X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el Resent-From: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6737.B.12802082156511 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6737 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.12802082156511 (code B ref -1); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:24:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2010 05:23:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Odcda-0001gy-4A for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:34 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1OdcdX-0001gs-PK for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:32 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:38717) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcde-0004L9-Oe for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:38 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32997 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Odcdd-0007RF-8X for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcdb-0005EB-Tg for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:37 -0400 Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:59812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1Odcdb-0005Dq-Cy for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:23:35 -0400 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.246]) by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o6R5NSdr018973 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:28 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o6R5NW191605776 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:32 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o6R5NWHA031802 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:32 +1000 Received: from skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com ([9.124.35.77]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o6R5NUGV031752 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:23:31 +1000 From: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-58-g6607fd6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:53:29 +0530 Message-ID: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el. Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the annotate buffer is available. git blame support incremental blame feature which should be used to imporve the user experience. A similar implementation can be found at git://git.bunkus.org/mo-git-blame.git -aneesh
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) Subject: bug#6737: Acknowledgement (24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el) Message-ID: <handler.6737.B.12802082156511.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 6737 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:24:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with GNU. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 6737: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D6737 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#6737: Any update ? Resent-From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6737.B6737.12877457004316 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6737 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6737-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B6737.12877457004316 (code B ref 6737); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 6737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2010 11:08:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1P9FTw-00017Z-7R for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:08:20 -0400 Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN>) id 1P9FTu-00017U-Ag for 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:08:19 -0400 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.247]) by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o9MB92UY013523 for <6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:09:02 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o9MBC8Ud1949934 for <6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:12:09 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o9MBC8OG004706 for <6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:12:08 +1100 Received: from skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com ([9.77.211.178]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o9MBC5uW004688; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:12:07 +1100 From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <handler.6737.B.12802082156511.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN> <handler.6737.B.12802082156511.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-90-g8071c5c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:42:04 +0530 Message-ID: <m3eibixz0b.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Any update on this bug ? For a source repo with large history this really make the annotation slow. There is a example of how do to do this in elisp at http://www.bunkus.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=mo-git-blame.git;a=summary -aneesh
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#6737: 24.0.50; Feature request for vc-annotate.el Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6737.B6737.162270924013324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6737 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) Cc: 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6737-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B6737.162270924013324 (code B ref 6737); Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:34:01 +0000 Received: (at 6737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2021 08:34:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1loing-0003Sq-JA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:34:00 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1loind-0003Sc-QS for 6737 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:33:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fEvZixgfAmj1deNI86RJBxnMa6G+1d0aXvKNTq33yy4=; b=mYikDhX/NOcw9wu3YK3gsD4UUa CDjaoMjK+SpYvAmO3kdM5INsn+1nQZ+XMU/cG7OgPNRhrBgeU5Bb0Sag2IlHVBIOd04Oe9DvvoM3z 7FHcgofszDDEPefGB4D0VUyKoIkInoiG4H9SwOWfHQZlsUUVxfUBeGFNl3BlmG7UKn9o=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1loinV-0008NI-6e; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 10:33:51 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> References: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: Little Simz's _Grey Area_: "Offence" Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 10:33:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <m3sk354hwu.fsf@HIDDEN> (Aneesh Kumar K. V.'s message of "Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:53:29 +0530") Message-ID: <87fsxz8hzn.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) writes: > It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el. > Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the > annotate buffer is available. git blame support incre [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) aneesh.kumar@HIDDEN (Aneesh Kumar K.V) writes: > It would be nice to support incremental blame support in vc-annotate.el. > Currently we have to wait for the full blame information before the > annotate buffer is available. git blame support incremental blame > feature which should be used to imporve the user experience. A similar > implementation can be found at git://git.bunkus.org/mo-git-blame.git (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got no response at the time.) vc-annotate seems to work quite fast for me (even in huge files that have decades-long histories, as in Emacs), so I'm not sure adding support for incremental annotation would be worth it. But perhaps changing the function to only work on the narrowed portion of the buffer would be nice? That way you could `C-x n d C-x v g' (for instance) and get a very snappy annotation of just the current function, for instance. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.