65155, an update trying to export XDG_DATA_DIRS for mesa. Since no one replied there, I'm not sure if this change is appropriate and if it fits in this update. -- dan
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2023 04:46:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 05 23:46:38 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38501 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qzrVV-0002jA-UZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2023 23:46:38 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:33180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1qzrVR-0002iu-Ml for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2023 23:46:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1qzrUk-0003Mv-Sq for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 05 Nov 2023 23:45:50 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1qzrUj-0004gT-8k for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Sun, 05 Nov 2023 23:45:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1699245945; x=1699505145; bh=ZUs/f0fvPyCb6Rm4y5wfeR2LZjvNCAJ7GmRJ42bo8v8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=IW2kfGxNlLgh5nu126FvzwQD18qLVpGxMdUuHgrPyxyAQe/lRmgz5i4535jENFp/q wvzWCtjm9uQYCHSDyuypRL+3tkb5rRymCNZ0Evf9YCdZaRdrq9W1ej8nKxnaD+qpiU Z5m44qePDtm+x77Z8Ysg5qr4DLtgQ/9wyCxwpRm3YwXq3pc0XtnsQo6UESdljrlsMz mQcFfroN+etO93lHsLClrwCh8X/1KvwTgPaD1y6kAcH0QswivJXrSkRKn8Tvqro61l /QCo7/psZWEjT0949YNIKz1hqP5yhvgdHFzRPUWHPWOJlvMz2YkBnFYicR8NNTnEqX 6JB3lQHeg7olw== Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 04:45:41 +0000 To: "guix-patches@HIDDEN" <guix-patches@HIDDEN> From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87a5rr32x8.fsf@HIDDEN> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.131; envelope-from=john.kehayias@HIDDEN; helo=mail-40131.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, This is to start the process for merging the "mesa-updates" branch. A set of commits was just pushed there and the CI already has a build job for this branch. It is only 12 commits currently, but will [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (john.kehayias[at]protonmail.com) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, This is to start the process for merging the "mesa-updates" branch. A set o= f commits was just pushed there and the CI already has a build job for this= branch. It is only 12 commits currently, but will be a lot of builds due m= ostly to the ungrafting of libx11 (and certain package updates beyond mesa = itself, like pixman, libdrm, etc.). So, mostly waiting for things to build = and hoping no major breakages. The ungrafts and version updates shouldn't b= e huge changes but you never know. Please feel free to report any issues here and I'll update as well as thing= s go. Thanks! John
John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#66964; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.