GNU bug report logs - #70278
udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 70278 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 16:16:14 +0200

Since the recent ‘gnome-team’ merge, we get this message at boot time:

  udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown

Should we add ‘sgx’ to ‘%base-groups’?  (What is it for?)

Ludo’.

Message #8 received at 70278 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: 70278 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>,
 Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#70278: udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:58:08 +0200

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> Since the recent ‘gnome-team’ merge, we get this message at boot time:
>
>   udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown
>
> Should we add ‘sgx’ to ‘%base-groups’?  (What is it for?)

Cc’ing Vivien & Liliana who might know more about this.

Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 70278 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 70278 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
Subject: Re: bug#70278: udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:08:58 +0200

Am Donnerstag, dem 11.04.2024 um 09:58 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
> 
> > Since the recent ‘gnome-team’ merge, we get this message at boot
> > time:
> > 
> >   udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown
> > 
> > Should we add ‘sgx’ to ‘%base-groups’?  (What is it for?)
> 
> Cc’ing Vivien & Liliana who might know more about this.
This seems related to Intel's Software Guard eXtensions, or, as we in
the free world like to call them Security paper Generator eXtensions. 
As far as I'm aware, these ought to be disabled anyway, and we might
want to drop the offending lines.  According to [1], there's only two
of them anyway.

Cheers

[1] https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5265

Message #14 received at 70278 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>, 70278 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#70278: udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:23:09 +0200

Hi,

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Am Donnerstag, dem 11.04.2024 um 09:58 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>> 
>> > Since the recent ‘gnome-team’ merge, we get this message at boot
>> > time:
>> > 
>> >   udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown
>> > 
>> > Should we add ‘sgx’ to ‘%base-groups’?  (What is it for?)
>> 
>> Cc’ing Vivien & Liliana who might know more about this.
> This seems related to Intel's Software Guard eXtensions, or, as we in
> the free world like to call them Security paper Generator eXtensions. 

:-)

> As far as I'm aware, these ought to be disabled anyway, and we might
> want to drop the offending lines.  According to [1], there's only two
> of them anyway.

[...]

> [1] https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5265

Sounds good.  (My intuition would have been to create the ‘sgx’ group to
placate udev, but removing those lines may be even better.)

Can you look into it?

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.