Received: (at 69284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2024 10:14:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 10 06:14:28 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rjGCK-0002vZ-9g for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 06:14:28 -0400 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:58168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1rjGCF-0002vL-Az for 69284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 06:14:27 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 65D6E1851DC; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:13:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1710065628; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Sn7dcmGrZThzlddOpqBF2ynjDBNu5bksCQlFOUMSp/M=; b=Pjv8uLAtO57Mnqgah8onGi0jWgXxXSBK26zhGksA1aRCAXXLCy6WtQJkcluvWioEaRsDPo QQnSw+HXU7KDuQGE6hbeLwHLv4o85fqQ86DNT1jDq11rrkK+/DpiW0HbbN/L/mxFzAk9Uf JFBGtCuS2G5rYEsfHTitTtxWeM+PhhSfn/MMomq3bTlStmqUw1AsQQylSIH5lUW2TP4Zwe AXwG/tFEUrG//62cTYoPfkkael/LQWVFacHIsc/bVkfqwldTQJgGhZTP6jr2YyA/+buH6T rydkenKBBw3WuQJ+V/pKwmecOFBeQqitQ6xqK5ooPiybk3UAU9bOFyx0IuR1eg== From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN> To: Andrew Tropin <andrew@HIDDEN>, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>, 69284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#69284: guix pull is not reproducible In-Reply-To: <87r0gjre60.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <874je3xvbn.fsf@HIDDEN> <87h6hhojo1.fsf@wireframe> <87r0gjre60.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:13:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87h6hemm1x.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@HIDDEN smtp.mailfrom=dev@HIDDEN X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69284 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew, Andrew Tropin via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@HIDDEN> writes: > I don't think that hash of the profile depends on the building process > itself. And it seems on the same system it returns the same result on > consequent rebuilds. It seems something leaks from the environment. Yes, it's rather that the .drv themselves are not reproducible apparently. Can you compare the derivations building the guixes in the different profiles? You can look at them using first `guix gc =2D-derivers` on the profile and then analyzing the .drv manually. I remember seeing the same thing, but I don't really remember anything conclusive. One thing I can say is that Guix generates the .drv dynamically by looking at the check-out. If the checkout is somehow tainted (as it has often happened, maybe because of libgit2?), the .drv can end up being different. If you retry by first resetting the Guix checkouts in ~/.cache/guix/checkouts/ to a pristine state, do you still get a discrepancy? Best, =2D-=20 Josselin Poiret --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHEBAEBCAAuFiEEOSSM2EHGPMM23K8vUF5AuRYXGooFAmXth9oQHGRldkBqcG9p cmV0Lnh5egAKCRBQXkC5FhcaiuTPDACFJBgahcf2Cd0994NJOGCxMxFQkBZp8w47 /tbdNCjTrBZFls8iZ3WDYHuhaSxbqNXOIGOSy4p/m34J9nxICfagc8BWc4IVzhHw WS3DuoPpEOeVV4rk9o3xpUYi+GV0gV2LOdPXw0sKXqYCOqkr+iaer6k4W4JGTam8 SU8lz+xadov1iTBbL9ww6wbj0+k1iNYzygsVetlmG59sX9kpp3w9oKwIRDgX5fKP AzfR6S+iQTPE5zZO5Z8kV2NTyUDPXGlCAM0/+HDxo34xLOgoBmSuxeGz8cb9WrhE 5qwwPoKbScjiuFMsnI38BECDA+EEzHH8vnmrDwDkazKirBy++QL3IqC4nNDM1OH2 Re12JwOfZ35ZnjBF/VQ4VVZgMRFlfj3FmZOAQ6sQa46onoogf4MZDBdcbefpy+O9 IZQO54s993ePD44SqrVO4LerVCg47GECBulQ0gUJyv4KqbIcAfpD4dWzVFBjnIoH yUdDq+E5XgH0jkwtbSJg5wwXSXdf/L0= =iw8X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69284; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 69284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2024 08:41:58 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 09 03:41:58 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1risHF-0003EV-IF for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2024 03:41:57 -0500 Received: from out-183.mta1.migadu.com ([95.215.58.183]:33164) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andrew@HIDDEN>) id 1risHC-0003EF-KQ for 69284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2024 03:41:56 -0500 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@HIDDEN and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=trop.in; s=key1; t=1709973645; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zOAaTJ9+tOYI8zUTdGC760LSmUl76duCM53CoJmTrU8=; b=KMf1h0cFoXEtAgFra3zlh9ekQODZbQWfWooFiqoSdLs2IW3nRtieK3uGCIEGXQq9BkvX3c s3RbVk/z8+QdegQLPgHBskouR7eqk8sYZx6X50QpzkekmWzJzom3mecO0wf+4svfjpywij Ucjce8fcSEUbk863H3aVtPO+5zf4Adm5k9z7yvNC389iXzyM03l7UY14+dZjYFkDMjLRQN zuAe+IAKuZhsGGuF+v9yngAJfY17j/dQdk0xzvzmi9w1Ms9TGMBWIU+WMCti3nI/CvL5nE RgCXvQvgUvoiUutxMwvT9rIbU0x7SvvRSdYh0Fi6Efz5JoShtdAEjV8hEFCOww== From: Andrew Tropin <andrew@HIDDEN> To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN>, 69284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#69284: guix pull is not reproducible In-Reply-To: <87h6hhojo1.fsf@wireframe> References: <874je3xvbn.fsf@HIDDEN> <87h6hhojo1.fsf@wireframe> Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 11:40:39 +0300 Message-ID: <87r0gjre60.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69284 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2024-03-07 12:45, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2024-02-20, Andrew Tropin wrote: >> guix pull -C channels-lock.scm produces different profiles on different >> machines. >> >> I executed the same command on a few different machines. >> channels-lock.scm contains channels list with exact commit specified. >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> curl https://paste.sr.ht/~abcdw/5f18e9e5cc6cb243c84a3975eb4e6a46ed17d996= > channels-lock.scm >> guix pull -C channels-lock.scm -p tmp >> readlink tmp-1-link >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> The output log on all machines starts similiar: >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> Updating channel 'rde' from Git repository at 'https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/= rde'... >> Authenticating channel 'rde', commits 257cebd to 2a0c7e9 (2304 new commi= ts)... >> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu= .org/git/guix.git'... >> Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d264237 (69420 new com= mits)... >> Building from these channels: >> guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d264237 >> rde https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde 2a0c7e9 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> Updating channel 'rde' from Git repository at 'https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/= rde'... >> Authenticating channel 'rde', commits 257cebd to 2a0c7e9 (2,304 new comm= its)... >> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu= .org/git/guix.git'... >> Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d264237 (2,382 new com= mits)... >> Building from these channels: >> guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d264237 >> rde https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde 2a0c7e9 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> but resulting profile is different: >> /gnu/store/w3qq81dzdj9wckcw8fpz5lv6ylhw1m2d-profile (local fresh guix sy= stem) >> /gnu/store/c2i8iyqkc146ac2hqzy1v6zkqs82xypp-profile (debian 11) >> /gnu/store/svg0is4iwvlg6mgi2rvpkngcccqcvhys-profile (debian 12) >> /gnu/store/w3qq81dzdj9wckcw8fpz5lv6ylhw1m2d-profile (remote fresh guix s= ystem) >> >> The first guix pull takes from 25 to 50 minutes, which is really long >> time. However, due to irreproducibility, building the guix profile on >> CI doesn't help to cut that time to some manageable numbers. > > Does passing --cores=3D1 help? I have found building guix (and other guile > packages) on Debian had reproducibility issues frequently triggered by > parallelism. I don't think that hash of the profile depends on the building process itself. And it seems on the same system it returns the same result on consequent rebuilds. It seems something leaks from the environment. =2D-=20 Best regards, Andrew Tropin --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKEGaxlA4dEDH6S/6IgjSCVjB3rAFAmXsIIcACgkQIgjSCVjB 3rCMBw//W4O+Srg8udBn+ZF7SS5llee7gnnogF1zO7sBvLKCDo0JrxVIwBNovsQ0 IuTZpjgvJkXrBf8U8e9g8pZeDeJPIvzNns9P/Zsbz5Ow0H/BevpF8L1A5qY5PqKR HYWMADlBh34P31cTaZL3TqD+E2XSMKXiGua8wp2XWnvSYeXZY9vxA3aMS5INoGC1 YLNNbEB2VMmVaL+Eej4E6sG9hFteEQAxb/yvfqmo7ZEbenY9BgUh1mZenAn/covb yLR3ooWPW2T3tNKE7uLZ2HGpMUeRQ71R3OUj77uFqVr6uou5bORJXNzwPS++7UC5 WzabF+yzKt8+Mnvj0xC2LKb+Txm5qomN8i1RQVyldleG35ScT+b8SoqEGBlO43v9 dveKGMFezh2uA46gtz/U8FVW3LseXNq0VlUu8XVLI5WmGKKZQW66OVFwV4HD2ECp apv1g6Y1O/1Pc27P5LI5G3vyKA00U3Nqraoqu87HiZf5CEGIPfTMLvo6D9Zz6mdL O4R7Fy/foFI7UsEOXHiFfktboXDnaewFGnds1Cy68UD3A3xbFvl1m8TtquunLjJt BW6kbAWNUaYXgNpSHiC4+A78GTTCnOujU7qUOtYEGberrBA+JjaCIc0TTm7uho7W 6DsPVTf70ec8pd6GL2GmwO0JOcEIR0iiDcHYr0FKBSSO/luwBIk= =HIQ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69284; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 69284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2024 20:55:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 07 15:55:14 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1riKlm-0005os-B4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 15:55:14 -0500 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]:37216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <vagrant@HIDDEN>) id 1riKlj-0005of-DK for 69284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 15:55:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:50]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@HIDDEN) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FCEA1AD7C; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:54:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=reproducible-builds.org; s=1.vagrant; t=1709844841; bh=DkI3vu+9DLSUmua+wEjHQ4GPGLDdTqqQo9cMwpEoH6g=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=3S5zjps85fATjru+ZtEHRppKAyNEKshUt0jbFiDmd2n7Zk01Z9sdvrwvEjdkFhVvL d8efhsTQldh7qaLBdIQTSZzMU9ZBEpXK2DUktWjeS9NSn/I3v6FjFwL8WI/8eE5lOd sinrtrszW6CVtOGKs1G/kmQhC/Hm60vpL9rdzCpGiwAHnAbivia+mNHLA3cWCQAaOq dtRWYSdcMCXZfHU02c5GGryWcBcfzYot7Gvn7rx5Fzww8OIMw3hQvrE/1a8gR38a7w 16ZlzZ+QtEfjHpg4g2jqPHjdxyJz5WkQ9nEJwcK7qTDD2gcPqGxmBu7aVH6Eper79W rCKpf3F2+0Paw== From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> To: Andrew Tropin <andrew@HIDDEN>, 69284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#69284: guix pull is not reproducible In-Reply-To: <87h6hhojo1.fsf@wireframe> References: <874je3xvbn.fsf@HIDDEN> <87h6hhojo1.fsf@wireframe> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 12:53:58 -0800 Message-ID: <87bk7poja1.fsf@wireframe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69284 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2024-03-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2024-02-20, Andrew Tropin wrote: >> guix pull -C channels-lock.scm produces different profiles on different >> machines. >> >> I executed the same command on a few different machines. >> channels-lock.scm contains channels list with exact commit specified. >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> curl https://paste.sr.ht/~abcdw/5f18e9e5cc6cb243c84a3975eb4e6a46ed17d996 > channels-lock.scm >> guix pull -C channels-lock.scm -p tmp >> readlink tmp-1-link >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> The output log on all machines starts similiar: >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> Updating channel 'rde' from Git repository at 'https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde'... >> Authenticating channel 'rde', commits 257cebd to 2a0c7e9 (2304 new commits)... >> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... >> Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d264237 (69420 new commits)... >> Building from these channels: >> guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d264237 >> rde https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde 2a0c7e9 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> Updating channel 'rde' from Git repository at 'https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde'... >> Authenticating channel 'rde', commits 257cebd to 2a0c7e9 (2,304 new commits)... >> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... >> Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d264237 (2,382 new commits)... >> Building from these channels: >> guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d264237 >> rde https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde 2a0c7e9 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> but resulting profile is different: >> /gnu/store/w3qq81dzdj9wckcw8fpz5lv6ylhw1m2d-profile (local fresh guix system) >> /gnu/store/c2i8iyqkc146ac2hqzy1v6zkqs82xypp-profile (debian 11) >> /gnu/store/svg0is4iwvlg6mgi2rvpkngcccqcvhys-profile (debian 12) >> /gnu/store/w3qq81dzdj9wckcw8fpz5lv6ylhw1m2d-profile (remote fresh guix system) >> >> The first guix pull takes from 25 to 50 minutes, which is really long >> time. However, due to irreproducibility, building the guix profile on >> CI doesn't help to cut that time to some manageable numbers. > > Does passing --cores=1 help? I have found building guix (and other guile > packages) on Debian had reproducibility issues frequently triggered by > parallelism. See also: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/issues/unstable/nondeterministic_ordering_in_guile_binaries_issue.html https://bugs.debian.org/995092 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/78778 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/20272 https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/732638 live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCZeopZgAKCRDcUY/If5cW qn/NAQDmWNFrSI3LYC+QRM3PIKJ8etVMjjxUBS94lRxIuEH8hQD9FQOXBWw3UFLs i6EVXASRcY7rgY1PPhu8do3KvGL54Qk= =p8Gv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69284; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at 69284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2024 20:46:27 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 07 15:46:27 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1riKdG-0005TR-H7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 15:46:27 -0500 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]:35016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <vagrant@HIDDEN>) id 1riKdB-0005T9-Vx for 69284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 15:46:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:50]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@HIDDEN) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0848F1AD7C; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:45:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=reproducible-builds.org; s=1.vagrant; t=1709844341; bh=Iu/ndOeTjbpA94l/1gnYjm8VxjlJT5IOBgojw7aBdws=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Ohp/XuaKdIOL/muFfaAokUobKk7AD5JuBNGUbjOFCDaMaVq56QecuFA7Cagu7Brwi N5AOZCz/VCsFF1K7mpauMEh8kxkIVKYDzkSpEcJEKfZx2LcNYEdNA6RPl4nlo20Bg2 xZv+Z02a65DqboN8NZ5srwLpmAYMSzS+1Z0dAqcqn2js0OsBgiIHPZ549b51jgNQ20 PCNkiFIoxVWMb1vyTad8HluSNO/fodrG0W/Tq5H4s1/9lQO0yF1Yk6SU+6wIRiq6/W kgMIEfEnSpCAJYiUFTf9jCJ96dCNgM5XRssMF/8HX/H47GbcKChMUnSgBQiYEY5f73 0VfzS4p5SQrZQ== From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@HIDDEN> To: Andrew Tropin <andrew@HIDDEN>, 69284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#69284: guix pull is not reproducible In-Reply-To: <874je3xvbn.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <874je3xvbn.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 12:45:34 -0800 Message-ID: <87h6hhojo1.fsf@wireframe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69284 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2024-02-20, Andrew Tropin wrote: > guix pull -C channels-lock.scm produces different profiles on different > machines. > > I executed the same command on a few different machines. > channels-lock.scm contains channels list with exact commit specified. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > curl https://paste.sr.ht/~abcdw/5f18e9e5cc6cb243c84a3975eb4e6a46ed17d996 > channels-lock.scm > guix pull -C channels-lock.scm -p tmp > readlink tmp-1-link > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > The output log on all machines starts similiar: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Updating channel 'rde' from Git repository at 'https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde'... > Authenticating channel 'rde', commits 257cebd to 2a0c7e9 (2304 new commits)... > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... > Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d264237 (69420 new commits)... > Building from these channels: > guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d264237 > rde https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde 2a0c7e9 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Updating channel 'rde' from Git repository at 'https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde'... > Authenticating channel 'rde', commits 257cebd to 2a0c7e9 (2,304 new commits)... > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... > Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d264237 (2,382 new commits)... > Building from these channels: > guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d264237 > rde https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde 2a0c7e9 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > but resulting profile is different: > /gnu/store/w3qq81dzdj9wckcw8fpz5lv6ylhw1m2d-profile (local fresh guix system) > /gnu/store/c2i8iyqkc146ac2hqzy1v6zkqs82xypp-profile (debian 11) > /gnu/store/svg0is4iwvlg6mgi2rvpkngcccqcvhys-profile (debian 12) > /gnu/store/w3qq81dzdj9wckcw8fpz5lv6ylhw1m2d-profile (remote fresh guix system) > > The first guix pull takes from 25 to 50 minutes, which is really long > time. However, due to irreproducibility, building the guix profile on > CI doesn't help to cut that time to some manageable numbers. Does passing --cores=1 help? I have found building guix (and other guile packages) on Debian had reproducibility issues frequently triggered by parallelism. live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCZeonbgAKCRDcUY/If5cW quMLAP4nFU471s+NUTAKDW8gUcUJJ1MJ1pdtq3p9jVncNIcREAD/VgslOq9czO7w f2G+QjvQLb2Zv83LPxZXIeHX65e27QM= =YAbY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69284; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2024 10:52:17 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 20 05:52:17 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rcNjV-0002JQ-9h for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 05:52:17 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andrew@HIDDEN>) id 1rcNjS-0002JF-4m for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 05:52:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andrew@HIDDEN>) id 1rcNiy-00028L-Hh for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 05:51:45 -0500 Received: from out-170.mta0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:1004:224b::aa]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andrew@HIDDEN>) id 1rcNir-000425-6D for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 05:51:40 -0500 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@HIDDEN and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=trop.in; s=key1; t=1708426289; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=1dSHmLqLSbr464uSCBLcyQp7SnjRXVXvcj4GOQGN6Fs=; b=gv1NbQAQHlkC8WvXwOuiYVMBOI3HRCHsbSxQd/VBq2u2Na0yJ+eQuuyiI21I3H2Bk9VtvP dY5TBufkS2pxl5q9qLvvL17o7pgZfTwNPxG0O4KR++e045s4nqHpDAKeaxWvakTKZ3kshQ aMtrcfzKFGBYmIASXZAeGyQNapmhZw1Bv0+1TEF8zyb+QfElGfVsHNSxvfnHt2eqMRKxfT pw5NRbBm+R1F9eN4dU3zyWCeOwX6l72qnXm8Ig7JKsmn6Ddx46i0B+p7OXt5RPBG3fJHbM WKwPehGQuaPXDHi5fROP9tOeVg/Mk6mUdmp8Q2X7athasG1Ig+GQlvet0ICr1Q== From: Andrew Tropin <andrew@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: guix pull is not reproducible Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:51:24 +0300 Message-ID: <874je3xvbn.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:41d0:1004:224b::aa; envelope-from=andrew@HIDDEN; helo=out-170.mta0.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable guix pull -C channels-lock.scm produces different profiles on different machines. I executed the same command on a few different machines. channels-lock.scm contains channels list with exact commit specified. =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- curl https://paste.sr.ht/~abcdw/5f18e9e5cc6cb243c84a3975eb4e6a46ed17d996 > = channels-lock.scm guix pull -C channels-lock.scm -p tmp readlink tmp-1-link =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The output log on all machines starts similiar: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Updating channel 'rde' from Git repository at 'https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde= '... Authenticating channel 'rde', commits 257cebd to 2a0c7e9 (2304 new commits)= ... Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.or= g/git/guix.git'... Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d264237 (69420 new commit= s)... Building from these channels: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d264237 rde https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde 2a0c7e9 =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Updating channel 'rde' from Git repository at 'https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde= '... Authenticating channel 'rde', commits 257cebd to 2a0c7e9 (2,304 new commits= )... Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.or= g/git/guix.git'... Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d264237 (2,382 new commit= s)... Building from these channels: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git d264237 rde https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/rde 2a0c7e9 =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- but resulting profile is different: /gnu/store/w3qq81dzdj9wckcw8fpz5lv6ylhw1m2d-profile (local fresh guix syste= m) /gnu/store/c2i8iyqkc146ac2hqzy1v6zkqs82xypp-profile (debian 11) /gnu/store/svg0is4iwvlg6mgi2rvpkngcccqcvhys-profile (debian 12) /gnu/store/w3qq81dzdj9wckcw8fpz5lv6ylhw1m2d-profile (remote fresh guix syst= em) The first guix pull takes from 25 to 50 minutes, which is really long time. However, due to irreproducibility, building the guix profile on CI doesn't help to cut that time to some manageable numbers. =2D-=20 Best regards, Andrew Tropin --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKEGaxlA4dEDH6S/6IgjSCVjB3rAFAmXUhCwACgkQIgjSCVjB 3rBCkA/9HbDjSEzj0dwz+aC891PvVgATI8zWJbJL5jwjYYTmnG/y/OD115LI4+ca V4vijeE5V6CO74OOBxw4FMgULRl9BI1eMp5DBUTgwNGulzcVORuBpLEYKuaBinb3 x7qD6MsiZJaCUAvWrdoBPdFK+wnE02G+HY0N/OW0OxZS/u34+HUqx8jqgrdblc/B zvER1qzjR0vSqUS+YuqtLEBrESpJfXhlSTDJ20cmU+xeoJiCk/g8hDIbHcoNhzRN CJIOhsX8+Fq6s+GuCa2576wOI+IJZ09uBrk6/dxjg9lkbpNu9bhoTGYGP0npW23Y oefqhzImoHTFHB1Rx4kVYYdttUvb9fctR8ORQl7fp/tMxcbs18l+YWpBCO8/zPCS FzHuAhX0SQrwajhGCOzRvzgJFSZDKQ6SNSmpr6f7abTjdRfE11pgsGOawo3Qh2FF 987VGNp8COSGZ376ow1gD8kBDc0Fdnu16ZjuBJTb3XQKkuEMz1ywR18FsYeM/8T+ l4O7KxGhKwbDxmG86B5BwaBeyksos4Y96B1l+lS+elO9Z92Aeny4DjMIpIpmD7gT tloE38sfxd8KNjwDwq3pGHSnTPfJr6930h5Yfow0cfYh2y1qoxCgflwidXp76ZqT D/cobHaqsh9PtdhwNxGyJxPxEHTF75ljuVeQQbfJlzXf0hbg5FY= =MGtl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Andrew Tropin <andrew@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#69284; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.