GNU bug report logs -
#67211
[PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-adwaita-dark-theme
Previous Next
Reported by: Tristan Cottam <tristan <at> cott.am>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 21:48:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Tristan Cottam <tristan <at> cott.am>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 67211 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 67211 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
andrew <at> trop.in, cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com, liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67211
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 15 Nov 2023 21:48:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Tristan Cottam <tristan <at> cott.am>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
andrew <at> trop.in, cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com, liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 15 Nov 2023 21:48:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-adwaita-dark-theme): New variable.
Change-Id: Id6e6d0d6aa27e7c1cc6ec0fc11c3a5f09231d751
---
> FWIW, changing the Version keyword in the header is a release. Also, it
> has the benefit of making the version number more meaningful.
I agree, I had missed that version bump commit. However, it isn't in fact the
last one, so I left the rest as it is.
gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
index be7ffd1f37..443f315f23 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
@@ -1995,6 +1995,29 @@ (define-public emacs-suneater-theme
theme but now takes more inspiration from the Nano theme.")
(license license:gpl3+)))
+(define-public emacs-adwaita-dark-theme
+ (let ((commit "a97d5d5f5657a52c3b4c4b146b4d307dfb1a7a74")
+ (revision "0"))
+ (package
+ (name "emacs-adwaita-dark-theme")
+ (version (git-version "1.1.1" revision commit))
+ (source (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://gitlab.com/jessieh/adwaita-dark-theme")
+ (commit commit)))
+ (file-name (git-file-name name version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0g8fjqmz805fhqspbzmpvb90kpzwigl4z56bkykywgy2cwb9ljzh"))))
+ (build-system emacs-build-system)
+ (home-page "https://gitlab.com/jessieh/adwaita-dark-theme")
+ (synopsis "Adwaita-inspired dark color scheme for Emacs")
+ (description
+ "adwaita-dark-theme is an Adwaita-inspired dark color scheme for
+Emacs.")
+ (license license:gpl2+))))
+
(define-public emacs-treepy
(package
(name "emacs-treepy")
base-commit: bd0f2173210416e86281c1de8789e7cdab66dd57
prerequisite-patch-id: 5e36e77f4fa1848dbd20c2e5d5cec31d2473c2a8
--
2.41.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67211
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Tristan Cottam via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> I agree, I had missed that version bump commit. However, it isn't in fact the
> last one, so I left the rest as it is.
My point is that is it usually better to package version bumps rather
than arbitrary commits. IOW, I'd rather drop the revision and package
057c39313341907b35c68d2179226886a0c276fd instead.
> + (description
> + "adwaita-dark-theme is an Adwaita-inspired dark color scheme for
> +Emacs.")
You didn't change this. Is it intentional?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67211
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67211
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 67211 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I accidentally sent a reply to #67198 to guix-patches <at> gnu.org, resulting in
this new issue. How can I close this?
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67211
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Tristan Cottam via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> I accidentally sent a reply to #67198 to guix-patches <at> gnu.org, resulting in
> this new issue. How can I close this?
You can send an empty mail to <NNN-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org> where NNN is
the number of the issue you created.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67211
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Tristan Cottam <tristan <at> cott.am>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:36:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Tristan Cottam <tristan <at> cott.am>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 67211-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> You can send an empty mail to <NNN-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org> where NNN is
> the number of the issue you created.
Great, thanks!
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 146 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.