GNU bug report logs - #70017
Emacs 29.3 treesit-parser-list function parameters changed, while the master branch didn't

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 70017 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 70017 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Meow King <mr.meowking <at> anche.no>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Cc: casouri <at> gmail.com
Subject: Emacs 29.3 treesit-parser-list function parameters changed, while
 the master branch didn't
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:59:27 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

treesit-parser-list function parameter changed in Emacs 29.3. It only
accepts one mandatory parameter called BUFFER, however, in the latest master
branch, it accepts three optional parameters, the same as before.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #8 received at 70017 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Meow King <mr.meowking <at> anche.no>
Cc: casouri <at> gmail.com, 70017 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#70017: Emacs 29.3 treesit-parser-list function parameters
 changed, while the master branch didn't
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:27:37 +0200

merge 70017 70016
thanks

> Cc: casouri <at> gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:59:27 +0800
> From:  Meow King via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>
> treesit-parser-list function parameter changed in Emacs 29.3. It only
> accepts one mandatory parameter called BUFFER, however, in the latest master
> branch, it accepts three optional parameters, the same as before.

This is an exact duplicate of bug#70016 that you submitted just a few
moments ago; merging them.

Message #13 received at 70017 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Cc: mr.meowking <at> anche.no, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 70017 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 70016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#70017: Emacs 29.3 treesit-parser-list function parameters
 changed, while the master branch didn't
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 22:56:49 -0700

Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> writes:

> My pleasure. It just happens today I finally got a day where I can sit down and
> write some code. I updated manual and news entries. There’s one thing though, I
> couldn’t find a good way to avoid using variables (which starts with lowercase)
> at the beginning of sentences. I don’t know how do you feel about having lower
> case letter at the beginning of sentences. If you have good tips on avoiding
> them I’m happy to apply it to all the occurrences in the new manual entries I
> wrote.

My best idea for that is to reformulate the sentence.  It's not the end
of the world, IMHO.

Could this bug be closed?

Message #18 received at 70017-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Meow King <mr.meowking <at> anche.no>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 70017-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 70016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#70017: Emacs 29.3 treesit-parser-list function parameters
 changed, while the master branch didn't
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:54:45 -0700

> On Jun 29, 2024, at 10:56 PM, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> My pleasure. It just happens today I finally got a day where I can sit down and
>> write some code. I updated manual and news entries. There’s one thing though, I
>> couldn’t find a good way to avoid using variables (which starts with lowercase)
>> at the beginning of sentences. I don’t know how do you feel about having lower
>> case letter at the beginning of sentences. If you have good tips on avoiding
>> them I’m happy to apply it to all the occurrences in the new manual entries I
>> wrote.
> 
> My best idea for that is to reformulate the sentence.  It's not the end
> of the world, IMHO.
> 
> Could this bug be closed?

Yes. I closed it. I personally am fine with having lowercase at the beginning, so I’ll live with it :-)

Yuan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.