Received: (at 67326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2024 00:13:53 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 11 19:13:53 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34334 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rO5BI-00040q-Ul for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 19:13:53 -0500 Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:44458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gregory@HIDDEN>) id 1rO5BG-00040h-Bs for 67326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 19:13:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1705018431; bh=vnF2/sOtene1pNwzl1n4ZufmKiRmjBUAJnqBZl0Ey6w=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=5c4wB3L74R6VomODCSiGQ9uM/cTX2Pe1neU0FxQ5D80kNfmiULNQKqB4+sj3OGoL4 Z53LcXnHbtnTgXghR7PLzw0IQ5wsjuA5vtDUpWIMbnBIhbJ8BvbsM6wcjNfOT8KaZJ obD0hg1FDD47iPLaccRji08I0A/aeIdnGsGxxehMrWIs4+SG4B85OIYrDogX+FXcQA VC5GwdBG0ATrlZBMqiBTj2fa96BISUq5JPeNpBmwkKZKgES61S3qWaQpeb3os6vlEK EtxlRd/N+EoCPVAHQ3+poSMIkuCVv87wwFWad637VdpcCoGZafzur6TmWVogjC1r+/ zY8aq/eOmzIfg== Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:13:51 +0000 From: Gregory Heytings <gregory@HIDDEN> To: Yuchen Pei <id@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#67326: 29.1.90.1; time-stamp slowdown in large org file after org-refile-get-targets, caused by e7b5912b23 (Improvements to long lines handling) In-Reply-To: <87o7fn9txn.fsf@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <4719da9bc2ffe34f1a2f@HIDDEN> References: <87o7fn9txn.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67326 Cc: 67326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Yuchen, Thanks for your bug report, and sorry for the delay. > > Set up: foo.org is a 12MB file, longest line 4753, about 21000 > headlines. It contains the timestamp thingie "Time-stamp: <....>" as one > of the first few lines that already has a timestamp from before. > I can't reproduce that bug alas, because I don't have that file. I understand that it may contain private information. Could you perhaps create a censored version of that file, and send it to me (privately, a 12 MB attachments is too large for this list)? > > Like bug#57207, > This bug is likely not directly related to that one, as Ihor confirmed that it was fixed (and no other similar reports were filed since then). > > BTW what is the commit that fixed bug#57207? I searched for commits in > master and emacs-29 with message containing 57207 but could not find > any. > The reason for that is that development happened on feature branches, on which commits were not tagged as fixing specific bugs.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#67326
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at 67326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2023 06:12:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 25 01:12:21 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37624 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r6ltt-00041u-1u for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 01:12:21 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:52533) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <id@HIDDEN>) id 1r6ltp-00041a-4L for 67326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 01:12:20 -0500 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921DB3200A26 for <67326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 01:12:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 25 Nov 2023 01:12:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ypei.org; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1700892725; x=1700979125; bh=NS LXaXJxni6aaUKYM1oNuGzr6nC3clwUmpKDFA0Sq/M=; b=qWWFqOyqPfHA6cvT8n dXzyyOVLF3TE31nkmVcUuO3HOJGYy/qY+GoGHgNkwT9hl7kaJ+ZzqHtH1ygc01EQ 5Ry832+RkNVSu8uwFywjIqOrjlvirgJP6T0XSK2u7KLNNcPBD5RrIKVEdwthhCps pt6hjzTKO08f558ROPjFPnzJdz7H938esuCCivgJT0IsX2Z/k8L7DBVjT6jZuriW +OsQxjYM1+6AJipC9QeB9SCV619N1xDGjvrsP/GxqFqdmbxdKpNkP5563KgRmI93 +CByLOHXApMrk0Kwq4fEoto5cCyyUbzFLtRwzjPc565ULjGIjuKFOcxzmOXJLy1k 6NTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1700892725; x=1700979125; bh=NSLXaXJxni6aa UKYM1oNuGzr6nC3clwUmpKDFA0Sq/M=; b=AoQjiAFRE4DKPipfEaFIVN3lAZEWF gi94I8yGUWieTAfq2VuGV1xHnzyNesKj365plSJxwqSNrMDW+MnsUdQjAEqAJBP0 lNwFxmFBSByayDjFoc6S0wxZA6HwfHeSJmzttxUUsJUjQf0LtzS+KhuNl1rhihA/ kXarfcTQ+J9PZzkVDcG4zOsLsyBkAQIgTPoRnJ0AzWZTP4YgitFB0L8Y6AfDIIo7 0RI/V43f8HBh/IoSrNtrbAcy9LyeSGN28HhKeyCNGp5PJ4MlmDLlQBn7yeoLX46L 9Df5EvSKqz0RD3dyWzkyZe82kFVLHZ9b6CpJUFZIz4p3iqjrMg+hn6Lag== X-ME-Sender: <xms:NJBhZdTuZww5vQb_eq3Wkmj5vtc2tbhLQhYTaeL-NXpgMeJdw2ZeGg> <xme:NJBhZWxEOfSEDWBCeRyaD6aRkZE4vooel3upQImpxKILxlI9G8q8l5iOhp4jVX4De KGmckptVNdwAXcUIQ> X-ME-Received: <xmr:NJBhZS2CyyLGUDX4-R4nRnog8pmej9OKJpP8SrmtpfWxdaLpyUP9xfHK> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrudehiedgleehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufhffjgfkfgggtgesthdtre dttdertdenucfhrhhomhepjghutghhvghnucfrvghiuceoihguseihphgvihdrohhrgheq necuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeeiveefhedvheeufedvgfelueehieejtefgleevjeetue ekgfetgeehledvleetnecuffhomhgrihhnpeihphgvihdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehiugeshihpvghirdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:NJBhZVBH-vM8joCpvMmLJJGJY95kBblFWHYpg4TlOy2CkTTP5DkMDA> <xmx:NJBhZWgBphdEQyYQ1m55cZUEQgnnz5EOwjPVkz6z4q0emJJruFGT1A> <xmx:NJBhZZqluDNxJL7-uEN3tLj5wvjCN38Hakh2WFlhXEMM6_Tj27ofBA> <xmx:NZBhZccYQXRTv77s1gYS1UXdpJXwtTLckHuspEGmxiISfSMDuAwAoA> Feedback-ID: i51b146f9:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <67326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 01:12:03 -0500 (EST) From: Yuchen Pei <id@HIDDEN> To: bug#67326 <67326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Re: bug#67326: 28.1.90.1; time-stamp slowdown in large org file after org-refile-get-targets, caused by e7b5912b23 (Improvements to long lines handling) References: <87o7fn9txn.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 17:11:59 +1100 In-Reply-To: <87o7fn9txn.fsf@HIDDEN> (Yuchen Pei's message of "Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:23:16 +1100") Message-ID: <878r6m745s.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67326 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) retitle 67326 29.1.90.1; time-stamp slowdown in large org file after org-refile-get-targets, caused by e7b5912b23 (Improvements to long lines handling) thanks > [... 66 lines elided] Best, Yuchen -- Dr Yuchen Pei | https://ypei.org | Timezone: UTC+11 PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040 4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0 https://ypei.org/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#67326
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at 67326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2023 14:31:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 21 09:31:58 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55584 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r5RnC-0001L5-7T for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:31:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60642) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1r5RnA-0001Ks-Fv for 67326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:31:57 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1r5Rn2-0005tk-8k; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:31:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=jZAJxMiEbw6nEvCf3CDC37bcrc+2zrBSoAQ5QdtpAOQ=; b=asDLtqKIzFZY eD1CFouycArA/1o3etwvX7WXQ/PgS2qbDPe+jEPElURjYf+SN3r3IbawNRhCSmcYDCJx1WqrpVDWb X0/cEDbly4A/o6U4oex/jXr6PHZb5WCwZ/yjwN9WoHk/vpCDnZTv2MSYetWCY7wwUT8eo44VZor5s T576+ym9anore01/BFo8DnhvfXog67TzvoF6jO8egLIjl0rT5wIJvm/boDVbiiFn/+a7EHdDP76hw uhaD4Rnu0rlOHfhOg1N+imhuOMd0f8T9l/nYutiuUQflcQRP9phdOdMbA8KzAoKqe0+8mBF12fcjD RCeMNo2hahxum25vrjNBSQ==; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:31:22 +0200 Message-Id: <83wmubgoud.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: Yuchen Pei <id@HIDDEN>, gregory@HIDDEN In-Reply-To: <87o7fn9txn.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Yuchen Pei on Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:23:16 +1100) Subject: Re: bug#67326: 28.1.90.1; time-stamp slowdown in large org file after org-refile-get-targets, caused by e7b5912b23 (Improvements to long lines handling) References: <87o7fn9txn.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67326 Cc: 67326 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Yuchen Pei <id@HIDDEN> > Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:23:16 +1100 > > > Previously reported in emacs-devel at > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2023-06/msg00113.html > > Emacs built with > > ./configure --with-native-compilation --with-imagemagick --with-json > > Possibly related to bug#57207 > > Set up: foo.org is a 12MB file, longest line 4753, about 21000 > headlines. It contains the timestamp thingie "Time-stamp: <....>" as one > of the first few lines that already has a timestamp from before. Say the > following file is called bar.el > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > (add-hook 'before-save-hook 'time-stamp) > (require 'org-refile) > (setq org-refile-use-cache t) > (setq org-refile-use-outline-path t) > (setq org-refile-targets '((nil :maxlevel . 5))) > (setq org-goto-interface 'outline-path-completion) > (setq large-file-warning-threshold 15000000) > (find-file "foo.org") > (org-refile-get-targets) > #+end_src > > To reproduce, do > > ./src/emacs -Q -l bar.el foo.org > > followed by eval > > (time-stamp) > > It will take 10+ seconds to complete, and 10+ seconds if I undo > afterwards. > > Like bug#57207, > > (setq long-line-threshold nil) > > is a workaround, and (time-stamp) completes instantly. Adding Gregory to the discussion. > I could not measure the precise time or have the whole process run in > batch mode because: > > 1. It does not affect batch mode, presumably because of the change has > to do with x display > 2. (time-stamp) has funny pseudo-asynchronous behaviour: if I do > (progn (time-stamp) (message "Done.")) the message evals immediately, > long before time-stamp "completes" and unhangs emacs. I think you misinterpret what happens: what takes a long time is not time-stamp, but the redisplay after it. IOW, it isn't the evaluation that takes time, it's the redisplay after it. But maybe I'm missing something. > BTW what is the commit that fixed bug#57207? I searched for commits in > master and emacs-29 with message containing 57207 but could not find > any. It's 1c837c42c2, I think.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#67326
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2023 14:16:46 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 21 09:16:46 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1r5RYT-0000w1-4y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:16:45 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:58088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <id@HIDDEN>) id 1r5Pmx-0000z1-R2 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:23:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <id@HIDDEN>) id 1r5Pmp-0007Bt-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:23:27 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <id@HIDDEN>) id 1r5Pmn-000462-JX for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:23:27 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887E932014B9 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:23:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:23:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ypei.org; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1700569402; x=1700655802; bh=H9aIl3yYFb9/jLRZmBMRx2q2+ 0tpKvk1+OJZFMzGNS0=; b=B0nnabYXzHFug3YA+5nSnkSUuQ/2kTxbzGJqcGGl9 yskNTO5eWHIYm8jIx3b23A1r1V6r5+GTnkIE6CtfFAQomp7NuQ3CJq0VnmeD203o Wh3WE+DvYgj/jvfqNJCv8/DG4H4uffIYjqyrrKv7sUhgl10u8y+r6DKS764UYaRW l7zghDkMh97WHOGMFyARUkpQrnfNK3SGTPBarHxJdfIlXos+TD5m7MBdtkLCKauJ UFTJZW9qjqxQLnlDQgJPTN3EclEvPbmx9Xn8CWXGEDDhdT1hWfMjKU3V5QuvPACU TG+1QCcHDljv3zcMwdNPPkAdory7sGRFs9vr6pHsDQiDg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1700569402; x=1700655802; bh=H9aIl3yYFb9/jLRZmBMRx2q2+0tpKvk1+OJ ZFMzGNS0=; b=DcmvNr55TSyofw16ocJZI7J1Id0dlQva2p9bnPC25y3Lh3BLYgv q+iaLWMviXXg4NQi6DyBGeW2HLHSzndty+M+wST0X2qgYhC4e6vtG/8krVk+qVfr BRed7DmQTgvT+vQwqhP4IxooHrZ1tCfVf5IEPtWIzeXjTaCQEMkfZtMaN/MNIFte Nj/lv5gVIHTtJPDnmi7KP1+fTwTipuV2nB+PAJE8WA8WwaZNj6Xeo8v5ZywsqQLG mfE3JR6C1/6NPO1JR4O+nVDX9zqzXX8JT/9A5MSRljHhm2urB2NJVoPHZZfz1ZAZ zg3sNR3E5JOilZujiSJeFcd6T6ieU9hzJrA== X-ME-Sender: <xms:OaFcZcETjWNaOpusWt7mdIztXqZRJL7aALvmklbb8X4CDtTPTZKp4g> <xme:OaFcZVXrsv7fJbZHn4lLUul-jc3PdGUKPozxymFeh4o0tSzKl5S8qHhSShEsY-SN0 jCoZ4VYTAhmJRTGYg> X-ME-Received: <xmr:OaFcZWLpWNGd1DjaHKuSJE1Bs4mslpNNUicqG1HM4irhtduuAU1RzlL4> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrudegledgfeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkfgggtgesthdtredttd ertdenucfhrhhomhepjghutghhvghnucfrvghiuceoihguseihphgvihdrohhrgheqnecu ggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeekgedutdfgveefleefudetuddvhfdvfeevtdelvddvvdevke fhtdeftdevuedunecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgpdihphgvihdrohhrghenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehiugeshihpvg hirdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:OaFcZeHWxGvNrVE0entZAXmMY5b-_hgN4qP0lmmu6d4nhnA-crrzuw> <xmx:OaFcZSVojS0M0ecDPTzuOU_8cWvBuu6M7_BXCZm5AZ1cAmGG-LXXPA> <xmx:OaFcZRMyyQngXgzCPd31DrY0eC06YYsla1dx595BHSKUhk9CjqrUgw> <xmx:OqFcZdBTRzPqePMEuo2LWHumDsPA-cuwu7BYVJJgEHJAPMEexZ4BGw> Feedback-ID: i51b146f9:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:23:20 -0500 (EST) From: Yuchen Pei <id@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Subject: 28.1.90.1; time-stamp slowdown in large org file after org-refile-get-targets, caused by e7b5912b23 (Improvements to long lines handling) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:23:16 +1100 Message-ID: <87o7fn9txn.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.25; envelope-from=id@HIDDEN; helo=wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:16:42 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) Previously reported in emacs-devel at https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2023-06/msg00113.html Emacs built with ./configure --with-native-compilation --with-imagemagick --with-json Possibly related to bug#57207 Set up: foo.org is a 12MB file, longest line 4753, about 21000 headlines. It contains the timestamp thingie "Time-stamp: <....>" as one of the first few lines that already has a timestamp from before. Say the following file is called bar.el #+begin_src emacs-lisp (add-hook 'before-save-hook 'time-stamp) (require 'org-refile) (setq org-refile-use-cache t) (setq org-refile-use-outline-path t) (setq org-refile-targets '((nil :maxlevel . 5))) (setq org-goto-interface 'outline-path-completion) (setq large-file-warning-threshold 15000000) (find-file "foo.org") (org-refile-get-targets) #+end_src To reproduce, do ./src/emacs -Q -l bar.el foo.org followed by eval (time-stamp) It will take 10+ seconds to complete, and 10+ seconds if I undo afterwards. Like bug#57207, (setq long-line-threshold nil) is a workaround, and (time-stamp) completes instantly. I could not measure the precise time or have the whole process run in batch mode because: 1. It does not affect batch mode, presumably because of the change has to do with x display 2. (time-stamp) has funny pseudo-asynchronous behaviour: if I do (progn (time-stamp) (message "Done.")) the message evals immediately, long before time-stamp "completes" and unhangs emacs. BTW what is the commit that fixed bug#57207? I searched for commits in master and emacs-29 with message containing 57207 but could not find any. Best, Yuchen -- Dr Yuchen Pei | https://ypei.org | Timezone: UTC+11 PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040 4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0 https://ypei.org/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt
Yuchen Pei <id@HIDDEN>
:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
:bug#67326
; Package emacs
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.