GNU bug report logs - #68340
coreutils-mesboot-9.1 failed

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Jing Luo <jing <at> jing.rocks>

Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 08:32:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 68340 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 68340 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#68340; Package guix. (Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:32:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jing Luo <jing <at> jing.rocks>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:32:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jing Luo <jing <at> jing.rocks>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: coreutils-mesboot-9.1 failed
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:52:17 +0900
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Guix,

Guix told me to report a bug here.

I fresh installed Guix in a qemu vm using the official guix 1.4 iso 
image. After booting to desktop, I ran `guix pull 
--substitute-url=https://guix.jing.rocks` (guix.jing.rocks is a server 
running `guix publish` in my local LAN), then ran into a loop. I'm 
attaching console message, config.scm, build log here. Maybe it's 
already fixed, but let me know if any other information is needed.

-- 
Jing Luo
About me: https://jing.rocks/about/
PGP Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC
[config.scm (text/plain, attachment)]
[guix-loop-bug-console-log.txt (text/plain, attachment)]
[spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz (application/gzip, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#68340; Package guix. (Sat, 13 Jan 2024 11:54:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 68340 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
To: Jing Luo <jing <at> jing.rocks>, 68340 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68340: coreutils-mesboot-9.1 failed
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 12:53:54 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Jing,

Jing Luo via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:

> building /gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv...
> | 'build' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv' failed with exit code 1
> build of /gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv failed
> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/9d/spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz'.

Can you also include the relevant failing part of
/var/log/guix/drvs/9d/spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz?

Best,
-- 
Josselin Poiret
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#68340; Package guix. (Sun, 14 Jan 2024 08:01:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 68340 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jing Luo <jing <at> jing.rocks>
To: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
Cc: 68340 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68340: coreutils-mesboot-9.1 failed
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 21:26:10 +0900
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

On 2024-01-13 20:53, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> Hi Jing,
> 
> Jing Luo via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
>> building 
>> /gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv...
>> | 'build' phasebuilder for 
>> `/gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv' 
>> failed with exit code 1
>> build of 
>> /gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv 
>> failed
>> View build log at 
>> '/var/log/guix/drvs/9d/spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz'.
> 
> Can you also include the relevant failing part of
> /var/log/guix/drvs/9d/spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz?
> 
> Best,

Not sure if I got it right, but here it is:

```
[...]

phase `patch-source-shebangs' succeeded after 0.3 seconds
starting phase `configure'
source directory: 
"/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1" (relative 
from build: ".")
build directory: 
"/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1"
configure flags: 
("CONFIG_SHELL=/gnu/store/rb75igdc6daly1mz2ivz7rs8hd85imdz-gash-boot-0.3.0/bin/bash" 
"SHELL=/gnu/store/rb75igdc6daly1mz2ivz7rs8hd85imdz-gash-boot-0.3.0/bin/bash" 
"--prefix=/gnu/store/6waxmqaggl0h1v811y1wdmd9pdaix7yl-coreutils-mesboot-9.1" 
"--enable-fast-install" "--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu")
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-fast-install

[...]

checking whether snprintf returns a byte count as in C99... yes
Backtrace:
In gash/eval.scm:
 221: 19 [eval-sh (<sh-set!> ("as_decl_name" (<sh-cmd-sub> #)))]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 642: 18 [for-each #<procedure 13d1da0 at gash/eval.scm:221:17 (name 
word)> # #]
In gash/eval.scm:
 222: 17 [#<procedure 13d1da0 at gash/eval.scm:221:17 (name word)> 
"as_decl_name" #]
 131: 16 [eval-word (<sh-cmd-sub> (<sh-pipeline> # #)) #:output string 
...]
 121: 15 [expand-word (<sh-cmd-sub> (<sh-pipeline> # #)) #:output string 
...]
In gash/shell.scm:
 289: 14 [sh:substitute-command #<procedure 13d1d20 at 
gash/eval.scm:129:35 ()>]
 270: 13 [%subshell #<procedure v ()>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 12 [catch quit #<procedure v ()> ...]
In ice-9/r4rs.scm:
 176: 11 [with-output-to-port #<variable 1f783c0 value: #<output: file 
24>> ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 619: 10 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> ((<sh-pipeline> # #))]
In gash/shell.scm:
 344: 9 [sh:pipeline #<procedure 13d19a0 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...]
 310: 8 [plumb #<input: #{read pipe}# 13> #f ...]
 270: 7 [%subshell #<procedure thunk* ()>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 6 [catch quit #<procedure thunk* ()> ...]
In gash/shell.scm:
 316: 5 [thunk*]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "sed" "s/ *(.*//"]
  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each #<procedure 11ca1a0 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1 
2 ...)]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 23> "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 19 [catch #t #<catch-closure c93c40> ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 18 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure c93c40>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  63: 17 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 432: 16 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 793: 15 [call-with-input-file "./configure" ...]
In gash/gash.scm:
 121: 14 [#<procedure 13047e0 at gash/gash.scm:120:19 (port)> #<input: 
./configure 23>]
In gash/repl.scm:
  38: 13 [run-repl #<input: ./configure 23> #f]
In gash/shell.scm:
 129: 12 [sh:exec-let () "ac_fn_check_decl" ...]
In gash/environment.scm:
 215: 11 [save-variables-excursion () ...]
 292: 10 [with-arguments # #<procedure 1c8ced0 at gash/shell.scm:145:25 
()>]
 389: 9 [call-with-return #<procedure 1c8ce10 at gash/shell.scm:147:28 
()>]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 619: 8 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> ((<sh-begin> # # # ...))]
 619: 7 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# # # # ...)]
 616: 6 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# #)]
In gash/shell.scm:
 245: 5 [#<procedure 1fb0cc0 at gash/shell.scm:239:17 ()>]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "printf" "%s" "checking whether  is declared... 
"]
  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each #<procedure 11ca1a0 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1 
2 ...)]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 22> "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
no
checking for stdbool.h that conforms to C99... yes
[...]
checking for uname... yes
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 15 [catch #t #<catch-closure c93c40> ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 14 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure c93c40>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  63: 13 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 432: 12 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 793: 11 [call-with-input-file "./configure" ...]
In gash/gash.scm:
 121: 10 [#<procedure 13047e0 at gash/gash.scm:120:19 (port)> #<input: 
./configure 20>]
In gash/repl.scm:
  38: 9 [run-repl #<input: ./configure 20> #f]
In gash/shell.scm:
 441: 8 [sh:cond # #]
  55: 7 [without-errexit #<procedure 134c580 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>]
 380: 6 [sh:or #<procedure 134c4e0 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...]
  55: 5 [without-errexit #<procedure 134c4e0 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "test" "" "!=" "yes"]
  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each #<procedure 11ca1a0 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1 
2 ...)]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 14> "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
/gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test: 
Unknown unary operator: "-lt"
/gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test: 
Unknown unary operator: "-eq"
checking whether unlink honors trailing slashes... (cached) yes

[...]

/gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test: 
Unknown unary operator: "-c"

[...]

phase `patch-generated-file-shebangs' succeeded after 0.3 seconds
starting phase `patch-shell-references'
phase `patch-shell-references' succeeded after 0.4 seconds
starting phase `build'
  GEN      lib/alloca.h

[...]

  CC       lib/libcoreutils_a-u64.o
  CC       lib/libcoreutils_a-unicodeio.o
In file included from lib/unicodeio.c:40:0:
lib/unistr.h:21:22: fatal error: unitypes.h: No such file or directory
 #include "unitypes.h"
                      ^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [lib/libcoreutils_a-unicodeio.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
srfi-34 #<condition &invoke-error [program: "make" arguments: () 
exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 17613c0>
phase `build' failed after 172.3 seconds
command "make" failed with status 2
```

Although later that day guix successfullly built coreutils, so it's 
probably fixed?


-- 
Jing Luo
About me: https://jing.rocks/about/
PGP Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Reply sent to Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Jing Luo <jing <at> jing.rocks>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:23:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 68340-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
To: Jing Luo <jing <at> jing.rocks>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, 68340-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68340: coreutils-mesboot-9.1 failed
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:22:00 -0400
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 3:01 AM Jing Luo via Bug reports for GNU Guix
<bug-guix <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 2024-01-13 20:53, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> > Hi Jing,
> >
> > Jing Luo via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >> building
> >> /gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv...
> >> | 'build' phasebuilder for
> >> `/gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv'
> >> failed with exit code 1
> >> build of
> >> /gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv
> >> failed
> >> View build log at
> >> '/var/log/guix/drvs/9d/spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz'.
> >
> > Can you also include the relevant failing part of
> > /var/log/guix/drvs/9d/spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz?
> >
> > Best,
>
> Not sure if I got it right, but here it is:
>
> ```
> [...]
>
> phase `patch-source-shebangs' succeeded after 0.3 seconds
> starting phase `configure'
> source directory:
> "/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1" (relative
> from build: ".")
> build directory:
> "/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1"
> configure flags:
> ("CONFIG_SHELL=/gnu/store/rb75igdc6daly1mz2ivz7rs8hd85imdz-gash-boot-0.3.0/bin/bash"
> "SHELL=/gnu/store/rb75igdc6daly1mz2ivz7rs8hd85imdz-gash-boot-0.3.0/bin/bash"
> "--prefix=/gnu/store/6waxmqaggl0h1v811y1wdmd9pdaix7yl-coreutils-mesboot-9.1"
> "--enable-fast-install" "--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu")
> configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-fast-install
>
> [...]
>
> checking whether snprintf returns a byte count as in C99... yes
> Backtrace:
> In gash/eval.scm:
>   221: 19 [eval-sh (<sh-set!> ("as_decl_name" (<sh-cmd-sub> #)))]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>   642: 18 [for-each #<procedure 13d1da0 at gash/eval.scm:221:17 (name
> word)> # #]
> In gash/eval.scm:
>   222: 17 [#<procedure 13d1da0 at gash/eval.scm:221:17 (name word)>
> "as_decl_name" #]
>   131: 16 [eval-word (<sh-cmd-sub> (<sh-pipeline> # #)) #:output string
> ...]
>   121: 15 [expand-word (<sh-cmd-sub> (<sh-pipeline> # #)) #:output string
> ...]
> In gash/shell.scm:
>   289: 14 [sh:substitute-command #<procedure 13d1d20 at
> gash/eval.scm:129:35 ()>]
>   270: 13 [%subshell #<procedure v ()>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   157: 12 [catch quit #<procedure v ()> ...]
> In ice-9/r4rs.scm:
>   176: 11 [with-output-to-port #<variable 1f783c0 value: #<output: file
> 24>> ...]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>   619: 10 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> ((<sh-pipeline> # #))]
> In gash/shell.scm:
>   344: 9 [sh:pipeline #<procedure 13d19a0 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...]
>   310: 8 [plumb #<input: #{read pipe}# 13> #f ...]
>   270: 7 [%subshell #<procedure thunk* ()>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   157: 6 [catch quit #<procedure thunk* ()> ...]
> In gash/shell.scm:
>   316: 5 [thunk*]
>   129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "sed" "s/ *(.*//"]
>    92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>   616: 2 [for-each #<procedure 11ca1a0 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1
> 2 ...)]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 23> "r" 7]
> In unknown file:
>     ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]
>
> ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
> ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   157: 19 [catch #t #<catch-closure c93c40> ...]
> In unknown file:
>     ?: 18 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure c93c40>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>    63: 17 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>   432: 16 [eval # #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   793: 15 [call-with-input-file "./configure" ...]
> In gash/gash.scm:
>   121: 14 [#<procedure 13047e0 at gash/gash.scm:120:19 (port)> #<input:
> ./configure 23>]
> In gash/repl.scm:
>    38: 13 [run-repl #<input: ./configure 23> #f]
> In gash/shell.scm:
>   129: 12 [sh:exec-let () "ac_fn_check_decl" ...]
> In gash/environment.scm:
>   215: 11 [save-variables-excursion () ...]
>   292: 10 [with-arguments # #<procedure 1c8ced0 at gash/shell.scm:145:25
> ()>]
>   389: 9 [call-with-return #<procedure 1c8ce10 at gash/shell.scm:147:28
> ()>]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>   619: 8 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> ((<sh-begin> # # # ...))]
>   619: 7 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# # # # ...)]
>   616: 6 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# #)]
> In gash/shell.scm:
>   245: 5 [#<procedure 1fb0cc0 at gash/shell.scm:239:17 ()>]
>   129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "printf" "%s" "checking whether  is declared...
> "]
>    92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>   616: 2 [for-each #<procedure 11ca1a0 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1
> 2 ...)]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 22> "r" 7]
> In unknown file:
>     ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]
>
> ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
> ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
> no
> checking for stdbool.h that conforms to C99... yes
> [...]
> checking for uname... yes
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   157: 15 [catch #t #<catch-closure c93c40> ...]
> In unknown file:
>     ?: 14 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure c93c40>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>    63: 13 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>   432: 12 [eval # #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   793: 11 [call-with-input-file "./configure" ...]
> In gash/gash.scm:
>   121: 10 [#<procedure 13047e0 at gash/gash.scm:120:19 (port)> #<input:
> ./configure 20>]
> In gash/repl.scm:
>    38: 9 [run-repl #<input: ./configure 20> #f]
> In gash/shell.scm:
>   441: 8 [sh:cond # #]
>    55: 7 [without-errexit #<procedure 134c580 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>]
>   380: 6 [sh:or #<procedure 134c4e0 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...]
>    55: 5 [without-errexit #<procedure 134c4e0 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>]
>   129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "test" "" "!=" "yes"]
>    92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>   616: 2 [for-each #<procedure 11ca1a0 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1
> 2 ...)]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 14> "r" 7]
> In unknown file:
>     ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]
>
> ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
> ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
> /gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test:
> Unknown unary operator: "-lt"
> /gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test:
> Unknown unary operator: "-eq"
> checking whether unlink honors trailing slashes... (cached) yes
>
> [...]
>
> /gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test:
> Unknown unary operator: "-c"
>
> [...]
>
> phase `patch-generated-file-shebangs' succeeded after 0.3 seconds
> starting phase `patch-shell-references'
> phase `patch-shell-references' succeeded after 0.4 seconds
> starting phase `build'
>    GEN      lib/alloca.h
>
> [...]
>
>    CC       lib/libcoreutils_a-u64.o
>    CC       lib/libcoreutils_a-unicodeio.o
> In file included from lib/unicodeio.c:40:0:
> lib/unistr.h:21:22: fatal error: unitypes.h: No such file or directory
>   #include "unitypes.h"
>                        ^
> compilation terminated.
> make[2]: *** [lib/libcoreutils_a-unicodeio.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
> srfi-34 #<condition &invoke-error [program: "make" arguments: ()
> exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 17613c0>
> phase `build' failed after 172.3 seconds
> command "make" failed with status 2
> ```
>
> Although later that day guix successfullly built coreutils, so it's
> probably fixed?
>
>
> --
> Jing Luo
> About me: https://jing.rocks/about/
> PGP Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC

Closing since reporter noted that the issue turned out to be transient.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 23 May 2025 11:24:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 38 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.