GNU bug report logs -
#67304
Build python-cdflib.x86_64-linux on master is broken.
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 67304 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 67304 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
sharlatanus <at> gmail.com, bavier <at> posteo.net, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67304
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
sharlatanus <at> gmail.com, bavier <at> posteo.net, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello!
cuirass <at> gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> <p>The build <b>python-cdflib.x86_64-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2635702/details">here</a>.</p>
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2635702/details
It seems something in the commits series
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?qt=range&q=2ab5e449246f98b049888dde3c310f5b4a0a64a2..b7abea0fd6a146563830db1dc4ddd0cceb6fcf1c
either broke the test, else it's flaky.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67304
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 67304 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Maxim, thanks for the report.
On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 14:02 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>
> It seems something in the commits series
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?qt=range&q=2ab5e449246f98b049888dde3c310f5b4a0a64a2..b7abea0fd6a146563830db1dc4ddd0cceb6fcf1c
> either broke the test, else it's flaky.
>
I have built the package locally many times without fail.
The failed test is one that checks fidelity of a rountrip time format
conversion for a randomly-generated time, so failure may indeed be
intermittent.
I will try to dig a bit further, and maybe Sharlatan can as well.
`~Eric
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67304
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 67304 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Guix,
I've checked the cement to the test and it mentioned as a candidate to be
removed as it's not stable
https://github.com/MAVENSDC/cdflib/blob/master/tests/test_astropy_epochs.py#L116
# Unfortunately, currently there is a pretty big loss of
precision that comes with
# the compute function. Need to stop testing early.
We may consider to disable it to stabilize build.
Thanks,
Oleg
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 19:25, Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim, thanks for the report.
>
> On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 14:02 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> >
> > It seems something in the commits series
> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?qt=range&q=2ab5e449246f98b049888dde3c310f5b4a0a64a2..b7abea0fd6a146563830db1dc4ddd0cceb6fcf1c
> > either broke the test, else it's flaky.
> >
>
> I have built the package locally many times without fail.
>
> The failed test is one that checks fidelity of a rountrip time format
> conversion for a randomly-generated time, so failure may indeed be
> intermittent.
>
> I will try to dig a bit further, and maybe Sharlatan can as well.
>
> `~Eric
--
… наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна
найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но
совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#67304
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:57:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 67304 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
I've open an issue in upstram.
Mean while please check the patch disabling the test.
Thanks,
Oleg
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 22:39, Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Guix,
>
> I've checked the cement to the test and it mentioned as a candidate to be
> removed as it's not stable
>
> https://github.com/MAVENSDC/cdflib/blob/master/tests/test_astropy_epochs.py#L116
> # Unfortunately, currently there is a pretty big loss of
> precision that comes with
> # the compute function. Need to stop testing early.
>
> We may consider to disable it to stabilize build.
>
> Thanks,
> Oleg
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 19:25, Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Maxim, thanks for the report.
> >
> > On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 14:02 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems something in the commits series
> > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?qt=range&q=2ab5e449246f98b049888dde3c310f5b4a0a64a2..b7abea0fd6a146563830db1dc4ddd0cceb6fcf1c
> > > either broke the test, else it's flaky.
> > >
> >
> > I have built the package locally many times without fail.
> >
> > The failed test is one that checks fidelity of a rountrip time format
> > conversion for a randomly-generated time, so failure may indeed be
> > intermittent.
> >
> > I will try to dig a bit further, and maybe Sharlatan can as well.
> >
> > `~Eric
>
>
>
> --
>
> … наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна
> найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но
> совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.
--
… наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна
найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но
совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.
[0001-gnu-python-cdflib-Disable-shaky-test.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 04 Dec 2023 20:53:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 04 Dec 2023 20:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 67304-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 22:56 +0000, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've open an issue in upstram.
> Mean while please check the patch disabling the test.
I've pushed this patch as 33f9d3cc36fbfbd2849d626492721667abfe8306.
We can revisit if we ever get a response from upstream.
`~Eric
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 130 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.