GNU bug report logs - #6980
Could goto-char please have its own history list?

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: emacs; Severity: wishlist; Reported by: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>; dated Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:27:02 UTC; Maintainer for emacs is bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.

Message received at 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2011 12:29:51 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 18 08:29:51 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Qu1jJ-00072h-EM
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:29:50 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44])
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>) id 1Qu1jH-00072a-CV
	for 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:29:48 -0400
Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so930111ewy.3
	for <6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=MfOOyIAjYpbbFsn63y+1KomyuhzBpsdnwIJZtfLOaM4=;
	b=ucA0tZc72T5bZ8pCG1Vq+JBPKrVYCJ/ntfmogxy6PGblUbQSiJngdpLWfgLDy9dZ0C
	/eee/jXO/Q2pP4px0qGn/TfzGhbXuT+puHdF2hppvIc0MNcPbZoujLI6U+NPkG0ykSeU
	k0vZLTmF1pfFkkTM05ncyqNeBtv8hrk1cc3Fw=
Received: by 10.213.29.76 with SMTP id p12mr175452ebc.74.1313670467636; Thu,
	18 Aug 2011 05:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.19.132 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87sjoz543b.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <AANLkTi=+_ua6EWt9FWpEy+Cu4prmtYvjCFVnhytmgC_6@HIDDEN>
	<878vr1rqpc.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<89731AF8DD9241E7807DCEED9672DC4B@HIDDEN>
	<87sjoz543b.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:27:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CANbX3646aqW91+mXrvwWVv8dLSWSA0bDNAYtnycrfRZavVLQzw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list?
To: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980
Cc: 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---)

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 13:52, Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN> wrote:
>>> > I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else.
>>> > (More than devel historic reasons ;-)
>>>
>>> It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric
>>> values between all commands that use `read-number', like
>>> e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because
>>> non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands)
>>> are useless for such number-reading commands.
>>
>> I don't have much of an opinion about the suggestion.
>> There are always pros & cons to making a history more or less specific.
>>
>> But I'll point out that just because non-numeric histories are inappropr=
iate for
>> numeric input does not mean that the same numeric history should be used=
 for all
>> numeric inputs.
>
> Yes, not all number-reading commands should share the numeric history.
>
> For instance, version-control commands that read a revision number
> can also accept non-numeric values like "submit:". =C2=A0So every case
> should be carefully considered on its own.

And of course I mean "I can see no reason its history should be mixed
by something else". ;-)




Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#6980; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2011 11:56:09 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 18 07:56:09 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Qu1Cj-0006JC-6a
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:56:09 -0400
Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com ([208.113.175.8])
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1Qu1Cg-0006J3-Qd
	for 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:56:07 -0400
Received: from ps18281.dreamhostps.com (ps18281.dreamhost.com [69.163.218.105])
	by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10CC6E8074;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105])
	by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A1D451C3C3;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list?
Organization: JURTA
References: <AANLkTi=+_ua6EWt9FWpEy+Cu4prmtYvjCFVnhytmgC_6@HIDDEN>
	<878vr1rqpc.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<89731AF8DD9241E7807DCEED9672DC4B@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:52:20 +0300
In-Reply-To: <89731AF8DD9241E7807DCEED9672DC4B@HIDDEN> (Drew Adams's
	message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:41:51 -0700")
Message-ID: <87sjoz543b.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980
Cc: 'Lennart Borgman' <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>, 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)

>> > I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else.
>> > (More than devel historic reasons ;-)
>>
>> It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric
>> values between all commands that use `read-number', like
>> e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because
>> non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands)
>> are useless for such number-reading commands.
>
> I don't have much of an opinion about the suggestion.
> There are always pros & cons to making a history more or less specific.
>
> But I'll point out that just because non-numeric histories are inappropriate for
> numeric input does not mean that the same numeric history should be used for all
> numeric inputs.

Yes, not all number-reading commands should share the numeric history.

For instance, version-control commands that read a revision number
can also accept non-numeric values like "submit:".  So every case
should be carefully considered on its own.




Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#6980; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2011 21:43:20 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 10 17:43:20 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1QrGYa-000826-HS
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:43:20 -0400
Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117])
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <drew.adams@HIDDEN>) id 1QrGYY-00081z-Rb
	for 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:43:19 -0400
Received: from rtcsinet21.oracle.com (rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29])
	by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id
	p7ALg0rx001580
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:42:02 GMT
Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157])
	by rtcsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
	p7ALfu0w018754
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:41:57 GMT
Received: from abhmt113.oracle.com (abhmt113.oracle.com [141.146.116.65])
	by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	p7ALfpWU003004; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:41:51 -0500
Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194)
	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
	with ESMTP ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:41:51 -0700
From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN>
To: "'Juri Linkov'" <juri@HIDDEN>,
	"'Lennart Borgman'" <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>
References: <AANLkTi=+_ua6EWt9FWpEy+Cu4prmtYvjCFVnhytmgC_6@HIDDEN>
	<878vr1rqpc.fsf@HIDDEN>
Subject: RE: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list?
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:41:51 -0700
Message-ID: <89731AF8DD9241E7807DCEED9672DC4B@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@HIDDEN>
Thread-Index: AcxXlx57b5+iahV3QA6QLV2E5H32ugADsbOA
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Source-IP: rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29]
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4E42FB2A.0093,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0
X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980
Cc: 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----)

> > I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else.
> > (More than devel historic reasons ;-)
> 
> It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric
> values between all commands that use `read-number', like
> e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because
> non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands)
> are useless for such number-reading commands.

I don't have much of an opinion about the suggestion.
There are always pros & cons to making a history more or less specific.

But I'll point out that just because non-numeric histories are inappropriate for
numeric input does not mean that the same numeric history should be used for all
numeric inputs.





Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#6980; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2011 19:53:10 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 10 15:53:10 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1QrEpx-0004ac-U9
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:53:10 -0400
Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com ([208.113.175.8])
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <juri@HIDDEN>) id 1QrEpv-0004aU-4M
	for 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:53:08 -0400
Received: from ps18281.dreamhostps.com (ps18281.dreamhost.com [69.163.218.105])
	by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16306E8088;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105])
	by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0122451C366;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Juri Linkov <juri@HIDDEN>
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: Could goto-char please have its own history list?
Organization: JURTA
References: <AANLkTi=+_ua6EWt9FWpEy+Cu4prmtYvjCFVnhytmgC_6@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:50:39 +0300
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=+_ua6EWt9FWpEy+Cu4prmtYvjCFVnhytmgC_6@HIDDEN>
	(Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:24:21 +0200")
Message-ID: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980
Cc: 6980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)

> I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else.
> (More than devel historic reasons ;-)

It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric
values between all commands that use `read-number', like
e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because
non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands)
are useless for such number-reading commands.




Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#6980; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2010 22:26:33 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 03 18:26:33 2010
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1OreiP-00028g-HQ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:26:33 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92])
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>) id 1OreiN-00028b-Mz
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:26:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>) id 1Orek2-0006tU-KK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:28:18 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:46451)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>) id 1Orek2-0006tQ-Ho
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:28:14 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38405 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Orejp-0007Mb-LW
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:28:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>) id 1Orege-0006GV-Jm
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:25:37 -0400
Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:36693)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>) id 1Orege-0006GO-G4
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:24:44 -0400
Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so3030935qwf.0
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
	bh=VnWqbUwf45MGiY3s6bfNLHpXyZFHeboJzTL3CLiDTJY=;
	b=QOf1tlSf+ho21BJEuKuA4p7xTeIU0VJGzTFHku1CGqmZf7UJoA53r/oMDzqkhG904f
	EMSTdhMIFV7p4NiZjCIgW4v2gSXZbB/C13fpxdoT4pOScMxz6CvzsaftbxowjxX5PjG/
	rs+5+gl30g21hC3OLibtgu+2/ObF9WZ5aoT6g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
	b=HqOPJfzQDpC+iyPlXqRFqmgR3V1NKovCLtCxvr5blzHJ6MDPFRVlQIQU/fep/jTGQ8
	+OOohUoAnYP2Hg7v7iaYJ0Wc4IYkbrK/0wkylqP0j9ER9X+tI58OnvCi+9ac6q8lHK2f
	9PRDnYS9Qicni+CtV6k4+zWv+HAEitb3Ofb28=
Received: by 10.224.45.135 with SMTP id e7mr482846qaf.166.1283552683991; Fri,
	03 Sep 2010 15:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.27.133 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:24:21 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=+_ua6EWt9FWpEy+Cu4prmtYvjCFVnhytmgC_6@HIDDEN>
Subject: Could goto-char please have its own history list?
To: Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older,
	4)
X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/pipermail/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----)

I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else.
(More than devel historic reasons ;-)




Acknowledgement sent to Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#6980; Package emacs. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:00:04 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.